With Texans in Tow, Hochul Vows to Redraw New York’s House Maps
© Cindy Schultz for The New York Times
© Cindy Schultz for The New York Times
© Sophie Park for The New York Times
© Melyssa St. Michael for The New York Times
© Matt Slocum/Associated Press
© The New York Times
A boat has capsized off Yemen’s coast leaving 68 African migrants dead and 74 others missing, the UN’s migration agency said.
It was the latest in a series of shipwrecks off Yemen that have killed hundreds of people fleeing conflict and poverty in hopes of reaching the wealthy Gulf Arab countries.
The vessel, with 154 Ethiopian migrants onboard, sank in the Gulf of Aden off the southern Yemeni province of Abyan early on Sunday, the head of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in Yemen said.
Abdusattor Esoev said the bodies of 54 people washed ashore in the district of Khanfar, and 14 others were found dead and taken to a hospital morgue in Zinjibar, the provincial capital of Abyan on Yemen’s southern coast.
Only 12 survived the shipwreck, and the rest were missing and presumed dead, Esoev said.
The Abyan security directorate described a huge search-and-rescue operation given the large number of dead and missing migrants. Its statement said many dead bodies were found scattered across a wide area of the shore.
Despite more than a decade of civil war , Yemen is a major route for people from east Africa and the Horn of Africa trying to reach the Gulf Arab countries for work. Migrants are taken by smugglers on often dangerous, overcrowded boats across the Red Sea or Gulf of Aden.
Hundreds of people have died or gone missing in shipwrecks off Yemen in recent months, including in March when two migrants died and 186 others were missing after four boats capsized off Yemen and Djibouti , according to the IOM.
More than 60,000 migrants arrived in Yemen in 2024, down from 97,200 in 2023, probably because of greater patrolling of the waters, according to an IOM report in March.
南方周末中国企业社会责任研究中心
责任编辑:侯明辉
2025年7月第4周,129家上市公司曝光风险事件196起,风险指数233.05,其中治理风险占26.2%,环境风险占14.6%,社会风险占59.2%。风险事件数和风险指数较上周有所下降。
在本期风险榜中,中国建筑(601668)“断崖式领先”,ESG风险指数达到V级。具体来看,中国建筑旗下单位中建六局因存在多次虚开发票的违法违规行为,被国税总局天津市税务局处罚101.4万元。中建八局5月至7月发生违反安全生产管理规定、夜间违规施工、未取得建筑垃圾处置证等行为,相关罚单在本周被集中释出,从而使得中国建筑的风险指数累计达到21.3。
中国建筑在ESG方面获得多项荣誉,为推动ESG目标落地,中国建筑将环境、供应链、安全等ESG相关指标纳入经理层薪酬考核,激励经理层积极履行职责。但对于组织架构复杂、旗下工程单位众多的大型建筑企业来说,如何让ESG意识和治理制度穿透不同层级,落实到每一个业务单元和施工现场,仍是难点所在。
除此之外,本期监测的几起“抄袭”事件值得关注。7月25日,北京点众科技股份有限公司与短剧厂牌听花岛相继发布声明,公开指控中文在线(300364)海外子公司枫叶互动旗下短剧平台涉嫌抄袭其多部原创版权作品,并列举了作品目录。7月29日,有市场消息称,索尼近日以侵犯版权及商标权起诉腾讯,指控腾讯(00700)新游《荒野起源》涉嫌抄袭《地平线:零之曙光》,有媒体在法律研究网站上找到了索尼的诉状内容,这场纠纷的焦点围绕两款游戏的核心表现元素展开。目前,两起事件的涉事方尚未对此做出回应。
校对:赵立宇
广东新增报告病例数呈现下降趋势,但境外输入风险持续存在。
2025年1月1日起,无论一孩、二孩、三孩,每年均可领取3600元补贴,直至年满3周岁。
南方周末记者 宋炳晨
责任编辑:黄思卓
【《基孔肯雅热诊疗方案(2025年版)》发布】
2025年7月31日,国家卫生健康委办公厅、国家中医药局综合司在官网发布《关于印发基孔肯雅热诊疗方案(2025年版)的通知》。
该方案显示,基孔肯雅热是由基孔肯雅病毒感染引起,经伊蚊叮咬传播的急性传染病。临床以发热、关节痛、皮疹为主要特征。基孔肯雅热在全球热带和亚热带地区广泛流行,流行范围呈持续扩大趋势。此病重症少见,但境外基孔肯雅热疫情暴发时有重症及死亡病例报告,要加强病情监测,警惕重症病例发生。中国伊蚊分布广泛,近年来已经发生多起境外输入病例导致的本地传播疫情。
8月3日,广东省疾控局发布最新一周情况:7月27日0时至8月2日24时,全省新增报告2892例基孔肯雅热本地病例,未报告重症和死亡病例。本周全省新增报告病例数呈现下降趋势,但境外输入风险持续存在;叠加汛期台风、降雨等天气影响,蚊媒活动频繁,疫情防控仍然面临复杂严峻挑战。
健言:新版《基孔肯雅热诊疗方案》在2008年版基础上升级推出,表明官方对境外输入性传染病本地化传播风险的高度警觉。伊蚊在中国南方地区广泛分布,随着气候变暖、人员流动频繁,本地传播事件频发,防控压力上升。肯尼亚医学研究院(KEMRI)首席研究员Damaris Matoke-Muhia博士告诉南方周末记者,未来疟疾、登革热、基孔肯雅热这些蚊媒疾病同时暴发是有可能的,之前在肯尼亚的海岸地区就发生过类似情况,但目前不太确定他们是否会合并感染,但是疟疾治愈后继续感染登革热等是可能的。
近日,北京律师张晓玲称在爱康国宾体检10年未能查出患癌风险一事引发广泛关注。2025年7月30日,爱康集团召开
校对:吴依兰
The brother of an Israeli hostage held in the Gaza Strip has told the BBC that a Hamas video showing him emaciated and weak is a "new form of cruelty" that has left his parents shattered.
Hamas released the footage of Evyatar David, 24, on Saturday, drawing strong condemnation from Israel and Western leaders.
"He's a human skeleton. He was being starved to the point where he can be dead at any moment, and he suffers a great deal. He barely can't speak, he barely can move," David's brother Ilay said in an interview on Monday.
In the video, Evyatar says: "I haven't eaten for days... I barely got drinking water." He is seen digging what he says will be his own grave.
Hostages' families have urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to prioritise their release as reports suggest he might be planning to expand the military campaign.
The footage of Evyatar was released after Palestinian Islamic Jihad published video of another hostage, Rom Braslavski, thin and crying.
Both men were abducted from the Nova music festival during the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023.
Ilay David said his father had barely recognised his son Evyatar's voice on the video and had not been able to sleep. He said his mother cried all day.
"Seeing those images of my brother as a human skeleton, we understood it's, it's, it's a new kind of cruelty," Mr David said. "It's the lowest you can get."
He called on world leaders to unite to save him and other hostages "from the cruel, twisted hands of Hamas".
"So we have to be so focused on delivering the message, which is, Evyatar is dying, we need to give him medicine, to give him food, proper food, and you need to get this treatment now, or else will die."
Hamas's armed wing has denied it intentionally starves prisoners, saying hostages eat what their fighters and people in Gaza eat.
After the hostages' videos were released, Netanyahu spoke with their families, telling them that efforts to return all the hostages "will continue constantly and relentlessly".
But an Israeli official - widely quoted by local media - said Netanyahu was working to free the hostages through "the military defeat of Hamas".
The possibility of a new escalation in Gaza may further anger Israel's allies who have been pushing for an immediate ceasefire as reports of Palestinians dying from starvation or malnutrition cause shock around the world.
The main group supporting hostages' families condemned the idea of a new military offensive saying: "Netanyahu is leading Israel and the hostages to doom."
That view was pointedly made in a letter by some 600 retired Israeli security officials sent to US President Donald Trump urging him to pressure Israel to immediately end the war in Gaza.
"Your credibility with the vast majority of Israelis augments your ability to steer Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu and his government in the right direction: End the war, return the hostages, stop the suffering," they wrote.
The group included former Mossad chief Tamir Pardo, Ami Ayalon, former chief of Shin Bet - Israel's domestic secret service agency - former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and former Defence Minister Moshe Yaalon among others.
"It is our professional judgement that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel," they said.
"At first this war was a just war, a defensive war, but when we achieved all military objectives, this war ceased to be a just war," said Ayalon.
The former top leaders head the Commanders for Israel's Security (CIS) group, which has urged the government in the past to focus on securing the return of the hostages.
"Stop the Gaza War! On behalf of CIS, Israel's largest group of former IDF generals and Mossad, Shin Bet, Police, and Diplomatic Corps equivalents, we urge you to end the Gaza war. You did it in Lebanon. Time to do it in Gaza as well," they wrote to the US president.
Israel launched a devastating war in Gaza following Hamas's 7 October attack in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken into Gaza as hostages.
More than 60,000 people have been killed as a result of Israel's military campaign in Gaza since 7 October, the Hamas-run health ministry says.
On Monday, the ministry reported that at least 94 people had been killed in Gaza in the past day, including dozens it said had died in Israeli strikes.
The territory is also experiencing mass deprivation as a result of heavy restrictions imposed by Israel on what is allowed into Gaza. The ministry says 180 people, including 93 children, have died from malnutrition since the start of the war.
Such reports have become almost daily in recent months but are hard to verify as international journalists, including the BBC, are blocked by Israel from entering Gaza.
UN-backed agencies have said the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out" in Gaza.
The territory is also experiencing mass deprivation as a result of heavy restrictions imposed by Israel on what is allowed into Gaza. The ministry says 180 people, including 93 children, have died from malnutrition since the start of the war.
Passengers on several Eurostar trains are facing delays and cancellations after a power supply issue on a rail line in northern France led to its closure.
The Eurostar website shows at least nine services on Monday between London and Paris have been cancelled, while a further 15 services have been delayed.
The problem started at about 08:30 local time (06:30 GMT) on Monday and disruptions are expected to continue until the end of the day, with trains being diverted to run on slower lines.
Eurostar has advised passengers to postpone their journeys if possible.
Some services between Brussels and Paris and between Amsterdam and Paris have also been cancelled, delayed or faced other disruptions due to the rail closure, which happened on the high-speed line between Moussy and Longueil in the Hauts-de-France region.
SNCF, which operates the line, said on its website that the "severely disrupted" services were due to a power supply issue which required "major repairs".
It predicted delays of between one and five hours on the Eurostar, as well as its other services TGV inOui and Ouigo.
Trains between London-Amsterdam, Brussels-Amsterdam, Brussels-London and Brussels-Cologne have not been impacted.
August is a peak period for cross-Channel travel due to school holidays, meaning services are often busier than normal.
Monday's disruptions come nearly a month after a Eurostar train travelling between Brussels and London had to be evacuated in northern France due to a power failure.
And in June, there were two days of major disruptions after separate fatal incidents on France's LGV Nord line, which was followed by cable theft.
This video can not be played
India win dramatic final Test by six runs to clinch series draw
Inside the JM Finn Stand at The Oval, opposite the pavilion, is a staircase that leads up to the Test Match Special commentary box. It is used by media and spectators alike.
In the hours after the sensational fifth Test between England and India ended, with the ground emptying, on that staircase was found a left shoe, then some underwear, then a right shoe.
Because of their size, they presumably belonged to a man. Quite how the owners misplaced them, or when they realised their loss, is unclear. However, it raises the prospect that someone left this famous old ground both shoeless and pantless.
It would have been entirely in keeping with the mayhem that had already played out on Monday morning.
There had been 57 minutes of the most intense, dramatic and emotional sport you could ever wish to see.
Twenty-five days of gripping Test cricket came down to a one-armed man painfully scampering 22 yards of south London turf. One wonders how the productivity of the UK was affected at the beginning of the working week, or how many offices in Mumbai, Kolkata and Bengaluru closed early.
There had been an element of farce to the previous evening. Players went to the dressing rooms because of rain and bad light when the game was on a knife-edge, then stayed there as the gloom turned to evening sunshine.
Any frustration over the events of Sunday turned into anticipation of what might be possible on Monday. Thirty-five runs or four wickets. The Oval was sold out, but would anyone bother to turn up?
Turn up they did, filling this historic venue with constant noise and nervous energy. There were echoes of the 2005 Ashes classic in Birmingham, when Edgbaston was full for what might have only been two deliveries of action. Just like then, there was a rich reward for turning up. India's six-run win here is the narrowest of its kind in this country since England beat Australia by two runs 20 years ago.
India began the day with a huddle that seemed to have every member of the touring party included. Security, chef, bus driver. England, naturally, played football.
Fittingly, it was Surrey v England. When Jamie Overton took fours off each of the first two balls of the day, England had almost a quarter of the runs they required. It was the best it got.
Jamie Smith has looked increasingly frazzled in his first five-Test series as a wicketkeeper. He wafted at two deliveries, then edged the third. The dhol drum of the Bharat Army beat out the rhythm of We Will Rock You, and rocked England were. When Overton was struck on the pad, umpire Kumar Dharmasena paid his own 2005 tribute with the slow finger of Rudi Koertzen.
Josh Tongue had a scattergun game with the ball and found himself as the last line of defence before the stricken Chris Woakes.
On Sunday evening, Woakes somehow folded his dislocated shoulder into a set of cricket whites, which sounds excruciatingly painful in itself. When Tongue had his stumps rearranged by Prasidh Krishna, security staff rushed on to the outfield, believing the match to be over. They had not been briefed that Woakes, the nicest man in cricket, is also the bravest.
This video can not be played
'Here he comes!' - Woakes comes out to bat with arm in sling
Earlier this year, Woakes had a tattoo inked on his left tricep in memory of his late father Roger, who died last year. Now the same arm was strapped under his England sweater as he descended the pavilion stairs, putting his broken body on the line for the Three Lions on his chest.
History will remember Woakes as a World Cup winner in both formats, an Ashes winner and one of the finest seamers in English conditions. This will trump them all. The Wizard will always be the man who tried to help England win a Test with only one functioning arm.
How painful it must have been for Woakes to run three times between the wickets, his shoulder jolted by every step. Mercifully, he never faced a delivery. While Woakes played Jack Leach, Gus Atkinson could not ape Ben Stokes. Atkinson was bowled attempting to hit the six that would have levelled the scores and won the series.
According to Stokes, Woakes' reaction in the dressing room was to "shrug his shoulder", which is probably the last thing he should have done.
This video can not be played
'England panicked' - Vaughan on fifth Test defeat
The last word went to Mohammed Siraj, who personified the unbreakable spirit and never-say-die attitude of a young India team. He carried the torch of the retired Virat Kohli, with the ability to get into a fight in a phone box.
There was barely a time in this Test when Siraj was not bowling, haring in with the pavilion behind him. Thriving on responsibility, both Siraj's average and strike-rate are better when he is not playing in the shadow of Jasprit Bumrah. India's two wins in this series came in matches Bumrah did not play.
A series level at 2-2 was a fair result, even if England will feel aggrieved they were denied in the drawn fourth Test at Old Trafford. If they had caught Ravindra Jadeja on nought in Manchester, or any of the six they dropped in India's second innings here, it might have been different. The sight of India great Sunil Gavaskar leading his TV production staff in song on the Oval outfield said much about which side would be happier with the result.
It was highly creditable for England to get so close to chasing down 374, what would have been their second highest of all time. It was also a missed opportunity for a statement series win.
This video can not be played
Watch all five of Siraj's wickets in England's second innings
Whisper it quietly, but there is a chance this was the last home Test for the England team as we know it.
There is certainly a scenario where a poor Ashes leads to one of captain Stokes or coach Brendon McCullum walking away. Stokes may simply decide he has had enough of rehabbing from injuries.
As cruel as it sounds, Woakes' heroics may be his last act in an England shirt. Mark Wood is 36 in January. England's next home Test is in June.
There was a moment on Saturday morning of this Test, when England were fielding and contemplating a potential DRS review. In the conversation were Smith, Atkinson, Zak Crawley, Jacob Bethell, Ollie Pope and Ben Duckett. It was a window into what the senior England players will look like the next time India tour this country.
If this is the end of something, England went out playing the hits. Attempting the unthinkable, stirring the emotions like few other teams can. They are exhilarating and infuriating in equal measure, never boring, and responsible for the rebirth of Test cricket in this country.
Crucially, the Bazball era is still to claim a top prize. The full home series against Australia and India played under Stokes and McCullum have been drawn 2-2. England have beaten neither since 2018, when Alastair Cook was still in the team. Trips to both countries have recently ended in shellackings, regardless of who has been in charge.
The next chance to change that record comes quickly, starting in Perth in November.
Bazball in Australia. The drama, emotion and craziness would be nice. A win would be better.
A 17-year-old boy has been detained for the torture and killing of two kittens that were found cut open in a wooded area in west London.
He was given a 12-month detention and training order by District Judge Hina Rai, who said that the killings near Ruislip Golf Course were "without a doubt the most awful offences against animals I have seen in this court".
The boy, who cannot be named because of his age, had also dreamed of killing a human and "getting away with murder". His accomplice in the animal abuse, a 17-year-old girl, will be sentenced later.
A passerby saw the boy holding a black bag, which was "moving slightly as if something live was inside it", Highbury Corner Magistrates' heard.
Warning: This article contains details some readers may find distressing
The boy was given a lifetime ban on keeping or owning animals.
Along with the girl, who also cannot be named because of her age, the teenager had previously pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering to the animals by mutilating and killing them.
A member of the public who found the kittens warned another passerby not to go down the footpath because "there is something horrific down there".
The black kittens were found with ropes attached to them and had been cut open. Also discovered at the scene were blowtorches, three knives and a pair of scissors.
One kitten was found hanging from a rope and was completely ripped open, with its eyes bulging, the court heard.
Alongside the tools, a significant amount of blood and fur were found.
The teenagers also admitted one count of unlawful possession of a knife.
Sentencing the boy, Judge Rai told him his actions had been "extensively planned" and were "clearly premeditated".
She told him: "You said sorry in your [police] interview but reports also show that you struggle to show empathy and realise that the kittens would suffer."
She added: "It seems you chose the kittens because they have emotion and you would have power over them."
Notes on the boy's phone detailed his desire to kill another person.
They read: "I really wanted to murder someone.
"Every day I was researching how to get away with murder. I have come close. I have killed cats to reduce my urges. I have skinned, strangled and stabbed cats."
The boy, who may have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism which has yet to be diagnosed, had no previous convictions.
Additional reporting by PA Media
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
Broadcaster and radio personality James Whale has died aged 74 following a cancer diagnosis, his agent confirmed on Monday.
His career spanned six decades, including stints on the BBC airwaves as well as stations such as LBC and TalkSport.
Whale's TalkTV colleague and friend Mike Graham read an obituary on air and paid tribute to Whale, who had stage four kidney cancer.
Known for being outspoken and often controversial, more recently Whale went on to front his own podcast and night-time weekly radio show on TalkRadio.
Whale was first diagnosed with kidney cancer in 2000 and then, in 2020, he revealed it had returned.
In recent months, he had documented his deteriorating health on social media, his Talk TV programme and his podcast Tales of the Whales.
He first gained prominence in the 1980s as the host of The James Whale Radio Show on Radio Aire in Leeds, before hosting a night-time radio show on TalkSport in the late mid-late 90s.
When TV stations first started airing programmes after midnight in the late 1980s, one presenter seized the opportunity to gain fame - and infamy - with a type of live late-night show that hadn't been seen on British screens before.
On the James Whale Radio Show, the presenter was a cross between a shock jock, talk show host, gonzo roving reporter and working men's club MC.
Launched in 1988, Whale's live, often chaotic programme was like a daytime TV format gone rogue: one which had lost its inhibitions and any qualms about upholding the usual standards of taste and decency.
Some said it had completely lost its morals. But many viewers loved it.
Whale took calls from - and unceremoniously cut off - callers. He sparred with celebrities and expert guests, dallied with scantily-clad "bimbos", and offered combative, sardonic or flippant takes on topical issues, from immigration to teenage gambling to sex therapy.
In short, it entertained and offended in equal measure.
The James Whale Radio Show had "Radio" in its title because it went out live from Leeds on both Radio Aire and ITV simultaneously at 1am on a Friday night, as people sat at home after coming back from the pub.
At first, it only went out in Yorkshire and the north-west, but was soon picked up elsewhere as ratings went up and other ITV regional counterparts floundered.
When it arrived on London Weekend Television in April 1989, the press started to take notice.
A review in The Stage newspaper noted how "Mighty Mouth" Whale had taken a "critical hammering" since transferring across the ITV network.
But it added that, because it was broadcast so long after any family audience had gone to bed, it was pointless to complain about the show's "crudities, ruderies, or the occasional swear word".
In fact, the reviewer found Whale "the liveliest natural new personality to turn up on TV for ages", saying he possessed "a surfeit of punch and charisma".
The smooth-voiced Whale, from Surrey, had been presenting on Radio Aire since 1982, after cutting his teeth on stations in Middlesbrough, Derby and Newcastle.
On Newcastle's Metro Radio from 1973-80, he set the template for phone-ins that gave callers short shrift.
Before that, Whale's first proper job in broadcasting had been to found a radio station inside Top Shop at London's Oxford Circus in 1970 - the country's first in-store station.
The 70s and 80s were the ages of larger-than-life radio DJs, and Whale's stint at Radio Aire saw him named local DJ of the year at the Sony Radio Awards in 1988.
Moving to the small screen that year, he gained a national reputation, for better or for worse.
As one sketch duo who appeared on The James Whale Radio Show half-joked, the programme was known for its "controversy, filth and degradation - and that's just behind the scenes".
It featured regular appearances from comics like Bernard Manning, Steve Coogan and Charlie Chuck, while Whale threw singers Wayne Hussey and Lemmy off for turning up drunk.
The host even stormed off his own show once, frustrated with things going wrong behind the scenes. But he also revelled in the chaos, and (usually) steered the show through it with some aplomb.
The James Whale Radio Show lasted until 1992, with the host keeping much of its flavour for another late-night format, Whale On, from 1993 to 1995.
But it was up against other, hipper shows like The Word, and a balding, middle-aged, middle-class man being risqué suddenly seemed less cutting-edge.
In 1995, Whale went back to radio with an opinionated late-night phone-in on Talk Radio.
He hit the headlines two years later when it was revealed that a female listener who appeared on air to invite him to "pop round for a coffee" was in fact his lover. Whale's wife of almost 30 years, Melinda, stuck with him.
The presenter was one of the few non-sport presenters to survive when the station rebranded as TalkSport in 2000, but was sacked eight years later after calling on his listeners to vote for Boris Johnson in the London mayoral election.
Regulator Ofcom ruled it was a serious breach of impartiality rules, and fined the station £20,000.
Whale pitched for a job with Johnson, saying: "Ken Livingstone had 70 media advisers. Boris Johnson only needs me. I'm ideal. I know what the ordinary man or woman on the street thinks."
The future prime minister didn't take him up on the offer.
Having hosted an afternoon weekend show at LBC in the 90s, Whale returned to the station as drivetime host the same year (despite having called the station's programme director a "pillock prize-prat and a half" not long before).
Also in 2000, Whale was first diagnosed with cancer when a large tumour (he said it was "the size of a football") was found in his kidney.
The kidney and tumour were successfully removed. For the next few years, he and Melinda decided to live life to the full.
"Those were my hedonistic years - I ate as much steak as I wanted and drank copious amounts of wine," he said. "Every weekend, we flew off to a destination we'd never seen. We ran up huge bills. I didn't care."
He also wanted to raise awareness about the disease, so set up the James Whale Fund for Kidney Cancer in 2006. It merged with Kidney Cancer UK nine years later.
Whale stayed at LBC for five years before hosting the BBC Essex breakfast show for three and launching an online version of The James Whale Radio Show.
In 2016, he took part in the 18th series of Celebrity Big Brother - becoming the sixth housemate to be voted out.
Three months later, he went back to TalkRadio, but was suspended in 2018 after an interview with author and journalist Nichi Hodgson about her being raped.
In a video clip, the presenter could be seen mouthing the words "orally raped", shaking his head and laughing when Ms Hodgson gave details about what had happened to her.
"What began as a typically strident exchange between me and a journalist known for his belligerent presenting style became a merciless exercise in how not to interview someone who has experienced a sexual assault," Ms Hodgson wrote in The Guardian.
TalkRadio admitted the interview "completely lacked sensitivity", but Whale eventually kept his job.
In 2018, his wife Melinda died of lung cancer. Two years later, he was forced to take a break from broadcasting because his disease had spread to his remaining kidney, spine, brain and lungs.
He recovered enough to walk down the aisle with Nadine Lamont-Brown in 2021. They had got chatting in their local pub in Kent when they found out their spouses were both being treated by the same doctor.
In 2024, Whale was awarded an MBE for his services to broadcasting and charity, and he continued hosting a weekly radio and TV show on Talk.
He lost none of his fiery opinions or ability to outrage, causing controversy by saying the "Navy should be out there pointing weaponry" at migrants in small boats, and clashing with pro-Palestinian guests over the Israel-Gaza conflict.
He carried out his final interview, with his "good friend and political hero", Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, in his garden in mid-July.
Whale also wrote a weekly column for the Daily Express, which on 27 July included a series of tributes from friends and former colleagues.
Dragon's Den businessman Theo Paphitis hailed his charity work for Kidney Cancer UK, adding: "They broke the mould when they made James, and there's a good reason that he has lasted decades as a broadcaster on the airwaves."
Actor Shane Richie said: "Love him or loathe him there's been no denying that the Whale was and will always be regarded as a one-off unique broadcaster.
"In the eighties, James moved the goalposts when it came to live TV... his late-night Friday talk show was the stuff of legend and is still regarded as a show that moved the parameters of British television."
Broadcaster Eamonn Holmes said: "He made direct speech entertaining. With that he was ahead of his time. I'm just sorry he hasn't had more time."
Whale kept broadcasting for as long as he could as the cancer tightened its grip.
"I've spent much of my professional life winding people up about their stupidity, taking the wind out of their sails, and I can't tell you how much I'm going to miss that," he wrote in one of his last weekly columns for the Daily Express.
"It wasn't always presidents and prime ministers and celebrities and leaders of industry – though they often got their comeuppances – sometimes, it was just normal folk who needed taking down a peg or two.
"But boy have I had some fun, and hopefully created some entertaining, engaging radio that has made people think a bit harder."
Radio host Charlamagne tha God fired back at President Donald Trump, accusing the president of pushing authoritarian tactics after Trump called the radio host a “dope” in a recent social media post.
On Monday’s episode of his radio show "The Breakfast Club," Charlamagne said Trump also failed to deliver on key campaign promises and used his show to dissect the president’s Truth Social post point by point.
“Listen, my fellow Americans, we are in a strange time right now, a time we have never seen because authoritarian strategy is being used against anyone who speaks out against this administration,” Charlamagne, whose given name is Lenard McKelvey, said.
Charlamagne drew the ire of Trump after he joined Fox News’ "My View with Lara Trump," the president’s daughter-in-law. Charlamagne said under the new administration “the least of us are still being impacted the worst.” He also said the ongoing controversy around the release of information regarding the death of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein is driving a wedge between the GOP and its supporters.
Soon after, the president responded by calling Charlamagne a “racist sleazebag,” a criticism Charlamagne defended against on Monday.
“He called me a racist. I didn't mention race, not one time on Lara Trump. I didn't bring up the fact that President Trump issued an executive order directing oversight of institutions like the Smithsonian to remove or suppress narratives about systemic racism and Black history,” Charlamagne said, referring to an executive order earlier this year demanding the Smithsonian remove exhibits that divided Americans "based on race."
Charlamagne added that he was “just talking to your base” and letting voters know Trump hasn’t kept the promises he made on the campaign trail.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Charlamagne also accused Trump of making the economy “worse” before criticizing the president's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, after the latest monthly jobs report came in well under expectations.
“It's actually hilarious to see you upset about the high unemployment rates when you let Elon Musk take a chainsaw to the federal government and fire a bunch of government workers earlier this year. You did that, President Trump, and now you're doing exactly what the Biden administration did, trying to convince America the economy is all good when it's not,” he said.
Still, Charlamagne said that he is actually “rooting” for Trump.
“President Trump, don't worry about Lenard, okay, don't worry about Charlamagne tha God. I know something I said hit a nerve and rattled you a little bit, but I don't want you rattled,” Charlamagne said. “I want you to end wars, okay? I want you to keep the border secure. I want you to have the economy booming, okay? I want all these things to be true. I am an American. I don't care who's in the White House. I want America to succeed. But I need you focused, and right now you’re not focused.”
© Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had a message Sunday for the dozens of Democratic legislators who fled the state to derail a mega-partisan gerrymander: “This truancy ends now.”
But Abbott’s options to compel those Democrats — whose departure to Illinois and other states is preventing the state Legislature from conducting any business — to return and vote are more constrained and legally uncertain than he let on. And they may take significant time to resolve in court.
Abbott and other Texas Republicans face a hard deadline as they are preparing to adopt maps that could net the GOP five seats in the U.S. House, potentially cementing the party’s majority in Congress. Maps need to be completed before the end of the year so that election officials can prepare for the state's March 3 primaries. The move has also prompted retaliation threats by Democratic governors in other states and roiled expectations for the 2026 elections, when Democrats hope to take the House and act as a check on President Donald Trump.
Here’s a look at the central questions as Abbott’s standoff with Texas House Democrats deepens into a monumental political and legal brawl.
Texas’ constitution requires two-thirds of the state’s 150 House members to be present to conduct business. That gives the 62-member House Democratic minority a break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option to grind the Capitol's business to a halt even if they would be outnumbered on an up-or-down vote.
By absconding from Austin — and the state altogether — Democrats ensured that the Legislature lacked a quorum to convene for a special session called by Abbott to address redistricting. There is some recent history on this: Democrats mounted a similar effort to “break quorum” in 2021 in protest of election-related legislation. The effort ended after Democrats gradually trickled back into the state, amid a similar flurry of arrest threats and lawsuits.
Importantly, breaking quorum is not a crime. However, if the absentee Democratic lawmakers remained in Texas, Abbott could order state troopers to haul them to the Capitol. That’s why they fled for the friendlier confines of Illinois and other blue states, where Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker and other allies have vowed to shelter them from Texas’ demands to bring them back.
Federal laws allow states to demand the return, or “extradition,” of criminal fugitives from other states. But because breaking quorum is not illegal, Abbott can’t seek help from the courts to compel the Democrats’ return.
Instead, Abbott threatened to take another action against the absentee lawmakers: Ask Texas courts to remove them from office altogether. State law permits a Texas district court to determine whether a public official has “abandoned” his or her office, declaring it vacant — enabling the governor to set new elections to fill the empty seats.
“Come and take it,” dared state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader, in an appearance Monday morning on CNN. Wu declared Abbott’s threat to be “all bluster.”
The governor’s threat is rooted in a nonbinding legal opinion issued in 2021 by Attorney General Ken Paxton, amid the last attempt by Democrats to break quorum. Paxton, notably, took no position on whether breaking quorum is constitutional.
The republican AG also declined to say whether fleeing Democrats could or should be removed from office. Rather, he called it a “fact question for a court” that he said was beyond the scope of his office to decide. He noted instead that he could file what are known as “quo warranto actions” in court, asking a judge to determine whether the missing lawmakers had officially vacated their seats.
How would a judge make that call? Paxton said he wasn’t certain.
“We find no constitutional provision or statute establishing an exhaustive list for why a vacancy occurs or the grounds under which an officer may be judicially removed from office,” he wrote.
This is the most uncertain aspect of Abbott’s gambit. Paxton’s office would need to file “quo warranto” actions in various judicial districts for more than 50 fleeing lawmakers. Judges may take up these cases on different timelines and reach different conclusions, requiring appeals that could wind their way to the Texas Supreme Court.
Paxton acknowledged in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that the timeline would be problematic.
“The challenge is that [it] wouldn't necessarily be an immediate answer, right?” he said. “We'd have to go through the court process, and we'd have to file … in districts that are not friendly to Republicans,” Paxton said. “So it's a challenge because every, every district would be different. We'd have to go sue in every legislator’s home district to try to execute on that idea."
And even if Abbott and Paxton win a clean sweep in removing the Democrats from office, it would then require a time-intensive process of calling special elections to fill the vacancies — and guaranteeing that the winners of those elections also remain in the state as well.
That timing matters when the GOP-led redistricting plan is on a fixed timeline: A new map must be adopted by early December in order to be in place for the 2026 midterm cycle. That would require Democrats to remain out of state for about four months while they accumulate $500-per-day civil fines. The current special Legislative session is slated to end on Aug. 19, but Abbott could call another one.
Abbott’s letter, though sharply critical, stopped short of actually accusing Democrats of breaking the law. Rather, he suggested that if outsiders are helping them fundraise to cover their fines, they might run afoul of bribery laws.
“It would be bribery if any lawmaker took money to perform or to refuse to perform an act in the legislature,” Abbott said in a Fox News interview Monday. “And the reports are these legislators have both sought money and offered money to skip the vote, to leave the legislature, to take a legislative act."
If Texas prosecutors in fact level any such charges, then Abbott’s authority to return them grows stronger. He could then ask courts in Texas and Illinois to seek the return of the missing lawmakers.
“I will use my full extradition authority to demand the return to Texas of any potential out-of-state felons,” he said in his Sunday statement.
Liz Crampton contributed reporting.
© Brandon Bell/Getty Images
© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times
© Damon Winter/The New York Times
© Jeenah Moon/Reuters
The police and crime commissioner for Leicestershire and Rutland has defected from the Conservatives to Reform UK.
Rupert Matthews has held the position since 2021 and served as an MEP for the East Midlands for the Tories between 2017 and 2019.
Speaking at a press conference alongside Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, he said the "dark heart of wokeness" needed to be cut out of the criminal justice system.
"The self-serving, self-entitled liberal elite who have let our country down time after time are now on notice their day is almost done," he said.
"Be they Conservative or Labour governments, everyone knows our politicians have failed us all. They have let this country down. They have let the British people down. Enough. Now is the time for Reform."
Matthews was re-elected as PCC in May 2024, beating Labour's Rory Palmer by 860 votes.
Announcing the defection on Monday, Farage told the conference: "He's twice been elected as a Conservative but today he comes across to us as our first police and crime commissioner."
He added: "Welcome on board."
Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Tesla has granted its chief executive Elon Musk $29bn (£21.7bn) worth of its shares, in an attempt to keep the billionaire at the firm.
The move comes after a US court struck down his 2018 pay package, worth more than $50bn, ruling that it was "unfair to shareholders".
Musk has been appealing the decision made by the Delaware court in 2024 and on Monday Tesla told shareholders it was "confident" that the $29bn of shares "will incentivize Elon to remain at Tesla" especially as "the war for AI talent is intensifying".
The award should boost Musk's voting power on the electric car company's board.
"It is imperative to retain and motivate our extraordinary talent, beginning with Elon", Tesla's board wrote on X, a platform owned by Musk, adding that "no one matches Elon's remarkable combination of leadership experience, technical expertise".
The company said the billionaire had a "proven track record" in building "revolutionary and profitable businesses".
Tech firms trying to assert themselves in the AI sector have been offering huge sums to workers at rivals in an effort to persuade them to join them and boost their development.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was said to have recently tried to lure top developers from ChatGPT-creator OpenAI with million-dollar pay deals.
Meanwhile Microsoft's AI division, headed up by former Google DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman, recently gained several new hires from Google's ranks.
Tesla the company was at an "inflection point" and needed Musk's prowess as it pivots from being an electric vehicle firm to an AI and robotics focussed company.
The company added that the share award would be attractive for Musk "with other "demands on his time and attention".
Musk's other roles include executive positions at xAI, Neuralink, and The Boring Company, which makes tunnels and other infrastructure in the US.
He recently announced that he was stepping back from politics, after a stint as US President Donald Trump's advisor.
Additional reporting by Liv McMahon.
Two men have appeared in court, charged in connection with the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton.
Ahmad Mulakhil is accused of rape, while Mohammad Kabir is accused of kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl aged under 13.
Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch has alleged the two men were asylum seekers, which the BBC has been unable to verify independently, and accused Warwickshire Police and the Home Office of covering up their immigration status.
Police refused to disclose further details, saying: "Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status."
In a statement to the BBC the Home Office said: "Foreign nationals who commit crimes should be in no doubt that the law will be enforced and justice delivered."
Mr Kabir and Mr Mulakhil, both 23 and from the Warwickshire town, have appeared before magistrates in Coventry and will both appear at Warwick Crown Court on 26 August.
Mr Mulakhil is also facing an additional charge of rape relating to a different case.
Anyone who was in the Cheverel Street area of Nuneaton between 20:30 and 21:45 BST on 22 July and saw anything of interest is urged to come forward by Warwickshire Police.
Finch, who at 19 became the youngest council leader in the UK and represents Reform UK, published a letter on his social media accounts on Sunday, addressed to the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, the Chief Constable of Warwickshire Police, Alex Franklin-Smith, and the chief executive of the council, Monica Fogarty.
He said Ms Fogarty had told him that Mr Kabir was an asylum seeker living in a house of multiple occupancy.
Residents had "very easily been able to join the dots together" and conclude that the men were asylum seekers, he said.
"Residents of Warwickshire can see they have not been told the full story," he said.
"I am disgusted that one year on from the social unrest that we saw in parts of the UK in 2024, the Home Office and the police have clearly not learned any lessons from the handling of similar incidents last year."
He added: "I strongly believe that the only risk to public order from this case in Warwickshire comes from the cover-up itself."
In a statement, Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner Philip Seccombe said: "It is essential to state that policing decisions—such as whether to release details about a suspect—must follow national guidance and legal requirements."
He added that he would not speculate on the personal circumstances of those involved while court proceedings were active.
The BBC has contacted Warwickshire County Council for comment.
Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
“这个理由编的不好,换一个”
相关阅读:https://chinadigitaltimes.net/chinese/720128.html
奔驰女亮证的事情,后续已经出来了。
1,她亮的“证件”是假的;
2,她不是公职人员;
3,她是私家车主的亲戚的亲戚,所以正好认识私家车主的车。
我只能说,好离谱的剧情,这要是搁在电视剧里,一定是部烂剧。因为哪怕演员的演技再怎么给力,剧情过于扯淡,有屁用?
你问我信不信,我都不知道该说什么好。“是他亲戚的亲戚”,好家伙,这理由得多大的脑洞才能想得出来,简直比《红楼梦》里的“贾府亲戚”还要更神奇。
他的亲戚的亲戚,居然就因为这么一点小事,半夜三更带了俩民警去上门威胁要拘留他?难不成两民警又是“她”亲戚的亲戚?
他亲戚的亲戚,居然惊动了“副市长”亲自下场,厉害呀。不禁想起莎士比亚在《哈姆雷特》里说的那句,“腐烂的东西,总是从内部开始。”
那我建议,一定要拘留他这个亲戚的亲戚,因为“假冒执法人员”,以及让民警给利用公权力给自己办私事,这可都是一等一的大罪名。
至于我信不信,那都不重要,你要看大家信不信。
一条还没有上热搜的消息,这点赞量,这清一色的评论,看着都令人尴尬。
“这个理由编的不好,换一个。”
“一个假的让别的派出所上门,牛逼哦。”
“这解释比天水医院改数据还离谱。”
我能说什么?如果是真的,只能说我的想象力不够。如果不保真,那我还是得建议有些人,你们要想好了再编,而不是编好了再想。
另外说实话,出现这种画面我并没有太过于感到意外,因为从本质上来讲,它似乎是一步一步,循序渐进的出现。
按照往常,引起这般滔天舆论的新闻,早就提级调查,各种回应了。但广西防城港这个不一样,事情发生之后快一个星期,奔驰女是什么身份都没有回应。不仅如此,从昨天上热搜之后开始,各家媒体陆陆续续透露出来的都是些什么回应?
要么就是在帮助私家车当事人和奔驰女“协调”;要么就是派出所称“将视情况回应”……始终偏离主线的这些回应,都在指向同一个方向,地方上还是想尽可能的保护这个奔驰女。
如果她是公职人员,又是利用公权欺辱普通老百姓,又是利用权力调动警察半夜三更上门,这公职,恐怕是保不住了。
但企业家没事,逻辑大家都懂。民警打你,那是权力的问题;一个卖包子的打你,那也就是斗殴而已。
只不过这次,连往常那些毫无底线的正能量大v,似乎都洗不动了,只能表示“这情况,的确离奇。”
西方法学家霍姆斯说过一句话,“正义不仅要实现,而且要被看见。”
而我们也应该提一句,“官方回应,不仅是给出一个回应,它更要让人们信服。”
那么问题来了,人们不信,怎么办?
答案其实很简单:拿出证据,说服他们。否则,这么扯淡的理由,你为什么觉得人们会信?
而人们若是不信,回应的意义又在哪里?
官方的回应,一方面是对问题的解释,另一方面是对公信力的延续。而不是一纸敷衍,无论内容多么浮夸,丢出来就完事。
青少年霸凌殴打侮辱同学的视频,需要强忍着极端的不适感才能看下去。
视频就不放了,我承受不住……
尤其我刚在德国奥地利带了两周的夏令营回来,很难想象假如这些可爱的学生被霸凌至此,我会燃起怎样的怒火!更难想象,亲眼见到自家宝贝女儿被肆意殴打侮辱的视频,父母会经历怎样的心碎痛悔。
最难想象,或者说我完全不敢想象的是,四川江油这位被一群同学带至偏僻无人处飞踹打脸脱衣侮辱的14岁女生,这位由聋哑母亲养大的女生,被告知报警也没有用的女生,她经历过怎样的绝望与屈辱?一秒钟都不敢去代入感受……
青少年的恶行其实古今中外都有,也并不罕见,但四川江油这起霸凌事件,经一名15岁少女之口揭露了一个令人极度不安的现实:
又不是没进去过,以为我们怕你(报警)吗?没得20分钟就出来了!
显然,打人者并不是第一次霸凌同学,也不是第一次犯事被送到派出所,她非常清楚霸凌同学的后果,实际上就是几乎没有后果。
进去不到20分钟就出来了。
这是对霸凌者的批评教育吗?这叫鼓励纵容!
《治安管理处罚法》和《刑法》对未成年人有诸多免责、减责条款,立法的依据之一是青少年心智发展不成熟,不具备完全的行为能力,不清楚自己做的事是什么性质,不明白自己做了坏事会有怎样的后果,所以应该批评教育和积极挽救。
可事实上呢?一些小坏蛋小恶魔,比成年人更清楚这些免责保护条款,甚至在有意识地利用这些专属于未成年人的免责条款,行事愈发肆无忌惮,一次次突破更低的底线。
青少年有意识地违法犯罪却几乎毫无代价的问题,正在严重侵蚀整个社会的安全感,也严重侵蚀法律的公平正义。
据江油市公安部门通报,即便此次霸凌事件情节如此恶劣,即便施暴的女生早有前科,即便案件造成如此巨大的社会影响,施暴的两名女生所承担的后果也只是“送往专门学校进行矫治教育”。
这样下去,真的不行!
无论是从保护无辜少年儿童的角度,还是从震慑与挽救问题青少年的角度,当下的法律条款与执法尺度都已经严重落后于社会现实,到了必须要大改的时候了!
首先,要大幅提高对问题青少年监护人的惩戒力度。孩子有严重霸凌行为或违法犯罪的,一定要让监护人足额赔偿受害人损失,再处以罚款,孩子重复出现违法犯罪行为的,监护人必须要接受一周以上的警示教育或社区劳动。
然后,对违法犯罪的青少年本人,不能简单粗暴地以年龄来划分责任界限,还应该在必要时引入生理发育情况和心智发育情况的评估,对明知故犯的小恶魔在法律规定范围内顶格处理。
最后,公安等执法机关一定不能在未成年人违法犯罪问题上敷衍了事,一放了之。实际上,即便是根据现有法律,公安机关对霸凌同学的青少年也有很多可以惩戒教育的措施。
最简单一点,让霸凌者在派出所待满一整天,做笔录,写悔过书,责令当面道歉,也绝对比进去20分钟就放出来要好得多。
如果15岁的霸凌者上一次进去时接受了这一整套处理,其监护人因此付出了沉重的经济代价,很有可能这一次的霸凌事件就不会发生,至少不会这么轻飘飘地有恃无恐地发生。
分享一条基本常识:
保护未成年人,不是纵容未成年人违法犯罪的意思!
日前,中办、国办发布《育儿补贴制度实施方案》,立即成为热点。
《育儿补贴制度实施方案》规定,从2025年1月1日起,对符合法律法规规定生育的3周岁以下婴幼儿发放补贴,至其年满3周岁,其中,对2025年1月1日之前出生、不满3周岁的婴幼儿,按应补贴月数折算计发补贴。根据该方案,育儿补贴按年发放,现阶段国家基础标准为每孩每年3600元。对按照育儿补贴制度规定发放的育儿补贴免征个人所得税。在最低生活保障对象、特困人员等救助对象认定时,育儿补贴不计入家庭或个人收入。
事实上,自从中国共产党在二十届三中全会的《中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化的决定》中提出“建立生育补贴制度”以后,特别是2025年政府工作报告明确要“发放育儿补贴”之后,社会上对国家层面的生育补贴政策早就已经有了相当高的预期。
现在实施方案落地了,社交媒体上一些网友又称,一年3600元,不够养孩子啊。算满3年,一共10800元,有人会为了这么一些钱去生育一个孩子吗?“那样做,不是为了得到一勺子醋,而去买了一盘饺子么?”甚至有人调侃称,除非给我送房子,我才会生。
这次发放育儿补贴,是政府拿出“真金白银”补贴育儿家庭,也是我国首次对居民发放普惠式现金补贴,意义当然不可小视。一般估算,全国每年将有两千多万名婴幼儿可以领取到现金补贴。有论者强调,育儿补贴是一项“投资于人”的重大政策举措,充分体现了国家对保障和改善民生的高度重视。
那么,为什么还会有这么多的人“不领情”呢?下面就来简要地分析一下其中的原因。
根据有关方面的统计,截至2024年11月,已经有23个省份的不同层级政府出台了生育补贴政策,其中有3个省份已经实现省级层面的政策覆盖。
虽然此前各地出台的育儿补贴方案往往针对二孩及以上,很少有地方政府将一孩纳入补贴范围,但是相比较而言,此前各地出台的育儿补贴标准大多高于现在落地的全国补贴标准,而且有不少地方的政策也已经将一孩纳入了补贴范围。
例如,内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市的补贴方案是:一孩,一次性补贴1万元;二孩,每年发放1万元,持续至5岁,总额5万元;三孩,每年发放1万元,持续至10岁,总额10万元。这个力度高于全国标准。
陕西省宁陕县的补贴标准是:二孩,每月600元,发放至3岁,总额2.16万元;三孩,每月1200元,发放至3岁,总额4.32万元。
黑龙江省哈尔滨市的补贴标准是:二孩,每月500元,持续3年,总额1.8万元;三孩,每月1000元,持续3年,总额3.6万元。
湖北省天门市的补贴标准是:二孩,每月800元,持续3年,总额2.88万元;三孩,每月1000元,持续3年,总额3.6万元。(该市还补贴“房票”。)
黑龙江省伊春市的补贴标准是,二孩,每月500元,持续3年,总额1.8万元;三孩,每月1000元,持续3年,总额3.6万元。
以上列举的若干地方政府对二孩及以上的补贴标准,均高于此次出台的全国标准。事实上,已经出台补贴政策的其他地方,对二孩及以上的补贴,只有少数不比全国标准高。
尽管此前很少有地方政府对一孩进行补贴(内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市是一个突出的例外),但是对二孩及以上的补贴,已经大幅拉高了人们对全国补贴政策的预期。所以当全国补贴方案落地之后,固然是预期兑现,但许多人产生“不过如此”的感慨。(详见附表。)
附表:各地出台的生育补贴政策(不完全统计,有些地区另有房票等其他形式的补贴,未列出)
传统看法是,父母或长辈对生儿育女更加重视也更加急切,他们也是“催生”“催婚”的重要力量,有意思的是,朋友圈和社交媒体上,父母辈对此次育儿补贴政策的反应也不是非常热烈。
他们中有些人持这样一个观点:以前我们多生一个,罚得挺凶,现在要我们多生几个,只给这么点钱?
当然,生育是个人和个体家庭的决策,也许不应该把责任推给政府,但是这种说法反映了不少人的感受。对新生儿补贴三年、每年3600元这个标准,到底是根据什么依据确定的?
计划生育时代,城市地区普遍实行独生子女政策,农村地区普遍实行“一孩半”政策(即头胎是女孩可生二胎,头胎是男孩不准生二胎),当时官方要求,“法律规定超生者必须缴纳社会抚养费,不是罚款,而是超生者对社会进行的经济补偿。因为,多出生人口侵占了较多的社会公共资源”。那么,社会抚养费的征收标准是什么呢?
提前生育(含婚前生育、未满生育间隔期生育、符合再生育条件未经审批生育):按双方上年收入总额的60%-1倍征收。
多生育一个子女:按双方上年收入总额的2-3倍征收。
多生育第二个子女:按双方上年收入总额的4-6倍征收。
多生育第三个及以上子女:从重征收。
婚外生育:按双方上年收入总额的4-6倍征收。
非法收养:比照上述标准征收。
(收入界定:以上年统计部门公布的数据为准,若当事人年收入低于标准,按统计标准征收;高于标准则以实际收入倍数征收。 流动人口:按户籍地标准执行。)
以上标准依据《社会抚养费征收管理办法》及地方实施细则制定,具体执行可能因地区差异有所不同。
有人据此认为,既然当年的“社会抚养费”是根据当事人收入(或当事人所属户籍地的人均收入)的若干倍来确定的,那么现在的补贴也应当如此。显然,《育儿补贴制度实施方案》规定的补贴是达不到当年的社会抚养费的标准的。
不管怎么说,由中央政府在全国层面上对所有新生儿发放育儿补贴,尽管金额不如一些人预期高,都是一件极具象征意义的事情。
首先,从人口政策来说,“只要生了孩子国家就会发钱”,表明国家的人口政策彻底转向了鼓励生育和支持生育,这一政策惠及千家万户,不仅可以增进民生福祉,同时也是“投资于人”的重要措施。
其次,这意味着,国家层面已经真正认识到了我国最严峻的问题之一是“孩子太少了”,这是未来生育观念以及相应的预期的变化的第一步。
最后,这代表着在人口和生育政策领域,计划的成分基本完全消失了。此前各地出台的鼓励生育政策,仍然区分一孩、二孩、三孩,仍然带有计划生育的色彩。相比之下,这次补贴,由于不再区分一孩、二孩、三孩及以上,已经没有这种色彩了。
最后这一点其实非常重要,因为这意味着将生育的自主决策权完全归还给个人,国家即便要鼓励生育,也就应当以这一点为基础和出发点。因此,对于这项育儿补贴政策的宣传和解释,也许本来应该将重点放在这个基点上。
遗憾的是,不少媒体很快就将这项补贴政策纳入了“拉动消费、促进经济”的叙事框架。许多人马上开始计算:全国每年大约有两千万孩子可以收到补贴,那么可以释放多少千亿的消费,进而拉动GDP多少个百分点……
这样一来,也就把生育孩子这件事情彻底纳入了经济计算。而一旦进行经济计算,任何人都会发现这点补贴是远远覆盖不了成本的。
根据《中国生育成本报告2024》,中国家庭(不包括港澳台地区),0-17周岁孩子养育成本平均为53.8万元,其中,上海、北京、浙江为养育成本最高的三个地区,分别高达101万元、93.6万元和85.5万。三年补贴1万多元,怎么够呢?
上面提到的还只是养育孩子至17周岁的成本,还有未来接受教育和恋爱、结婚并生育再下一代的成本呢?所有这些,在很大程度上也都需要父母来支付部分费用的(或给予支持的)。
无论如何,要让本来不想生孩子的人生孩子,从成本计算的角度去说,这些补贴确实是不够的。进一步,人们会质疑,补贴三年、每年3600元这个标准的确定,既然不是根据育儿成本确定的,那么是根据“财政可以承受的限度”确定的吗?抑或是根据“拉动经济”的数额来确定的?那样的话,这种感受反而会影响生育动力。
所以,计算生孩子能多大程度上促进经济,这既不合理,也不现实。生育,终究是一个个人和家庭选择的权利。