Democrats Start to Hammer Vulnerable Republicans Over War in Iran in Ads

© Kenny Holston/The New York Times

© Kenny Holston/The New York Times

BBCProsecutors are providing "early investigative advice" to police forces as they carry out inquiries into Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Lord Peter Mandelson's links to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
A spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said: "We can confirm that we are now providing early investigative advice to the Metropolitan Police Service regarding the force's investigation into a 72-year-old man and will continue to liaise as requested.
"We can now also confirm that we are providing early investigative advice to Thames Valley Police in relation to a 66-year-old man."
Mountbatten-Windsor and Lord Mandelson have separately been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office over their connections to the paedophile and have both since been released under investigation.
Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.
Lord Mandelson has repeatedly let it be known that he believes he has not acted criminally.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.

Getty ImagesCouncillors have approved plans by fashion designer Stella McCartney and her husband Alasdhair Willis for a clifftop home in the Highlands.
The proposals for a site on Loch Ailort, a sea loch west of Fort William, had received more than 65 objections.
Opponents raised concerns about the property's size, design and impacts on the landscape and wildlife.
A spokesperson for the couple said the stone walls and turfed roof would make it barely visible, and that the energy efficient house would be used as a "family, forever home".
McCartney and Willis' proposed site is in an area at Roshven on a rocky headland called Commando Rock which historically was used for military training.
A previous owner of the land had started work on a house in the early 2000s, but later abandoned the project leaving some low walls.
The couple's project overlaps some of the previous site, and avoids removing pine trees, which had been a cause of some objections.
Renewable energy would provide power to the new house.
McCartney, daughter of former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, has established herself as one of the world's leading fashion designers.
She was awarded a CBE in recognition of her services to fashion and sustainability in 2022.
Willis is a creative director at clothing brand Adidas.
Highland Council's south planning applications committee approved the plans on Wednesday, subject to a number of conditions.
They included measures to mitigate the impact of external lighting on the landscape due to the site's elevated position.
There was also a requirement that sewage and surface water drainage be handled away from the site's cliff edge.
A licence is also required from Scotland's nature body, NatureScot, due to the presence of otters in the area.
Fort William and Ardnamurchan Green Party councillor Kate Willis asked that "strong" conditions be placed on the project.
But her request for a decision on the application to be deferred to allow for a site visit was not supported by other councillors.
Highland Independent councillor Thomas MacLennan said the property would sit "more comfortably" in the landscape than the previously consented property.
A spokesperson said the couple had sought to deliver a "highly sustainable home that has been sympathetically designed".
They said the property would use natural Scottish stone and have a turfed roof.
The spokesperson added: "It will be secluded and barely visible due to the site's contours, including views from the water.
"Unlike many of the homes in the area, this is not a holiday home; it is a house that the family will live in, our forever home.
"We look forward to continuing to engage with the local community as we progress our development and when we move into our new home."

BBCTwo teenage girls have been arrested after a large crowd of young people caused anti-social behaviour in south-west London, the Met Police has said.
Officers were called to Clapham High Street on Tuesday evening and put a dispersal order in place to move the young people out of the area.
Two teenage girls were arrested on suspicion of assaulting an emergency worker and were taken to custody, the force said.
It added that officers would respond to any concerns from local residents and businesses.
Christine said she was walking with her husband and baby in Clapham High Street when she saw hundreds of young people, adding: "I think it took everyone by surprise."
She continued: "We weren't sure what was going on initially. There were a lot of police and police cars. You don't see that very often, even having such a heavy police presence was very unusual.
"It was clearly people up to no good. It was quite intimidating, especially with a new baby."
She added: "It's a great neighbourhood, I'm sure it's just a one off. The police were very good yesterday, it was reassuring to have so many around."

Giulia MarchettiClapham resident Aisling said it was scary but added that any number of people in a big group was scary, no matter the age.
"Nobody wants to see violence in this area. I hope everyone in the shops and everyone passing by is okay."
She said the closure of shops was a "massive shame", adding: "They might have lost quite a lot of money from that. A lot of the staff are very frightened."
The force was contacted for further details.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk

Getty ImagesSix Metropolitan Police officers are being investigated after a black child suffered a broken knee during a stop and search in north London, the police watchdog has said.
The boy, who was aged 16 at the time, was forced off his electric bike by an officer over concerns about his behaviour as he rode along Northumberland Park in Tottenham in April 2025, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said.
The IOPC launched an investigation in November, looking at the level of force used, whether race or the child's age was a factor in their treatment of him, and the aftercare provided to him.
The Met, which has been contacted for comment, made a mandatory referral to the IOPC of a complaint made on behalf of the boy about his treatment by officers.
Nothing was found in the search before officers removed the battery from his electric bike and told him he could leave.
But they returned a short time later and arrested him on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence, threats to kill and dangerous driving.
The officers attempted to take him into custody but this was refused and they were told to take him to hospital, where he was diagnosed with a fractured knee, according to the IOPC.
Since January, three police constables are being criminally investigated - one officer for potential offences of assault occasioning grievous bodily harm or actual bodily harm and the other two officers for intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence, contrary to section 44 of the Serious Crime Act 2007. They are also being investigated for potential gross misconduct.
A further three police constables are being investigated for potential misconduct in relation to alleged failures to challenge the conduct of the other officers and their treatment of the boy.
IOPC director Amanda Rowe said: "The use of stop and search is an important policing tool, however it must be used proportionately.
"This is a serious case where a child has been injured as a result of force being used and we are investigating the officers' actions in this case and their treatment of the child, who was not provided with immediate first aid.
"We have been in contact with the boy's family and obtained further evidence to assist our investigation. We will continue to keep all parties updated as the investigation progresses.
"As part of our investigation, we have viewed officers' body-worn video, obtained accounts from some of the officers involved, a statement from the boy and reviewed medical evidence.
"The officers will be interviewed under caution, and we are currently obtaining further witness statements."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk


© Anna Rose Layden for The New York Times

© Mike Blake/Reuters


© Theo Wargo/Getty Images for Hot Girl Productions
以色列军方4月1日早晨报告伊朗向以色列发射了导弹。以色列紧急救援部门宣布有14人受伤,其中一名11岁女童伤势严重。
以色列军方在电报群Telegram上发布消息称,“以色列国防军探测到伊朗向以色列领土发射导弹。防御系统正在部署拦截。
法新社说,以色列红十字会没有具体说明伤者所在位置。但据以色列警方称,特拉维夫地区和以色列中部有“武器弹药掉落”。以色列中部地区响起了空袭警报。
此外,以色列表示,也有来自也门的一枚导弹也袭击了以色列,并称这是亲伊朗的胡塞武装自这场冲突以来向以色列发射的第三枚导弹。
与此同时,科威特和巴林分别报告称,其机场和一家企业办公场所发生火灾,据称是伊朗发动的袭击所致。
在卡塔尔近海,一艘油轮遭弹片击中受损。而在阿联酋,一架无人机袭击被拦截后,一名孟加拉国公民被弹片击中身亡。
美国总统特朗普4月1日称,美国将很快结束对伊朗的战争,且他正在考虑将美国撤出北约。
当被问及何时会结束对伊朗战争时,特朗普称:“我不能确切地告诉你……我们会相当快地撤出”。他强调,美国的行动已确保伊朗无法获得核武器:“他们现在无法制造核武器,然后我会撤出,我会带走所有人,如果有必要,我们会回来进行局部打击”。
国际能源署同一天表示,4月份全球石油供应受到的冲击将是3月的两倍。这凸显了结束战争的紧迫性。特朗普在社交媒体上称,伊朗曾提出停火请求,但他不会在德黑兰停止封锁霍尔木兹海峡之前考虑该请求。伊朗则否认提出过停火。两位巴基斯坦安全消息人士此前表示,伊斯兰堡方面曾向冲突双方提出临时停火,但未收到任何一方回应。
特朗普前一日表示,即便没有协议,美国也可能在两到三周内结束战争。他同时威胁,如果欧洲国家不协助阻止伊朗威胁霍尔木兹海峡,美国可能退出北约。他在接受路透社采访时表示,北约缺乏支持美国在伊朗目标的态度,对此他表示不满,并称自己“绝对”在考虑尝试将美国退出北约。
这场冲突已经造成数千人死亡,并波及整个中东地区,引发前所未有的能源中断。国际能源署署长法提赫·比罗尔表示,伊朗关闭霍尔木兹海峡导致喷气燃料和柴油短缺,这一问题已经在亚洲显现,并预计将在四五月影响欧洲。全球企业也面临困难,包括化妆品和茶叶在内的行业已报告生产和供应受阻。

Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto"Now or never," Peter Magyar has been telling Hungarians, in a breathless campaign across the country in the run-up to 12 April elections that opinion polls suggest he can win.
This 45-year-old former Fidesz party insider represents the biggest threat to Viktor Orban's rule in Hungary since he won the first of four consecutive victories in 2010.
Magyar's slogan dates back to a revolutionary poet's 19th Century rallying cry to rise up for the homeland.
After more than 100 campaign stops his message has been shortened to "Now": the words "or never" have been crossed out, adding to the urgency.

Getty ImagesHe is on course to visit all of Hungary's 106 constituencies, and he has given four, five, even six speeches a day. Magyar has built a powerful support base in more than two years of touring the country, even in the small towns and villages were Fidesz traditionally dominates.
Last year he walked 300km (185 miles) from Budapest to the Romanian border in a campaign to "reunite" the nation, in a bid to bring natural Fidesz voters to his side.
Magyar promises to tackle corruption, improve the economy and he has sought to woo Hungary's disadvantaged Roma community. He has also promised to unlock billions of euros in EU funds, frozen largely because of concerns over Hungary's rule of law.
But Orban has depicted him as a "puppet" of the EU and Ukraine, and he has been wary of getting too close to Brussels and has promised voters "we are the real party of peace".
His self-confidence stems from a deep understanding of the rival he faces.
Until February 2024, Magyar was very much part of the Fidesz family.
He joined the party at university and married one of its rising stars in Judit Varga, with whom he had three children.
Then Magyar stunned Hungarians with a live appearance on a pro-opposition YouTube Channel called Partizán.
In a country of 9.6 million people, a million watched as a solemn Peter Magyar explained why he had had enough of his own party.
"Everyone warned me against it, friends, family people I know," he told presenter Márton Gulyás. "Obviously I've been in this system, in this circle, for a very long time."

ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFPHungary was in the midst of a scandal in which President Katalin Novak had granted a pardon to a man who had helped cover up sexual abuse in a Hungarian state-run children's home.
She resigned, and so did Magyar's ex-wife. Varga had been justice minister and had co-signed the pardon. Two leading Fidesz women were left to carry the can. Varga had been destined for big things in Fidesz, having left her job as minister to spearhead Fidesz European election campaign. That career was over.
Now she was no longer part of the Fidesz machine, Peter Magyar sensed this was his moment.
"I do not want to be part of a system in which the real people in charge hide behind women's skirts," he wrote on Facebook.
Towards the end of his Partizán interview Magyar spoke of his hope for political change, while realising it would be very difficult while Orban was still in power.
The current opposition was totally inept, he complained, so change would have to come from within. But one day there would be change and when it did happen it could be fast, he predicted.
His YouTube appearance went viral.
"It was not a planned move," he later told the BBC. "My mother called me not to go, but I did the opposite. Everybody knew the situation in Hungary - it's not very safe to go against this government."
Peter Magyar's high-profile party marriage had fallen apart in 2023 but he was still an important figure in Fidesz even if he was little known to the wider public.

AFPHe was a natural fit for Orban's social conservatives.
The son of two lawyers - his mother was as senior judge - Peter Magyar also counts a former Hungarian president as his godfather, and he was very interested in politics from an early age.
Magyar went to an elite Catholic boys' high school near the centre of Budapest before studying law at a Catholic university in Budapest while Orban was serving his first term as prime minister from 1998-2002.
Magyar joined the party after Orban's election defeat, and the woman he married, Judit Varga, was destined for Fidesz success, becoming justice minister in 2019, nine years after Orban's return to office.
Magyar himself became a diplomat at Hungary's permanent mission in Brussels, later running Orban's team working with the European Parliament. He went on to serve on the boards of state-owned companies.
His disaffection with the party was gradual.
"After a while I became more and more critical, openly and just among friends. I can tell you that the Fidesz we see today is very very different from the one I joined in 2002."
"I was always told by the politicians it's necessary to keep power - I accepted it for a time. But of course the turning point was in 2024," he told the BBC's Budapest correspondent Nick Thorpe.
For a while, Magyar worried if he had made a mistake: "I have three kids, I love them very much and I was very much worried about their future as well."
If the YouTube interview was the turning point, the next big moment came on 15 March 2024, a national holiday marking the anniversary of Hungary's failed revolution in 1848.
While Orban spoke from the steps of Budapest's National Museum, condemning the EU and calling for the "occupation of Brussels", Peter Magyar was addressing an estimated 10,000 people, alleging corruption and mishandling the economy at the top.
He announced he was forming a new party, with only weeks to go before Hungarians voted in European elections.
He doubled down on his accusations of corruption, releasing a secret recording made of a conversation with his ex-wife in 2023 in which she speaks about a high-profile trial.
Judit Varga said she was appalled by Magyar's actions, accusing him of abuse which he denied. He also fell out with a former friend, Orban minister Gergely Gulyás - who said Magyar was "one who first betrays his family, then betrays his country as an agent of Brussels".
Asked what he thought of his challenger, Orban told the BBC: "He left Fidesz, that's all."

NurPhoto via Getty ImagesBy now Varga's ex-husband was making big strides politically and forming new friendships, among them popular actor Ervin Nagy.
Magyar took over a dormant party called Tisza, and won 29.6% of the vote and seven seats in the European Parliament. Tisza was well behind Orban's ruling Fidesz on 44.8%, but Magyar had made a powerful statement.
By autumn 2024, Magyar's new party was ahead of Fidesz in the polls and he tore into Orban's close ties with Russia as they led rival marches marking Hungary's 1956 uprising against the Soviet Union.
While Orban labelled Tisza as "warmongers" indulging in a "Brussels war march", Magyar taunted the prime minster as the man who had in 1989 called for Russian troops to leave Hungary but now trampled on the legacy of 1956 and was "the most loyal ally of the Kremlin".
"Mr Prime Minister, why won't you say 'Russians go home' any more?" he asked.
Magyar is no liberal. He has openly derided the liberal opposition that tried to take Orban on in the past, only to see the Fidesz leader storm to a two-thirds majority it needed to mould the constitution.
One key to his success has been his demolition of the fragmented, old opposition parties. He sees former Socialist leader Ferenc Gyurcsany as no better than Orban.
And he has not been afraid to take on the pro-Orban new outlets that dominate Hungary's media landscape.
Earlier this year he alleged he had been the target of an attempted "Russian-style" smear campaign involving a sex tape.
Journalists had been sent a black-and-white surveillance image apparently showing drugs on a table near a bed. The implication was that more footage was to come and Magyar moved to pre-empt it.
He admitted having consensual sex with an ex-girlfriend but was adamant he had not touched anything on the table and said he had been lured into a "honey-trap" set up by the secret services.
"My conscience is clear," he said, adding later that he had taken a drug test on 22 March to prove he had not consumed any drugs during the past months, and pointing out he had had similar negative tests in the past.
Until now, none of the accusations and barbs directed at Peter Magyar have stuck. As a former Fidesz adviser, he believes this gives him an advantage.
"I know them, I know their tricks. I know they're very much frightened," he said.
"This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, not for Peter Magyar but for the country."

Getty ImagesLeaning against a wall near a news-stand in central Rome, Tommaso Silvestri, 65, scans the morning's front pages, their headlines swinging between "apocalypse," "scandal" and "disaster" after Italy's latest footballing collapse.
"We've made a real mess of it," he says, shaking his head. "We had players who couldn't even find the target."
"The golden days of Italian football are well and truly gone."
On Tuesday night in Zenica, four-time World Cup winners Italy failed to qualify for the tournament for a third consecutive time, losing 4-1 on penalties to Bosnia and Herzegovina after being reduced to 10 men before halftime.
Since winning the World Cup in 2006, the Azzurri have largely disappointed in international tournaments - with the exception of their surprise victory at the Euros in 2021 against England at Wembley.
"We are what our results say we are," Silvestri said. "When you shoot and can't even hit the goal, you're not going to go far. When it comes to taking the game home, Italy just doesn't get there anymore."
Last night's defeat drew swift and emotional reactions across Italian politics and society.
"Everything has a limit," lamented Ignazio La Russa, president of the Senate and a senior figure in Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's far-right Brothers of Italy party.
In a post on X, he wrote: "We're not going to the World Cup. We supported them, we hoped, we even railed against a couple of questionable refereeing decisions... but deep down we feared it. In fact, we knew it."
Gomorrah author and anti-mafia writer Roberto Saviano also weighed in, pointing to deeper structural failures in Italian football, from governance to youth development.
"Clubs are corrupt and at the mercy of criminal organisations. True laundering vaults. No investment in young players, no care for second-generation talent. It's easier to buy foreign players than to develop new athletes," he said in a post on Instagram.

Getty ImagesAcross Italy, a legendary football nation with a rich history of producing world-class talent, many are wondering what went wrong. Giovanni Colli, 71, rolling his eyes while sipping an espresso at a café near the Pantheon, says he feels "betrayed."
"Not going to the World Cup three times in a row, how on earth did it happen? What a huge disappointment. Everyone should resign. Give the young players a chance," he says.
Italy's World Cup heartbreak was crystallised in the tear-streaked face of coach Rino Gattuso, who struggled to hold back his emotions after the national team's defeat.
"We don't deserve this, it's not fair. I'm sorry I couldn't make it happen," Gattuso said, eyes glistening, before retreating to the dressing room.
The legendary 2006 World Cup-winning midfielder was only given the job of coach last June.
Despite the disappointment, Gattuso expressed pride in his players: "I'm proud of my boys and what they gave on the pitch."
The match, decided on penalties after Italy were reduced to 10 men following Alessandro Bastoni's early red card, gave a brief moment of hope to Italians with Moise Kean's goal, only for it to end in dismay.

Getty ImagesGattuso admitted the team's shortcomings: "When you have chances and don't take them, football punishes you."
Reflecting on their elimination, he added: "This hurts. We gave everything we could. It's a real shock."
Sport journalist Elisabetta Esposito of La Gazzetta dello Sport told the BBC that Italian football was facing a difficult period - one that would take time to overcome, during which loyalty to individual clubs was outweighing support for the national team.
"The risk is that this third consecutive failure to qualify will deepen young people's disengagement from the Azzurri," she said.
"The disappointment is profound, but the country is not only disappointed but almost disillusioned. It's as if a new generation no longer knows what it means to cheer for their country."
Reflecting on Tuesday's match, Esposito added: "From a technical standpoint, everything went wrong. The team hasn't worked together enough. Rebuilding will require a long-term strategy, chasing immediate wins with rushed decisions won't succeed."
On a busy street in central Rome, 56-year-old Teresa is walking her dog among tourists and commuters rushing to work.
"Oh, we are not going to the World Cup?" she asks. "I don't know much about football, but that's a bit of disaster, isn't it?"

AFP via Getty ImagesAt least four people have been killed by a series of powerful explosions at an ammunitions depot in Burundi's largest city, Bujumbura, local residents have told the BBC.
The blasts erupted late on Tuesday at the facility, located in the suburb of Musaga, due to an electrical fault, an army spokesperson said.
Shrapnel and debris were propelled more than 5km (three miles) and several houses in nearby districts were destroyed by the force of the explosions.
The authorities have not yet provided any casualty figures but family members and eyewitnesses told the BBC of four separate deaths in the city. The AFP news agency quotes security sources as saying that dozens of people had died.
One woman told BBC Gahuza that a relative, who had been detained at Mpimba Central Prison, had died after a bomb hit the facility.
Numerous inmates at the prison, which is located near the ammunitions store, are reported to have been injured.
In the north-eastern neighbourhood of Gisandema, witnesses told BBC Gahuza that a bomb had destroyed a house and killed a domestic worker.
The authorities have said they cannot yet comment on the number of casualties as they are still assessing the extent of the damage.
The explosions sent plumes of smoke rising above the city, sparking panic in the city of more than a million people.
President Evariste Ndayishimiye, in a message on X, expressed his condolences to all Burundians, adding that the authorities are "here to help".

Getty Images/BBCGo to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

Emin Sansar/Anadolu via Getty ImagesA judge in Brazil has blocked a project to build a zipline connecting the famous Sugarloaf Mountain in Rio de Janeiro to a nearby hill, Morro da Urca.
The attraction's developer said it would allow visitors to descend from Sugarloaf Mountain at speeds of almost 100km/h (62mph) via four ziplines covering a distance of 755m (0.47 miles).
The project - which started four years ago - had triggered protests from locals and environmentalists, who argued that the construction work was causing irreparable damage to the Unesco World Heritage Site.
The developer is expected to appeal against the decision.

CARL DE SOUZA/AFP via Getty ImagesGricel Osorio Hor-Meyll, one of the activists who had led the campaign against the zipline told AFP news agency that the ruling was "a huge victory".
Those opposed to the attraction argued that in order to build the platforms needed to access the zipline, the rock on top of Sugarloaf Mountain would have to be excavated.
The company which manages the site said that excavation would be kept to a minimum by using areas with existing construction.
The project had the approval of both Rio City Council and the National Historical and Artistic Heritage Institute (IPHAN).
As part of Tuesday's ruling, the judge ordered that IPHAN and the project's developer pay 30m reals ($5.77m, £4.35m) in damages, stressing the "inestimable value of Sugarloaf Mountain, not only for Brazilians but for people worldwide".
The project has been at the centre of a legal battle for years and construction had been halted on a number of occasions as the company argued its case in court.
In January, construction work restarted after the high court had ruled that stopping would cause more damage than finishing the project at this late stage.
It added that the project was 95% completed.
That decision has now been overturned by Tuesday's ruling.
However, the legal saga is likely to continue with the company behind the project expected to lodge an appeal.

AFP via Getty ImagesSouth Africa's army has officially been deployed to several parts of the country to help overwhelmed police clamp down on violent crimes, including illicit mining and gangs.
President Cyril Ramaphosa earlier this year announced the deployment of 2,200 soldiers to five of the country's nine provinces hardest hit by criminal activities.
Authorities say the deployment, set to run for a year, is aimed at restoring order to crime-ridden areas, but critics warn that using the military in civilian policing rarely delivers lasting results.
Illicit mining and gang violence are major problems in South Africa, which has one of the world's highest murder rates.
According to the latest crime statistics, covering the period between October and December 2025, around 71 people were killed each day.
An initial group of soldiers was deployed to several parts of Gauteng province, which includes Johannesburg, in March.
The second, and main cohort, will help with operations in the Eastern Cape, Free State, North West and Western Cape provinces from 1 April for a year.
The BBC spoke to several residents in a Johannesburg suburb, Eldorado Park, a few weeks after soldiers arrived in the area. It is one of the three Johannesburg suburbs targeted in the initial military deployment due to the high levels of gang violence there.
Some of those interviewed expressed scepticism about the soldiers' presence in their neighbourhood.
Leola Davies, a 74-year-old pensioner, described Eldorado Park as a "hell-hole to live in".
"Sodom and Gomorra have nothing on this place. I stay indoors all day because I just don't want to be the next victim. Things are getting worse," she said.
Elviena le Roux, a mother of three, told the BBC she doesn't believe having the military in the area will help, saying it will only "make the violence worse".
Ronald Rabie, 56, said that while seeing the army patrolling the streets makes some difference, as it creates a safer environment for families, this peace is short-lived.
"Once they leave, things return to chaos – they need to be here permanently," the father of three said.

Anadolu via Getty ImagesThis is not the first time Ramaphosa has deployed troops to help bring down the country's high crime levels.
In 2023, over 3,000 soldiers were roped in to help tackle illicit mining across the country for six months.
In July 2021, the army was also deployed to help quell the deadly riots that had hit the country after the arrest of former South African President Jacob Zuma.
Under South Africa law, soldiers can only arrest civilians under rare circumstances and must then hand the suspect over to the police as soon as possible.
Security experts have repeatedly warned that the military is trained for combat - not for the kind of community-based policing needed to build trust.
And there is also history to contend with. The racist apartheid regime used the military to enforce their rule - a legacy that still shapes how some South Africans view soldiers on their streets today.
Criminologist Guy Lamb told the BBC he was not convinced the deployment would deliver lasting results, saying soldiers are "not designed to engage in policing" but rather to engage in combat and use maximum force.
"There's danger that they will escalate situations or respond very aggressively in... tense situations," he said.
He cited their conduct during the Covid-19 pandemic as an example. The army's deployment during that period, meant to help enforce the curfew and other restrictions, drew sharp criticism as reports came out of soldiers using excessive force, unlawfully detaining and harassing civilians.
Authorities have expressed optimism that the soldiers' presence will make a difference this time around but Lamb is not completely convinced.
He said that without "a dedicated plan... to try and address why crime is so violent in these sort of places", there was a strong likelihood it would flare up again once the soldiers leave.
"So we're likely to see this happening into the foreseeable future, because this plan of addressing what are the root causes of crime [in these] areas is not in place."
Additional reporting by Khanyisile Ngcobo

Getty Images/BBCGo to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

© Karen Ducey/Getty Images

© Malcolm Jackson for The New York Times

© Hannah Beier for The New York Times
美国最高法院2026年4月1日开始审理总统特朗普签发的取消出生公民权行政命令的合法性。特朗普当日亲自到场,出席大法官的辩论。美国宾夕法尼亚州立大学社会学和人口统计学的特聘教授Jennifer Van Hook3月31日接受采访时表示,若最高法院维持这项行政命令,未来25年内,预计美国将有340万没有公民身分的儿童生活在美国。
2025年1月底,特朗普开始第二个美国总统任期后签署的首批文件中包含要取消出生公民权的行政命令。这是特朗普重返白宫强力推动的强硬移民政策的一环,而是最有争议的措施之一。美国地方法院均裁定这项行政令不合法。最高法院九名大法官2026年4月1日起就此展开口头辩论。特朗普则亲临辩论现场。美国媒体称这是美国在职总统首次亲临最高法院的辩论活动。
不少民众当日也在最高法院门外集会,反对取消这项已经有150多年历史的公民权利。
美国宾夕法尼亚州立大学社会学和人口统计学的特聘教授Jennifer Van Hook以及另一位学者Nicole Kreisberg在研究了美国人口统计数据预计移民人口统计数据后认为,倘若最高法院维持特朗普的取消政令,那将意味着未来25年内,美国将有340万没有公民身分而在美国生活的儿童。两位学者在研究中也发现,鉴于在美亚裔族群的体量,取消出生公民权意味着亚裔无证移民人口将会大幅增加。而这项措施也会导致更多的留学生选择回国,在某种程度上导致美国挥霍此前在教育领域投入的大量资金。
出生公民权目前依据的是美国在1868年通过的宪法第十四修正案。那时,美国刚刚结束南北战争。这项修正案意在赋予获得自由的奴隶在美国出生的后代以美国公民身分,规定任何在美国出生的人均为美国公民。30年后的1898年,在美国出生、但父母都不是美国人的华裔男子黄金德的美国公民身分认定争议被提交最高法院审议。最高法院的裁决最后确定了宪法第十四修正案的“美国公民出生地原则”。
特朗普重返白宫后签署的政令禁止联邦政府向在美国出生、但母亲在美没有合法身分或只是暂时居留、父亲也不是美国公民或持有绿卡的永久居民的人发放护照或公民身份证书。该政令也适用于那些持留学签证或工作、旅游签证在美国临时居住者在美国出生的孩子。
美国重要的公民团体”美国公民自由联盟“(ACLU)d的负责人4月1日在最高法院门前表示,只是一场捍卫最好的美国价值观的战斗,在美国土地上出生,就是完完全全的美国公民。
![]()
今年清明前,我约赵玉顺做了一场直播。
他从湖南老家接进来,刚给爷爷奶奶扫完墓。他说,一开始还好,但他伯伯对着坟头说"爸爸,崽来看你了",他当场就哭了,好久没缓过来。他很多年没回去扫墓了,不是不想回,是因为他一直没有办法去接受那种失去。
我理解他的感受。我奶奶去世之后,我第一次回去根本受不了。后来慢慢多回几次,才好一些。我奶奶生前最大的担心就是说,你们以后会把我忘掉。所以我每次回去,不管多忙,都要和家里人去她坟边看一眼,把周围的杂草弄干净。她在那里,我们才有回老家的理由。
这次直播从晚上8点聊到11点过,三个多小时。我们聊了农民的土地、宅基地、生活成本、养老金,聊了公粮、义务工、互助养老,也聊了他和贞贞这五年走遍村镇的故事。意犹未尽,最后玉顺的手机没电了。
我公号的读者很多都是农民的孩子,这场谈话里有很多东西,是我们和父母的故事。
本文整理自2026年3月31日与赵玉顺的直播访谈,直播回放请搜索视频号“彭远文”,文字有删节和整理。赵玉顺与袁贞贞是自媒体"遇真纪事"的创作者,已走访全国数十个省份的村镇,记录农民与农民工的真实生活。
一、那块地,真的没有想象中值钱
"农民有地"——这是反对提高农民养老金最常见、也最理直气壮的一个说法。
意思是:你农民有地,城里人没有地;你有地就可以种出粮食、自给自足,凭什么还要国家给你钱?
我问玉顺:你走了这么多地方,那块地到底能给老农民带来多少收入?
他先从产权说起。土地不是农民私有的,是村集体所有,农民只有使用权。这个前提很多人不知道,或者知道了也没细想过它意味着什么。
然后他说了一句我觉得很准的话:
"抛开数量谈收入,跟抛开剂量谈毒性一样,都是耍流氓。"
中国人均耕地大概1.4亩,但这是全国平均数,东北拉了一大截。南方的实际情况是什么?他说,在四川、湖南、福建、贵州这些地方,如果你去问农民家里有几亩地,"别人是会笑你的"——因为他们是以"分"为单位计算的,10分才等于1亩。一户四口人加在一起,南方农村普遍也就两三亩地。
这两三亩地能产出多少钱?他给我算了一笔账:
种粮食作物,刨去种子、化肥、农药、机械这些成本,现在农资价格一直在涨,但粮价稳定,一亩地一季能净赚800块,"那是要烧高香的"。一年算下来,很少有人超过2000块。
如果租出去呢?南方丘陵地带,两三百到五百块钱一亩;华北平原地势平坦、土地肥沃的地方,能租到800到1000块。东北黑龙江能到十几亩,但只能种一季,要除以2,再乘上租金,算下来一年也就四五千到七八千块,依然不够。
云南鲜花产区有一些特例,能租到两三千块一亩,但那是极端情况。
平均下来,南方农村一个人靠地的年收入,往往不到2000块。换算成一个月,就是一百来块钱。
这时候你再看那163块钱的月均养老金,你就能理解它为什么是个问题了——它跟你那块地的价值差不多,甚至不如。
我说:农民手里那块一亩三分地,其实比不上城里一把扫把——就是说,还不如去城里当环卫工人。
玉顺说是的。而且六七十岁的老农民,你还指望他们干得动农活吗?他们身上普遍都是一堆慢性病,城里人六十岁退休了跳广场舞,农村老人六十岁还要弯腰下地。这是另一层不公平。
二、宅基地:有家,不能回
除了土地,另一个常见说法是"你们农民有宅基地"。有人甚至说,想要涨养老金?可以,先把宅基地退回去。
玉顺没有专门研究过宅基地政策,但他从实地观察给了我一个很清晰的图景:那些宅基地上的房子,一家几代人花了三四十万盖起来的两三层楼,一年里除了过年那十来天,剩下的时间里只住着一两个老人,最多再带两个孙子。
"宅基地当然重要,但你有家不代表你能回家。青壮年在那里找不到合适的工作,找不到收入,所以是有家不能回。"
这就是宅基地真实的处境:有,但形同虚设。你不能卖给村集体以外的人,不能在市场上自由流通,那它的价值就被大打折扣。
我补充了一点:宅基地无法自由流通,其实是对农民产权的一种剥夺,和城里的房产限购是一个道理——限购让你无法卖给更多人,你的房子价值就缩水。可是很多城里人经历了几十年市场经济,还是不明白这个道理。他们觉得城里人不能买农村宅基地,是农民的"特权"。这让我觉得蛮费解的。
我们自己家就是这样。我户口迁出来了,我爸妈不在了宅基地就收回去,房子要修好才有资格继续用,但修好了我又不会回去住,而且现在农村修一栋二层楼要三四十万。所以那块地,那栋房,就只能烂着。
三、农村生活成本低?这也是耍流氓
第三个常见说法:农村生活成本低,农民不需要那么多钱。
玉顺的反驳也简单直接:
"你只谈成本,不谈收益,同样是耍流氓。"
更何况,生活成本真的低吗?
他在广东打工期间经常看到,珠三角城中村里有19块9的衣服,你把同样的衣服运到四川宜宾某个镇上,未必还买得到。县城里吃一碗粉,和一线城市吃一碗粉,价格差不了多少。农村老人不是生活成本低,是他们在压抑自己的欲望。城里人今天心情不好去吃个榴莲喝杯奶茶,农村老人心情不好,顶多喝口自家酿的米酒。
农村人觉得便宜的东西,往往是些什么?你回农村的那些小卖铺看一看,货架上摆的是康帅傅这样的山寨版——农村其实是很多假冒伪劣产品的倾销地。甚至现在直播间有AB货,大城市用户发货发A货,查到了你的收货地是农村就发B货,因为农村人维权渠道少,投诉意识弱。
农村老人的实际开销是什么?
玉顺去年做的一期内容,去村里问老人,他们总结下来主要是三块:
一是慢性病药费。高血压、高血糖、糖尿病,这类病要长期吃药,一个月两三百到四五百都是正常的。现在的月均养老金是163块,连药费都不够。
二是人情往来。农村一年红白喜事,少则一二十场,多的更多。青壮年不在家,这些随礼的事就落到老人身上,一两百块一次,一年下来可以是笔大数。
三是带孙子的开销。大量农村老人既要在地里劳作,还要每天开着电动三轮车来回接孙子上下学——因为村小撤并,孩子要到镇上上学。接送孩子意味着老人的时间和精力被大量占用,这在城里是夫妻双方都觉得很重的负担,在农村全压到老人一个人身上。
再加上孙子买铅笔、买零食、买文具的零钱,以及许多子女自顾不暇,能打回来多少钱就是多少。
四、"农民满意"和"子女应该养"
吕德文在文章里写,根据田野调查,农村老人对一两百块钱的养老金普遍感到满意。
我问玉顺,你采访过的老人,有这种情况吗?
他说:我大概前后跟一百多个农民聊过这个问题,其中至少95个明确告诉他,这钱少了,要更多。
剩下那5个"满意"的人,他给了一个让我印象很深的解释。他在湖南永州采访过一个80多岁的老人,老人说的大意是:以前又要交钱又要交粮又要出义工,那才叫苦。现在国家不要人民的钱了,还倒过来给钱,这当然好啊。
"他的满意是一个比较意义上的满意。你之前是-10,现在是+1,他当然比-10 满意。但-10 得到+1,那是合理的吗?他至少应该得+8。"
这是一个很有力量的表达。
还有一个场景:玉顺在广西采访,问一群老人养老金应该多少合适。老人们反问:城里企事业单位的老人拿四五千、五六千,他们都是为国家做贡献,凭什么我们只拿一两百?不说跟他们一样,起码也给我们两三千吧。
他们知道。我们以为他们不知道,他们其实什么都知道。
玉顺还遇到一个很有意思的情况:有农村老人的子女跟他说,老父亲60多岁,最近学会了刷短视频,然后因为算法精准推送,他经常刷到一种视频——主播语气激动地说"好消息,国家终于看见农民了,养老金今年至少涨到1200",然后老人就一遍一遍地看,满心期待。
那是谣言,是流量账号专门针对老人群体制造的情绪化内容。但农村老人无从辨别。一个假消息能让他们那么在乎,恰恰说明他们多么渴望这件事变成真的。
关于"子女应该赡养",玉顺的回答也很准确:子女当然有义务,但子女的义务和国家应尽的责任是两件独立的事,不能互相替代。
他采访过很多农民,问他们养老金不够,为什么不叫孩子多给点?老人的回答大多是一句:
"孩子也有他们的孩子要养。"
就这一句话,把所有的事情都说清楚了。现在年轻的农民子弟在城里打工,上有老下有小,还要还房贷,其实很多人是自身难保的。让他们把钱往上补,等于在挤一块已经很干的海绵。
五、公粮往事:那不只是"税"
关于农民以前"没有缴养老保险"的问题,很多人会说:那是因为农民种了国家的地,交公粮、出义工都是应该的,就像缴税。
玉顺用三个词总结了公粮的本质:交最好、交很多、交很远。
交最好:你把收成里最饱满的那部分交出去,剩下的留给自己。
交很多:交完之后,自己不够吃。要靠红薯、洋芋、杂粮撑到下一季。二三月份就断粮,是普遍现象。
交很远:公粮要挑到乡里的粮站,少则五公里,多的走十公里山路,天不亮出发,天黑了才回来。
他问了一个很尖锐的问题:有哪个税是符合这三个特征的?个人所得税还有起征点,税率再高也是45%,不会交完了自己吃不上饭。但公粮是在交完了全家都断粮的前提下还要交,它绝对不只是一个"税"。
我补充了一点:这里真正重要的不是交了多少,而是剩了多少。即便只交了5斤,如果交完之后全家二三月份就断粮,那这5斤就是不能要的5斤。
我爸妈就是这么跟我说的:以前交完公粮,到二三月就没饭了。
六、互助养老,听起来好,做起来呢?
贺雪锋的观点是:养老金涨了没用,农村真正需要的是互助养老服务;与其给农民发钱,不如把钱统筹到村集体里搞养老食堂。
玉顺今年春节前刚去广东从化见过一个类似的案例:有社工组织介入,有政府补贴,村里以同一姓氏的宗族为纽带,老人们集体种菜做饭,能维持一个小范围的互助。但他说,这个模式要复制推广,非常难。
更重要的一句话他说得很直白:
"把钱给到村集体,再由村集体来用,比直接给农民还不如。农民肯定比村集体更会用自己的钱。"
弹幕里有人总结得更简洁:统筹即腐败。
我觉得这些三农专家一直有一个莫名其妙的预设:农民不会花钱,需要他们帮农民花。可是农民又不傻,你给我1000块,我知道该买什么药、该去什么医院、该怎么分配给家人。市场会响应的,只要钱到位,养老服务自然会跟上来。
这才是市场经济的基本逻辑。
七、让被忽视的得以被看见
聊完农民养老金这些"反对理由",我们聊到了玉顺他们这五年做的事情。
他们2021年开始,以"遇真纪事"为账号名,走遍中国村镇,拍农民、农民工和村镇里的日常生活。前期一边上班一边做,周一到周五在公司,周六周日出去拍,拍完周日夜里赶回来,周一直接去上班。
坚持了一年之后,他们做了一个决定:辞职,全职做这件事。
27岁,一无所有,最坏的结果就是干不下去再回去打工。但前两三年,他们靠网贷为生,“各大互联网平台都认识我们”,半年接不到一个广告是常态。
最让我感动的是贞贞妈妈的故事。她在城中村的发廊里剪了三十年头发,不懂哔哩哔哩是什么,不懂拼音,只能用手写输入法。但她注册了账号,一条一条地给孩子的视频点爱心,有时候凌晨两点还在看他们的视频。她经常在评论区写"这两个年轻人真是好样的,走遍中国给农民讲话"——假装不认识他们,帮他们刷评论。
他们的书出版后,她把书摆在发廊的每面镜子前,让来剪头发的客人顺手翻翻。帮他们做地推。
这个母亲不理解他们在做什么,但她知道这是孩子想做的事,就无条件支持。
我自己做自媒体刚满一年,上个月才全职做,挣得钱是这十年来最少的,但确实是最开心的。在此之前,即便在做我喜欢的媒体工作,也有大量的时间在做不愿意做的事情。玉顺也说了类似的话:
"这五年,连那些为了生存而焦虑的瞬间,对我来说都是最好的时光。因为相比起之前被无意义感操控、被迫做自己不想做的事情,现在要好太多了。"
他们为什么要做这件事?
玉顺说了一句话我觉得说到点子上了:
"以前我以为是城里人要看得起农村人,现在我觉得,城里人怎么看我们一点都不重要,重要的是农村人自己要看得起农村人。"
城市的运转,离不开农村。你吃的菜、住的楼、点的外卖、用的快递,背后都有来自农村的人。CBD那些敲键盘的、写稿的、拍摄的,很多也出身农村。是村镇托起了整个城市的运转,但这些年一直是城市化的话语在定义什么是成功——进城、买房、逃离农村,才叫成功;回村,才叫失败。
玉顺说,他们在做的事,就是要打破这种叙事。
书名叫《看见中国村镇》,书里有一句话被他们反复提起:让被忽视的得以被看见。
玉顺说:“如果农民不会说话,我们就把话筒递到他们面前”。这句话,套用台湾音乐人林生祥金曲奖致辞里的一个意思,也是他们一切行动的出发点。村镇是中国的主体,但却是"房间里的大象"——一直在那里,却像不存在一样。
我说,知青文学写了很多知青下乡的苦,但几乎没有人写农民那时候有多苦,也没有人写知青走了之后农民继续吃苦。我们不应该怪知青,也不应该怪我们的父母——他们不识字,不会拍视频,没有工具替自己发声。玉顺说了一句:
"如果没有人愿意替我们发出声音,没关系,那我们就自己来。"
这是我们这代农民孩子的责任。
尾声:我为什么推荐《看见中国村镇》
我读这本书的时候,一次又一次地想起我奶奶,想起我在广东打工时挤火车的感觉,想起我们村里弯着腰背背篓的老人。
这是一本用五年田野调查写成的书。270多张照片,全彩印刷,定价39块,比很多粗制滥造的书便宜得多——出版社的编辑帮他们把价格压下来了,考虑到读者里有很多农民子弟。
玉顺说,书里的文字只占他们五年素材的三分之一不到,编辑还砍了不少。也就是说,这本书之外,还有大量没被讲出来的故事。
他们今年还计划做两个系列:公粮往事和水库往事。那些在1950年代到1970年代修水库的农民,最年轻的一批人已经七老八十了。在那些水库的纪念碑上,你只能看到几个数字——多少万民工参与修建——但他们天不亮就出发、深夜才回来,究竟是怎么过来的,那些故事正在随着这批老人慢慢消失。
玉顺他们在做的,是一种抢救性的记录。博物馆里永远讲的是王侯将相,讲金缕玉衣和龙椅。普通人的历史,如果我们这代人不记,就真的没了。
我之前写文章的时候引用了一句话:为众人抱薪者,不可使其冻毙于风雪。但我觉得这句话说得太保守了——我们不是让他们别冻死,我们是要让他们过上好日子,名利双收,这样才能吸引更多人投入到这件事来。
我是这样想的:如果我们这群农民孩子,连自己人的书都不支持,还指望谁来支持?不管怎样,我们至少还可以用钞票投票,就好像不买董明珠的产品一样,我们也可以选择买谁的东西。
买一本,自己看,也送给父母看一看。让他们知道,他们的生活值得被记录,他们的人生有人在意。
相关文章:

© Mauro Pimentel/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
被指为华裔大亨陈志犯罪团伙的一名核心成员和电诈嫌疑人李雄,已从柬埔寨被引渡回中国。
法新社4月1日引述中国官媒央视消息,这次被遣返回中国的李雄是陈志太子集团旗下的汇旺(Huione)集团前董事长,涉嫌多起犯罪,被指控领导电诈团伙。
与柬埔寨政治精英关系密切的陈志本人已于今年1月在柬埔寨被捕,并引渡回中国。
陈志还于去年10月被美国当局起诉,美方指控他控股的太子Prince集团充当了“庞大网络诈骗帝国”的掩护。
美国财政部已将柬埔寨金融集团汇旺(Huione Group)排除在美国金融体系之外,指控其协助洗钱,将太子集团的贪污所得洗白。
伊朗表示未对美国提出的15点计划作出回应,该计划由特朗普于上周提出,旨在结束战争;伊朗外交部长拒绝提谈判事宜。
伊朗外长阿拉格奇在半岛电视台周三播出的采访中表示:“我像以往一样直接收到(美国特使)维特科夫发来的信息”。“通过我们在该地区的朋友,必要时我们会回复这些信息”,
“但这并不意味着我们正在进行谈判”。
据巴基斯坦官员透露,美国于3月24日向伊朗提交了一份15点计划,但具体内容尚未披露。
随后,伊朗“塔斯尼姆”通讯社称,德黑兰方面已提出了五项条件作为回应,以期彻底停止美以对伊朗的“侵略”。
但伊朗外长阿拉格奇称,德黑兰方面“并未提出任何交换条件”,那(五项条件)只是媒体的“纯粹猜测”。
伊朗外长还强调德黑兰对华盛顿“毫无”信任,因为(美方)在双方谈判期间发动空袭,这与2025年6月那场为期12天的战争如出一辙。
伊朗近日指责美国正筹备对伊朗的地面进攻,并称一艘美国两栖攻击舰已部署至该地区。对此,伊朗外长阿拉格奇说,“我们正等着他们”,并警告称,美军将遭受“重大伤亡”。

© Kenny Holston/The New York Times

© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

ReutersA mass robotaxi outage in the Chinese city of Wuhan caused at least a hundred self-driving cars to stop mid-traffic, sparking renewed debate around the safety of driverless vehicles.
Local police said initial findings suggested a "system malfunction" caused multiple vehicles to stop in the middle of the road on Tuesday.
Videos on social media have documented the outage, with one appearing to show it resulting in a highway collision, although police said no injuries had been reported and passengers exited their vehicles safely.
Baidu did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
According to the police statement, posted on social media site Weibo, the cause of the incident is still under further investigation.
Baidu operates its Apollo Go driverless taxi service in dozens of cities across the world, mostly in China.
In December 2025, ride-sharing apps Uber and Lyft announced partnerships with the Chinese technology giant to test its Apollo Go cars on UK roads, aiming to start trials in 2026.
However, both still need approval from regulators before they can begin the pilot programmes.

ReutersWhile driverless tech may be safer on average than human drivers, this incident showed it could "still go wrong in completely new ways," said Jack Stilgoe, professor of science and technology policy at University College London.
"If we're going to make good choices about this technology, we need to understand entirely new types of risk," he told BBC News.
The outage is not the first time self-driving cars have faced technical difficulties.
In December 2025, a large power outage in San Francisco led Waymo taxis to stop working around the city, causing huge traffic jams.
Meanwhile in August 2025, an Apollo Go robotaxi carrying a passenger in Chongqing fell into a construction pit.


Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.