前科莫竞选顾问曾任中国国有企业高管
前科莫竞选顾问曾任中国国有企业高管

(德國之聲中文網)台灣經濟部國際貿易署週日(6月15日)發聲明證實,上週二(10日)把601個實體納入了出口管制名單,其中包含華為、中芯等中資企業。
聲明指出,若台灣企業欲出口給實體名單內的企業,應事先取得該署核發的「戰略性高科技貨品輸出許可證」,且台灣海關也會參與邊境攔查。
國際貿易署表示近期舉行了跨部會審查會議,這次更新名單是基於「防止武器擴散及其他國安考量」而新增出口納管對象。該署也呼籲,廠商應「善盡企業查證義務,謹慎評估交易風險,以避免涉入武擴活動」。
在台灣政府證實之前,彭博社先行報導了此一消息,並形容這對華為、中芯造成重大打擊。這兩家企業引領中國先進人工智慧(AI)晶片發展,但如今台灣設下新的出口管制,至少會部分切斷中企獲取台灣建廠科技、半導體材料與設備的管道。
華為、中芯尚未公開發表評論。
台企技術外流中國?
2020年12月,中芯因跟中國「軍民融合」戰略有關聯,被美國商務部產業與安全局列入實體清單。
華為則自2019年起便遭美國以國安風險納入實體清單:若美國企業欲銷售受出口管制條例規範的產品給華為,就必須獲得許可。隔年,美國又擴大適用「外國製造之直接產品規定」,意即只要產品的設計與製造涉及美國科技,即使不是在美國製造,同樣受到限制。換言之,台積電等台企也受限於美國的出口管制規範。
然而,科技研究機構TechInsights去年拆解華為「昇騰910」系列的先進AI處理器,發現裡面使用了台積電的7奈米製程晶片。
路透社今年4月引述知情者說法指,華為應是透過另一間中企「算能科技」繞過美國禁令,向台積電採購晶片;台積電已主動通知美方此事,並停止供貨給算能。台積電公司對外則強調一向遵守法規,自2020年9月便不再出貨給華為。
無獨有偶,彭博社2023年的報導曾點名崇越科技、亞翔工程、漢唐集成等台灣企業的子公司在深圳協助華為的關聯企業建造晶圓廠。此外,另一間台企矽科宏晟曾在官網上公布跟華為有合作的中企「鵬芯微」達成合作的消息;「鵬芯微」此前已遭美國列入出口管制名單。
上述的四間台灣公司當時回應,跟華為關聯企業的合作並不涉及半導體製程設備或材料,因此稱不違反美國的出口禁令。儘管如此,華為在遭美國制裁的情況下,設法建立起「影子供應鏈」,仍然在台灣掀起爭議。
根據台灣國科會成立的智庫「科技、民主與社會研究中心」(DSET)去年底發表的研究報告,打造「影子供應鏈」的具體做法是,深圳市的國有投資集團先成立「鵬芯微」、「昇維旭」等多家「新創」公司,再由這些默默無名的企業跟台灣廠商接觸,藉此規避美國出口管制,獲取台灣服務,把台灣的半導體業者「吸納進深圳與中國整體的半導體國家戰略」。
報告摘要寫道:「華為影子網絡、中芯國際、福建晉華、長鑫存儲等重要的中國半導體企業皆獲得台灣廠商所提供的無塵室廠房工程服務……台灣政府雖然透過投資審查,為晶圓廠赴中投資設下限制,成功保全台灣的產業競爭力,但是半導體製造的生產網絡高度複雜,使得審查範圍未能有效觸及所有供應商。」
2023年,美國半導體產業協會(SIA)也曾針對華為的「影子網絡」向各界示警。在拜登政府任內,美國政府除了對中國施加一系列出口管制措施,也陸續把許多協助華為、涉及其「影子供應鏈」的中企納入黑名單。
川普重返白宮之後,雖取消了一部分針對先進半導體的出口管制,但也公布新的指導方針,警告美國企業不要使用中國製造的AI晶片,特別是華為的產品,否則恐怕會違反出口管制。對此,中國商務部重申一貫立場,批評美國的舉動是「典型的單邊霸凌和保護主義」、「濫用出口管制遏制打壓中國」。
DW中文有Instagram!歡迎搜尋dw.chinese,看更多深入淺出的圖文與影音報導。
© 2025年德國之聲版權聲明:本文所有內容受到著作權法保護,如無德國之聲特別授權,不得擅自使用。任何不當行為都將導致追償,並受到刑事追究。
A survivor of Saturday's deadly attacks on two Minnesota lawmakers says she and her husband are both "incredibly lucky to be alive" after they were hit by 17 bullets.
State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were gunned down at their home early on Saturday morning, but lived. Melissa Hortman - the top Democratic legislator in the state House - and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed.
Yvette Hoffman said in a statement that she and her husband John were "devastated" by the Hortmans' deaths.
Police are hunting for the suspect, Vance Luther Boelter, who wore a latex mask and posed as an officer to shoot the victims at their homes in suburban Minneapolis, before escaping on foot.
Mrs Hoffman's statement was shared on Instagram by Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar.
"John is enduring many surgeries right now and is closer every hour to being out of the woods," Mrs Hoffman wrote.
"He took 9 bullet hits. I took 8 and we are both incredibly lucky to be alive.
"We are gutted and devastated by the loss of Melissa and Mark. We have no words. There is never a place for this kind of political hate."
Police have not disclosed the killer's motive.
A Facebook post from someone identifying as Mrs Hoffman's nephew said she had thrown herself on her daughter during the assassination attempt, "using her body as a shield to save her life".
According to the Minnesota Star Tribune, the daughter, Hope, is in her 20s and was born with spina bifida, which her father previously cited as motivating him to get into state politics.
On Sunday, police said they had found an unoccupied car linked to the suspect in Sibley County, about 50 miles (80km) from the murder scene.
The discovery of the black sedan was alerted to local residents' mobile phones in a message that said: "Suspect not located. Keep your doors locked and vehicles secured."
A cowboy hat, similar to what Boelter, 57, was believed to have been wearing, was found nearby.
Police also said on Sunday that Boelter's wife had been detained in a traffic stop along with three relatives in a car in the city of Onamia, more than 100 miles from the family home in the rural community of Green Isle, on Saturday morning.
Jenny Boelter was released without being taken into custody because she was co-operative, Drew Evans, of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, told a news conference on Sunday evening.
Police have extended the search over state lines to South Dakota and the FBI has added Boelter to its most-wanted list, issuing a $50,000 reward.
Both of the targeted lawmakers belonged to Minnesota's Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, which is affiliated with the national Democratic Party.
Authorities said they recovered a target list that included the names of state Democratic politicians from another vehicle used by the suspect.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, congresswoman Ilhan Omar, Klobuchar and Minnesota's other US senator, Tina Smith, were on the list – along with state Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, people familiar with the investigation told local media.
"Clearly, this is politically motivated," Klobuchar told NBC News' Meet the Press on Sunday morning.
President Donald Trump, a Republican, told ABC News on Sunday the attack was "a terrible thing".
Investigators say Boelter was disguised as a police officer when he carried out the attacks and had a vehicle that looked like a police car, equipped with flashing emergency lights.
The gunman first targeted the Hoffmans at their home in Champlin at around 02:00 local time on Saturday, authorities said.
Soon afterwards, Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed at their home in Brooklyn Park, eight miles away.
Officers arrived at the Hortmans' home and exchanged gunfire with the suspect at around 03:35. The suspect managed to flee, leaving behind his car, authorities said.
According to Boelter's CV, he has a background in security and military training.
The city of Brooklyn Park was silent on Sunday morning as the neighbourhood came to terms with a suspected political assassination on their doorstep.
A police car was parked outside the Hortmans' house and bright yellow caution tape surrounded the property.
Taha Abuisnaineh, who lives across the street, said he and his wife had known the family for more than 20 years.
"They were very nice neighbours in a very quiet neighbourhood," he told the BBC. "You don't see police activity in this neighbourhood. We are very shocked."
Two other nearby residents who did not want to be named said the suburban community was reeling.
"My next-door neighbour heard the shots," said one. "We've all been texting back and forth."
She and her husband described how they received an annual Christmas card from the Hortmans.
"What a big loss for Minnesota," she said.
In Sibley County, where the suspect's car was found, local resident Brian Liebhard also told the BBC of his shock.
"This guy needs to get caught," he said. "I don't agree with everything they [the two politicians] vote for, but this is sad - the guy went wacko."
台湾网红“馆长”陈之汉日前赴上海直播参访,引发两岸强烈关注与巨大争议。有人赞其“打破偏见”,也有人批其“沦为统战样板”。从“高铁平稳”惊叹到“厕所有门”点赞,这场直播到底是真诚转变还是流量表演?舆论已呈现鲜明裂痕。
上周,台湾知名网红“馆长”陈之汉现身上海,与前艺人汪小菲共进晚餐,并在YouTube同步直播。根据《联合早报》报道,当晚在线观看人数一度突破43万人,刷新台湾YouTube历史纪录。随后几天,他的直播内容包括参观高铁、体验磁浮列车、逛商场、进厕所、看垃圾桶,几乎全程保持高热度,腾讯新闻称其每日观看量累计高达190万人次。
四川一位不愿署名的作家将“馆长”上海之行称为“表演”,他接受本周一(16日)自由亚洲电台采访时,以首短诗评论“馆长”:“台湾变色龙,社会小爬虫,亲爹可以卖,只要当网红。”这位不愿具名的作家解释:“在过去,陈之汉一度在台湾被视为爱台抗中的代表人物,甚至骂过中共、挺过民主。如今却在直播中高呼’上海发展超越台湾’,引起部分台湾网民和知识分子的反感,我也认为馆长像‘变色龙’。”
直播中,陈之汉不时露出惊叹神情,称赞大陆高铁座椅“有靠背”、厕所“干净有门”、还有“送餐机器人”“城市人情味浓”等,言语之间完全颠覆了其以往对中国大陆的批判立场。
重庆早期泛蓝联盟成员章之行接受本台采访时表示,据其观察,“馆长”并非一位有政治立场的网红,而是在权势之间钻营讨好、不择手段求名逐利的人:“他在台湾虽然拥有众多粉丝与影响力,但精神上却在‘大场面’前自我矮化、靠谄媚维生。大陆不少网民对他本人毫无兴趣,反而认同八炯的观点。”
这次“大陆之旅”之所以引发舆论海啸,不只是因为流量,而是“馆长”态度的惊人转变。过去长期标榜“反共、抗中”的陈之汉,曾多次在节目中批评中国制度与人权议题,此番却在直播中大力称赞大陆的基础建设和社会氛围。
中国网民注意到陈之汉在高铁上,他惊呼“有靠耶!”、“哇!厕所里面有门!”、“居然还有送餐机器人!”在商场和民宅间穿梭,他更盛赞上海“连小区垃圾桶都智能化”、“人都很热情”,甚至感慨“大陆建设真的领先太多”。
陈之汉还公开表示:“台湾人应该要多出来走一走,看一看外面的世界,不要关在自己的茧房里。”他甚至呼吁恢复双城论坛等两岸交流机制,“我们明明是自己人,为什么要吵架?”
对此,贵州退休教师黄先生接受本台采访时说,在两岸关系议题上,北京当局一向透过舆论引导台湾两千三百万人舆情走向,不惜砸下重金、动用各种手段推进所谓的统一目标。他说:“陈之汉此次上海之行,并非他个人的独角戏,而是整个庞大统战工程中的一环。在社交媒体算法主导的时代,自媒体已成为最强大的统战工具之一,大陆方面对此心知肚明。台湾民众若想真正了解’馆长’,就必须先了解中共。”
陈之汉在上海的一番言论,在大陆收获部分民众的肯定与赞誉。据报有网友称其为“民间和平大使”、“用实际体验粉碎谣言”,认为他亲身直播让更多台湾年轻人看到大陆的真实面貌。但更有众多人质疑其动机,怀疑这次行程是否为“剧本安排”,甚至称他是“演给台湾人看的”。大陆微博上一位用户评论道:“看他在高铁上真诚点赞,那表情是被震到的,不像作秀。”也有人说:“厕所门和高铁靠背都是真的,但他被安排得太顺了,像软统战样板。”
台湾方面的反应则明显对立。绿营支持者指责其“亲中卖台”,称其遭到“信息战洗脑”。有网友讽刺他“墙头草转得比风还快”,还有人开始检举其社群内容涉嫌“违反台湾国家安全法”。
国民党台北市议员游淑慧对“馆长”赴大陆实况直播一事发表了支持评论,强调他“公开透明、大辣辣地告诉全台湾民众、公开直播”,民进党立法院总召集人柯建铭直言这是“国民党和共产党演这场戏”,并批评这种行为是对台湾人民的“非常大的侮辱”。
部分台湾年轻观众留言支持:“没想到大陆厕所都有门欸,我以前以为很脏。”、“这次看到上海的样子,真的刷新我三观。”但也有江苏网民顾天方告诉本台:“汪小菲宴请馆长吃龙虾视频,背景音乐响起《我爱你,中国》、还有中天跟拍……都像是剧本导览。”
陈之汉此次上海之行带来了庞大流量与舆论关注,也折射出两岸在彼此认知上的巨大鸿沟。
近期,在微信、抖音等平台上,不少台湾账号发布展现台湾社会文明与人文关怀的视频,例如:中学生操练花枪、捷运车厢门口服务员协助轮椅或失明乘客上下车,以及月台上客服人员维持秩序、保障高铁安全运行的画面。这些细节不仅让大陆网民眼前一亮,更获得广泛好评。有网友在评论区感慨:“这才是我想要的制度,尤其是台湾的健保制度全球最棒。”
浙江学子陆豪表示,陈之汉扮演的究竟是“和平使者”、流量艺人、还是“朝贡角色”?答案或许并不重要。重要的是,这趟旅行,让我们更清晰地看见:在真假混杂、立场分裂的舆论场中,一次“真香”式转弯,激起的,不只是掌声,还有雷鸣般的质疑。
责编:许书婷
© Youtube频道“馆长恶名昭彰”截图。
© Tim Gruber for The New York Times
© Justin Merriman for The New York Times
A survivor of Saturday's deadly attacks on two Minnesota lawmakers says she and her husband are both "incredibly lucky to be alive" after they were hit by 17 bullets.
State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were gunned down at their home early on Saturday morning, but lived. Melissa Hortman - the top Democratic legislator in the state House - and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed.
Yvette Hoffman said in a statement that she and her husband John were "devastated" by the Hortmans' deaths.
Police are hunting for the suspect, Vance Luther Boelter, who wore a latex mask and posed as an officer to shoot the victims at their homes in suburban Minneapolis, before escaping on foot.
Mrs Hoffman's statement was shared on Instagram by Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar.
"John is enduring many surgeries right now and is closer every hour to being out of the woods," Mrs Hoffman wrote.
"He took 9 bullet hits. I took 8 and we are both incredibly lucky to be alive.
"We are gutted and devastated by the loss of Melissa and Mark. We have no words. There is never a place for this kind of political hate."
Police have not disclosed the killer's motive.
A Facebook post from someone identifying as Mrs Hoffman's nephew said she had thrown herself on her daughter during the assassination attempt, "using her body as a shield to save her life".
According to the Minnesota Star Tribune, the daughter, Hope, is in her 20s and was born with spina bifida, which her father previously cited as motivating him to get into state politics.
On Sunday, police said they had found an unoccupied car linked to the suspect in Sibley County, about 50 miles (80km) from the murder scene.
The discovery of the black sedan was alerted to local residents' mobile phones in a message that said: "Suspect not located. Keep your doors locked and vehicles secured."
A cowboy hat, similar to what Boelter, 57, was believed to have been wearing, was found nearby.
Police also said on Sunday that Boelter's wife had been detained in a traffic stop along with three relatives in a car in the city of Onamia, more than 100 miles from the family home in the rural community of Green Isle, on Saturday morning.
Jenny Boelter was released without being taken into custody because she was co-operative, Drew Evans, of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, told a news conference on Sunday evening.
Police have extended the search over state lines to South Dakota and the FBI has added Boelter to its most-wanted list, issuing a $50,000 reward.
Both of the targeted lawmakers belonged to Minnesota's Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, which is affiliated with the national Democratic Party.
Authorities said they recovered a target list that included the names of state Democratic politicians from another vehicle used by the suspect.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, congresswoman Ilhan Omar, Klobuchar and Minnesota's other US senator, Tina Smith, were on the list – along with state Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, people familiar with the investigation told local media.
"Clearly, this is politically motivated," Klobuchar told NBC News' Meet the Press on Sunday morning.
President Donald Trump, a Republican, told ABC News on Sunday the attack was "a terrible thing".
Investigators say Boelter was disguised as a police officer when he carried out the attacks and had a vehicle that looked like a police car, equipped with flashing emergency lights.
The gunman first targeted the Hoffmans at their home in Champlin at around 02:00 local time on Saturday, authorities said.
Soon afterwards, Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed at their home in Brooklyn Park, eight miles away.
Officers arrived at the Hortmans' home and exchanged gunfire with the suspect at around 03:35. The suspect managed to flee, leaving behind his car, authorities said.
According to Boelter's CV, he has a background in security and military training.
The city of Brooklyn Park was silent on Sunday morning as the neighbourhood came to terms with a suspected political assassination on their doorstep.
A police car was parked outside the Hortmans' house and bright yellow caution tape surrounded the property.
Taha Abuisnaineh, who lives across the street, said he and his wife had known the family for more than 20 years.
"They were very nice neighbours in a very quiet neighbourhood," he told the BBC. "You don't see police activity in this neighbourhood. We are very shocked."
Two other nearby residents who did not want to be named said the suburban community was reeling.
"My next-door neighbour heard the shots," said one. "We've all been texting back and forth."
She and her husband described how they received an annual Christmas card from the Hortmans.
"What a big loss for Minnesota," she said.
In Sibley County, where the suspect's car was found, local resident Brian Liebhard also told the BBC of his shock.
"This guy needs to get caught," he said. "I don't agree with everything they [the two politicians] vote for, but this is sad - the guy went wacko."
在罗帅宇事件闹得沸沸扬扬之后,官方昨天迅速公布了调查结果。
对调查结果里的死因判断和分析这些我不作讨论,就他举报刘翔峰而遭迫害的事,我相信这个调查结果。
原因在于,罗和刘翔峰交集应该比较小,一个研究生去举报实习医院里其它医生,而且和自己没有利益关系的老师,概率极低。
至于刘翔峰作恶那么多年,有没有举报,我相信大概率有的。手术是需要团队一起完成的,刘翔峰作为一个外科医生作恶,不可能没人知道,但举报他的更可能的是那些受害患者,其次是同科室里看不下去,或者有利益冲突的同事,而不太可能没什么交集的实习医生。
至于那些对刘翔峰的举报是不是有人掩盖,我也相信大概率有,不然他不至于能作恶那么多年,那些收到举报故意掩盖的,我觉得应该继续调查而不应该放过,但也没必要把没什么关系的事混在一起讨论。
刘翔峰所做的事,包括对无需手术的患者做手术,故意夸大病情欺骗患者接受高风险手术等,确实超出了很多患者,甚至很多医生同行的想象,所以也有人问我,医疗行业是不是全国最黑的行业。
我曾在公立医院工作过很多年,也自己创业多年,和不同行业的人也算接触的比较多的,以我的认知和经验,医疗行业肯定不是最黑的。
我也不认为哪个行业会就比哪个行业更黑或更白,毕竟每个行业都是由人组成的,而人性是相通的。
医疗行业不太可能专门挑选那些道德低下的人进来,相反医学教育里还是会做一些职业道德的培训,再加上文化上对这样行业的道德要求也更高,也有很多法规和制度的约束,所以这个行业从业人员的平均道德水平不可能低于社会平均水平。
只不过医疗行业和其他行业比起来基本是一个行政管制的行业,市场淘汰机制效应比较小,另外就是这是一个于生死相关的行业,所以恶产生的影响很直接,也很容易被放大。
一个行业如果坏人扎堆,要么是专门挑选坏人进去,或者好人进去也变成坏人,那也是制度问题,不是人的问题。
就当下医疗行业的结构性问题,这几年到处都在降本增效,医疗行业也不例外。
这几年很多公立医院也在大幅降薪,降薪的背后也就意味着增效的需求很强烈,对大的医院来说,手术科室占医院收入比重很大,所以必然手术指征会放得更宽。
另一方面,我们国家已经开始人口下降了,2023年,我国人口减少了208万,执业医生数量增加了34.7万,相比2022年增加了7.8%,在僧多粥少逐渐加剧的背景下,过度医疗也难免加剧。
所以如果不从医疗体制层面做大的调整,过度医疗、过度手术的问题只会越演越烈,也越容易催生出刘翔峰这样的医生。
不得不说,罗S宇事件的通报写得真烂。
尽管与以往的惜字如金相比,这次的篇幅竟长到需要下滑好几次屏幕才能读完,且看起来内容详实、面面俱到——走访做了、调查做了、鉴定也做了。但结果还是一样,没人信。
这不仅仅是因为网上流传的诸多疑点没能得到解答,更大的原因在于,这种蓝底白字的通报形式,在置信度上天生存在劣势,哪怕它能与事件本身前后呼应、且逻辑自洽。
为什么这么说?因为我看过不少置信度高的案情通报,这样的通报我们一般称它为调查报告。
很多人应该还记得,在2020年,美国发生过一起轰动全球的悲剧事件:非洲裔男子弗洛伊德因被怀疑使用假钞,遭到白人警察膝压超过9分钟,当场失去意识,最终身亡。
该事件引发的舆情风暴席卷了整个美国,最终经过三年的调查,美国司法部发布了一份长达89页的调查报告。
之所以查了这么久、报告这么长,是因为这不仅仅是一份关于“警察误杀事件”的通报,而是要回应美国社会对于根本性问题的关切。
从报告中可以看出,调查方的证据非常扎实,有海量的视频证据、文件证据、数据统计证据以及口头证词,还有相关专家建立模型对这些证据进行科学评估。另外,许多媒体和学术组织也对这些证据进行了独立验证。
不仅如此,具体的调查方法亦会说明,比如在视频鉴定中,调查者是谁、鉴定方是谁、公证方是谁、采用什么鉴定手段等。再比如在走访调查中,采访者身份、被访者身份、采访形式、是否记录、如何记录、是否备份等都会一一写明。
有这样的调查报告,得出的结论自然不会是“弗洛伊德违法,警察执法过度,责令赔偿整改”这么简单了,而是明尼阿波利斯警察局存在系统性的过度使用武力、种族歧视性执法、侵犯第一修正案、对心理或行为障碍者的歧视性执法、问责机制失效等。
说完了弗洛伊德事件的调查报告,我们回过头看罗S宇事件的通报,我认为有9点证明其置信度低的理由。
调查组是由胡楠卫健委、中楠大学、长沙龚安菊组成,而被调查对象湘雅二医院恰好隶属中楠大学,主管部门就是胡楠卫健委,这不是既当运动员又当裁判员吗?光这一点就足以对其可信度打上一个大大的问号。
整篇通报下来,未见援引任何法律条文或赋权机制,究竟是依据的哪部法律成立的调查组?为何由卫生部门牵头?依据什么法条核查举报和认定死因?文件授权、上级批准等信息统统没说,只有“高度重视”“全面核查”“依法”。
全是结论性语句,缺乏调查细节。比如罗S宇的尸体落地为什么会发生反弹,原理与依据是什么?有没有专家参与论证?再比如在高坠点开展侦查实验,实验方法、过程是怎样的?再比如调查访问相关人员,调查启动时间、被访者时间段安排是怎样的?是否同步记录、是否保留材料副本、是否允许律师或家属参与、是否设有监督机制?这类没有任何细节说明的例子在通报中比比皆是,以至于没有可供外部检视的时序性和取证路径,大众只能接受结论,无法检验过程。
通报中多次提到声纹鉴定、音频核对以及电脑数据备份,用的都是“经鉴定、经核对、经检索”,却只字未提鉴定由哪家司法鉴定机构完成、是否有声纹数据库佐证,也未说明举报材料的提取方式、技术软件、时间点以及笔记本镜像有没有经公证人或外部律师验证。这导致报告中的关键证据看起来几乎是完全封闭的,既不公开也没有第三方审查,存在重大可验证性漏洞。搞半天,调查者是你,证据处理者是你,结论发布者还是你。
表面上看这则通报内容详实、面面俱到,从尸体落点到房间勘察,再从走访询问到音频鉴定,然而证据虽多,却十分杂乱,与其说它是通报,不如说是堆积式的披露,因为它光有证据堆叠却无事实分析。信息过载的同时却没有清晰的动因—行为—路径—结果的逻辑链,这进一步降低了通报的可信度。
这份通报最大的槽点就是刻意回避了公众最关切的问题,即医院的制度性腐败与结构性风险。通报只说管理不规范、责令整改,但未说明是否存在隐瞒工资、逃避监督、洗钱、财务空转等问题,也未审查管理不规范是否由系统性漏洞引起,以及罗S宇的死与腐败的医疗环境有没有关系。在公众对医疗系统逐渐失去信任的当下,这样的问题一笔带过,怎能让人信服?
有位网友说:“虽然我不擅长文本分析,一时间看不出什么漏洞,但这份通报给我的第一感觉就是不舒服。”为什么他会觉得不舒服?
第一是因为这篇通报在提到罗S宇时,强调说他成绩不好、情绪消极,给人一种“他就是因此自杀的,跟我们无关”的印象,却对自身责任闭口不提。
第二是在提到罗S宇的父母时,强调说他们提出了不合理的巨额赔偿、拒绝沟通、反复申请刑事复议,给人一种家属不懂事、无理取闹的印象,忽视了家属对调查失去信任的可能性。
第三,整篇通报经常出现“合理”“合法”“正常”等正向词汇,还有“不存在违法违规”“转换文字材料存在错误”“签名捺印真实有效”等肯定语气,看似专业,却暗藏着强化“自身无责”的逻辑,有种洗白文的既视感。
一份可信的通报,是为了回应民众关切的,理应传达“我们意识到问题严重性、愿意反思并推动改变”的情绪态度,而不是“我们很专业,一切都是因为你们不懂、你们误会、你们夸大”。
这种冷漠、充满技术性与防御性,缺乏对悲剧的同理与反思、毫无责任语言与换位思考的通报,与其说是通报,不如说是法院驳回起诉裁定书。连最基本的态度诚恳都做不到,怎能让人信服其内容呢?
8.通报虽说“科室在绩效分配中存在管理不规范问题,已责令医院整改,并对涉事科室主任、护士长等4人进行了严肃问责”,但却未公开说明如何整改、怎样问责。而且既已发现绩效流转经由研究生账户一事,通告是否应该说明有没有建立防止机制?有没有审计建议?后续的监督由谁落实?头疼医头脚疼医脚,这种“个案结案”式的整改与问责方式,不被信任是应该的。
9.目前所有的证据处理都由调查组独立完成,通报没有说明这些证据日后是否会公开,什么时候公开,媒体、组织与个人是否可以申请查看,能否参与数据比对。就目前这种“调查组—公众”的单向发布结构而言,缺乏“证据共享—公众复查—媒体校验”的完整循环,因此可信度大打折扣。
以上就是我认为的,为什么这篇通报无法让人信服的原因。反过来,也可以当作是如何写一篇让人信服的通报的简要指南。
老实说,在国内为这种事件写调查报告确实挺难的,若要实事求是,就不得不直面某些敏感话题。说瞎话吧,又容易漏洞百出,毕竟越是细节,越易于验证。那就只好退而求其次了,放弃调查报告,转为通告形式,前者是解释,容许反驳质疑,而后者则是告知,好好听着就行了。
中国医学界素有北协和,南湘雅的说法,今年却成了5月全国热议协和,6月热议湘雅。前几天,似乎所有人都在转发原湘雅医院实习医生罗帅宇的故事,从一开始转发罗的家属的举报内容起,很多人都坚信罗的自杀背后有巨大阴谋,不,不少人应该是坚信罗是“自杀”,不是自杀。
即使如今官方通告已经详细回应了此前网上热议的各个疑点,但似乎没说服多少人——从很多人这两天又转发罗父对通告的质疑,可窥一二。
可罗身前真的撞破了巨大的阴谋,以至于要被“自杀”吗?我个人持怀疑态度。
罗的遭遇为什么引发如此强烈的热议,显然是因为和之前的刘翔峰案扯上了关系。罗轻生发生在2024年5月8日,刘案宣判在2024年10月31日,于是就有了刘案调查期间,罗“被害”的联想。而罗是2021年考上湘雅的研究生,时间上也和刘有交集,更加让人容易相信这种联想。
但是这种联想即便没有如今的通告,也有很多逻辑漏洞,或者至少可以说是可疑之处。从时间上看,刘案宣判虽在罗轻生之后,但刘的吓人事迹早在2022年8月中旬就曝光于网络,也是在巨大的舆论压力下,2022年8月下旬,刘就因涉嫌严重违纪被调查。
除了10月31日这个宣判日期外,我没找到刘案的其它诉讼时间点。只是从22年开始调查,24年10月是宣判,合理的推测,罗出事时,刘案调查应该早就完成或者至少大部分已经完成。若如此,即便有所谓幕后黑手、大阴谋,又何必在此时去逼迫罗呢?
更何况从科室、资历看,刘案发前是创伤急救医学中心副主任,罗是肾脏移植方向的研究生,理论上二者工作交集并不会多。就算刘案背后有更大阴谋,罗又有多大概率能知晓?
调查通告也提供了更多细节,比如罗仅在2022年4月到刘所在科室轮转,且二人不同组,从入学起,罗与刘没有同台手术的记录。罗没有举报过刘,刘案调查期间,有关部门也未向罗了解过情况。
这些符合罗、刘二人当时的岗位背景特征。网民或许希望罗这个过早去世的年轻人是一位英雄,曾经揭发过刘的恶行。可是罗的人品不需要也不应通过虚构来论证——其实通告里的一个细节可以看出端倪:在出事前,罗最后的短信是提醒与自己私下换班的同学去上班。
抛开和刘案的“瓜葛”,罗的家属提出的举报内容,基本可以分类三条线,从冲击医学伦理底线的程度,个人认为可以如此排序:买卖器官,特别是指控买卖儿童器官(肾脏)(录音);钱没给到位,切除好的肠道(录音);给罗转账40多万,被认为是洗钱或封口费。
这三条里的第一条,买卖儿童肾脏,从现实角度就非常可疑。不知从何时起,中国社会噶腰子的传说泛滥成灾,从泰国偷肾,到缅甸摘器官,好像拿人的器官做移植和摘桃子是一个难度。可真相是肾脏移植这类手术并不简单,需要庞大的团队。哪能像录音里那样,随便和一个实习医生说,你去找几个。别说罗作为一个实习医生去哪里找,就算他能找到,后续呢?给谁配型?什么时候做手术,谁来做?这又不是菜场买个猪腰子,回家先放冰箱,得空再炒个腰花。
更不现实的是该录音被认为是在买卖儿童肾脏。录音里一口就是几岁男孩女孩各要几个。儿童肾脏移植很少,根据文献,美国每年大约1000例,欧洲约300例。
2014年一篇国内研究人员发表的论文显示从2001-10年,国内儿童肾脏移植最多的一年也仅为114例(2008年):
另一篇更接近当下的2020年论文,提到中国儿童肾脏移植最多的在上海、广州、郑州的三个医学中心——注意没有湘雅。而上述三地三个中心合在一起,2015-18年也只有286例:
湘雅怎么可能让一个实习医生去买卖12个儿童肾脏?通告里提到该录音实际为收集科研样本,反倒更加现实,也更为可信。
至于另一段说是“肠道是好的,钱不到位就切掉”,对话都是方言,关键的前半段我是一点都没听懂。懂湖南方言的可以自行判断通告给出的解读是否准确。需要注意,通告不仅说了实际录音内容是什么,还提到了明确的录音发生场景与对话医生身份,应该是挺有底气。
从通告来看,家属举报的材料里,唯一能证实湘雅有问题的是给罗的转账。但是3年给罗转账的30多万,绝大部分又由罗转给了原科室护士长,再分发给其他人,罗自己获得的只有3万多。
这些转账应该都有银行流水,想必罗的家人也能看到,不会有作假。从数额看,通告里说是绩效奖金,比较合理。只是通告并未详细解释为什么科室的绩效奖金要先发给罗,再转回到其他人。个人猜测可能是为了躲避税务,毕竟作为研究生,罗身前收入在整个科室里肯定是较低的一族,绩效奖金先发给他,缴税可能就少了。
通告同样未触及的是这种绩效奖金发放不规范的普遍性。我个太相信这种小聪明只有罗所在的科室想到了,完全有可能是某个医院甚至更多医院提升员工实际收入的普遍做法。
这虽然不如买卖器官洗钱那般劲爆,但或许更符合真相:某医院未必是从头到尾的恶,而是管理上的平庸混乱。
很多人看到刘翔峰的恶,会怀疑这样的恶背后必然是系统性的恶,必然有更大的阴谋才会包庇刘那么多年。可或许,刘的背后不是更大的阴谋,更大的恶,只是一个平庸混乱的土壤,允许他可以持续作恶。刘被“纵容”,未必是其他人也在做同样的事,或是分得了多少好处,而是多一事不如少一事。
回到罗案。其实当下的通告里给出了不少案发现场勘验、案件调查信息——包括罗的个人情况,判定罗是轻生,从这些信息看,却是基于证据而非阴谋。
罗的去世本身已是悲剧,只是如今这个悲剧还在进一步扩散。从网传的其父反驳通告看,罗的父母似乎处于创伤后应激的状态。罗死于阴谋,或许比罗自己选择离开人世,更容易被他们接受。
罗的家人们的处境固然令人同情,但网上众人,作为外人,同情不应以虚构现实为方式。否则,那是把一个悲剧变成闹剧。
参考资料
谁享了呢?
A survivor of Saturday's deadly attacks on two Minnesota lawmakers says she and her husband are both "incredibly lucky to be alive" after they were hit by 17 bullets.
State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were gunned down at their home early on Saturday morning, but lived. Melissa Hortman - the top Democratic legislator in the state House - and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed.
Yvette Hoffman said in a statement that she and her husband John were "devastated" by the Hortmans' deaths.
Police are hunting for the suspect, Vance Luther Boelter, who wore a latex mask and posed as an officer to shoot the victims at their homes in suburban Minneapolis, before escaping on foot.
Mrs Hoffman's statement was shared on Instagram by Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar.
"John is enduring many surgeries right now and is closer every hour to being out of the woods," Mrs Hoffman wrote.
"He took 9 bullet hits. I took 8 and we are both incredibly lucky to be alive.
"We are gutted and devastated by the loss of Melissa and Mark. We have no words. There is never a place for this kind of political hate."
Police have not disclosed the killer's motive.
A Facebook post from someone identifying as Mrs Hoffman's nephew said she had thrown herself on her daughter during the assassination attempt, "using her body as a shield to save her life".
According to the Minnesota Star Tribune, the daughter, Hope, is in her 20s and was born with spina bifida, which her father previously cited as motivating him to get into state politics.
On Sunday, police said they had found an unoccupied car linked to the suspect in Sibley County, about 50 miles (80km) from the murder scene.
The discovery of the black sedan was alerted to local residents' mobile phones in a message that said: "Suspect not located. Keep your doors locked and vehicles secured."
A cowboy hat, similar to what Boelter, 57, was believed to have been wearing, was found nearby.
Police also said on Sunday that Boelter's wife had been detained in a traffic stop along with three relatives in a car in the city of Onamia, more than 100 miles from the family home in the rural community of Green Isle, on Saturday morning.
Jenny Boelter was released without being taken into custody because she was co-operative, Drew Evans, of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, told a news conference on Sunday evening.
Police have extended the search over state lines to South Dakota and the FBI has added Boelter to its most-wanted list, issuing a $50,000 reward.
Both of the targeted lawmakers belonged to Minnesota's Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, which is affiliated with the national Democratic Party.
Authorities said they recovered a target list that included the names of state Democratic politicians from another vehicle used by the suspect.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, congresswoman Ilhan Omar, Klobuchar and Minnesota's other US senator, Tina Smith, were on the list – along with state Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, people familiar with the investigation told local media.
"Clearly, this is politically motivated," Klobuchar told NBC News' Meet the Press on Sunday morning.
President Donald Trump, a Republican, told ABC News on Sunday the attack was "a terrible thing".
Investigators say Boelter was disguised as a police officer when he carried out the attacks and had a vehicle that looked like a police car, equipped with flashing emergency lights.
The gunman first targeted the Hoffmans at their home in Champlin at around 02:00 local time on Saturday, authorities said.
Soon afterwards, Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed at their home in Brooklyn Park, eight miles away.
Officers arrived at the Hortmans' home and exchanged gunfire with the suspect at around 03:35. The suspect managed to flee, leaving behind his car, authorities said.
According to Boelter's CV, he has a background in security and military training.
The city of Brooklyn Park was silent on Sunday morning as the neighbourhood came to terms with a suspected political assassination on their doorstep.
A police car was parked outside the Hortmans' house and bright yellow caution tape surrounded the property.
Taha Abuisnaineh, who lives across the street, said he and his wife had known the family for more than 20 years.
"They were very nice neighbours in a very quiet neighbourhood," he told the BBC. "You don't see police activity in this neighbourhood. We are very shocked."
Two other nearby residents who did not want to be named said the suburban community was reeling.
"My next-door neighbour heard the shots," said one. "We've all been texting back and forth."
She and her husband described how they received an annual Christmas card from the Hortmans.
"What a big loss for Minnesota," she said.
In Sibley County, where the suspect's car was found, local resident Brian Liebhard also told the BBC of his shock.
"This guy needs to get caught," he said. "I don't agree with everything they [the two politicians] vote for, but this is sad - the guy went wacko."
US President Donald Trump may have called tariffs his favourite word in the dictionary. But when it comes to obsessions, business investment has got to be close.
As of last month, he said more than $12 trillion (£8.8tn) had been "practically committed" on his watch. "Nobody's ever seen numbers like we have," he said, crediting his agenda of tariffs, tax cuts and deregulation with making the difference.
If true, the figure would indeed be astonishing, potentially tripling the roughly $4tn in gross private investment the US reported all of last year.
So is a sudden gush of business spending setting the stage for a new golden economic era as Trump claims, or is it all theatre?
First things first: it is too early in Trump's tenure to have clear data to evaluate his claims. The US government publishes statistics on business investment only every three months.
January to March, which reflect two months of Trump's tenure, show a strong jump in business investment, albeit one that analysts said was partly due to data skewed by an earlier Boeing strike.
Other anecdotal and survey evidence indicates that Trump's impact on investment is far more incremental than he has claimed.
"We have hardly any data at this point and almost all the information we have is probably for investment projects that were planned and ordered last year," says economist Nick Bloom, a professor at Stanford University whose work looks at the impact of uncertainty on business investment.
"My guess is business investment is down a little bit, not massively... primarily because uncertainty is quite high and that will pause it."
Swiss pharmaceutical firm Roche, which announced plans to invest $50bn in the US over five years in April, is a good example.
Some of the projects included in the sum were already in the works.
Executives have also warned that some of Trump's ideas - in particular a proposal to overhaul drug pricing - could imperil its plans.
"The pharma industry would need to review their expenses including investments," the company said.
Trump typically makes his case pointing to investment promises made by high-profile firms such as Apple and Hyundai.
The White House keeps a running tally of those announcements, but at the start of June, it put total new investments at roughly $5.3tn - less than half the sum cited by Trump.
Even that figure is inflated.
Roughly a third of the 62 investments on the list include plans that were at least partially in the works before Trump took office. For example:
In reality, as of mid-May, new investment stemming from the announcements likely totalled something closer to $134bn, according to analysis by Goldman Sachs.
That sum shrank to as little as $30bn, not including investments backed by foreign governments, once researchers factored in the risk that some projects might fail to materialise, or would have happened anyway.
"Though not negligible economically, such increases would fall well short of the recent headlines," they wrote.
When pressed on the numbers, White House spokesman Kush Desai brushed off concerns that the administration's claims did not match reality.
"The Trump administration is using a multifaceted approach to drive investment into the United States... and no amount of pointless nitpicking and hairsplitting can refute that it's paying off," he said in a statement, which noted that many firms had explicitly credited Trump and his policies for shaping their plans.
The BBC approached more than two dozen firms with investments on the White House list.
Many did not respond or referred to previous statements.
Others acknowledged that work on some of their projects pre-dated the current administration.
Exaggeration by politicians and companies is hardly unexpected.
But the Trump administration's willingness to radically intervene in the economy, with tariffs and other changes, has given companies reason to pump up their plans in ways that flatter the president, says Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Petersen Institute of International Economics.
"A firm making an announcement is a way to get some current benefits, without necessarily being held to those [spending pledges] if the situation changes," he says. "There's a strong incentive for companies to provide as large a number as possible."
That's not to say that Trump policies aren't making a difference.
The tariff threats have "definitely been a catalyst" for pharmaceutical firms to plan more manufacturing in the US, a key source of sector profits, says Stephen Farrelly, global lead for pharma and healthcare at ING.
But, he adds, there are limits to what the threats can accomplish.
The pharma investments are set to unfold over time - a decade in some cases - in a sector that was poised for growth anyway.
And they have come from firms selling branded drugs - not the cheaper, generic medicines that many Americans rely on and that are made in China and India.
Mr Farrelly also warned that the sector's investments may be at risk over the long term, given uncertainty about the government's approach to tariffs, drug pricing and scientific research.
Overall, many analysts expect investment growth to slow in the US this year due to policy uncertainty.
Economist German Gutierrez of the University of Washington says Trump is right to want to boost investment in the US, but believes his emphasis on global competition misdiagnoses the problem.
His own work has found the decline in investment is due in part to industry consolidation. Now a few large firms dominate sectors, there is less incentive to invest to compete.
In addition, the kinds of investments firms are making are typically cheaper items such as software rather than machines and factories.
Tariffs, Prof Gutierrez says, are unlikely to address those issues.
"The way it's being done and the type of instruments they are using are not the best ways to achieve this goal. It just takes a lot more to really get this going," he says.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) will carry out a nationwide operation to target and jail predators who have sexually exploited children as part of a grooming gang, according to the Home Office.
It said the NCA would work with police forces to give victims whose cases were not progressed through the criminal justice system "long-awaited justice" and prevent more children from being hurt by such crimes.
It comes ahead of the release of a report by Baroness Louise Casey on Monday on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced on Saturday there would be a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs covering England and Wales.
The NCA operation will aim to imprison more perpetrators of child sexual abuse, protect more victims and improve how local police forces investigate such crimes, the Home Office said.
It will also aim to "put an end to the culture of denial in local services and authorities about the prevalence of this crime".
The Home Office said police had reopened more than 800 historic cases of group-based child sexual abuse since the home secretary had asked them in January to look again at cases that were "closed too early and victims denied justice".
"The vulnerable young girls who suffered unimaginable abuse at the hands of groups of adult men have now grown into brave women who are rightly demanding justice for what they went through when they were just children," Yvette Cooper said.
"Not enough people listened to them then," the home secretary added. "That was wrong and unforgivable. We are changing that now."
The Home Office said the national inquiry announced by the prime minister on Saturday would be able to "compel" investigations into "historic cases of grooming gang crimes".
That would ensure complaints and allegations of "mishandling, wrongdoing and cover-ups by police, agencies and other professionals and elected officials are brought to light and those responsible held accountable", the Home Office added.
It said the inquiry would report to a single chairperson and its panel would have the power to call witnesses to hearings.
The grooming gangs issue was thrust into the spotlight at the start of 2025, fuelled partly by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who had criticised Sir Keir for not calling a national inquiry.
A row between the two centred on high-profile cases where groups of men, mainly of Pakistani descent, were convicted of sexually abusing and raping predominantly young white girls in towns such as Rotherham and Rochdale.
On Saturday, Sir Keir said he had read an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Casey and would accept her recommendation for an inquiry covering England and Wales.
In January, the government stopped short of launching a statutory national inquiry intro grooming gangs despite the idea receiving support from some Labour MPs.
Instead, Cooper unveiled plans for five government-backed local inquiries - to be held in Oldham and four other area yet to be named.
She also announced a "rapid" three-month audit, led by Baroness Casey, into the data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse.
That report is expected to be published on Monday and Cooper is set to address the findings of the review in Parliament.
For months, the prime minister has faced criticism for not being willing to set up a national inquiry, with the Conservatives claiming they had forced him into a U-turn.
Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride told the Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme that the decision to launch the inquiry should have happened "far, far earlier".
Chancellor Rachel Reeves defended the decision to launch a national inquiry, telling the programme on Sunday that ministers "never dismissed the concerns of victims" of grooming gangs.
Up to 100 truckloads of Scotland's waste each day will be moved to England once a landfill ban comes in at the end of the year, the BBC's Disclosure has been told.
The Scottish government is banning "black bag" waste from being buried in landfill from 31 December but acknowledges that there are not currently enough incinerators to meet the extra demand.
The ban, which covers biodegradable municipal waste (BMW), will apply to pretty much all domestic and commercial waste.
Scottish ministers said any export of waste should only be viewed as a "short-term solution".
The ban was originally meant to be in place by 2021 but was delayed because of the Covid pandemic and concerns that businesses were not ready.
It will see a string of materials banned from landfill, including non-recyclable black bag municipal waste, wood, textiles, paper and food.
Such biodegradable waste breaks down to produce methane, a greenhouse gas that is around 28 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
Some inert material, such as ash from incinerators and building rubble, will still be allowed at landfill sites.
The Scottish government wants to stop traditional black bag waste being buried in the ground by increasing recycling rates and using more energy-from-waste incinerators.
However, four years on from the date of the original plan, environmental consultants have concluded that hundreds of thousands of tonnes of rubbish still have no home.
More waste is already being sent to incinerators - or energy-from-waste sites - but not enough of them will be ready by the 31 December deadline.
It is leaving a "capacity gap" which is estimated by Zero Waste Scotland to be 600,000 tonnes in the first year of the ban.
Some councils and commercial waste companies have been approaching rubbish handling operators in England to negotiate "bridging contracts".
Because most incinerators run with very little spare capacity, it would mean sending Scotland's excess waste to be landfilled in England.
The UK government also wants to eliminate biodegradable waste from landfill and it announced a consultation earlier this year but there is currently no policy in place south of the border.
David Balmer, a waste expert from ERS Remediation, told the Disclosure programme: "You're looking at the equivalent of between 80 and 100 trucks minimum running seven days a week to take this material to a facility in England or abroad."
And there are concerns that logistically the transportation might not be fully achievable.
Alasdair Meldrum, director of waste management consultants Albion Environmental, said: "We've probably not got the trucks and vehicles to actually move it."
He added: "You've got the environmental impact of all that transport, it's nonsensical, but the people who have invested in incinerators are saying 'we've invested all this money because of the ban'.
"So, we're stuck in a really hard place."
While the reason for the ban is to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases coming from landfill sites, the short-term impact will be a rise in emissions from the fleet of heavy vehicles taking the waste to sites in Cumbria, Northumberland or potentially as far away as Manchester.
The long-term strategy had been to reduce the amount of "black bag" waste households generate, meaning less would have to be incinerated.
But domestic recycling rates have barely budged in a decade.
In 2013, Scottish homes recycled 41.6% of their waste but by 2023 that figure had increased by less than 2 percentage points to 43.5%.
The figures for England and Northern Ireland are slightly better but for Wales it is a massive 64.7%.
In Scotland, there are currently eight operational incinerators across the country.
Until 2022 there was a rush to build more but the Scottish government put the brakes on development fearing there would end up being an overcapacity.
The only additional ones which will now be built have already entered the planning process.
While incinerators are still responsible for a significant amount of greenhouse gases, experts say they are about a third less environmentally damaging than the methane caused by materials rotting in landfill sites.
As an additional benefit, they also produce some electricity and some recover heat to warm neighbouring homes and buildings.
Colin Church, who chaired an independent review into incineration in Scotland, believes the shift to incinerators has been the right choice.
He told Disclosure: "It's probably the best thing that we can do with waste, with our current levels of technology, and so capturing some energy from that is a good idea."
Environmental groups are concerned that contracts which guarantee waste being delivered by councils to incinerators will put off local authorities from investing in more recycling.
Kim Pratt, from Friends of the Earth Scotland, described the current waste management system as broken.
She said: "Incineration in Scotland is out of control.
"There have been incinerators built in Aberdeen, in Falkirk, there's one this year that's going to be built in North Ayrshire as well.
"All of these incinerators have communities locally who are opposing them."
Waste campaigner Laura Young said: "One of the worries is these are expensive facilities – expensive to run, big contracts involved in this – and it means that we need to utilise them.
"We built them so we need to use them."
The Scottish government points to a range of initiatives it has launched in recent years to tackle household waste and create a more "circular" economy, where material are reused over and over.
These include bans on single use vapes, forthcoming charges on disposable cups and a planned deposit-return scheme for cans and plastic bottles.
It said the "vast majority" of councils had alternative measures in place ahead of the landfill ban coming into force but they will "work closely with local authorities and sector bodies to monitor and review any related issues which may arise as the date of the ban approaches".
The Scottish government added: "Any export of waste should only ever be viewed as a short-term solution."
US singer Chris Brown has kicked off his UK tour in Manchester, days before he is due back in court after being arrested in the city last month.
The Grammy-winning star performed to thousands of fans at Manchester's Co-op Live arena on Sunday, with a string of stadium dates to follow in other cities.
On Friday, he will appear in court in London for the latest hearing after he was charged with grievous bodily harm over an alleged assault in a nightclub in 2023. The 36-year-old, who is free on £5m bail, has not yet been asked to enter a plea.
"Thank you for coming and supporting me," he said to fans in Manchester. "And thank you to the jail," he joked. "It was really nice."
A video montage was shown of his career highs and lows, including brief clips of TV news footage from outside the Manchester court after he was arrested, which was met by a supportive roar from his loyal fans.
The star is accused of inflicting an "unprovoked attack" on a music producer with a tequila bottle at a nightclub in London while on his last UK tour in 2023.
He was arrested when he returned to the country a month ago, when detectives from London's Metropolitan Police travelled to the hotel in which he was staying in Salford, Greater Manchester.
He was held in custody for almost a week, before being released after agreeing to pay a £5m security fee to the court.
A security fee is a financial guarantee to ensure a defendant returns to court. Mr Brown could be asked to forfeit the money if he breaches bail conditions.
However, the judge agreed that the singer could go ahead with his tour as part of his bail conditions, and he played the first night in Amsterdam last weekend.
The singer's Breezy Bowl XX tour is marking 20 years in the music industry. He has had 19 singles in the UK top 10 over that time, including number one hits Turn Up The Music and Freaky Friday.
Last week, he won the prize for best male R&B/pop artist at the BET Awards in Los Angeles.
After performing a second night in Manchester on Monday, he will move on to Cardiff's Principality Stadium on Thursday.
He will then appear at court on Friday with his co-defendant, Omololu Akinlolu, a 38-year-old who performs under the name HoodyBaby, also from the US.
After the hearing, Mr Brown is scheduled to play at London's Tottenham Hotspur Stadium on Saturday and Sunday, before further stadium shows in Birmingham and Glasgow, and two more arena dates in Manchester.
A chemical that scientists worry might have an impact on human reproduction has been found in rivers across the UK.
Researchers from York University analysed samples from 32 rivers in all the UK's 4 nations and found traces of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at 98% of the test locations.
TFA is what's known as a "forever chemical" which means that it breaks down extremely slowly in nature, and so accumulates over time.
As with other "forever chemicals", also known as PFAS, just how much a threat to human health and at what concentrations is still being researched.
But scientists in Germany say having looked at the impact of TFA on animals they want it to be classed as toxic for reproduction.
TFA forms when synthetic chemicals from other "forever chemicals" such as those found in pesticides and refrigerants are partially broken down.
"This molecule (TFA) is everywhere," Alistair Boxall, professor of Environmental Science at the University of York who carried out the research, told the BBC. "We will all be drinking water containing TFA every day - so we'll be exposed throughout our lifetime. It's that long-term, low level exposure that is the big concern."
This new study was funded by environmental charity Fidras and involved sampling in 5 rivers in Wales, 3 in Northern Ireland 14 in Scotland and 10 in the north of England. The highest concentration was recorded on the River Kelvin in Glasgow.
The River Ness, which flows from Loch Ness to the Moray Firth, was the only river sampled not to show traces of TFA.
Recent studies in the EU have found TFA to be widespread, including in wine and food, human blood and breast milk.
Authorities in Germany have been looking with interest at rising TFA levels in drinking water. In the last two decades its concentrations have gone up fourfold and researchers have been trying to establish what impact - if any - it might have on human health.
Citing scientific studies that showed TFA affecting rabbit and rat foetuses, the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA) has applied to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) for TFA to be classified as toxic for reproduction and harmful to the environment. That could eventually lead to recommendations being made in the EU as to how products containing TFA should be controlled.
"Currently, there are no expected adverse health effects from consuming water or food contaminated with TFA," said Andreas Hensel, president of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). "The new classification is an important step in preparing further measures to ensure that this remains the case in the future".
There aren't currently any rules or regulations in place to identify or reduce the concentrations of TFA either in the environment or in drinking water supplies in the UK.
But aware of concerns, the Drinking Water Inspectorate, which monitors and regulates drinking water quality in England and Wales, has just commissioned its own research. It will look at how much TFA is already in drinking water and what risk - if any - it poses.
"The information signposted by the University of York suggests that TFA can be formed from the degradation of PFAS-containing pesticides," Ann Bunting, Principal Inspector of the Drinking Water Inspectorate, told the BBC. "It is important that the fate of pesticides and other chemicals in the environment is understood, in order to protect drinking water sources."
A spokesperson for Water UK, which represents the UK's water companies, told the BBC: "We want to see PFAS, including TFA, banned and the development of a national plan to remove it from the environment which should be paid for by manufacturers."
The manhunt for a suspect in deadly attacks on Minnesota lawmakers continued into its second day on Sunday, as police extended the search over state lines to nearby South Dakota.
Minnesota state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed in their home early Saturday morning .
Another lawmaker, state Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were also shot multiple times and injured.
Police are searching for Vance Luther Boelter, a 57-year-old who they say impersonated a police officer while carrying out the attacks. Federal authorities announced a $50,000 reward for information.
Both lawmakers belonged to Minnesota's Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, which is affiliated with the national Democratic Party.
Senator Hoffman and his wife underwent surgery on Saturday, and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said he was "cautiously optimistic they will survive this assassination attempt."
"Clearly, this is politically motivated," US Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat who represents Minnesota, told NBC News' Meet the Press on Sunday morning.
Authorities said they recovered a target list from a vehicle used by the suspect that reportedly contained the names of several Democratic politicians who supported abortion rights, as well as abortion providers. The office of Tina Smith, Minnesota's other US Senator, confirmed to BBC News she was on the list.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) added Boelter to their most wanted list, and issued a $50,000 reward for information leading to his arrest and conviction.
"It is really not about any of us, it is this incredible woman that we lost, Melissa Hortman," Klobuchar said. "We think about her family today."
"I just wish everyone in the world political world knew this woman like we know her in Minnesota. Loved by Democrats and Republicans," Klobuchar said.
President Donald Trump is aware of the situation, but it was not clear if he would reach out to the state's leadership about the attack.
Governor Walz, a Democrat, was presidential candidate Kamala Harris' running mate in the 2024 election.
Despite the frantic search under way across the region, the city of Brooklyn Park, where Rep. Hortman lived, was still and silent on Sunday morning as the neighbourhood came to terms with the deadly attack.
A police car stood guard outside the Hortman's house, and bright yellow caution tape surrounded the home, now an active crime scene.
Taha Abuisnaineh, who lives across the street, said he and his wife had known the Hortmans for more than 20 years.
"They were very nice neighbours in a very quiet neighbourhood," he told the BBC. "You don't see police activity in this neighbourhood. We are very shocked."
Two other nearby residents who did not want to be named said this suburban community was reeling as news spread of the attack.
"My next-door neighbour heard the shots," said one. "We've all been texting back and forth."
She and her husband described how they received an annual Christmas card from the Hortmans - and recounted how Representative Hortman got along with local Republican politicians.
"What a big loss for Minnesota," she said.
© Wheeling, W.Va. Fire Department
© Bryan Anselm for The New York Times
American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, a longtime powerhouse member of the Democratic National Committee, is leaving the DNC, according to a letter obtained by POLITICO.
Weingarten, who has been a member of the DNC for 23 years, wrote to DNC Chair Ken Martin that she had fundamental disagreements with him.
"I appear to be out of step with the leadership you are forging," the union leader said in the letter dated June 5, "and I do not want to be the one who keeps questioning why we are not enlarging our tent and actively trying to engage more of our communities."
Weingarten's departure is the latest sign that the party is still embroiled in factional disputes, and it is likely to only further finger-pointing and intensify criticism among Democrats. Weingarten has defended former DNC vice chair David Hogg, who was ousted last week from his post on the committee, as he has come under fire over his decision to fund primary challenges against Democrats that he sees as ineffective in safe-blue districts.
Weingarten also supported another candidate to lead the DNC, Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler, during the party’s election earlier this year. When Martin took over, he removed Weingarten from her position on the influential DNC’s rules and bylaws committee, which she had sat on since 2009.
A spokesperson for Weingarten said that when she told AFT members the news of her departure, “Randi has gotten applause" from them, “much to her dismay as a proud Dem.”
Martin has been criticized by some Democrats after he told DNC officers and staff in a recent private conversation that Hogg had “essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to” and “I don’t know if I wanna do this anymore,” as POLITICO first reported. But many other Democrats, including DNC officers, have stood by Martin and bashed Hogg as divisive.
The infighting among Democrats comes as they are trying to rebuild their party in the wake of their 2024 loss.
Martin did not respond to a request for comment.
© J. Scott Applewhite/AP
© Eric Lee/The New York Times