Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today — 10 December 2025News

The Challenges to Europe’s Security Go Beyond Trump’s Lack of Support

10 December 2025 at 18:03
Europeans find themselves stranded between hostile powers, Russia and the United States, with key decisions looming over the future of Ukraine.

© Laetitia Vancon for The New York Times

A convoy of German armored vehicles passed through Frankenberg, Germany, en route to Poland in 2024 for NATO military exercises.

Fed Divisions Will Cloud Interest Rate Decision at Final 2025 Meeting

10 December 2025 at 18:03
The central bank is poised to lower interest rates on Wednesday even as a growing chorus of officials urge caution.

© Caroline Gutman for The New York Times

Jerome H. Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, has been able corral his colleagues to move as a cohesive group under complex economic conditions, but this meeting could be especially challenging.

Netflix and Paramount Battle for Warner Bros. — Have We Seen This Show Before?

10 December 2025 at 06:09
The tug of war for Warner Bros. Discovery echoes an earlier clash of media titans.

© Aleksey Kondratyev for The New York Times

The contest between Paramount and Netflix for Warner Bros. Discovery is a mirror image of a struggle decades ago for control of Paramount.

The Latest Trump Resistance Is Within the Indiana G.O.P.

10 December 2025 at 18:02
Some Republicans in the Indiana Senate have resisted a new congressional map despite lobbying from the White House and threats of political consequences.

© Kaiti Sullivan for The New York Times

The fight over redistricting has intensified in the Indiana legislature in recent weeks.

Democrats Make a Fresh Push to Win State Legislatures

10 December 2025 at 18:03
The arm of the party that focuses on statehouses is targeting hundreds of seats and more than 40 chambers, according to a strategy memo, reflecting Democrats’ new optimism.

© Go Nakamura/Reuters

The Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix. The state is one of several with Republican-controlled legislatures that Democrats are trying to flip.

Democrats Press to Expand House Map, Targeting 5 New G.O.P. Seats

10 December 2025 at 19:00
Four of the additions are for districts where President Trump won handily, but Democrats are feeling emboldened by election outcomes this fall.

© Eric Lee/The New York Times

The seat of Representative Darrell Issa, a Republican whose California district Democrats redrew to lean Democratic, is among those added to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s list of “districts in play.”

Brad Lander Will Run for House Seat with Mamdani’s Support

10 December 2025 at 18:03
Brad Lander, the New York City comptroller, will run for a House seat in Brooklyn and Manhattan, challenging Representative Daniel Goldman in the Democratic primary.

© Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Brad Lander, the New York City comptroller, will be endorsed by Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani and other notable leaders of the Democratic left, including Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.

Ryan Coogler on ‘Sinners,’ Chadwick Boseman and Why He Declined to Join the Academy

10 December 2025 at 18:01
The director on what he’s thinking of post-“Sinners,” how the loss of Chadwick Boseman affected him and why he turned down the invitation to join the academy.

© Ariel Fisher for The New York Times

Coogler said he couldn’t engage with his work “as the kid whose dreams were to come to Hollywood and make movies. I have to engage with it as a professional shepherd of the story.”

Supreme Court Hears Death Penalty Case on Intellectual Disability

10 December 2025 at 18:04
The case involves an Alabama man who challenged his death sentence after a murder conviction because of his varying results in a series of I.Q. tests.

© Eric Lee for The New York Times

Two decades ago, the Supreme Court barred the execution of people with mental disabilities as a violation of the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. But the court’s composition has changed since then.

A New Governor Inherits a Misconduct Investigation Into the State Police

10 December 2025 at 16:00
A prolonged slowdown in traffic enforcement by New Jersey troopers coincided with an uptick in fatal crashes. The pattern remains under investigation as Mikie Sherrill prepares to take office.

© Kriston Jae Bethel for The New York Times

Governor-elect Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey has told the head of the State Police that he will not be reappointed.

A Cinnabon Worker Was Fired for a Racist Slur. Her Supporters Have Raised $130,000.

10 December 2025 at 18:03
On a video that went viral, the worker, who is white, can be seen calling two Black customers an epithet. The campaign to give her money echoes the reaction to a similar incident this year.

© Johnathon Kelso for The New York Times

Poll: Here’s what Americans’ affordability problems look like

10 December 2025 at 18:55

Americans are struggling with affordability pressures that are squeezing everything from their everyday necessities to their biggest-ticket expenses.

Nearly half of Americans said they find groceries, utility bills, health care, housing and transportation difficult to afford, according to The POLITICO Poll conducted last month by Public First. The results paint a grim portrait of spending constraints: More than a quarter, 27 percent, said they have skipped a medical check-up because of costs within the last two years, and 23 percent said they have skipped a prescription dose for the same reason.

The strain is also reshaping how Americans spend their free time. More than a third — 37 percent — said they could not afford to attend a professional sports event with their family or friends, and almost half — 46 percent — said they could not pay for a vacation that involves air travel.

While President Donald Trump gave himself an “A-plus-plus-plus-plus-plus” grade on the economy during an exclusive interview with POLITICO’s Dasha Burns, the poll results underscore that voters’ financial anxieties have become deeply intertwined with their politics, shaping how they evaluate the White House’s response to rising costs.

Trump insists that “prices are all coming down,” as he told Burns, but the results pose a challenge for Trump and the Republican Party ahead of the 2026 midterms, with even some of the president’s own voters showing signs that their patience with high costs is wearing thin.

POLITICO reporters covering a variety of beats have spent the past few weeks poring over the poll results. We asked some of them to unpack the data for us and tell us what stood out most. Here’s what they said:

TARIFFS

The big observation: Trump has struggled to persuade even parts of his base to accept the idea that tariffs will pay off over time. A minority — 36 percent — of Trump voters said tariffs are hurting the economy now but will benefit the U.S. over time.

Even fewer said the strategy is already working: 22 percent of voters who cast their ballots for Trump in 2024 said tariffs are helping the U.S. economy both now and in the long term, according to the poll conducted in November.

What really stood out: Staunch supporters of the president were roughly twice as likely as other Republicans to believe tariffs are a net positive already, although large shares of both groups still said they view them as harmful. Even people who self-identify as MAGA Republicans were split on one of the president’s favorite tools: 27 percent of those MAGA voters said tariffs are boosting the economy both now and in the long term, while 21 percent of them said tariffs are damaging in both the short and long term.

What now? Tariffs represent more than an economic tool to the president, who argues the levies have helped him negotiate peace deals around the globe and nudged corporations to bring investment to American shores.

Trump has frequently urged Americans to be patient with his tariff strategy, much of which could be cut down by the Supreme Court in the coming months, but it remains a delicate political issue when a lot of voters may be more concerned about their everyday expenses rather than a broader global calculus.

– Ari Hawkins

COLLEGE COSTS

The big observation: The tuition is too damn high. Only a quarter of Americans think college is worth the money, regardless of party, The POLITICO Poll found. Overall, 62 percent of Americans said college isn’t worth it because it either costs too much or doesn’t provide enough benefits — a belief supported most by 18- to 24-year-olds and those aged 65 and up.

The income gap between Americans with college degrees and those with high school degrees widened over the last two decades. And recent research from the U.S. Census Bureau found the median income of households headed by someone with a bachelor’s degree or higher last year was more than double the median income of those with householders with a high school degree but no college.

What really stood out: Despite that economic divide, more than half of people surveyed who graduated from college supported the idea that higher education is either too expensive or not sufficiently useful.

What now? Both former President Joe Biden and Trump have tried to respond to this frustration, pitching efforts to boost technical education programs and federal support for professional degrees in lieu of 4-year universities.

The Trump administration has pressed universities to control their costs — attempting to tie those efforts to the schools’ access to federal funds — but also shed the student loan forgiveness programs Biden championed.

– Juan Perez Jr. 

FOOD PRICES

The big observation: Trump attributed his 2024 victory over Biden partly to his pledge to bring down the cost of everyday goods like eggs. But a year later, Americans are more worried about being able to afford groceries than the rising cost of housing or health care, according to The POLITICO Poll.

Half of those surveyed said they find it difficult to pay for food. And a majority, 55 percent, blame the Trump administration for the high prices — even as the White House emphasizes its focus on affordability and the economy ahead of the midterm.

What really stood out: As affordability increasingly becomes a political flashpoint, with Democrats eager to seize on GOP vulnerabilities, a meaningful share of Trump’s own voters — 22 percent — blame the president for the high grocery costs.

What now? Balancing those concerns with a president who has put tariffs on goods imported from all over the world is a challenge for Trump’s administration — and an issue Democrats are certain to keep prodding.

Rachel Shin

HOUSING

The big observation: Concerns about housing costs — which have represented a major share of inflation in recent years — eclipsed those for health care, utilities, commuting expenses and child care, The POLITICO Poll found.

Only grocery costs bested the issue across more than a dozen expenses when respondents were asked to identify the items they find “the most challenging” to afford. The high cost of housing is also coming through in other metrics: The median age of first-time homebuyers climbed to a record high of 40 this year, according to the National Association of Realtors.

What really stood out: The POLITICO Poll found that homebuying and rental costs were of particular concern for young and Hispanic adults, two constituencies whose support for Trump last year helped Republicans regain control of Washington. There’s also an interesting wrinkle among GOP voters. While only 10 percent of those who identified as MAGA Republicans believe the Trump administration is responsible for the housing costs they see as unfavorable (52 percent of them point to the Biden administration), that figure was three times higher for non-MAGA Republican respondents.

What now? Those surveyed spread the blame for high housing costs across the Trump and Biden administrations, state and local governments and private landlords. But it's Republicans who have to protect their hold on Washington heading into the midterms while the president generally dismissed affordability this week as “a hoax that was started by Democrats.”

– Cassandra Dumay 

HEALTH CARE COSTS

The big observation: Nearly half of American adults find it difficult to afford health care, according to The POLITICO Poll. Health care ranked as the No. 3 cost concern for respondents.

Democrats are pushing to extend pandemic-era enhanced Affordable Care Act premium tax credits, which are set to expire at the end of the year. If they end, prices will skyrocket for many Americans who buy insurance through the Obamacare marketplace. Democrats, who have struggled since Trump’s victory to coalesce around a campaign message, are banking on health care costs and other affordability concerns being a winning issue for them in the midterms.

What really stood out: The divide between MAGA and non-MAGA. While 84 percent of people who identified as MAGA Republicans said they trusted the GOP to bring down the cost of health care for everyday Americans (7 percent of which actually trusted the Democratic Party more on this issue), 49 percent of non-MAGA Republicans felt the same way. And nearly a quarter — 24 percent — of the non-MAGA respondents put their faith in Democrats on this issue.

What now? While poll respondents overall said they were more likely to trust Democrats to bring down health care costs, the overall split may not be concerning to Republicans running for reelection: 42 percent favored Democrats on the issue, compared with 33 percent favoring Republicans. The question becomes whether the non-MAGA Republicans can be persuaded to break ranks, or undecided voters are wooed.

– Sophie Gardner 

© Illustration by Anna Wiederkehr/POLITICO (source images via Getty)

那些原本是废话的常识|每人每月发1.7万元、向富豪征收遗产税,该国人民都拒绝了

10 December 2025 at 18:02

file

当地时间11月30日,瑞士在公投中以78%对22%的压倒性多数否决了旨在对超级富豪征收50%遗产税的提案。

这项由瑞士极左翼青年社会主义者党发起的提案,原计划对超过5000万瑞士法郎(约合4.4亿元人民币)的遗产与赠与资产引入50%的联邦税,并将所得收入专项用于气候相关支出(包括建筑节能改造、新能源开发等)。公投前,瑞士联邦政府、商业团体和高净值人士就已普遍提出反对态度,警告其可能损害瑞士作为国际财富中心的吸引力。

有人或许会觉得奇怪:有钱人反对这事儿很正常,可提案若落实,仅仅涉及大约2500名瑞士富人,只占该国人口的0.03%,而这次公投的投票率为43%。公投结果如此悬殊,说明绝大多数普通人也不看好这事儿。

在那些崇尚“劫富济贫”的人眼中,对富人课以重税理所应当且正义,虽然提案称这部分税收会专项用于气候相关支出,但富人能把它扛起来,普通人未来就不会有类似征收,政府财政支出也能省下来一部分并用之于民,怎么瑞士人就不乐意呢?

越是缺乏商业传统的地方就越仇富,这是因为一旦缺乏商业传统,富人的发家之路与权力牵扯不清的可能性就大增,普通人因为这些灰色地带的遮蔽,对真正商业体系、契约精神的认知程度也很低,两方面互相作用,就会产生对富人的敌视。但在瑞士,这种现象并不存在。

瑞士人反对向富人征收50%的高额遗产税,当然有利益因素的考量。目前全球经济体对富豪群体的税收政策存在分化,比如阿联酋的迪拜和阿布扎比,还有新加坡等都以税收优惠和宽松监管吸引富人。其中新加坡通过修订《所得税法》下的税收豁免计划,为单一家族办公室(SFO)提供管理财富和投资收益的税收激励,迪拜也通过税收优惠实现人口的迅速增长。南欧的意大利和西班牙等国家则倾向于加大富人的税负。博弈无处不在,今年法国社会党就曾提出对净资产超过1亿欧元的个人征收2%的最低税率,但法国议会于10月否决此方案,其后还推翻了对超过1000万欧元财富征收3%税收的另一份提案。

采用宽松政策吸引富人,当然是看中了富人的钱袋子。在这方面,瑞士一向是“行家”。就算对金融毫不熟悉的人,也在影视剧里见识过“瑞士银行”的出镜频率,美剧里的富豪、港剧里的大鳄,在瑞士银行有账户简直就是标配。可以说,瑞士是无数离岸资产的合法温床,堪称“避险天堂”。

数据显示,瑞士每百万居民拥有超过九位亿万富翁,这一密度是西欧国家平均水平的五倍,瑞士最富有的300位居民总财富高达8500亿瑞士法郎。能够成为富人聚集地,正是因为政策。外国富人在瑞士可享受特殊税收条款,允许在未完全披露所有资产的情况下完成纳税。2023年,瑞士税收占国内GDP的比例,在经合组织(OECD)38个成员国中仅排第31位。

如果向富人征收50%高额遗产税的提案真的在公投中通过,会带来一连串负面效果:很多准备来瑞士的富人可能会转向宽松的阿联酋与新加坡,目前身在瑞士的富人可能会选择移居他国,毕竟有钱人的流动更容易,有无数办法优化税务问题。

这就很可能出现一个结果:这头在富人身上多收了点税,那头一群富人直接选择走人,原先的大笔财产税直接归零,失去的很可能与新增的抵消,甚至造成瑞士整体税收下降。瑞士联邦委员会测算显示,若按此提案征税,理论上可获25-50亿瑞士法郎收入。但以目前制度,在瑞士大多数州,财产税税率采用累进式,资产越多,税率就越高,瑞士最富的10%群体已贡献总财产税的86%之多。如果顶级富豪出现离境潮,瑞士的财产税损失显而易见。

img

所以,公投结果一出来,有瑞士金融业人士就盛赞“瑞士人的常识占了上风”,瑞士的商业中心地位和声誉也得以保全。

利益考量并非全部,瑞士人的理性也并非仅此一次。

说起公投,很多人会第一时间联想到“民粹”,认为不靠谱。但作为世界上最爱公投的国家,瑞士和“民粹”二字并不沾边,反而诠释着何为理性。

瑞士有直接民主的传统,“联邦民众倡议”制度保障任何瑞士公民都拥有发起意图修改法律的全民公投权利,前提是要在18个月内攒够至少10万个有效签名。瑞士人口数量为800多万,10万签名的门槛不算高,因此每年都起码有几次全民公投。只要多数人投出赞成票,并且多数州为赞成方,达到了双重多数标准,就可成功修订法律。

公投门槛这么低,肯定有人会担心滥用,觉得瑞士会天下大乱,但这显然低估了瑞士人的普遍理性。

公投的定义是指公民就被提议之事案,表明赞成与否时所举行之投票,是一种直接民主制。与广泛使用的代议制相比,公投处于补充地位,但一旦动用,所谋多为大事要事。

瑞士人是公投先行者,早在19世纪中期就已开始尝试全民公投,从1848年至今已经进行过六百多次公投,超过世界上其他所有国家公投次数的总和。

许多人对公投的反感,是因为他们认为公投会形成“多数人的暴政”,形同闹剧。历史上也确实出现过值得深深警惕的全民公投,比如希特勒就喜欢这一套。1936年,希特勒将国会改选与“恢复民族荣耀及国家主权”的公投一并举行,投票率高达99%,纳粹党获得了98.8%的支持率。1938年,希特勒又以全民公投方式并吞奥地利,支持率达到99.08%,有人正是就此得出“公投制造民粹”的结论。

也许正因为希特勒的阴影,在自由主义底蕴深厚的英国,二战后曾有不少反对公投之声。如1945年,首相丘吉尔提出针对是否继续战时联合政府举行全民公决,工党领袖克艾德礼明确反对,认为全民公决违反英国民主传统,是专制可利用的工具,后来的撒切尔夫人同样如此认为。

但这种判断偷换了概念,即将“全民公投”等同于“独裁者控制下的全民公投”。但实际上,宪政制度下的公投,即使有政党政治左右,即使也有舆论引导,但充其量是一种潜移默化式的诱导,不具有强制性。

而且,不应低估宪政制度下的民众智商,也不能滥用“民粹”一词。

2016年,瑞士曾有一次公投引发热议,主题是“无条件基本收入”,即针对瑞士政府是否每月给瑞士成年人发放2500瑞士法郎(当时约合1.7万元人民币)、给儿童发放625瑞士法郎(约合4000多元人民币)这一问题进行公投,最终76.9%的选民对该项提案说不,26个州也全部表示反对。

这个结果在许多中国人看来简直不可思议,政府每个月给你白发钱,简直是天上掉馅饼的好事,可是大多数瑞士人都表示拒绝,这是不是疯了?

这甚至不是瑞士人第一次拒绝“馅饼”。2012年,瑞士人以67%的反对率拒绝将原本4周的带薪假期提高至6周,2014年,瑞士人以76%的反对率否决了每小时22瑞士法郎的最低工资标准。反对者们认为,无论最低工资标准、延长带薪假期还是直接发钱,都会腐蚀年轻人,使之丧失学习与工作的动力,不利于社会的长久发展。

按照某些人对“民粹”的理解,上述几个公投理应获得超高支持率才是。可瑞士人的选择一点也不“民粹”,觉悟之高实在让人感慨。这显然与国民素质和公投传统有关,频繁公投多少磨练了瑞士人的责任感和眼界,从而形成良性循环。

瑞士并非历史上最早进行公投的地方,历史公认的首次公投是法国大革命时期的阿维尼翁公投,在当时的15.3万名投票者中,超过10万人支持阿维尼翁脱离教皇控制,同时并入法国。后来,美国总统威尔逊正是基于阿维尼翁公投所创造的“独立公投”概念,在一战后提出“民族自决”。

同样在瑞士产生公投之前的还有1845年的德克萨斯公投,公投结果为德克萨斯脱离墨西哥,加入美国。1846年,非洲大陆上的利比里亚发起独立公投,52%的投票者选择独立。

如今以高福利著称的斯堪的纳维亚半岛也是热衷公投的地区。1905年,瑞典-挪威举行解体公投,以99.95%的惊人支持率实现解体,诞生了瑞典和挪威这两个独立国家。作为独立国家的瑞典,1922年以来曾发起六次公投,议题涵盖禁酒、改变驾驶方向、以政府税收资助退休金、核能发电、加入欧盟和采用欧元等。不过瑞典的公投为咨询性质,不具约束力,议会也未必按完全按照投票结果制订政策。1944年,冰岛举行独立公投,支持率同样达到了惊人的99.5%。

二战后,亚非拉大陆的独立公投屡见不鲜,如1958年的几内亚公投、1962年的阿尔及利亚公投、1964年的津巴布韦公投、1970年的巴林公投等,支持率都极高。但最有意思的公投来自于欧洲,而且与英国有关。1964年,“地中海心脏”马耳他举行独立公投,但独立支持率仅为54.5%,可算是险胜,这是因为马耳他的前宗主国是英国,民众担心离开英国后自己会变穷。

进入90年代后,因为东欧剧变、巴尔干硝烟,独立公投此起彼伏。如前苏联的各加盟共和国便相继举行独立公投并成为独立国家,仅1991年便诞生了亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆、爱沙尼亚、格鲁吉亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、乌克兰、土库曼斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦等新生国家。同年的斯洛文尼亚独立公投也开启了前南斯拉夫解体的序幕。

此后,分离主义的独立公投越来越多。1980年和1995年,魁北克两次举行公投,决定是否脱离加拿大独立,均未成功。1991年和2014年,克里米亚地区两次举行全民公投,决定地区归属。2008年,巴斯克地区独立公投。该公投被西班牙政府阻止并取消。

img

如果从历史上公投的频密度和具体效果来看,将之视为“相对多数人的暴政”实在站不住脚。有人将公投的坏处归结为“谁也不能确定自己能赢”,可这个理由只需一句话就能推翻——“谁也不能确定自己一定有道理”。

之前英国的脱欧公投就是个例子,当时结果公布后,我听到不少这样的说法:“连英国这种民主积淀如此深厚、国民素质相对较高的国家,搞起公投来都得到了一个人们不想看到的结果,可见公投绝不等于民主,甚至成为多数人的暴政。如果在民粹主义盛行的国家,公投后果更会不堪设想”,并认为“民主绝不是简单的一人一票,公投这种‘极端民主’行不通”。

这些说法都假设了一个前提,即“留欧好,脱欧不好”,所以公投的结果肯定有问题,进而推导出公投不是真正的民主,也不适合地球。这种预设立场的思维方式显然缺乏逻辑,而且“民粹主义”这一概念的使用也似是而非。

在英国脱欧公投前夕,我曾写过一篇文章,其中有这样一句话:“当一个国家的人民可以通过投票表达自己的意愿时,被嘲笑的肯定不应该是他们。”所谓公投,就是以全体民众的判断力来决定国家大事,结果或可商榷,但过程确实不该被嘲笑。

在英国脱欧一事中,“素质论”是反对意见中最为常见的一种,他们认为普通民众没有能力权衡利弊,无法胜任公投,尤其是像退欧这种关乎政治、经济、事关国家命运的议题,根本不应该让缺乏专业知识的民众来决定。但从公投历史来看,这显然是多余的担心。

关于这一点,英国前财长克拉克算是个反面教材。他在接受采访时表示,“公投从未解决过任何问题,除非是在一个强大的独裁者例如墨索里尼或拿破仑的支持下。”这个说法不但抹杀了历史上各种公投的意义,还将公投与民主对立,其潜台词就是“如果公投的结果没有预先决定,那么公投便是有毒的”,其荒谬性显而易见。

虽然法国大革命时的阿维尼翁公投是公认的史上首次公投,但公投雏形早在古希腊时期便已出现。被视为民主典范的雅典民主制度,其实就是直接民主形式。它由公民大会、500人议事会和陪审法庭等机构组成。公民大会是最高权力机构,一年召开40次,年满20岁的男性公民都有权参加,可自由发言,展开辩论,然后进行表决。在小国寡民的雅典城邦时代,这种制度的好处显而易见。

但也有人认为,恰恰是直接民主形式导致了雅典帝国的覆灭。当雅典城邦成为雅典帝国后,国家实际事务繁多,直接民主形式无法适应这种发展,反而造成了灾难性后果。比如失败的西西里远征就是野心家煽动民众,利用公民大会所促成,这场失败也成为伯罗奔尼撒战争的转折点,导致帝国崩溃。也正因此,美国“宪法之父”、第四任总统詹姆斯·麦迪逊曾声称“即使每个雅典公民都是苏格拉底,雅典公民大会仍将是一群暴民。”这句话也常被喜欢把“民粹”二字挂在嘴边的人士所使用。

可是,一个帝国的覆灭往往是多种因素叠加的结果。如果从政治角度分析,以公民大会为代表的直接民主形式当然有其局限,但更致命的问题是雅典帝国并没有及时发展国家管理的专业机构。换言之,公民大会既是决策者,又是执行者,与现代政治的差距恰恰在此。

现代文明社会的直接民主,与古希腊早已不可同日而语,有着足够丰富的支撑与配套。这种支撑来自宪政和施行已久的间接民主——代议制民主,至于配套,现代国家的各种事务机构已臻完善,具有相对稳定的执行力。在这种情况下,以公投弥补代议制的缺陷,已有足够土壤。比如最热衷公投的瑞士,在国家制度上就相当完善,它有两院制的联邦议会,国民院(下院)代表人民,联邦院(上院)代表瑞士26个州。公投这一直接民主手段,始终与代议制民主相结合。从历史来看,早在1848年首次公投之前,瑞士就已有悠久的“露天议会”历史。也正是因为这种传统,使得人们十分担忧的“多数人暴政”没有出现,反而能始终以妥协和共识为底线。

关于公投,有一种思维差别值得注意:一些人认为,当面对大事时,领导者乃至政府、国会就应该挺身而出,如果他们将决定权交给民众,是一种不负责任的表现。但在另一部分人看来,领导者乃至政府、国会在无法代表民众的情况下擅自决定,才是真正的不负责任,也会使得决策缺乏正当性,此时最需要的便是还权于民。

也有人认为,频繁公投是民众对于精英政治的失望,代议制也将走进死胡同。但如果明白公投是代议制的有效补充,就不会同意这种将公投与代议制直接对立的思维。

特别要指出的是,瑞士是当今世界上为数不多仍然坚守自由主义的国家之一。公投作为瑞士人的常用手段,其实是对国家控制的一种消解。在这背后,是对市场经济的坚守和对自由的捍卫。

(本文部分首发于《周末画报》)

湖北多个政府采购项目涉嫌造假 金额过亿元人民币

10 December 2025 at 18:37

中国多地政府部门文件照搬网络人名的“全网最忙五人组”风波持续延烧,《中国青年报》冰点周刊披露,湖北省十堰市竹溪县七个政府部门的多个采购项目涉嫌评审小组人名造假,项目中标金额总数过亿元(人民币,下同,1亿元人民币约合1800万新元)。相关报道发布后很快被删除。

中国政府采购网12月3日公布的《竹溪县住房和城乡建设局本级机械设备租赁采购中标(成交)结果公告》中提到,评审小组成员包括张吉惟、林国瑞、林玟书、林雅南、江奕云。

有眼尖的中国网民发现,这五个名字和百度文库《10000中国普通人名大全》中列出的头五个名字完全一致,且排列顺序一致,并且这些名字在中国各地不同的官方文件、公示场合中反复出现,引起外界质疑。

中青报冰点周刊星期三(12月10日)披露,在牵出这场“全网最忙五人组”风波的竹溪县,存在评审小组成员疑似照搬网络人名情况的,不止住建局作为采购方的中标结果公告。

据报道,涉嫌照搬网络人名充当评审专家的政府采购项目,共涉及竹溪县七个政府部门,分别是竹溪县城市管理执法局、水利和湖泊局、文化和旅游局、交通运输局、数据局、农业农村局、住建局,每个项目的中标金额均超3000万元,总额过亿元。

报道称,竹溪当地已由市、县纪委监委牵头成立联合调查组,对相关情况展开调查,后续调查结果将对外公布。竹溪县委宣传部一名工作人员受访时说,调查组不会只调查住建局采购程序违规的项目。竹溪县多个政府部门的工作人员透露,所在部门正在被调查。

报道举例,今年1月发布的《竹溪县数据局本级竹溪县智慧城市政务大模型建设及运维中标(成交)结果公告》中,评审小组成员为吴孟钰、蔡国伟、连俊达、林佳蓉、罗依茂。这五个人的名字,均能在百度文库《10000个中国普通人名大全》文档开头部分名字中找到,且顺序一致。

竹溪县数据局党组成员邹春红告诉中青报,数据局的这个项目是由代理公司做的,目前也在被调查,“直到这个事情出现之后,然后我们排查自己以前的一些项目,才发现这个代理公司在做这些材料的时候有问题”。至于具体问题出现哪个环节,邹春红称要看纪委监委的调查。

竹溪县城管局项目办相关负责人受访时也说,事发之后,城管局也在配合调查,“各单位都在开展自查和排查”。

中国人民大学公共管理学院教授、公共资源交易研究中心执行主任王丛虎向中青报分析,按照中国现在的科层制管理,“哪一个东西都得经过领导层层审批,他不审批不敢发出来,但是发出来又出现这些问题,说明一些领导缺少对法律的敬畏与遵循”。

中青报的这则报道星期三下午2时30分在微信公众号“冰点周刊”发布后,很快便被删除。

中国代表谈乌克兰问题 吁构建有效欧洲安全架构

10 December 2025 at 18:08

中国常驻联合国副代表孙磊谈及乌克兰问题时,呼吁有关各方重视并妥善解决彼此合理安全关切,构建均衡、有效、可持续的欧洲安全架构,并争取早日达成一份有约束力的和平协议。

据中国常驻联合国代表团网站消息,孙磊星期二(12月9日)在安理会审议乌克兰问题时说,当前乌克兰问题进入谈判解决的关键阶段,国际社会围绕乌克兰危机的讨论愈发向谈判聚焦、向和平靠拢,各重要利益攸关方提出了一些和谈倡议、举行了一系列接触。

他说,中国对这些进展表示欢迎,支持一切通向和平的努力,希望国际社会共同努力,推动危机早日实现政治解决,并呼吁有关各方抓住积极势头,相向而行,展现政治意愿,持续积累共识,争取早日达成一份公平、持久、有约束力的和平协议。

孙磊指出,有关各方曾达成明斯克协议、新明斯克协议,但最终仍爆发了危机,归根到底是没有妥善解决彼此安全关切,没有解决冲突的根源问题。新的和平协议应以此为鉴。

他呼吁各方秉持共同、综合、合作、可持续的安全观,牢记安全不可分割原则,重视并妥善解决彼此合理安全关切,特别是冲突的根源问题,构建均衡、有效、可持续的欧洲安全架构。

孙磊说,尽管和平呼声十分强烈,但地面战事仍未停歇。中国敦促冲突当事方展现最大程度克制,严格遵守国际人道法,切实保护平民和民用基础设施安全,同时呼吁国际社会加大人道救援力度,帮助受危机影响的民众渡过难关。

他重申,中国在乌克兰问题上的立场客观公正、一以贯之,那就是呼吁停火止战、坚持劝和促谈、推动政治解决。中国也将继续为推动危机政治解决发挥建设性作用。

全球首例 澳洲16歲以下青少年「社群禁令」生效

10 December 2025 at 18:17
null 周子馨
2025-12-10T09:19:40.308Z
澳洲針對未成年人的社群媒體禁令10日生效

(德國之聲中文網)澳洲總理阿爾巴尼斯(Anthony Albanese)週三(12月10日)表示,「今天的確是身為澳洲人值得驕傲的一天」,並將這項社群禁令形容為改善青少年網路安全的第一步。

政府表示,僅在TikTok上,已有約20萬個帳戶被停用,未來幾天還將有「數十萬個」帳戶被封鎖。

此前,澳洲政府在去年通過該項法案,禁止未成年人在TikTok、Instagram、YouTube、Facebook和Reddit等平台上註冊帳號,原先的註冊帳號也將被平台凍結或刪除。

該法案規定,若相關企業未能有效阻止未成年人使用其平台,將面臨最高4950萬澳元的罰款。

這項法案引發兩極爭議,支持者認為,這項法令能有效保護兒童免受網路傷害、霸凌和成癮的影響;但也有不少人質疑,這樣概括性禁令是否真的能解決根本問題,還是可能讓青少年轉移到其他未受規範的平台。

另外也有多國政府關注,包括紐西蘭、丹麥和馬來西亞在內的多個政府已先後表態,可能研究或仿效澳洲的做法。

歐盟執委會主席馮德萊恩(Ursula von der Leyen)先前也曾說,她受到澳洲實施年齡限制的舉措「啟發」。

主要平台封鎖未成年人

多個主流社群平台被澳洲政府強制從當地時間10日午夜起採用年齡驗證措施,除了TikTok、YouTube、Instagram、Facebook、Thread、X、Snapchat 和Reddit外,還包括實況串流平台Twitch和 Kick。WhatsApp、電子郵件服務、線上遊戲以及教育工具則被排除在禁令之外。

澳洲政府也補充,隨著其他新平台吸引年輕受眾,受管制平台的名單也將持續調整。

數十萬名年輕用戶被自動登出。在截止前的數小時,部分受影響的青少年在平台上互相告別,並使用「#seeyouwhenim16」(等我16歲再見)等標籤。但根據《衛報》實測,禁令生效後,青少年仍可以在未登入的狀態下瀏覽平台內容。

阿爾巴尼斯政府表示,這項限制旨在減少青少年因大量使用社群媒體而暴露於網路霸凌、令人不安的內容及其他相關風險。但澳洲政府也坦言,禁令要落實存在挑戰:「這不會完美。這是一個重大改變。成功意味著在於它正在發生,意味著我們正在進行這個討論。」

X、Meta及公民團體批評該法律

Facebook和Instagram的母公司Meta表示,這項新規定可能會將受影響的青少年族群推向監管較少的網路空間。由馬斯克(Elon Musk)擁有的X(前推特)則指出,這項限制是由澳洲政府強制要求:「這不是我們的選擇,這是澳洲法律的要求。」

相關企業表示將採用年齡認證工具、拍照評估用戶年齡以及選擇性身份驗證來判斷用戶年齡。

Reddit稱,無法確認是否會在澳洲高等法院挑戰該禁令。此前,有兩名青少年透過倡議團體「數位自由計畫」(Digital Freedom Project)對此提出訴訟,主張這項禁令侵犯了青少年的憲法權利。

其中一名提出法律挑戰的15歲澳洲青少年瓊斯(Noah Jones)本月1日接受路透社訪問時表示:「作為一名澳洲青少年,我們的憲法權利將被剝奪......我們將沒辦法分享自己的觀點或意見,也無法聽到他人的,不論是政治議題還是其他話題。」

他也向阿爾巴尼斯喊話,強調社群平台當前的問題並非是由青少年族群所製造,應該要努力消除平台本身有害的內容,而不是未成年族群。

國際特赦組織演算法問責實驗室負責人薩蒂亞(Damini Satija)10日在聲明中指出,「我們需要的是強而有力的保障措施」,並強調這些系統無所不在,實施社群禁令非有效的權宜之計,「澳洲政府應該做的是以更強的技術對社群平台實施有效監管措施,以充分保護使用者的隱私權、線上和平集會權、健康權和言論自由」。

DW中文有Instagram!歡迎搜尋dw.chinese,看更多深入淺出的圖文與影音報導。

© 2025年德國之聲版權聲明:本文所有內容受到著作權法保護,如無德國之聲特別授權,不得擅自使用。任何不當行為都將導致追償,並受到刑事追究。

Madeleine McCann's father tells BBC how his family was hounded by press

10 December 2025 at 17:17
Gerry McCann says hounding by press took 'huge toll' on family

Madeleine McCann's father is calling for greater scrutiny of the UK's media, complaining that his family was subjected to "monstering" by sections of the press.

He said the media "repeatedly interfered with the investigation" into his daughter's disappearance in 2007 and believes this has hindered the search for her.

Gerry McCann told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that more than a year on from Labour coming into power, "press regulation is no longer a priority".

He wants a resumption of the cancelled second phase of the Lord Leveson Inquiry, which would have examined unlawful action by the media, plus journalists' relationships with politicians and police. It was scrapped by the Tories in 2018.

Madeleine's disappearance during a family holiday in Portugal has never been solved.

In a rare interview, Mr McCann said that for months after her disappearance his family had "journalists coming to the house, photographers literally ramming their cameras against our car window when we had two-year-old twins in the back who were terrified".

"We are lucky we survived. We had tremendous support - but I can promise you, there were times where I felt like I was drowning. And it was the media, primarily," he told the BBC.

"It was what was happening and the way things were being portrayed, where you were being suffocated and buried, and it felt like there wasn't a way out."

Mr McCann and his wife, Kate McCann, are among more than 30 people to have signed a letter being sent to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and calling on him to reverse the decision not to hold the second phase of the Leveson Inquiry.

Among the other signatories are the families of Hillsborough victims, and the mother of TV presenter Caroline Flack.

Madeleine McCann, aged three, looks into the camera as she wears a blue and white football top. Her left hand is raised and brushing against her hair.
Madeleine McCann disappeared in 2007, then aged three

The letter, seen by the BBC, requests a meeting with the prime minister, saying: "We understand that you recently had time to meet News Corp chairman Lachlan Murdoch.

"We hope you will now meet with some of the British citizens whose lives have been upended by the illegal practices and abuses associated with his company."

Mr McCann told the Today programme: "It's quite obvious that press barons can meet the prime minister, but the people who have suffered at the hands of them can't."

News UK, the UK branch of News Corp, declined to comment.

The first part of the Leveson Inquiry was held from 2011 to 2012, in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal.

Its findings were published in 2012, and led to the creation of the industry-funded press regulator Ipso.

Mr McCann told the BBC that the inquiry's second phase had "almost certainly" not happened because he believes that politicians in the UK are fearful of the press.

PA Media Lord Leveson is pictured in 2012 holding a copy of his report which scrutinised how the media in the UK operates. He is wearing a dark suit, white shirt and a dark blue tie as he looks ahead. PA Media
Lord Leveson's report in 2012 recommended a self-regulation body for the press

He said that in the run-up to last year's general election, Labour politicians had committed to implementing the recommendations made in the first part of the Leveson Inquiry, and that he was "extremely disappointed" that they hadn't done so.

"We're over a year into the government, and there haven't been any changes," he said.

"It's not acceptable to me now, more than a year on, that Leveson and press regulation is no longer a priority."

A DCMS spokesperson told the BBC it "recognises that for victims and their families, incidents of harassment and intrusion from the media cause significant distress".

"The Culture Secretary has met with individuals and families who have experienced this intrusion in the past and the government is committed to ensuring that these failings are never repeated," they said.

'We put our morals aside'

Mr McCann added that he and his wife had "supped with the Devil" by working with the Sun in 2011, in order to have the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance reviewed - illustrating the newspaper's influence.

"There was a front page letter published in The Sun, and [then-prime minister] David Cameron ordered the review," he said.

"That's the power they had. So we put our morals aside to work with them to achieve what we wanted."

Criticising media coverage of the investigation, he said: "Published material which should have been confidential, should be passed on to the police, witness statements, many other things that have gone out," he said.

"So if you were the perpetrator, you knew a lot more than you should have done - and as a victim, as a parent, it's absolutely dismaying."

'Making stories up'

Mr McCann gave a witness statement at the Leveson Inquiry on behalf of himself and his wife in November 2011.

In it, he described news outlets "making stories up" about them, as well as a "sustained, inaccurate and malicious series of headlines in a number of papers which gave the impression that we were in some way responsible for or involved in Madeleine's disappearance".

He also said around the time their daughter disappeared, the now-closed News of the World newspaper had published complete transcripts from Kate McCann's personal diary.

That diary had been seized by police in Portugal as part of their investigation into Madeleine's disappearance, and the couple were "unsure as to how the [News of the World] obtained a copy", the inquiry heard.

In his interview with the Today programme, Mr McCann said: "Madeleine's been missing for 18 years, and the bottom line is, we still don't know what's happened to her."

He added that there is "no evidence".

"I don't even mean 'convincing' evidence - there is no evidence to say she's dead," he said.

"Now we fully understand she may be dead, it may even be probable, but we don't know that."

A spokesperson for press regulator Ipso told the BBC that it can intervene directly in cases of press harassment.

"We encourage anyone with concerns about press behaviour to contact us for help," it said.

Spat at, attacked and threatened by schoolkids - life as a bus driver in Britain

10 December 2025 at 14:04
'Broken bus windows, threatened with a knife - all in a day’s work'

"Would I catch a bus? No, not out of choice now," says Andy Collett. "I feel much happier using my own car."

His sentiment isn't unusual among passengers. But Mr Collett is a bus driver.

"It can be very intimidating," he says. "I've been assaulted twice, spat at numerous times, and I've had incidents of broken windows – it's just part and parcel of the job, unfortunately."

He describes a "lawlessness" among some of the travelling public - mostly younger people - which he believes has got worse in 38 years of driving Birmingham's bus routes.

The BBC has spoken to passengers, transport staff and other bus drivers in the West Midlands about what they say is a growing national trend of antisocial behaviour on public transport.

The British Transport Police recorded 40,034 incidents of antisocial behaviour in 2024-25, an increase of 24% on the previous year.

Buses are the most commonly used form of public transport but they're also where passengers feel least safe, according to a recent Transport for the North survey.

BBC/Andy Alcroft Andy Collett wearing a hi-vis vest, looking down the camera. BBC/Andy Alcroft
Andy Collett has driven Birmingham's bus routes for 38 years and says there's a "lawlessness" among some of the travelling public

One incident gives Mr Collett flashbacks.

"I was attacked by about 30 schoolkids," he says. "I had cuts, bruises. They actually bent the fingers back on my hand when I was trying to hold [the door] to stop them getting on the vehicle."

Mr Collett now mostly trains other drivers, warning them of the dangers. When he does get shifts behind the wheel, he tries to avoid routes known for antisocial behaviour.

Antisocial behaviour hotspot Chelmsley Wood in the West Midlands is a snapshot of this national problem. Its interchange has suffered vandalism and graffiti, while drivers have been threatened and buses damaged.

Security camera footage shows masked teenagers aiming barrages of fireworks at buses over Halloween and Bonfire Night.

Passenger Emma Banks, 52, says she has witnessed a similar incident.

"They [were] hitting the bus. I've got learning difficulties and sometimes it does scare you," she tells me on a cold evening, waiting in the interchange.

Ms Banks says she regularly sees overcrowding and people smoking on buses.

She can't drive so relies on public transport but, tonight, Ms Banks doesn't feel confident enough to catch the bus.

"I'll be getting a taxi because I know that I'll get home safely."

A Public Space Protection Order has been imposed at Chelmsley Wood to stop gatherings of young people and to require the removal of masks and hoods. But 17-year-old Elle Furlong says she's still afraid.

"They smash windows, purposely pull the fire alarm, light their lighters on the chairs. It's just horrendous."

The probability of becoming a victim of crime on public transport is very low - Transport for West Midlands estimates one crime for every 50,000 bus journeys. But perceptions can outweigh statistics and drive people like Ms Furlong away.

"If I can walk it, I'll walk it. If it's far enough, I'll get an Uber. If it's really far, I'll get my dad to drop me off. I avoid buses at all costs," Ms Furlong says.

BBC/Andy Alcroft Chelmsley Wood bus station, on a dark, wet evening. BBC/Andy Alcroft
Chelmsley Wood bus station is a hotspot for antisocial behaviour

The drivers have no choice but to carry on with their jobs, although many are afraid to speak openly about the risks. Even trade union officials have refused to go on the record.

"You come to work not knowing what you're going to face," says a driver who asks to remain anonymous. "It can cause a lot of anxiety and stress. I go home sometimes and just want to break down and cry because it's a horrible job."

They describe the daily grind of disrespectful teenagers, aggressive drug addicts, even passengers defecating on the bus. Then there's the racial abuse.

"You have to hold back. I've known a few drivers who have kicked off, but then they've lost their job because of it."

I saw for myself what drivers and passengers are facing when I sat on the top deck of the 94 from Chelmsley Wood, shortly after the school bell. A group of kids soon boarded without paying.

"I've been driving buses for 33 years and it's changed," driver Neil Evans says through the screen protecting his cab. "Society has changed. No one cares anymore. They just walk onto the bus and do what they want, when they want, how they want, and nothing's done about it."

Today, Mr Evans has backup. Esha Sheemar is one of 13 Transport Safety Officers (TSOs) patrolling the West Midlands. She warns the kids if they don't behave they'll be thrown off the bus.

TSO roles were introduced in 2019. They are not police officers, but they have limited powers to tackle issues on public transport.

BBC/Andy Alcroft Esha Sheemar is wearing a blue jacket and protective vest. She is stood at a bus station, looking at the camera. BBC/Andy Alcroft
Esha Sheemar is one of 13 Transport Safety Officers (TSOs) patrolling the West Midlands

Across the bus station, Ms Sheemar's colleague Lee Clarke has spotted a face from their most-wanted list: a 13-year-old accused of vandalising a bus shelter. The boy's details are taken but he is allowed to get on the bus, as Mr Clarke's limited powers mean he'll need to pass the case to police officers.

TSOs are funded by the Combined Authority and belong to the West Midlands Safer Travel Partnership, which includes West Midlands Police, British Transport Police, as well as bus and train companies.

At its control room in the city centre, hundreds of screens flicker with security camera images from stations and interchanges across the region's roads and rail lines; they can even get live pictures from most of the buses.

Kerry Blakeman is head of security for the West Midlands Safer Travel Partnership and says they have access to more than 5,000 fixed cameras. He says his staff capture about 30 incidents each day, although he is keen to stress millions of journeys are safe and uneventful.

"We are trying to do our best to keep the travelling public safe. Behind each camera is an operator looking out for your safety whilst you travel around the bus, train and tram network."

Last summer, a teenager was filmed threatening people at Chelmsley Wood bus station with a machete. He was identified and sentenced to six months in juvenile custody.

The footage of the firework attacks has been handed over to West Midlands Police - and efforts to trace the hooded youths are ongoing.

BBC/Andy Alcroft A large number of TV screens show live CCTV footage. A woman is sat at a desk watching it. BBC/Andy Alcroft
'Behind each camera is an operator looking out for your safety whilst you travel,' says Kerry Blakeman, head of security at West Midlands Safer Travel Partnership

Bus driver Bryan Cook recently called police after being threatened with a weapon while working. It was one of four times in the past three months that he's phoned for assistance while driving the 72 bus to Chelmsley Wood.

On this chilly evening, he takes his chance to tell the TSOs how their timetable fails to match that of the vandals. "Where are you on the weekends? Where are you on school holidays?" he asks.

TSO Mr Clarke starts to reply, but the driver has more to say.

"We're the ones getting threatened, we're the ones getting stuff thrown at us, broken windows. Where are you lot?"

Mr Clarke emphasises the importance of reporting incidents so patrols can be targeted in problem areas.

"We keep telling everyone. No one does anything," says Mr Cook, in exasperation.

It outlines the challenge for a small team covering such a large area. The number of TSOs doubled a year ago and is set to rise to 25 across the West Midlands. Some areas have similar teams - and others have piloted them - but many places are uncovered, relying on the police. Bus routes can be especially vulnerable.

The anonymous bus driver questions the effectiveness of Transport Safety Officers and urges more support from their employer.

"They [management] know what goes on. Do they care? I don't know. Doesn't feel like it, to be fair."

National Express West Midlands told the BBC that all reports of antisocial behaviour or crime are "fully investigated to ensure perpetrators are held accountable, to identify any learnings, and to provide support for those affected".

It added that antisocial behaviour "will always be a subject we need to keep challenging and working on".

The UK government's recent Bus Services Act allows local authorities to apply for extra powers to deal with issues such as smoking, vaping and fare evasion, the sort of problems TSOs can tackle already on trains.

The legislation also requires bus drivers to receive training in dealing with antisocial behaviour and spotting the signs of harassment and abuse faced by women and girls.

The Department for Transport told the BBC that abuse of passengers and staff is "unacceptable" and pointed to the new powers the Bus Services Act will give to help tackle antisocial behaviour.

Transport for West Midlands promises greater use of drone cameras and AI technology, capable of recognising known troublemakers and even identifying concealed weapons. It recently launched a campaign prioritising the safety of women and girls.

Mr Blakeman insists his team is having a positive impact but says he recognises passenger confidence is fragile.

"I respect why some members of the public wouldn't feel comfortable travelling, but I want them to know that we're actually doing everything we can behind the scenes."

Back on the 72 bus, Mr Clarke is trying to restore Mr Cook's faith. He promises someone will make contact to explain their role and discusses the most efficient way to flag issues.

The West Midlands Safer Travel Partnership is regarded as a model of good practice. And yet, this frosty exchange reveals a clash of perspectives – one that speaks of "intelligence-led tasking" and "visible reassurance"; the other of lone working under the stark reality of sustained abuse and the risk of attack.

Mr Cook sums it up like this: "Two weeks ago I had two windows broken on my bus, I got threatened with a knife - and that's all in a day's work".

How monogamous are humans? Scientists compile 'league table' of pairing up

10 December 2025 at 15:11
Getty A group of six meerkats stand on their hindlegs looking back at the camera. They have grey-brown fur, pointed noses and piercing eyes.Getty
Meerkats are incredibly social animals and live in large groups known as 'mobs' or 'clans'

Humans are a bit like meerkats when it comes to pairing up, according to a study that examined the monogamous lifestyles of different species.

In our romantic life, we more closely resemble these social, close-knit mongooses than we do our primate cousins, a "league table" of monogamy compiled by scientists suggests.

At 66% monogamous, humans score surprisingly highly, far above chimps and gorillas – and on a par with meerkats.

However, we are by no means the most monogamous creature. Top spot goes to the Californian mouse - rodents that form inseparable, lifelong bonds.

Getty A baby chimp clings to the back of a mother chimp. She leans against the head and shoulders of another chimp against a backdrop of green foliage.Getty
Chimpanzees are highly social and form strong bonds but have very different social structures from humans

"There is a premier league of monogamy, in which humans sit comfortably, while the vast majority of other mammals take a far more promiscuous approach to mating," said Dr Mark Dyble at the University of Cambridge.

In the animal world, pairing up has its perks, which may be why it has evolved independently in multiple species, including us. Experts have proposed various benefits to so-called social monogamy, where mates match up for at least a breeding season to care for their young and see off rivals.

Dr Dyble examined several human populations throughout history, calculating the proportions of full siblings – where individuals share the same mother and father – compared with half-siblings, individuals who share either a mother or a father, but not both. Similar data was compiled for more than 30 social monogamous and other mammals.

Humans have a monogamy rating of 66% full siblings, ahead of meerkats (60%) but behind beavers (73%).

Meanwhile, our evolutionary cousins fall at the bottom of the table - with mountain gorillas at 6% rating, while chimpanzees come in at just 4% (alongside the dolphin).

In last place is Scotland's Soay sheep, where females mate with multiple males, with 0.6% full siblings. The Californian mouse came top, at 100%.

Getty Two swans with white feathers and bright orange-red beaks float on a blue pond. They swim close to each other, their beaks almost touchingGetty
Monogamy is prevalent in birds; such as swans, which form strong pairs

However, being ranked alongside meerkats and beavers doesn't mean our societies are the same - human society is poles apart.

"Although the rates of full siblings we see in humans are most similar to species like meerkats or beavers, the social system that we see in humans is very different," Dr Dyble told BBC News.

"Most of these species live in colony-like social groups or perhaps live in solitary pairs that go around together. Humans are very different from that. We live in what we call multi-male, multi-female groups, within which we have these monogamous, or pair-bonded, units."

Getty Four sheep graze on fresh green grass below a stone wall. They are dark-brown with wooly fur.Getty
Soay sheep are the most promiscuous of all the animals studied

Dr Kit Opie at the University of Bristol, who is not connected with the study, said this is another piece in the puzzle over how human monogamy arose.

"I think this paper gives us a very clear understanding that across time and across space humans are monogamous," he said.

"Our society is much closer to chimps and bonobos – it just happens that we've taken a different route when it comes to mating."

The new study is published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences.

❌
❌