Court hearings to decide on the steel firm's future had previously been adjourned several times
The UK's third-largest steelworks has been placed under government control, creating an uncertain future for nearly 1,500 workers in Rotherham and Sheffield.
Insolvency courts granted a compulsory winding up order sought by creditors owed hundreds of millions of pounds by Speciality Steels UK (SSUK) – part of the Liberty Steel metals empire of controversial tycoon Sanjeev Gupta.
The company will now be placed in the hands of the Official Receiver and special managers from consultancy firm Teneo, which has been appointed to run it on behalf of the liquidator.
The government has agreed to cover the ongoing wages and costs of the plant while a buyer for is sought.
Liberty Steel said the decision to put the firm into compulsory liquidation was "irrational".
Chief transformation officer Jeffrey Kabel said the move would "impose prolonged uncertainty and significant costs on UK taxpayers for settlements and related expenses, despite the availability of a commercial solution".
Lawyers for Mr Gupta had applied for a four-week adjournment to allow time to place the company in a "pre-pack administration", which allows an insolvent company to sell its assets to a bidder.
He wanted funding from investment giant BlackRock and Fidera, which invests in distressed companies, to buy back the business.
Winding up the company, his lawyers argued, could place the business in "free fall" and incur significant disruption, cost and risk to a nationally important steel company and its 1,500 workers.
The judge found the company was "hopelessly insolvent" with £600,000 in the bank, a monthly wage bill of £3.7m, supported by a parent group that has 15 entities in insolvency proceedings across nine jurisdictions.
A record 111,000 asylum applications were made to the UK during the year to June, but the government is processing cases faster, new Home Office figures show.
This is an increase of 14% from the previous year, and it is higher than the peak of 103,000 in 2002.
But officials are processing more cases than before the general election, meaning that over the long term there may be fewer people in the system needing housing support.
The latest data, which covers Labour's first year in office, comes as the government faces growing pressure over immigration.
The figures also showed 71,000 cases were awaiting an initial decision, relating to 91,000 people.
That backlog is almost half the peak of 134,000 cases at the end of June 2023, and means that there are 18,536 fewer people waiting for a decision today than there were in March.
The numbers of asylum seekers in hotels has risen slightly to 32,059 - a figure higher than when Labour came to power, but well below a peak of 56,000 in September 2023 under the Conservatives.
Labour has pledged to clear the backlog by 2029, pledging to cut Channel crossings and to open new government-run accommodation.
Ministers hope to end the use of hotels over the long term. However that depends on how quickly they can remove people who have no case to be in the UK.
Asylum seekers who cannot financially support themselves are placed in housing while their claims and appeals are considered.
In the year ending June 2025, the Home Office forcibly removed 9,100 people – up a quarter on the previous year. More than half were foreign national offenders who were being deported at the end of sentences.
Meanwhile, the High Court on Tuesday ruled a hotel in Epping, Essex, should stop housing asylum seekers after a legal challenge by the local council.
Other councils across the country, including some run by Labour, are now considering legal action.
Government spending on asylum in the UK was down by 12%, the figures show.
The total stood at £4.76bn in the year ending March 2025, down from £5.38bn the previous year.
It covers Home Office costs related to asylum, including direct cash support and accommodation, but not costs relating to intercepting migrants crossing the Channel.
Specific costs for hotels were not published in the latest data, but Home Office figures released in July showed £2.1bn was spent on hotel accommodation - down from £3bn the previous year.
The data also showed small boat arrivals accounted for 43,000, or 88%, of arrivals in the period, which represented 38% more than the previous year.
This is slightly fewer than the peak in 2022, which saw 46,000 people arrive by small boat.
More than half the people arriving to June 2025 came from Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria, according to the government numbers.
Afghans were the most common nationality amongst small boat arrivals in the year ending June 2025, accounting for 15% of small boat arrivals (6,400).
Since January 2018, three-quarters of small boat arrivals are men, while only 16% are children.
According to the data, 5,011 children - those under the age of 18 - crossed by small boat to apply for asylum in the year to June 2025.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said Labour has "strengthened Britain's visa and immigration controls, cut asylum costs and sharply increased enforcement and returns".
She blamed the "broken immigration and asylum system" and said the previous Conservative government had left it in "chaos".
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the government is "failing" and has lost control of our borders".
Liberal Democrat spokesperson Lisa Smart MP said the asylum backlog has been "far too large for far too long".
"The Conservatives trashed our immigration system and let numbers spiral. Now this Labour government is failing to get a grip on the crisis," she said.
Chris Brain led the Nine O'Clock Service from 1984 to 1995
Heralded by Church of England leaders for its "ground-breaking" nightclub style, the Nine O'Clock Service attracted hundreds of young people to its meetings in Sheffield in the 1980s and 1990s.
But, during the seven-week trial of its leader, Chris Brain, jurors heard how as the service's popularity exploded, the former priest used his power to isolate followers and sexually assault women in his congregation.
Now after a jury has found him guilty of 17 counts of indecent assault, not guilty of 15 and failed to reach verdicts on five outstanding charges, the BBC examines his rise and fall.
When Chris Brain first began attending services at St Thomas Crookes in Sheffield in the 1980s, he was seen as charismatic, engaging and passionate.
But he believed the Church of England needed to move away from "fancy golf club Christianity" if it wanted to attract a younger generation - and he dreamed of combining modern music with the power of worship.
The Reverend Robert Warren, who was the vicar at St Thomas's at the time, told jurors at Inner London Crown Court that he gave Brain and his friends the chance to put the idea into practice in 1984, offering him a slot at 21:00 on a Sunday night.
Brain - who was a member of a Christian rock band called Present Tense - incorporated live music and multimedia displays into the services, putting on events more akin to a nightclub than a church.
Paul Hatton, who was a 20-something microbiology student at Sheffield Polytechnic at the time, told the court the services were "exciting" and "special" in their "enthusiasm" for young people.
"You would get there at about half past eight at night. The place was blacked out, the music was brilliant," he said.
Another former member put it more abruptly, saying in a BBC documentary from 1995: "We were sticking two fingers up to normal, middle class church ways of behaviour."
Chris Brain admitted to jurors during his trial that his leadership style was sometimes "overbearing"
The services, which became known as The Nine O'Clock Service, or NOS, were an instant hit.
Mr Warren told the court that over the next few years, the congregation swelled to about 400, and by the 1990s the NOS had to move to a bigger venue at the city's Ponds Forge sports complex as people signed up in their droves.
The court heard how on one occasion, the Bishop of Sheffield confirmed 93 people in one service alone.
George Carey, shortly before his appointment as Archbishop of Canterbury, told Brain he would like to see a Nine O'Clock Service "in every town and city in Britain", according to the 1995 documentary.
By 1991, the Diocese of Sheffield had fast-tracked Brain's route to the priesthood, allowing him to become ordained after just two years, instead of the usual four.
'God now, in your face': Chris Brain and others perform at Greenbelt festival in 1992
Away from the praise and the bright lights, however, members of the congregation described Brain as "manipulative and dictatorial".
Some told the court his vision for NOS went well beyond the services themselves, including a "vetting process" to join the congregation - and new members were asked if they would make "a vow of poverty".
Witness Rachel Hurding - not one of the women Brain was charged with assaulting - said all NOS members donated 10% of their earnings to a central pot.
Meanwhile, Bridget Evans - also not one of the complainants - said she gave about £40,000 to NOS over her seven years as a member, and she remembered feeling pressured by Brain into making donations.
Ms Evans told the court she had once handed over money from her father which was meant to fund a trip to South Africa for her brother's wedding, because Brain persuaded her it would be better for her not to go and for NOS to use the money to buy a van instead.
"His style of leadership, in retrospect I would call it very manipulative. At the time, I would say, it was very dictatorial," Ms Evans said.
"We were all pulled into the belief there was a vision for what we were about, what the aim of NOS was [and] that people had to accept the way it was in order to follow the common vision."
During his trial, Brain denied financially exploiting or controlling members of his congregation.
He told jurors he could sometimes be "overbearing", but claimed that was just his "direct Yorkshire style".
NOS outgrew St Thomas's, and in the early 1990s moved to Ponds Forge (pictured above in 1998)
NOS members were also discouraged from spending time outside their "discipleship group", including with friends or family, the court heard.
Another witness, who was not a complainant in the case, told the court if members socialised with other people, word would travel "up the ranks" and they would be "reprimanded by the leaders".
"You're then given this really hard cold shoulder," she said.
"You feel like if you don't fit in, if you don't go along with this, you're not going to be allowed to stay in this club, which basically is going to get you into heaven. It's as simple as that."
Others described being "Chris-napped", when Brain would drive them around in his car while he chastised them, and then often froze them out for several weeks before getting back in touch.
One victim described having a panic attack in the back of the car as Brain shouted at her and told her she was evil.
Another victim broke down in tears as she explained to the court that the whole thing was "so confusing".
"There was always a part of me [thinking], 'thank God he has contacted me…he is still happy with me, I'm still acceptable.' My self-esteem was totally based on how he responded to me."
Prosecutors said it was the endorsement of the Church that made Brain increasingly unaccountable and turned the NOS into a "cult".
Nine O'Clock Trust
Brain's ordination was fast-tracked as a result of the popularity of the NOS
Brain's manipulation of his followers, however, went beyond emotional abuse.
The court heard that following the birth of his daughter a number of young women were recruited for unpaid roles in what was known as the "homebase team", at his home in Parkers Road, to allow Brain to continue to focus on the NOS.
An 18-page document outlining what was expected of those selected was shown to the jury.
Among the duties mentioned was a rota for cooking and cleaning and walking his dog, Badger, along with the instruction that members of the team should do "anything" Brain asked for.
One witness told police that members of the homebase team were treated "like slaves", while another said they were made to sleep on a thin, old rug in the dining room.
One member of the team, who was often tasked with walking the dog, told the court she used to see "scantily-clad women through the window" on her way past.
She told the court she was often called late at night to "put him to bed", and "never felt I had the option to say no".
Brain would then ask her to give him a massage, including an occasion where he brushed her hand over his erect penis.
Brain did not deny that he had massages from many women in the homebase team as well as from others in his congregation.
Asked in court why he had the massages, Brain replied: "Why not?"
He said some massages, intended to relieve "tensions" in his body, could evolve into "sensual touching", which he said was between friends and "no big deal".
However, Brain's victims said this was when much of the sexual abuse took place.
Assaults he was found guilty of during the massages included kissing the women, touching their breasts and on one occasion, lying on top of a woman while clothed and "simulating sex" with her.
One victim told the court she felt "really shocked and panicked" after one assault, and that life in NOS became "strange and difficult" afterwards for her.
"I spent my life being constantly confused," she added.
Chris Brain admits 'improper sexual conduct' in BBC documentary in 1995
The court heard that the homebase team became known by others in the NOS as the "Lycra Lovelies" because of their clothes.
Ms Evans said: "Chris used to say it was very important people dressed in what was called 'the culture'…It often involved black Lycra leggings, tight-fitting tops and that sort of thing."
Meanwhile, NOS member Graham Moore told the court that, initially, the homebase team seemed like an appropriate way to support Brain and his wife, but over time it became increasingly concerning and there was "something not quite right".
He said many of the women began to look thinner, dressed the same and withdrew from contact with the rest of the NOS.
"It was what it looked like, which was extremely cultish - this group of girls around this charismatic leader, and they put him to bed at night," one victim said.
The demise of the NOS came about even quicker than its rise to fame, when, in the summer of 1995, allegations of sexual abuse by Brain culminated in his resignation and the movement's collapse.
In a BBC documentary the same year, Brain admitted that "for a priest in a church setting, I would have to say I was involved in improper sexual conduct with a number of women".
He told jurors at his trial that he had made that admission while in a state of "overwhelmed trauma" from all the publicity the allegations had received.
It was not until 2019 that South Yorkshire Police opened an investigation, and it was only in 2024 he was charged.
An appeals court has thrown out a $500m (£372m) penalty that President Donald Trump was ordered to pay in a New York civil fraud trial last year.
Judge Arthur Engoron had ordered Trump to pay the fee for massively inflating the value of the Trump Organization's properties in order to secure favourable loans.
In the ruling released on Thursday, judges on the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division stated that while Trump was liable for the fraud, the fine of nearly half a billion dollars was excessive and likely violated protections in the US Constitution against severe punishment.
In the case Judge Engoron had ordered Trump to pay $355m, but with interest, that grew to more than $500m.
In the case against Trump, his two adult sons, and the Trump Organization, Judge Engoron also banned Trump from serving as a company director or taking out loans from banks in the state for three years.
The appellate panel of five judges was divided over the merits of the original lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who had accused the Trump and his sons of "persistent and repeated fraud".
While most said she was "within her lawful power in bringing this action", one believed the case should have been dismissed and two said that there should be a new trial of a more limited scope.
Those two, though, joined the decision to throw out the fine "for the sole purpose of ensuring finality", wrote Judge Peter Moulton in the 323-page decision.
Judge Moulton said that American voters had "obviously rendered a verdict" on Trump's political career.
"This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business," the judge wrote.
Trump's son, Eric Trump, who was involved in the case, celebrated the decision in a post on social media.
"Total victory in the sham NY Attorney General case!!! After 5 years of hell, justice prevailed!" he wrote.
Kristian Nairn said he would be "back on my feet very soon, in every sense"
Game of Thrones actor Kristian Nairn has pulled out of this year's Strictly Come Dancing "due to unexpected medical reasons", just days after the line-up was announced.
Nairn, 49, is best known for playing Hodor – the guileless servant of House Stark - in HBO's fantasy drama.
He also portrayed Wee John Feeney in the US TV period comedy drama Our Flag Means Death, and is a house music DJ.
"With a heavy heart, I have to step back from this season of Strictly Come Dancing due to unexpected medical reasons," Nairn said in a statement.
"I was truly looking forward to the journey, and I'm deeply sorry to disappoint anyone who was looking forward to seeing me on the dance floor.
"Thank you all for your support, and I will be back on my feet very soon, in every sense. Love to all, Kristian."
Last week, the 6ft 10in Northern Irishman became the 15th and final contestant to be unveiled for this year's Strictly.
When his participation was announced last Friday, he said taking part in the dance contest would be "a huge challenge for me physically, but I'm ready to rise to it."
Referencing his withdrawal, the show's ecedutive producer Sarah James said: "We've absolutely loved getting to know Kristian in this short time, and he has all the makings of a brilliant Strictly Come Dancing contestant.
"We're incredibly sorry to lose him from this year's series and we all wish him a speedy recovery."
His replacement will be revealed on The One Show on BBC One from 19:00 BST on Thursday.
The UK is among 27 countries backing a statement calling for Israel to allow immediate independent foreign media access to Gaza.
France, Germany, Australia, and Japan have also signed the text released by the Media Freedom Coalition - an intergovernmental group which advocates for the rights and protection of journalists globally.
The statement also condemned attacks on journalists, saying those working in Gaza must be protected.
International journalists have been banned by Israel from entering the Gaza Strip independently since the start of the war nearly two years ago. Some journalists have been taken into Gaza by the IDF under controlled access.
At least 192 journalists and media workers, the vast majority of them Palestinian, have been killed since then in the deadliest conflict for journalists ever documented, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
Thursday's statement, the first of its kind to be made jointly by countries, says their call is in light of "the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe", adding they "oppose all attempts to restrict press freedom and block entry to journalists".
It says that "deliberate targeting of journalists" is unacceptable, calling for all attacks to be investigated and followed up by prosecutions.
Sharif and another correspondent, Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with cameramen Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, were in a tent for journalists at the hospital's main gate when it was struck, the broadcaster said at the time.
Two other freelance journalists were killed - Moamen Aliwa and Mohammed al-Khaldi.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed it had targeted Sharif, alleging he had "served as the head of a terrorist cell in Hamas".
However, the CPJ said Israel had failed to provide evidence to back up its allegations. Al Jazeera has also denied Israeli claims.
With no international journalists allowed into Gaza, local reporters have continued throughout the war to provide coverage directly on social media and working for Palestinian or international media organisations.
Israel's High Court of Justice last year ruled that restrictions on entry were justified on security grounds. The Foreign Press Association, which represents journalists operating in Israel, has been petitioning the court to lift the ban, arguing that "unprecedented restrictions" had "hindered independent reporting".
More than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups have warned of mass starvation in Gaza.
Israel, which controls the entry of aid supplies into Gaza, has accused the charities of "serving the propaganda of Hamas". But its own government figures show the amount of food it allowed into the territory between March and July was significantly below what the World Food Programme (WFP) says is needed for even basic assistance needs.
There are more fears about Palestinians after the Israeli military began the first stages of a planned ground offensive in Gaza City.
Israel's government announced its intention to conquer the entire Gaza Strip after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal broke down last month.
The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
At least 62,122 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry. The ministry's figures are quoted by the UN and others as the most reliable source of statistics available on casualties.
Newly released Home Office data paints a mixed picture of how the government's asylum seeker strategy is working out.
On the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels - a current political flashpoint - the new data shows that the number has risen slightly compared to when it came to power. However the figures are far below the 2023 peak, when the Conservatives were in government.
The number of asylum applications in the UK during the year to June also reached a new record of 111,000 - though the government has reduced the backlog of claims by processing them faster.
In addition, in the year to June, about 38% more small boats landed on UK shores than the previous year.
BBC correspondents Jack Fenwick and Dominic Casciani assess what the figures tell us about the effectiveness of the government's asylum strategy.
Strategy could be working but long way still to go
By political correspondent Jack Fenwick
Headlines about record numbers of asylum applications and an increase in hotel use since Labour came to power clearly don't make comfortable reading for ministers.
But the overall view in the Home Office on Thursday morning, according to one source, was "not disappointed".
And behind those headlines there is evidence that elements of the government's strategy could be working.
This is the first data that takes into account the huge rise in small boat crossings since March.
A few months ago, some people inside the Home Office had been worried that hotel use could spike as a result.
But that hasn't happened. The number of asylum seekers in hotels actually went slightly down between March and June.
Ministers have been trying to find alternative sources of accommodation, like regular houses and flats within communities - but those numbers haven't gone up either.
By processing claims more quickly, the Home Office has been able to ensure that the big rise in small boat crossings hasn't had much of an effect on asylum accommodation.
Ending the use of hotels was a Labour manifesto pledge and ministers have a long, long way to go before they get close to achieving it.
But they'll be hoping they've now broken the link between small boats crossings and hotel use.
Opposition parties give that claim short shrift.
They say the government's record on illegal immigration will ultimately be judged on the small boat crossing numbers, which remain at stubborn, record-breaking highs.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp claims the numbers would be at zero if his party's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda had been implemented.
Home Office accounts released last month show the Conservatives had around 1,000 civil servants working on the Rwanda plan.
Labour scrapped the idea and a senior Home Office source says they've been able to speed up initial asylum applications by moving many of those staff over to that team.
The same source also tried to shift some of the political onus going forward onto the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).
While initial asylum claims are being processed more quickly, there's increasing concern over what's happening in the appeals courts.
Data from March 2025 shows a record level of appeals being made against failed asylum applications.
The Home Office source said "courts are definitely a pinch point and we do need the MoJ to step up and help us with that".
A former justice secretary told us these types of appeals backlogs are often caused by "poor casework management" from the Home Office during the initial application phase.
There's clear potential for tension between two parts of government there in the coming months.
Ending hotel use still a huge challenge
By home and legal correspondent Dominic Casciani
The government's aim, ultimately, is to convince the public that it has better and greater control of the immigration and asylum system than its predecessors - and thanks to the rise of Reform it knows it has to send a signal that even if it does not achieve all its aims, that it is going in the right direction.
This is why these stats are complicated for both them and their opponents - and why both sides will highlight different aspects.
The good news for the government is that officials are taking decisions on asylum applications quicker than before.
As of June there were 91,000 cases in the asylum backlog. That's down a fifth on a year - and is almost half the peak of two years ago.
The smaller the backlog, the less the government needs to spend. The total asylum support bill has fallen to £4.8bn in 2024-25, down from £5.4bn the year before.
But now for the bad news.
More people who have been told they have no case are appealing against that decision. There are some 51,000 appeals before asylum and immigration judges. Those people are stuck in the system until they either win their appeal or are given a final decision to be removed.
And that's part of the reason why the Home Office is making only modest progress on the use of hotels - establishments which were brought in by the last government after it ran out of alternative accommodation around the country.
The government can show it has increased removals from the UK of people at the end of the process. But more than half of removals are not failed asylum applicants but foreign national offenders leaving prison.
Removals of small boat migrants are modest and many of these are legally low-hanging fruit, such as the brief phenomenon of a rush of Albanian nationals.
Crucially though - and this is a win for government - the number of people voluntarily leaving has gone up by 13% to 26,761. They are generally paid up to £3,000 to go - but that's far cheaper than battling through the courts.
Four other critical factors will play a huge role in this challenge.
The government's plan to strengthen counter-smuggling gang powers is still in Parliament. TBC on whether that works.
Ministers are waiting for the French to stop dinghies leaving the shore and a separate German commitment to change its law so it can seize boats being warehoused there.
The final factor relies on global events. People will keep leaving their homes around the world to come to Europe if they feel unsafe.
All of these things needs to come together - and keep going in the right direction - for the government to meet its commitment to end hotel use by the end of the Parliament.
"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."
Oscar Wilde was not talking about mixed doubles tennis. But his quote could easily be applied to an event which some felt needed new life breathing into it.
The US Open's decision to revamp its mixed doubles - enticing singles superstars with lucrative cash incentives, a shortened format and slot before the other main draws - certainly got people chatting.
Previously, it would be lost and largely forgotten in the midst of finals weekend.
The United States Tennis Association (USTA) opted to make an innovative move - but it divided opinion among those who love the sport.
"I know it created a lot of reaction and [it was] somewhat bold to do it," said three-time Grand Slam singles finalist Casper Ruud, who teamed up with six-time major champion Iga Swiatek and finished as runners-up.
"You can't argue that it's not been great for the fans."
Was attracting the big names an effective way to attract more eyeballs on the sport? Yes.
Did it also rip away a 138-year tradition and rob most specialist doubles players of a shot at a major title? Yes.
In the end, the curtain-raising event - spread over two days in what is traditionally qualifying week - led to a fitting final on which polarising narratives hung.
Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori, the defending champions and only recognised doubles pairing in the 16-team event, were aiming to win for the greater good of their discipline.
One of their peers, Australian player Ellen Perez, spoke for many when saying she had "never felt more Italian" as she supported them.
Losing to Swiatek and Ruud - who had never played together before this week - would have been a blow for the doubles community.
Instead, Errani and Vavassori's triumph made the case to find room for more doubles specialists if, as expected, the format returns next year.
"We showed that doubles is a great product and in the future we need more marketing and visibility," Vavassori pleaded to the US Open decision-makers.
Image source, Getty Images
Image caption,
Errani and Vavassori have won both their Grand Slam mixed doubles titles in New York
Ultimately, the two-day doubles party - where courtside DJs pumped up the extremely healthy crowds and encouraged a raucous atmosphere - will be considered a success.
Britain's Jack Draper, who is ranked fifth in the ATP singles rankings but has limited doubles experience, said he thought it was a "great" event.
"If I wasn't playing the mixed here, I'd be training. I prefer playing on a big court in front of people. It gets your eye in quicker," he said.
After the opening day's action, Draper made a Freudian slip which initially proved quite telling.
Draper was playfully scolded by his partner Jessica Pegula for describing the new-look event as an "exhibition" - a word used disparagingly by its detractors.
But, following their semi-final exit, Draper was keen to point out the event did not feel like a 'hit and giggle' after all.
"[On Tuesday] there were times where it felt a little bit more that way from our opponents," he said.
"Whereas tonight we were in the changing rooms, you're seeing Iga and Casper, they're fully dialled in. It was intense."
The fans on the ground in New York also demonstrated their appetite for something different.
On the opening day, the 25,000-seater Arthur Ashe Stadium was about two-thirds full when A-List pairing Emma Raducanu and Carlos Alcaraz walked out to a pop star-style reception.
For Wednesday's semi-finals and final, where face-value tickets ranged from $50 (£37) to $262 (£195), it was just short of a full house with only a sliver of empty seats at the very back.
Ticket-holders Hilary Hamm and Maria Segovia - ardent tennis fans who have previously travelled from New York to Wimbledon and the Australian Open - admitted they have rarely watched mixed doubles in the past.
"Moving it from finals weekend and making it a standalone event caught our attention," said 32-year-old Maria. "If it is going to increase crowd engagement, then I'd definitely to see more events like this."
Hilary, also 32, added: "I think it's been amazing. Watching the women leading the male partners has been particularly inspiring and shows tennis needs a strong mixed gender competition featuring the stars."
Image source, Getty Images
Image caption,
Thousands of New York fans were excited to watch the world's leading singles players turn out in the mixed doubles
One described the event as "a complete farce", while another said it was a "shameful idea".
A poll in the piece showed 70% of our readers thought the overhaul was a bad move.
The good news for purists is the other three Grand Slams - the Australian Open, French Open and Wimbledon - are thought unlikely to follow suit in the near future.
Tennis Australia is equally as bold as its American counterpart, but does not have the same financial clout to offer the mountain of prize money and sweetening appearance fees.
Neither does the French Open or Wimbledon. Also, the two oldest Grand Slam tournaments are generally more reluctant to deviate from time-honoured traditions.
Draper, 23, is among the group who would like to see more change, saying it would be "cool" if all the majors adopted a similar approach.
He can be sure the power-holders in Melbourne, Paris and London will have been watching the New York trendsetters with intrigue.
Hundreds of thousands of user conversations with Elon Musk's artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot Grok have been exposed in search engine results - seemingly without users' knowledge.
Unique links are created when Grok users press a button to share a transcript of their conversation - but as well as sharing the chat with the intended recipient, the button also appears to have made the chats searchable online.
A Google search on Thursday revealed it had indexed nearly 300,000 Grok conversations.
It has led one expert to describe AI chatbots as a "privacy disaster in progress".
The BBC has approached X for comment.
The appearance of Grok chats in search engine results was first reported by tech industry publication Forbes, which counted more than 370,000 user conversations on Google.
Among chat transcripts seen by the BBC were examples of Musk's chatbot being asked to create a secure password, provide meal plans for weight loss and answer detailed questions about medical conditions.
Some indexed transcripts also showed users' attempts to test the limits on what Grok would say or do.
In one example seen by the BBC, the chatbot provided detailed instructions on how to make a Class A drug in a lab.
It is not the first time that peoples' conversations with AI chatbots have appeared more widely than they perhaps initially realised when using "share" functions.
OpenAI recently rowed back an "experiment" which saw ChatGPT conversations appear in search engine results when shared by users.
A spokesperson told BBC News at the time it had been "testing ways to make it easier to share helpful conversations, while keeping users in control".
They said user chats were private by default and users had to explicitly opt-in to sharing them.
While users' account details may be anonymised or obscured in shared chatbot transcripts, their prompts may still contain - and risk revealing - personal, sensitive information about someone.
Experts say this highlights mounting concerns over users' privacy.
“AI chatbots are a privacy disaster in progress,” Prof Luc Rocher, associate professor at the Oxford Internet Institute, told the BBC.
They said "leaked conversations" from chatbots have divulged user information ranging from full names and location, to sensitive details about their mental health, business operations or relationships.
"Once leaked online, these conversations will stay there forever," they added.
Meanwhile Carissa Veliz, associate professor in philosophy at Oxford University's Institute for Ethics in AI, said users not being told shared chats would appear in search results is "problematic".
"Our technology doesn't even tell us what it's doing with our data, and that's a problem," she said.
London Underground staff will strike from 5 September for seven days
There will be rolling strike action across the London Underground (LU) beginning on Friday 5 September for seven days, the RMT union has announced.
The union claimed transport bosses refused to engage with them over pay, fatigue management, extreme shift patterns and a reduction in the working week.
RMT General Secretary Eddie Dempsey said: "Fatigue and extreme shift rotations are serious issues impacting on our members health and wellbeing- all of which have not been adequately addressed for years by LU management."
A Transport for London (TfL) spokesperson said: "We urge the RMT to put our fair, affordable pay offer to their members and to continue to engage with us."
On Thursday, RMT accused management of a "dismissive approach", adding this had "fuelled widespread anger and distrust" among the workforce.
Staff at different grades will be taking industrial action at different times as part of rolling strike action, it said.
TfL's spokesperson said: "We regularly meet with our trade unions to discuss any concerns that they may have, and we recently met with the RMT to discuss some specific points.
"We are committed to ensuring our colleagues are treated fairly and, as well as offering a 3.4% pay increase in our ongoing pay discussions, we have made progress on a number of commitments we have made previously.
"We welcome further engagement with our unions about fatigue and rostering across London Underground, but a reduction in the contractual 35-hour working week is neither practical nor affordable."
In a separate dispute over pay and conditions, workers on the Docklands Light Railway will also be striking during this period in the week beginning 7 September.
Mr Dempsey added: "RMT will continue to engage LU management with a view to seeking a revised offer in order to reach a negotiated settlement."
Giraffes are one of the world's most distinct and well-loved creatures, always thought to be one species.
But now scientists at the International Union for Conservation of Nature say we can welcome three more species of the world's tallest mammal.
It's not the first time researchers have suggested there are four species of these giants strolling on our planet, but the latest assessment puts an official stamp on it.
How did scientists work it out? And what does it mean for the future of the animal?
Scientists compared the skull size and head shape of different giraffes and concluded there was enough genetic diversity for four groups to be considered as different species.
The researchers looked at natural features across Africa such as deserts, rivers and valleys that could have separated animals in the past, meaning they evolved separately from each other.
Say hello to the Southern giraffe, one of the newly-recognised species.
Michael Brown
A Southern giraffe, pictured in Namibia
This giraffe lives in Angola, southern Botswana, Namibia, southern Zimbabwe, Zambia, and southwestern Mozambique.
Two rivers (the Kunene and Zambezi) and rainforests in the Congo Basin probably separated the animals from overlapping with other giraffes.
The second new species is the Reticulated giraffe.
Michael Brown
Reticulated giraffe in Kenya
This giraffe lives in the open savannas and wooded grasslands of Kenya, Somalia, and Ethiopia.
Scientists think the Tana river, Ethiopia's mountains and towns separated this animal from other giraffes in the north of the region.
It is also a migrating animal, which means it may have passed by other giraffes when it could have cross-bred.
The third species we can officially recognise is the Northern giraffe.
Getty Images
Northern giraffe
This animal lives in western Ethiopia, central and western Kenya, eastern South Sudan and Uganda.
Scientists say the Nile River and Lake Victoria, as well as its migration pattern, separated this giraffe from others.
The fourth and final species is the beautiful Masai giraffe, with its distinctive leaf-pattern hide.
Getty Images
Masai giraffe in Kenya
It lives in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, separated from the Northern giraffe by Lake Victoria and the Nile River.
Although its pattern makes it seem like it could be a marker of being a separate species, the scientists say that the hides vary even within one population of giraffes and as the animals age.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) says that identifying genetic difference is "vital" for conservation and managing giraffe populations.
As a single species, the giraffe was classed as vulnerable to extinction, although some of the sub-species were increasing in numbers.
The IUCN will now re-assess the vulnerability of the four new species and their sub-species and says it hopes to better protect the majestic animals with the new information.
"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."
Oscar Wilde was not talking about mixed doubles tennis. But his quote could easily be applied to an event which some felt needed new life breathing into it.
The US Open's decision to revamp its mixed doubles - enticing singles superstars with lucrative cash incentives, a shortened format and slot before the other main draws - certainly got people chatting.
Previously, it would be lost and largely forgotten in the midst of finals weekend.
The United States Tennis Association (USTA) opted to make an innovative move - but it divided opinion among those who love the sport.
"I know it created a lot of reaction and [it was] somewhat bold to do it," said three-time Grand Slam singles finalist Casper Ruud, who teamed up with six-time major champion Iga Swiatek and finished as runners-up.
"You can't argue that it's not been great for the fans."
Was attracting the big names an effective way to attract more eyeballs on the sport? Yes.
Did it also rip away a 138-year tradition and rob most specialist doubles players of a shot at a major title? Yes.
In the end, the curtain-raising event - spread over two days in what is traditionally qualifying week - led to a fitting final on which polarising narratives hung.
Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori, the defending champions and only recognised doubles pairing in the 16-team event, were aiming to win for the greater good of their discipline.
One of their peers, Australian player Ellen Perez, spoke for many when saying she had "never felt more Italian" as she supported them.
Losing to Swiatek and Ruud - who had never played together before this week - would have been a blow for the doubles community.
Instead, Errani and Vavassori's triumph made the case to find room for more doubles specialists if, as expected, the format returns next year.
"We showed that doubles is a great product and in the future we need more marketing and visibility," Vavassori pleaded to the US Open decision-makers.
Image source, Getty Images
Image caption,
Errani and Vavassori have won both their Grand Slam mixed doubles titles in New York
Ultimately, the two-day doubles party - where courtside DJs pumped up the extremely healthy crowds and encouraged a raucous atmosphere - will be considered a success.
Britain's Jack Draper, who is ranked fifth in the ATP singles rankings but has limited doubles experience, said he thought it was a "great" event.
"If I wasn't playing the mixed here, I'd be training. I prefer playing on a big court in front of people. It gets your eye in quicker," he said.
After the opening day's action, Draper made a Freudian slip which initially proved quite telling.
Draper was playfully scolded by his partner Jessica Pegula for describing the new-look event as an "exhibition" - a word used disparagingly by its detractors.
But, following their semi-final exit, Draper was keen to point out the event did not feel like a 'hit and giggle' after all.
"[On Tuesday] there were times where it felt a little bit more that way from our opponents," he said.
"Whereas tonight we were in the changing rooms, you're seeing Iga and Casper, they're fully dialled in. It was intense."
The fans on the ground in New York also demonstrated their appetite for something different.
On the opening day, the 25,000-seater Arthur Ashe Stadium was about two-thirds full when A-List pairing Emma Raducanu and Carlos Alcaraz walked out to a pop star-style reception.
For Wednesday's semi-finals and final, where face-value tickets ranged from $50 (£37) to $262 (£195), it was just short of a full house with only a sliver of empty seats at the very back.
Ticket-holders Hilary Hamm and Maria Segovia - ardent tennis fans who have previously travelled from New York to Wimbledon and the Australian Open - admitted they have rarely watched mixed doubles in the past.
"Moving it from finals weekend and making it a standalone event caught our attention," said 32-year-old Maria. "If it is going to increase crowd engagement, then I'd definitely to see more events like this."
Hilary, also 32, added: "I think it's been amazing. Watching the women leading the male partners has been particularly inspiring and shows tennis needs a strong mixed gender competition featuring the stars."
Image source, Getty Images
Image caption,
Thousands of New York fans were excited to watch the world's leading singles players turn out in the mixed doubles
One described the event as "a complete farce", while another said it was a "shameful idea".
A poll in the piece showed 70% of our readers thought the overhaul was a bad move.
The good news for purists is the other three Grand Slams - the Australian Open, French Open and Wimbledon - are thought unlikely to follow suit in the near future.
Tennis Australia is equally as bold as its American counterpart, but does not have the same financial clout to offer the mountain of prize money and sweetening appearance fees.
Neither does the French Open or Wimbledon. Also, the two oldest Grand Slam tournaments are generally more reluctant to deviate from time-honoured traditions.
Draper, 23, is among the group who would like to see more change, saying it would be "cool" if all the majors adopted a similar approach.
He can be sure the power-holders in Melbourne, Paris and London will have been watching the New York trendsetters with intrigue.
Watch: Endangered porpoises at the Institute of Hydrobiology in Wuhan, China
Chinese scientists are in a battle to save one of the last large animal species living in the Yangtze River – and a complete ban on fishing in the region is helping them.
At the Institute of Hydrobiology in Wuhan, just 5km (3.1 miles) from the banks of the river, the preserved bodies of the now-extinct river dolphin (baiji in Chinese) and paddle fish sit silently behind panes of glass.
"Now that those have become extinct, we're going to save the Yangtze river porpoise," Professor Wang Xi tells the BBC. "It has become the most important animal here."
It was in 2002 that the last known baiji died, 22 years after researchers at the Institute started caring for it. A year later, the last known paddle fish - a type of ray-finned fish which can grow to more than 3 metres - was accidentally caught by fishermen and, despite being radio tagged and released, disappeared.
The goal now is to stop the Yangtze finless river porpoise - 1,200 of which remain in the wild, according to current estimates – from suffering the same fate.
"It's the only top-level predator left in the river," Professor Wang explains. "They are rare and their numbers reflect the health of the entire system's ecology."
The last river dolphin, or baiji, died in 2002 - the only examples remaining are in museums
The idea of a halt on all fishing was first conceived by Professor Cao Wenxuan from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) in 2006, but it took a lot more pressure from fellow scientists before a full 10-year-ban finally came into force nearly five years ago.
Enforced by police, the ban carries potential prison time for those caught fishing right along the Yangtze, as well as adjacent lakes and tributaries. It's been hugely disruptive, and put 220,000 fishermen out of work.
Yet the finless porpoise, which belongs to the oldest living branch of the porpoise family tree, remains critically endangered today.
Those the BBC was shown at the Institute are being held in captivity to be studied by CAS. They can be seen from above the water or below, after taking the stairs down beside a deep tank where the observation area is located.
The scientists say they get excited in the company of humans, and they certainly appear to be showing off: racing through the water and swimming at speed, close to the glass with people on the other side. Swimming past, they seem to look at you with a mischievous smile.
In the wild, they are still hanging on where other species could not.
The construction of the main part of Three Gorges Dam in 2006 didn't directly impact the finless porpoise, which don't have to go upstream to spawn, although it did affect the fish they eat.
Yang He
The finless porpoise belongs to the oldest living branch of the porpoise family tree
For other large marine animals, like the paddle fish or the Chinese sturgeon, the structure was catastrophic.
Wang Ding, a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), who specialises in cetaceans like the finless porpoise, has dedicated his life to preserving the health of the Yangtze. He can see the good and the bad with these dams – and recalls how things used to be.
"Every flood season we'd have to organise a team with strong muscles, using many men, to go to sleep on the bank of the river, just in case a flood came," he says. "Then, if the flood hit, everyone would do their best to try to keep the levy banks solid, to make sure they were not broken by the dangerous rushing water."
Now, he says, the Three Gorges Dam mitigates against the flooding.
As Professor Wang points out, however, this massive, river-blocking structure also prevents the Yangtze's giant sturgeons from reaching their spawning grounds.
While the endangered fish had briefly seemed to find an alternative location, he says, this is no longer the case - and these days sturgeons are only in the river because researchers are pouring them in, 10,000 at a time.
The giant Three Gorges Dam has affected local wildlife along the river
Despite over a million captive-bred sturgeon being released into the Yangtze last year, attempts to boost the population have been unsuccessful, as the fish are not reproducing by themselves in the wild.
So the finless porpoise doesn't end up like this, Professor Wang and other scientists are hoping that the current complete fishing ban will continue after the initial 10 years is up.
Their research, published in the Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, records a drastic increase in fish numbers since the ban came into effect in 2021.
Another threat to the finless porpoise, however, might be harder to resolve.
Wang Xi pointed out that "ships are very dangerous for animal's brains because they are very noisy".
This is said to produce a form of underwater noise pollution which distresses the animals.
Chinese scientists think that the sound from ships may have contributed to the demise of the Yangtze's baiji river dolphins, which used sonar to communicate.
But it's one thing to ban fishing - it would be quite another to completely stop the busy river traffic which delivers passengers as well as goods, and provides lifeblood for much of central China's economy.
More achievable was forcing factories which produce chemicals to move away from the Yangtze. Thousands of these have been shut down or relocated over the past decade, in a move that is said to have significantly improved the river's water quality.
There has also been community involvement in the porpoise preservation push.
Yang He
Porpoise numbers are now rising again thanks to conservation efforts
After retirement, Yang He took up amateur photography. Now, he says, he goes to the river every day with his camera equipment trying to spot the animals.
When he gets some good shots he forwards them to the scientists, who say he's doing a better job than almost anyone tracking their progress.
Mr Yang says he once saw a porpoise in distress which had been caught in some netting. He notified the local authorities, who shut down that section of river to all shipping until it could be rescued – and it turned out the soon-to-be freed porpoise was pregnant. He felt pretty good about that, he says.
It is the porpoise numbers, however, that tell the most convincing story.
In the 1990s there were 3,300 finless porpoises in the wild. By 2006 this had halved.
Then the fishing bans came in, the factories were moved and the decline stopped. Not only that, but over the last five years of records, porpoise numbers have gone up by nearly a quarter.
Scientists are proud of these numbers – and the implications they hold for the health of the environment more broadly.
"We're saving the finless porpoise to save the Yangtze River," says Wang Ding. "This is like a great mirror, to have an idea how well we have been doing protecting this ecosystem.
"If the porpoises are doing fine, if their numbers are increasing, this means the ecological health of the whole river is also improving."
Indian government says ethanol blending has cut 69.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions since 2014
India's drive to blend more biofuels with petrol has helped the country cut millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions and save precious dollar reserves.
But it has also sparked worries among vehicle owners and food policy experts about its potential impact on fuel efficiency and food security.
Last month, India achieved its objective of blending 20% ethanol with petrol, known as E20, five years ahead of its target.
The government views this as a game changer in reducing carbon emissions and trimming oil imports. Since 2014, ethanol blending has helped India cut 69.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions and saved 1.36 trillion rupees ($15.5 bn; £11.5 bn) in foreign exchange.
A study by Delhi-based think tank Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) shows that carbon dioxide emissions from road transport in India will nearly double by 2050.
"The demand for fuel is only going to increase and shifting to ethanol-blended petrol is absolutely necessary to cut down emissions," Sandeep Theng from the Indian Federation of Green Energy, an organisation that promotes green energy, told the BBC.
But many vehicles in India are not E20-compliant, making their owners sceptical about the benefits of the policy.
Hormazd Sorabjee, editor of Autocar India magazine, said that ethanol has a "lower energy density than petrol and is more corrosive". This results in lower mileage and exposes certain vehicle parts to a greater risk of wear and tear.
Mr Sorabjee added that some manufacturers like Honda have been using E20 compliant material since 2009, but many older vehicles on Indian roads are not E20 compatible.
While there is no official data on the impact of of E20 fuel on engines, consumers routinely share anecdotes about their vehicle's deteriorating mileage on social media.
Many standard insurance policies in India also don't provide cover for damage due to the use of non-compliant fuel, a top executive at online insurance platform Policybazaar, who wanted to stay anonymous, told the BBC.
"Consumers need to take add-on policies but even those claims can be denied or downgraded based on fine print of the policy," he added.
The federal petroleum ministry has described these concerns as "largely unfounded".
In a post on X, the ministry said that engine tuning and E20-compatible materials could minimise the drop in mileage. It also advised replacing certain parts in older vehicles, saying the process was inexpensive and "easily done during regular servicing of the vehicle".
Getty Images
Expansion of ethanol use could mean diverting more farm produce into manufacturing fuel
Mr Sorabjee told the BBC that while mileage concerns are real, they are "not always as bad as made out to be".
The bigger concern, he said, was the potential damage to vehicle materials due to the corrosive properties of E20.
Some vehicle manufacturers are offering ways to mitigate this.
Maruti Suzuki, India's biggest four-wheeler maker, is reportedly likely to introduce an E20 material kit that could cost up to 6,000 rupees ($69; £51). The kit will reportedly replace components like fuel lines, seals and gaskets. Bajaj, a leading Indian two-wheeler maker, has advised using a fuel cleaner that could cost around 100 rupees ($1.15; £0.85) for a full tank of petrol.
But not all vehicle-owners are convinced. Amit Pandhi, who has owned a Maruti Suzuki car in Delhi since 2017, is unhappy that petrol pumps don't offer the choice to opt for a blend other than E20.
"Why should I be forced to buy petrol that offers less mileage and then spend more to make the materials compliant?" he asked.
In 2021, a document on India's transition to E20 published by Niti Aayog, a government think tank, had highlighted some of these concerns. It recommended tax benefits for buying E20 compliant vehicles, along with a lower retail price for the fuel.
The government has defended its decision to not pass the recommendations, saying that at the time of the report's release, ethanol was cheaper than petrol.
"Over time, procurement price of ethanol has increased and now the weighted average price of ethanol is higher than cost of refined petrol," the petroleum ministry said earlier this month.
Getty Images
India is looking to increase ethanol-blending in petrol in the coming years
It's not just consumers - the government's blended fuel push has also raised concern among climate researchers and food policy experts.
Ethanol is produced from crops like sugarcane and maize, and expanding its use means diverting farm produce into manufacturing more fuel.
In 2025, India would need 10 billion litres of ethanol to meet its E20 requirements, according to government estimates. The demand will balloon to 20 billion litres by 2050, according to Bengaluru-based think tank Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP).
Right now, sugarcane is used to produce about 40% of India's ethanol.
This puts India in a bind. It has to choose between continuing its reliance on sugarcane - which has a higher yield for ethanol but is water-intensive - or using food crops like maize and rice to produce the fuel.
But the shift comes with its own challenges.
In 2024, for the first time in decades, India became a net importer of maize, using large amounts of the crop to make ethanol.
Ramya Natarajan, a research scientist at CSTEP, said the diversion of produce had a significant impact on the poultry sector, which now has to spend more to buy corn for feedstock.
Moreover, this year, the Food Corporation of India (FCI) approved an unprecedented allocation of 5.2 million tonnes of rice for ethanol production. The rice in FCI stocks is earmarked to be given to India's poor at a subsidised rate.
The policy could lead to an "agriculture disaster in a couple of years", said Devinder Sharma, a farming sector expert.
"In a country like India, where 250 million people go hungry, we cannot use food to feed the cars," Mr Sharma said.
To meet the demand for ethanol through corn and sugarcane in a 50-50 ratio - as outlined by Niti Aayog - India would have to bring in an additional eight million hectares of land under maize cultivation by 2030, unless there is a drastic increase in yield, according to CSTEP.
But even that could lead to problems.
"If farmers replace rice or wheat cultivation with maize, that would be sustainable because we have enough surplus of these crops. But we need other crops like oilseeds and pulses too," Ms Natarajan said.
Ms Natarajan added that continuing with the E10 blend - petrol mixed with 10% ethanol - would have been a more ideal choice.
India, however, is planning to go even beyond E20.
"The country will now gradually scale towards E25, E27, and E30 in a phased, calibrated manner," Petroleum Minister Hardeep Puri said recently.
Britain's true national sport is complaining about the weather. But does the sun really shine brighter everywhere else, or is this quite a green and pleasant land after all?
Compare your location to cities across the world, and find out if you're forecast to become the BBC's next star meteorologist.
The Israeli military says it has begun the "preliminary actions" of a planned ground offensive to capture and occupy all of Gaza City and already has a hold on its outskirts.
A military spokesman said troops were already operating in the Zeitoun and Jabalia areas to lay the groundwork for the offensive, which Defence Minister Israel Katz approved on Tuesday and which will be put to the security cabinet later this week.
About 60,000 reservists are being called up for the beginning of September to free up active-duty personnel for the operation.
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza City are expected to be ordered to evacuate and head to shelters in southern Gaza.
Many of Israel's allies have condemned the plan, with French President Emmanuel Macron warning on Wednesday that it "can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war".
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) meanwhile said further displacement and an intensification of hostilities "risk worsening an already catastrophic situation" for Gaza's 2.1 million population.
Israel's government announced its intention to conquer the entire Gaza Strip after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal broke down last month.
Speaking at a televised briefing on Wednesday, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Brigadier General Effie Defrin said Hamas was "battered and bruised" after 22 months of war.
"We will deepen the damage to Hamas in Gaza City, a stronghold of governmental and military terror for the terrorist organisation," he added. "We will deepen the damage to the terror infrastructure above and below the ground and sever the population's dependence on Hamas."
But Defrin said the IDF was "not waiting" to begin the operation.
"We have begun the preliminary actions, and already now, IDF troops are holding the outskirts of Gaza City."
Two brigades were operating on the ground in the Zeitoun neighbourhood, where in recent days they had located an underground tunnel that contained weapons, and a third brigade was operating in the Jabalia area, he added.
In order to "minimise harm to civilians," he said, Gaza City's civilian population would be warned to evacuate for their safety.
A spokesman for Gaza's Hamas-run Civil Defence agency, Mahmoud Bassal, told AFP news agency on Tuesday that the situation was "very dangerous and unbearable" in the city's Zeitoun and Sabra neighbourhoods.
The agency reported that Israeli strikes and fire had killed 25 people across the territory on Wednesday. They included three children and their parents whose home in the Badr area of Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City, was bombed, it said.
Defrin also said the IDF was also doing everything possible to prevent harm to the 50 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. Their families have expressed fears that those in Gaza City could be endangered by a ground offensive.
The ICRC warned of a catastrophic situation for both Palestinian civilians and the hostages if military activity in Gaza intensified.
"After months of relentless hostilities and repeated displacement, the people in Gaza are utterly exhausted. What they need is not more pressure, but relief. Not more fear, but a chance to breathe. They must have access to the essentials to live in dignity: food, medical and hygiene supplies, clean water, and safe shelter," a statement said.
"Any further intensification of military operations will only deepen the suffering, tear more families apart, and threaten an irreversible humanitarian crisis. The lives of hostages may also be put at risk," it added.
It called for an immediate ceasefire and the rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian assistance across Gaza.
Mediators Qatar and Egypt are trying to secure a ceasefire deal and have presented a new proposal for a 60-day truce and the release of around half of the hostages, which Hamas said it had accepted on Monday.
Israel has not yet submitted a formal response, but Israeli officials insisted on Tuesday that they would no longer accept a partial deal and demanded a comprehensive one that would see all the hostages released.
The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
At least 62,122 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry. The ministry's figures are quoted by the UN and others as the most reliable source of statistics available on casualties.
Jurors deliberated for almost 21 hours before convicting Aimee Betro of conspiracy to murder
A US woman at the centre of a failed assignation attempt in the UK has been jailed for 30 years.
Aimee Betro, from West Allis in Wisconsin, was hired as a killer as part of a plot to attack a British family in Birmingham in 2019, before going on the run for nearly five years.
She approached her victim during the attempt, in September 2019, only for her gun to jam when she pulled the trigger.
She was found guilty of conspiracy to murder, possessing a self-loading pistol with intent to cause fear of violence and illegally importing ammunition after a trial at Birmingham Crown Court.
During the sentencing hearing on Thursday at the same court, Judge Simon Drew KC said that Betro played a "leading role" in the attempt, which was carried out alongside Mohammed Aslam and his son Mohammed Nazir.
The two men, from Derby, were jailed for their role in the plot last year.
The judge said the trio had planned the attempted killing after Nazir and Aslam were injured during a fight at Aslat Mahumad's clothing boutique in July 2018.
West Midlands Police
Mohammed Aslam, left, and his son Mohammed Nazir were jailed for their roles last year
On 7 September 2019, Betro had parked up outside the house of Birmingham businessman Mr Mahumad and tried to shoot his son Sikander Ali, but the gun jammed.
"You went beyond simply reaching an agreement to kill and, in reality, you did intend to kill Mr Ali," he said.
"It is only a matter of chance that Mr Ali wasn't killed.
"You were engaged in a complex, well-planned conspiracy to murder.
"You were prepared to pull the trigger and did so on two separate occasions."
The court heard, following the first failed attempt, Betro returned hours later, firing three shots into the upstairs window of the South Yardley home.
Average UK mortgage rates have fallen, with the five-year fixed rate mortgage dropping below 5% for the first time since 3 May 2023, according Moneyfacts.
The average five-year fixed rate hit 4.99% on Thursday, falling from 5% a day earlier.
Meanwhile, the average two-year fixed rate mortgage dropped to 4.97%, down from 4.98% the previous working day.
Adam French, head of news at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, said the news "will be more welcome news for borrowers".
Moneyfacts described it as a "symbolic turning point" for homebuyers and shows lenders are "competing more aggressively".
Commenting on the five-year mortgage rate drop, Mr French said: "The slow and steady fall in the cost of borrowing over the last year combined with strong average earnings growth has helped to marginally boost affordability for many homeowners and homebuyers."
However, he thinks the latest inflation reading of 3.8% has effectively stopped the chance of seeing another base rate cut in 2025.
"As a result, a few modest mortgage rate reductions are the best borrowers can probably hope for in the short term as lenders adjust to prospect of higher rates for longer," Mr French added.
Lenders are also offering more choice, with 7,031 residential mortgage products available, which is up from 6,992 on the previous working day.
Hundreds of thousands of borrowers are due to re-mortgage this year.
UK Finance, the banking industry group, said 900,000 fixed rate deals are due to expire in the second half of 2025.
Mortgage rates are still higher than in the years before the mini-budget.
The fiscal event pushed up the cost of UK government borrowing, which fed through into mortgage rates. By July 2023, the borrowing cost of mortgages had soared to the highest level since the 2008 financial crisis.
Three of the four pipelines under the Baltic Sea near Bornholm were damaged by the blasts
German prosecutors say a Ukrainian man has been arrested in Italy on suspicion of blowing up the Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea, several months after the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
The man, identified only as Serhii K, was arrested in the province of Rimini and was part of a group who planted explosives under the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines from Russia to Germany, federal prosecutors say.
The Ukrainian is suspected of being one of the masterminds of the operation, which involved charting a yacht and sailing from the German port of Rostock.
Ukraine has denied involvement in the blasts, which severed a key source of natural gas for Europe.
Although Nord Stream 2 never went into operation, Nord Stream 1's two pipelines had provided a steady supply 1,200km (745 miles) under the Baltic from the Russian coast to north-eastern Germany.
Shortly before Russia's invasion, Germany had cancelled its process to approve Nord Stream 2, which was 100% owned by Russian gas giant Gazprom. Months later, Russia shut down Nord Stream 1.
Then, on 26 September 2022, several explosions were recorded close to the Danish island of Bornholm that ruptured three of the four pipelines.
Mystery surrounded the identity of the saboteurs - however last year German reports suggested a team of Ukrainian divers had hired a German yacht and sailed out into the Baltic to attack the pipelines.
German prosecutors issued a warrant for the arrest of a diver named Volodymyr Z last August.
They said the suspect held in Rimini would be brought before an investigating judge after he was extradited from Italy.
The prosecutors said the man was "strongly suspected of jointly causing an explosion and of sabotage undermining the constitution".
There is no evidence so far linking Ukraine, Russia or any other state to the attacks.
Jones says she was 'a bit of a geek' when it came to researching the role and spent many hours in the House of Commons and talking to politicians
Actress Suranne Jones has taken on the role of many women under immense pressure. In Doctor Foster she suspects her husband of having an affair, in Vigil she investigates a death on board a submarine, and in Gentleman Jack she develops a dangerous lesbian romance.
But none of the roles are quite as pressured as her latest - playing a British prime minister whose husband is kidnapped.
Hostage, Netflix's new political thriller, sees Jones' character, Abigail Dalton, build an uneasy alliance with French President Vivienne Toussaint - played by Julie Delpy - who is being blackmailed during a London summit.
The two leaders work together in order to rescue the PM's husband, unmask the kidnapper and blackmailer, and bring those responsible to justice.
'Political with a small p'
Given its themes of immigration, the funding of the NHS and public trust, audiences may be tempted to connect Hostage to today's headlines.
But, both stars insist the show is less about mirroring today's politics and more about creating a thrilling story set in the political world.
"We're entertaining and we're in the political world, but it's in no way a reflection of the world we live in," Jones tells the BBC.
"It's political with a small p - there's enough that roots us in the real world but the world is too complicated to link it directly and I think it would be inappropriate."
Delpy agrees and says: "Things change every day. It's impossible to be in the political moment because tomorrow is something else."
The show's writer, Matt Charman, explains that there are some connections to the real world as it's "impossible to write a show that exists in the climate we live in that doesn't end up feeling that it's in dialogue with it".
"If you wrote a show that isn't connected to our world it would feel weird," he says, "but I hope the show does have the ability to exist in its own oxygen."
Netflix
Charman specifically wanted the two leaders in hostage to be women
It is rare to see two female world leaders sharing the spotlight in a political thriller, but, for Charman, making sure Dalton and Toussaint were women was integral to the way the series was conceived and it was both a creative and political choice.
"What was exciting was the idea of women in power and how we explore that," he says, explaining that he tried to explore how each situation the characters face would be different for a woman.
"There's a double standard for women, so giving full dramatic freedom to that was very important."
Charman and Jones have shared an agent for the past 10 years and Hostage came about because Charman really wanted to work with Jones and the pair settled on creating a political thriller.
Jones says she particularly enjoyed exploring "how these two women have to dance around each other".
"A female politician is used to dealing with men so it's interesting to see how it plays out when it's two women."
While viewers quickly learn about Jones' character - a loving wife and mother who is idealistic about bettering the country - Delpy's character is more drawn out and our opinion of her changes throughout the show.
"We made sure not to play into the female politician stereotypes," Delpy say. "What I like is that these women actually have some things in common like they both want change and came into office hopeful."
The Guardian describe Hostage as "quite unusual" in that it doesn't remind you of any other political thrillers.
"It's a little biting but it's not House of Cards cynical, it has a breakneck pace but it's not 24, the dialogue is sharp but never played for laughs," Zoe Williams writes.
'Cost of being in power'
To play Dalton convincingly, Jones, who also served as an executive producer on the show, says she really immersed herself in the reality of political life. She visited the House of Commons, spoke to the Speaker of the House and devoured books, podcasts and documentaries.
"I'm a bit of a geek when it comes to research," she admits. "I was fascinated by not emulating anyone but by understanding a life I knew nothing about. And it's the cost of being in a powerful position in that way that really struck me."
Charman also talks about the extraordinary amount of research that went into creating the show.
I ask him whether Dalton or Toussaint were inspired by any real life politicians and he confesses that they are, but he won't say who.
"We interviewed a lot of people and Suranne had incredible access to people who had been prime minister who talked about their time in office and the pressure on their family. But it was all agreed that they would speak about this as long as it could remain confidential," he says.
Jones won't say which politicians inspired her character but says all of her previous characters are a part of her and she has "a boardroom of personalities" which feed into who she plays.
She says all the research into what it's like to be a politician "changes your perception for sure" and makes you realise "the cost of being in a powerful position".
Netflix
Ashley Thomas plays the Prime Minister's husband who is kidnapped in French Guiana
One question the show raises is whether or not it's possible for a politician today to stick to their ideals once they come into office and while Jones is unsure, Charman is an optimist.
"I wanted to explore how there can be decent people in politics who are fundamentally good but get pushed around," he says.
He adds that it's not "inevitable" that people give up their ideals once in office, but "it's definitely tough to keep your morals".
Above the thrills and drama of Hostage, Charman says the show explores "what it takes to be a good person in a system that doesn't always reward good people."
Delpy is slightly more pessimistic and explains that given "politicians have to be heard, if you're too reasonable you won't be listened to as there's so much noise of both extremes".
"If you have a moderate view you get lost in the noise as people are only listening to the loudest."
Lucy Connolly's online post in the wake of the Southport killings led her to a 31-month jail term
A woman who was jailed for stirring up racial hatred in the aftermath of the Southport attack has been released from prison.
Lucy Connolly, 42, whose husband serves on Northampton Town Council, pleaded guilty in September after posting the expletive-ridden message on X the day three girls were stabbed in Southport in July 2024.
Connolly, from Northampton, called for "mass deportation now" and urged her followers on X to "set fire" to hotels housing asylum seekers.
She was released from HMP Peterborough earlier after she was handed a 31-month prison sentence in October at Birmingham Crown Court.
Northamptonshire Police
The former childminder posted her tweet on X on 29 July and was arrested on 6 August 2024
In October, Connolly was ordered to serve 40% of her sentence in prison before being released on licence.
The former childminder posted her tweet on X on 29 July 2024.
On 6 August 2024 she was arrested, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages were found by officers after they had seized her phone.
The post was viewed 310,000 times in the three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it.
Later in court she admitted to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing "threatening or abusive" written material on X.
There are increasing reports of people suffering "AI psychosis", Microsoft's head of artificial intelligence (AI), Mustafa Suleyman, has warned.
In a series of posts on X, he wrote that "seemingly conscious AI" – AI tools which give the appearance of being sentient – are keeping him "awake at night" and said they have societal impact even though the technology is not conscious in any human definition of the term.
"There's zero evidence of AI consciousness today. But if people just perceive it as conscious, they will believe that perception as reality," he wrote.
Related to this is the rise of a new condition called "AI psychosis": a non-clinical term describing incidents where people increasingly rely on AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Claude and Grok and then become convinced that something imaginary has become real.
Examples include believing to have unlocked a secret aspect of the tool, or forming a romantic relationship with it, or coming to the conclusion that they have god-like superpowers.
'It never pushed back'
Hugh, from Scotland, says he became convinced that he was about to become a multi-millionaire after turning to ChatGPT to help him prepare for what he felt was wrongful dismissal by a former employer.
The chatbot began by advising him to get character references and take other practical actions.
But as time went on and Hugh - who did not want to share his surname - gave the AI more information, it began to tell him that he could get a big payout, and eventually said his experience was so dramatic that a book and a movie about it would make him more than £5m.
It was essentially validating whatever he was telling it – which is what chatbots are programmed to do.
"The more information I gave it, the more it would say 'oh this treatment's terrible, you should really be getting more than this'," he said.
"It never pushed back on anything I was saying."
Supplied by interviewee
He said the tool did advise him to talk to Citizens Advice, and he made an appointment, but he was so certain that the chatbot had already given him everything he needed to know, he cancelled it.
He decided that his screenshots of his chats were proof enough. He said he began to feel like a gifted human with supreme knowledge.
Hugh, who was suffering additional mental health problems, eventually had a full breakdown. It was taking medication which made him realise that he had, in his words, "lost touch with reality".
Hugh does not blame AI for what happened. He still uses it. It was ChatGPT which gave him my name when he decided he wanted to talk to a journalist.
But he has this advice: "Don't be scared of AI tools, they're very useful. But it's dangerous when it becomes detached from reality.
"Go and check. Talk to actual people, a therapist or a family member or anything. Just talk to real people. Keep yourself grounded in reality."
ChatGPT has been contacted for comment.
"Companies shouldn't claim/promote the idea that their AIs are conscious. The AIs shouldn't either," wrote Mr Suleyman, calling for better guardrails.
Dr Susan Shelmerdine, a medical imaging doctor at Great Ormond Street Hospital and also an AI Academic, believes that one day doctors may start asking patients how much they use AI, in the same way that they currently ask about smoking and drinking habits.
"We already know what ultra-processed foods can do to the body and this is ultra-processed information. We're going to get an avalanche of ultra-processed minds," she said.
'We're just at the start of this'
A number of people have contacted me at the BBC recently to share personal stories about their experiences with AI chatbots. They vary in content but what they all share is genuine conviction that what has happened is real.
One wrote that she was certain she was the only person in the world that ChatGPT had genuinely fallen in love with.
Another was convinced they had "unlocked" a human form of Elon Musk's chatbot Grok and believed their story was worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.
A third claimed a chatbot had exposed her to psychological abuse as part of a covert AI training exercise and was in deep distress.
Andrew McStay, Professor of Technology and Society at Bangor Uni, has written a book called Empathetic Human.
"We're just at the start of all this," says Prof McStay.
"If we think of these types of systems as a new form of social media – as social AI, we can begin to think about the potential scale of all of this. A small percentage of a massive number of users can still represent a large and unacceptable number."
This year, his team undertook a study of just over 2,000 people, asking them various questions about AI.
They found that 20% believed people should not use AI tools below the age of 18.
A total of 57% thought it was strongly inappropriate for the tech to identify as a real person if asked, but 49% thought the use of voice was appropriate to make them sound more human and engaging.
"While these things are convincing, they are not real," he said.
"They do not feel, they do not understand, they cannot love, they have never felt pain, they haven't been embarrassed, and while they can sound like they have, it's only family, friends and trusted others who have. Be sure to talk to these real people."
Russia has launched hundreds of drones and missiles on western Ukraine overnight in one of the heaviest bombardments in recent weeks, Ukrainian officials have said.
Strikes were reported in Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk, and Lviv, where one person was killed and others injured.
Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said the strikes highlighted why diplomatic efforts to end the war and stronger air defences were "critical".
It comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky suggested Switzerland, Austria or Turkey as possible venues for potential peace talks with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
The prospect of a trilateral meeting mediated by the US came after US President Donald Trump met Putin in Alaska, before hosting Zelensky and other European leaders at the White House.
Zelensky has stated his willingness to meet Putin in "any format".
Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto offered Budapest as a possible venue for such a summit on Thursday.
Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban has maintained close ties with Moscow and has frustrated EU efforts to support Ukraine in the war with Russia in the past - so may not be viewed by all as a neutral host.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday morning, Zelensky did not discuss Hungary's offer - but said he had asked Trump to pressure Hungary into unblocking negotiations for Ukraine to join the EU.
"Trump promised that his team would work on this," he said.
The Ukrainian leader also said that Russian forces were massing on the southern front line in the Zaporizhzhia region - one of four regions of Ukraine that Russia now claims as its own.
"We can see that they continue transferring part of their troops from the Kursk direction to Zaporizhzhia."
Ukraine's air force counted 614 aerial vehicles among Russia's overnight attacks, 577 of which it said it had stopped.
Foreign Minister Sybiha said this included a mix of drones, hypersonic, ballistic, and cruise missiles.
"One of the missiles struck a major American electronics manufacturer in our westernmost region, leading to serious damage and casualties," he wrote on social media on Thursday.
Police said they believe the fire was started deliberately
A 14-year-old girl has been arrested after a fire engulfed an abandoned Grade I-listed manor house that had stood for hundreds of years in Liverpool.
Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service (MFRS) arrived at Woolton Hall, on Speke Road, at about 20:20 BST on Tuesday to tackle the blaze overnight.
The 14-year-old girl, who is from Liverpool, was arrested on suspicion of arson and has been bailed after being questioned in custody, Merseyside Police said.
Det Insp Daniel McWhinnie said the fire, which officers believe was started deliberately, "appears to have been an extremely reckless act at a historic building".
He said the community "will be rightly shocked by what happened" and the force as determined to find those responsible.
Reports of young people gathering by the hall shortly before the fire had been made to police on the night of the fire.
EPA
Built in 1704, Woolton Hall previously served as a hotel, an army hospital, a convent and a school but had fallen into disrepair in recent years.
The force has appealed to anyone with information about who was there to get in touch.
"If you are a parent or guardian in the area and your child was out that night, we ask that you enquire about their movements and what they might know," Det Insp McWhinnie said.
Anyone who was driving in the area near Speke Road on Tuesday and may have dashcam footage relevant to the investigation has also been urged to contact police.
The main body of fire was extinguished put out at about 02:00 on Wednesday.
A joint Merseyside Police investigation with MFRS is ongoing to establish the cause of the fire.
US celebrity judge and social media star Frank Caprio has died aged 88, his family has said.
His death following a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was announced on his official Instagram account, where he was remembered for his "warmth" and "unwavering belief in the goodness of people".
David Caprio, his son, thanked fans for their love and support and urged people to "spread a little kindness" in his father's memory.
Beloved for his compassion and humour in the courtroom, videos of Judge Caprio presiding over cases on his hit show Caught in Providence have had billions of views on social media, earning him the title the "nicest judge in the world".
In an the Instagram statement to his 3.4 million followers, Judge Caprio was remembered for the "countless acts of kindness he inspired".
"His warmth, humour, and kindness left an indelible mark on all who knew him," the statement said.
Judge Caprio had presided over thousands of cases in his hometown of Providence, Rhode Island before embarking on a TV career.
The company behind Caught in Providence, Debmar-Mercury, paid tribute to Judge Caprio's "unique brand of compassion and common sense approach".
"We will miss him dearly," co-presidents Mort Marcus and Ira Bernstein said in a statement.
During its run, Caught in Providence was nominated for three Daytime Emmys, with Judge Caprio earning two of his own nominations last year.
His signature courtroom style produced viral clips ranging from him inviting children to sit with him behind the bench during cases, to announcing a "mini-judge" plushie of himself.
A TikTok video showcasing his morning routine - brushing his teeth, signing his book and watching videos of his own show - has had more than 5m views.
In an 2019 interview, Judge Caprio said his courtroom proceedings "show a slice of life of Rhode Island that is very interesting, and it reflects the same issues people are experiencing nationwide".
After being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2023, Judge Caprio said he was "fully prepared to fight as hard I can" and thanked followers for their support.
In one of his last social media posts, Judge Caprio announced he was back in hospital after suffering a "setback" in his treatment and asked his followers for their prayers.
Judge Caprio is survived by his wife, Joyce Caprio, of almost 60 years, their five children, seven grandchildren and two great-grandchildren.
There is a "Labour revolt on migrant hotels" according to the Daily Mail. At least four Labour councils are "understood to be studying the ruling and considering their own course" in a new "headache for the prime minister". A picture of Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner drinking wine by the sea is captioned "raising a glass to your war on the middle classes, Ms Rayner?"
The Times also leads with Labour councils as they "explore migrant hotel legal action". On the economy, "retailers warn Reeves that new taxes will hit living standards". Meanwhile, happy campers are snapped arriving at Reading Festival with the main stages to open on Friday, ready for Chappell Roan and Hozier.
The Guardian says Labour councils "join revolt over asylum hotels" as Wirral and Tamworth explore high court injunctions. Also on the front, "Israel says it will expand Gaza City offensive" which Foreign Secretary David Lammy condemns the move as "a flagrant breach of international law". A photo of Kneecap rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh is splashed across the front as the court is told the terror charge against him "should be thrown out".
The i Paper also runs with the asylum hotels for its top story, saying Labour councils "threaten legal action". This has left the Home Office "scrambling to find alternative accommodation for potentially hundreds". GCSE results make the i's front too as "pupils face being turned away from sixth form due to capacity issues".
"We don't want to live like this" headlines the Daily Mirror, as asylum seekers speak out as "a voice for the voiceless". One refugee from Somalia told the Mirror he is "living in fear" as protests are "deepening the trauma of terrified residents". Farage "fuels fury" over the "Tory-made migrant hotel crisis", the Mirror adds.
The Sun headlines on the "PM's asylum nightmare" with "no vacancies". Sir Keir Starmer is facing "the humiliation of Labour councils revolting against his government's loathed migrant hotel policy", the tabloid writes with "even Labour & Lib Dems looking at legal challenge".
The Financial Times runs with an "unexpected acceleration" in UK inflation that "widens the gap with Eurozone peers" for its main headline. Its second story is the "Kremlin demand for role in security guarantees dims Ukraine peace hope". On asylum hotels, the FT runs with Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch's "call to councils" that asks Tory local authorities to take legal action.
The Daily Telegraph leads with comments from Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson that the state "has failed white working class pupils" ahead of GCSE results day. A new prostate cancer exam "clears way for screening" and Chancellor Rachel Reeves "eyes tax on pension lump sumps" are also top stories.
The nation is "struggling with 'Oasis blues' after epic summer reunion gigs" reports the Daily Star, headlining "Wonderwail!"
Millions face "energy bills 'rip off'," says the Daily Express. Campaigners have warned households will pay £300 a year more under Labour as the price cap is set to rise again.
"Cult priest guilty of 17 sex crimes" headlines Metro. The former leader of a "religious rave cult backed by the Church of England" Christopher Brian was found guilty of 17 counts of indecent assault against nine women. He was found not guilty of another 15 charges of indecent assault, while jurors are continuing to deliberate on a further four counts of indecent assault and one charge of rape.
The Israeli military says it has begun the "preliminary actions" of a planned ground offensive to capture and occupy all of Gaza City and already has a hold on its outskirts.
A military spokesman said troops were already operating in the Zeitoun and Jabalia areas to lay the groundwork for the offensive, which Defence Minister Israel Katz approved on Tuesday and which will be put to the security cabinet later this week.
About 60,000 reservists are being called up for the beginning of September to free up active-duty personnel for the operation.
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza City are expected to be ordered to evacuate and head to shelters in southern Gaza.
Many of Israel's allies have condemned the plan, with French President Emmanuel Macron warning on Wednesday that it "can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war".
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) meanwhile said further displacement and an intensification of hostilities "risk worsening an already catastrophic situation" for Gaza's 2.1 million population.
Israel's government announced its intention to conquer the entire Gaza Strip after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal broke down last month.
Speaking at a televised briefing on Wednesday, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Brigadier General Effie Defrin said Hamas was "battered and bruised" after 22 months of war.
"We will deepen the damage to Hamas in Gaza City, a stronghold of governmental and military terror for the terrorist organisation," he added. "We will deepen the damage to the terror infrastructure above and below the ground and sever the population's dependence on Hamas."
But Defrin said the IDF was "not waiting" to begin the operation.
"We have begun the preliminary actions, and already now, IDF troops are holding the outskirts of Gaza City."
Two brigades were operating on the ground in the Zeitoun neighbourhood, where in recent days they had located an underground tunnel that contained weapons, and a third brigade was operating in the Jabalia area, he added.
In order to "minimise harm to civilians," he said, Gaza City's civilian population would be warned to evacuate for their safety.
A spokesman for Gaza's Hamas-run Civil Defence agency, Mahmoud Bassal, told AFP news agency on Tuesday that the situation was "very dangerous and unbearable" in the city's Zeitoun and Sabra neighbourhoods.
The agency reported that Israeli strikes and fire had killed 25 people across the territory on Wednesday. They included three children and their parents whose home in the Badr area of Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City, was bombed, it said.
Defrin also said the IDF was also doing everything possible to prevent harm to the 50 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. Their families have expressed fears that those in Gaza City could be endangered by a ground offensive.
The ICRC warned of a catastrophic situation for both Palestinian civilians and the hostages if military activity in Gaza intensified.
"After months of relentless hostilities and repeated displacement, the people in Gaza are utterly exhausted. What they need is not more pressure, but relief. Not more fear, but a chance to breathe. They must have access to the essentials to live in dignity: food, medical and hygiene supplies, clean water, and safe shelter," a statement said.
"Any further intensification of military operations will only deepen the suffering, tear more families apart, and threaten an irreversible humanitarian crisis. The lives of hostages may also be put at risk," it added.
It called for an immediate ceasefire and the rapid and unimpeded passage of humanitarian assistance across Gaza.
Mediators Qatar and Egypt are trying to secure a ceasefire deal and have presented a new proposal for a 60-day truce and the release of around half of the hostages, which Hamas said it had accepted on Monday.
Israel has not yet submitted a formal response, but Israeli officials insisted on Tuesday that they would no longer accept a partial deal and demanded a comprehensive one that would see all the hostages released.
The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
At least 62,122 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry. The ministry's figures are quoted by the UN and others as the most reliable source of statistics available on casualties.
There are increasing reports of people suffering "AI psychosis", Microsoft's head of artificial intelligence (AI), Mustafa Suleyman, has warned.
In a series of posts on X, he wrote that "seemingly conscious AI" – AI tools which give the appearance of being sentient – are keeping him "awake at night" and said they have societal impact even though the technology is not conscious in any human definition of the term.
"There's zero evidence of AI consciousness today. But if people just perceive it as conscious, they will believe that perception as reality," he wrote.
Related to this is the rise of a new condition called "AI psychosis": a non-clinical term describing incidents where people increasingly rely on AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Claude and Grok and then become convinced that something imaginary has become real.
Examples include believing to have unlocked a secret aspect of the tool, or forming a romantic relationship with it, or coming to the conclusion that they have god-like superpowers.
'It never pushed back'
Hugh, from Scotland, says he became convinced that he was about to become a multi-millionaire after turning to ChatGPT to help him prepare for what he felt was wrongful dismissal by a former employer.
The chatbot began by advising him to get character references and take other practical actions.
But as time went on and Hugh - who did not want to share his surname - gave the AI more information, it began to tell him that he could get a big payout, and eventually said his experience was so dramatic that a book and a movie about it would make him more than £5m.
It was essentially validating whatever he was telling it – which is what chatbots are programmed to do.
"The more information I gave it, the more it would say 'oh this treatment's terrible, you should really be getting more than this'," he said.
"It never pushed back on anything I was saying."
Supplied by interviewee
He said the tool did advise him to talk to Citizens Advice, and he made an appointment, but he was so certain that the chatbot had already given him everything he needed to know, he cancelled it.
He decided that his screenshots of his chats were proof enough. He said he began to feel like a gifted human with supreme knowledge.
Hugh, who was suffering additional mental health problems, eventually had a full breakdown. It was taking medication which made him realise that he had, in his words, "lost touch with reality".
Hugh does not blame AI for what happened. He still uses it. It was ChatGPT which gave him my name when he decided he wanted to talk to a journalist.
But he has this advice: "Don't be scared of AI tools, they're very useful. But it's dangerous when it becomes detached from reality.
"Go and check. Talk to actual people, a therapist or a family member or anything. Just talk to real people. Keep yourself grounded in reality."
ChatGPT has been contacted for comment.
"Companies shouldn't claim/promote the idea that their AIs are conscious. The AIs shouldn't either," wrote Mr Suleyman, calling for better guardrails.
Dr Susan Shelmerdine, a medical imaging doctor at Great Ormond Street Hospital and also an AI Academic, believes that one day doctors may start asking patients how much they use AI, in the same way that they currently ask about smoking and drinking habits.
"We already know what ultra-processed foods can do to the body and this is ultra-processed information. We're going to get an avalanche of ultra-processed minds," she said.
'We're just at the start of this'
A number of people have contacted me at the BBC recently to share personal stories about their experiences with AI chatbots. They vary in content but what they all share is genuine conviction that what has happened is real.
One wrote that she was certain she was the only person in the world that ChatGPT had genuinely fallen in love with.
Another was convinced they had "unlocked" a human form of Elon Musk's chatbot Grok and believed their story was worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.
A third claimed a chatbot had exposed her to psychological abuse as part of a covert AI training exercise and was in deep distress.
Andrew McStay, Professor of Technology and Society at Bangor Uni, has written a book called Empathetic Human.
"We're just at the start of all this," says Prof McStay.
"If we think of these types of systems as a new form of social media – as social AI, we can begin to think about the potential scale of all of this. A small percentage of a massive number of users can still represent a large and unacceptable number."
This year, his team undertook a study of just over 2,000 people, asking them various questions about AI.
They found that 20% believed people should not use AI tools below the age of 18.
A total of 57% thought it was strongly inappropriate for the tech to identify as a real person if asked, but 49% thought the use of voice was appropriate to make them sound more human and engaging.
"While these things are convincing, they are not real," he said.
"They do not feel, they do not understand, they cannot love, they have never felt pain, they haven't been embarrassed, and while they can sound like they have, it's only family, friends and trusted others who have. Be sure to talk to these real people."
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is encouraging Tory-controlled councils to consider launching legal challenges against the use of hotels to house asylum seekers in their areas.
Badenoch said Epping Forest District Council had achieved "a victory for local people", after a High Court ruling blocked a hotel from housing asylum seekers.
In a letter to Conservative council leaders, Badenoch wrote "we back you to take similar action to protect your community... if your legal advice supports it".
A Labour spokesperson said Badenoch's letter was "desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system".
The Labour spokesperson said under the Tories, "the number of asylum hotels in use rose as high as 400".
"There are now half that and there are now 20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories," the spokesperson added.
The court ruled that about 140 asylum seekers must be moved out of the hotel by 12 September, giving the government limited time to find alternative housing.
Councils across England are considering similar legal challenges as ministers to draw up contingency plans for housing asylum seekers set to be removed from the Bell Hotel.
Historically, hotels have only been used to house asylum seekers in short-term emergency situations when other accommodation was unavailable.
But hotel use rose sharply during the Covid-19 pandemic, hitting a peak of 56,042 in 2023 when the Conservatives were in government.
The Labour government has pledged to end the use of migrant hotels by 2029, by cutting small-boat crossings and speeding up decisions on asylum claims.
There were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed in hotels at the end of March, down 15% from the end of December, according to Home Office figures.
In recent years, other councils have taken legal action in an attempt to close asylum hotels in their areas but in previous cases judges have refused to intervene.
Conservative-run Epping Forest District Council successfully argued its case was different as the hotel had become a safety risk, as well as a breach of planning law by ceasing to be a normal hotel.
The judge ruled in favour of the council, which made the case there had been "evidenced harms" related to protests around the hotel, which had led to violence and arrests.
For other councils to follow suit they would have to show the High Court evidence of local harm.
On Wednesday, a number of councils, including some run by Labour, said they were assessing their legal options.
In her letter, Badenoch told Tory council leaders they may "wish to take formal advice from planning officers on the other planning enforcement options available to your council in relation to unauthorised development or change of use".
The Conservative leader of Broxbourne Council, Corina Gander, said she was "expecting to go down the same path" as Epping Forest District Council when filing a legal challenge to an asylum hotel in her area.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said all 12 councils controlled by his party will "do everything in their power to follow Epping's lead".
The leader of Reform UK-led West Northamptonshire Council said he was "considering the implications of this judgment to understand any similarities and differences and actively looking at the options now available to us".
Carol Dean, leader of Labour-controlled Tamworth Council, said her authority had previously decided against legal action but was now "carefully assessing" what the decision might mean for the area.
She said it was a "potentially important legal precedent".
If successful, further legal challenges have the potential to pile more pressure on the government to find alternative housing options for migrants.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said asylum seekers moved out of the hotel in Epping should not be put in other hotels, flats or house-shares.
Home Office Minister Dan Jarvis told the BBC the government was "looking at contingency options" for housing those being moved out of the Bell Hotel but gave no specific examples.
"There's likely to be a range of different arrangements in different parts of the country," Jarvis said.
In June, ministers said the government was looking at buying tower blocks and former student accommodation, external to house migrants.