Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today — 15 July 2025Main stream

Marten and Gordon guilty of gross negligence manslaughter of their baby

15 July 2025 at 01:18
PA Media Mug shot of Constance Marten on the left and one of Mark Gordon on the rightPA Media

A couple who went on the run with their newborn daughter have been found guilty of her manslaughter by gross negligence.

Constance Marten, 38, and Mark Gordon, 51, were convicted on Monday following a lengthy and chaotic retrial at the Old Bailey, which the judge accused them of trying to "sabotage" and "derail".

It comes more than two years after the decomposed body of their baby, Victoria, had been discovered in a shopping bag in Brighton.

An earlier trial at the same court found them guilty of concealing the birth of a child, perverting the course of justice by not reporting her death, and of child cruelty - the latter of which could not be reported until now.

To now have been found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence means that the jury found that the couple's behaviour had been so exceptionally bad and fell below the standard of reasonably competent parents.

The prosecution had argued during their retrial that Marten and Gordon had made a conscious decision to not keep Victoria safe, and that it was clear their actions had been deliberate.

Central to the prosecution's case was that Victoria had died from hypothermia or by being smothered while co-sleeping in a small, thin tent in cold, damp and windy conditions in January 2023.

It is thought that the couple went on the run to avoid the authorities and keep Victoria, their fifth child together, with their four other children having being been previously taken into care.

Marten and Gordon both refused to stand as the jury delivered its unanimous verdict on Monday. Marten shook her head and sighed, while Gordon sat with his eyes closed and his head resting back on the wall.

Gordon also told the judge following the verdicts that he planned to "win on appeal" and described it as an "unfair trial".

Speaking afterwards, chief prosecutor Jaswant Narwal said the defendants had shown "little remorse for their actions" and had used "different antics to frustrate and delay court proceedings".

"I hope these convictions provide a sense of justice and comfort to all those affected by this tragic case."

Samantha Yellend, London's senior crown prosecutor, said it was "shocking" that the couple would expose their child to "such obvious risks" and that their "reckless actions were driven by a selfish desire to keep their baby no matter the cost".

In the retrial, the jury also heard that Gordon had been convicted of rape in Florida in 1989 when he was aged 14.

For legal reasons, this conviction - for which he was sentenced to 40 years in prison and deported back to the UK after serving 20 years - was not made known during the first trial.

The couple became the subjects of a police manhunt in 2023 when officers found evidence of a recent birth in a burnt-out car near Bolton.

They were found on 27 February 2023 and Victoria was discovered dead two days later in an allotment shed in the Hollingbury area of Brighton.

She had died in a tent in the South Downs in January that year.

Det Supt Lewis Basford, who led the search for them, said Victoria's death was "completely avoidable" and that the couple had many opportunities to "do the right thing and... ask for help".

"We have waited more than two years to secure justice for baby Victoria and I am pleased we have now been able to get that for her - despite her parents trying to disrupt and derail not one, but two trials," he said.

He added that as a father himself, he found it "hard to comprehend how, instead of providing the warmth and care their child needed" Marten and Gordon "chose to live outside during freezing conditions to avoid the authorities".

The couple are expected to be sentenced in September.

Two Dutch-nationals among four dead in plane crash

14 July 2025 at 23:59
UKNIP A huge billowing cloud of black, grey and white smoke coming from the edge of the airfield. It is so thick that it is hiding some of the trees - that are on the edge of the airfield. A fire engine can be seen spraying water towards the mass of smoke. UKNIP
East of England Ambulance Service said four ambulances and Essex and Herts Air Ambulance were sent to the incident

Four people who died when a small plane crashed at London Southend Airport are believed to be foreign nationals, police have confirmed.

The airport has been closed since emergency services were called to the incident involving a Beech B200 Super King shortly before 16:00 BST on Sunday.

Witnesses described a "fireball" type explosion soon after the Netherlands-bound light aircraft had taken off.

All four people were killed in the crash - two pilots and two passengers - and Essex Police said in a press conference on Monday it believed they were foreign nationals.

The names of the four who died have not been released but officers are now working to confirm their identities.

Ch Supt Morgan Cronin said the victims would be "treated with the utmost respect and dignity".

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has put in place a significant air exclusion zone surrounding the crash site.

All flights to and from the airport on Monday have been rerouted, with passengers advised to check with their airline for advice.

The Beech B200 Super King Air plane was operated by Zeusch Aviation, based at Lelystad Airport in the Netherlands, which has confirmed it is "actively supporting the authorities with the investigation".

The plane had flown from the Greek capital Athens to Pula in Croatia on Sunday before heading to Southend. It was due to return to Lelystad on Sunday evening.

Aerial video showed the plane crash site and wreckage

Detectives and forensic teams are working in parallel with the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), the Royal Air Force, Essex County Fire and Rescue Service and London Southend Airport to work out what happened.

Speaking at the press conference, Lisa Fitzsimons, a senior inspector at the AAIB, said it was "too early to speculate on what caused this tragic accident".

"If there are safety lessons that can be learned, we will make recommendations that will aim to prevent a similar accident occurring," she said.

Eight of its inspectors are now at the crash site.

A London Southend Airport spokesperson said: "Our thoughts are with those affected by [Sunday's] events and all passengers impacted by this disruption.

"We will restart flight operations as soon as possible and will continue to update the public on developments."

A graphic illustrates how a plane crash unfolded in real time on a photo of the airport runway in question.
A timeline of how the light aircraft crash unfolded at London Southend Airport
Smoke rises at Southend Airport after the plane crash

Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

First image of new Harry Potter released as filming begins for TV series

15 July 2025 at 00:14
Aidan Monaghan/HBO Dominic McLaughlin as Harry PotterAidan Monaghan/HBO
Dominic McLaughlin was pictured in costume as Harry Potter for the first time as production began

Production has begun on the new TV adaptation of Harry Potter, as the first picture of the lead actor in costume was released.

JK Rowling's series of novels has already been made into a film, but HBO is now producing a TV series which is expected to take 10 years to complete.

Producers released the first picture of Dominic McLaughlin in costume as Harry Potter on Monday and confirmed several new cast members.

Rory Wilmot hast been cast as Neville Longbottom, Amos Kitson as Dudley Dursley, Louise Brealey as Madam Rolanda Hooch, and Anton Lesser as Garrick Ollivander.

They join stars such as John Lithgow, who will play Dumbledore, Nick Frost as Hagrid, Janet McTeer as Minerva McGonagall and Paapa Essiedu as Severus Snape.

The three child actors who will play Harry, Ron and Hermione were announced in May.

The programme will be filmed at Warner Bros Studios Leavesden in Hertfordshire, which is where the eight Harry Potter movies were also shot.

HBO has previously said the series would be "a faithful adaptation of the iconic books".

The TV series will have more breathing space to explore the plot lines from the books without the time constraints of the film.

Producers also announced new production staff, several of whom have previously worked on The Crown such as director of photography Adriano Goldman and hair and makeup designer Cate Hall.

The first series will launch in 2027.

Stokes inspires England to defeat stubborn India

15 July 2025 at 00:14

Stokes inspires England to defeat stubborn India

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Highlights from day five as England secure 22-run victory at Lord's

Third Rothesay Test, Lord's (day five of five)

England 387 (Root 104, Carse 56, Smith 51; Bumrah 5-74) & 192 (Root 40; Sundar 4-22)

India 387 (Rahul 100, Pant 74, Jadeja 72; Woakes 3-84) & 170 (Jadeja 61*; Stokes 3-48, Archer 3-55)

England win by 22 runs and lead series 2-1

Scorecard

Ben Stokes once again inspired England to a 22-run win over a stubborn India on an unbearably tense final day of the third Test at Lord's.

The captain delivered a monumental shift with the ball to claim three wickets as India were bowled out for 170.

In an epic conclusion, the hosts had victory in their grasp until nerves were frayed by outstanding defiance from Ravindra Jadeja.

Chasing 193, India were 112-8 when Jadeja was joined by number 10 Jasprit Bumrah. They were together for almost 22 overs until Stokes, who bowled tirelessly from the Nursery End, drew Bumrah into a pull to mid-on. Bumrah's contribution to a stand of 35 was five from 54 balls.

Still Jadeja resisted, this time with last man Mohammed Siraj. Stokes refused to stop bowling. A delayed tea was taken with 30 required for India.

The injured Shoaib Bashir was summoned after the break, and incredibly got Siraj to defend the ball into the ground and back on to his stumps. Bashir, who has an injured finger on his non-bowling hand, set off on a delirious celebration, probably his last act of a series in which he is likely to be ruled out of the final two Tests. Jadeja was left stranded on 61 from 181 balls.

The drawn-out finale was a direct contrast to a pulsating morning, when Stokes and Jofra Archer broke open the India batting with some irresistible pace bowling.

Archer ripped Rishabh Pant's off stump out of the ground, Stokes had KL Rahul lbw on review for 39. Washington Sundar, who confidently told the media on Sunday night "India will win", was sensationally held by Archer's agile swoop in his follow-through.

Jadeja began his vigil, first alongside Nitish Kumar Reddy for 15 overs, then Bumrah. Jadeja and Brydon Carse had to be separated after an accidental collision while Jadeja was running between the wickets.

England tried everything and thought they had Jadeja until he overturned being given lbw to Chris Woakes on 26. Once again, Stokes decided it was up to him.

After a spell of 9.2 overs in the morning, the talismanic captain launched into another of 10 up to tea. Bashir had the moment of glory, but it was Stokes who carried England on his back.

Stokes conjures finale to slow-burning Test

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Rahul is trapped lbw by Stokes

This was a slow-burner of a Test, one that occasionally ground to a halt. The finale was more than worth it, a rowdy Monday at a sold-out Lord's. By the end, England's win was the tightest in terms of runs at this famous old ground.

It took three days for this match to spring to life. When it did, it was compelling. The deterioration of the pitch helped, but the real catalyst was the tension between the two teams. They are evenly matched and, if anything, India are unlucky to be behind. The last two Tests will be box-office viewing.

England look a better team with fire in their bellies, none more so than Stokes, the arch-competitor. He contributed to this win with bat and in the field, then shouldered the bowling almost single-handedly on the final day.

Stokes was also rewarded for his loyalty to Archer, who made one of the great England comebacks after four years away from Test cricket with injuries. The wicket of Yashasvi Jaiswal he took with his third ball back was an incredible moment, his spell on Monday morning final proof he remains every bit the bowler he was in his debut summer of 2019.

England will be forced into one change for the fourth Test, with Bashir set to be ruled out with an injury to his left little finger. India will wait on the fitness of Pant, who also has a finger injury.

In this wonderful year of Test cricket, with an Ashes series on the horizon, England are on the verge of winning a five-match series for the first time since 2018.

England overcome brave Jadeja

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Best shots from Jadeja's half-century against England

Archer was below-par on Sunday evening, but back to his best on Monday when India resumed on 58-4. Although he was in discomfort, Pant was India's key man. He charged to slap Archer straight for four. Next ball, Archer was just under 90mph, Pant was stuck on the crease and off stump obliterated. A fired-up Archer had words for Pant.

Stokes, supposedly protecting his fragile body, bowled virtually all day. The delivery to get Rahul was an arcing inswinger, the appeal turned down on the field, then overturned by the replay.

England coach Brendon McCullum hung off the dressing-room balcony to point to Sundar as he arrived, and the home team had plenty to say. He lasted only four balls before a leading edge was spectacularly held by Archer.

Stokes eventually gave way to Woakes, who only needed nine balls to find the edge of Reddy. Lunch was taken, India needed 81 and Jadeja had only the bowlers for company.

What happened next was utterly unexpected. Jadeja farmed the strike and Bumrah held up his end. Bar a Jadeja flick for six off Woakes, the score crawled along. When singles were taken, they were greeted by raucous noise from the India fans. England fielders ran everywhere, the hosts looked unnerved.

Stokes launched into a back-breaking spell of bouncers to finally draw the swipe from Bumrah when 46 were required. Stokes finally ended his second spell at the tea interval.

Archer peppered Siraj, but it was the unlikely Bashir who proved England's hero. It was cruel on Jadeja, who could not have given more.

India on brink

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

'England needed that' - Archer bowls Pant

Just like the first Test at Headingley, when they failed to defend 371, India might be wondering how they lost. At Lord's they reached 254-4 in response to England's 387, then 41-1 in the run chase.

In Bumrah, they have the outstanding cricketer on either side, probably the best in the world. He was mesmerising in this Test, deserving of more than his seven wickets. The heart he showed with the bat was just as impressive.

Still, India have lost the two Tests Bumrah has played and won the one he did not, the second Test at Edgbaston. If the tourists stick to their plan of him featuring only once more in the series, they have the tricky decision of where that would be.

As much thought will go into the fitness of Pant. Dhruv Jurel is an upgrade behind the stumps, but the swashbuckling way in which Pant bats at number five is irreplaceable.

India started this series as underdogs and were written off after the first Test, yet through performances like Jadeja's, the visitors have shown they are in the fight.

'England always seem to find a way' - reaction

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Archer takes brilliant catch to remove Washington Sundar for a duck

England captain Ben Stokes, speaking to BBC Test Match Special: "Day five, Test match on the line - I have some history of turning up in moments like that with the ball. I was pretty pumped.

"A bit of niggle out in the middle gets over-egged from people watching. A massive series, emotions are going. I'm all for it. I don't think it went over the line whatsoever. It adds to the theatre."

England bowler Jofra Archer on TMS: "I never thought about not coming back. Really, I only had two injuries. But also it was a long road back and I didn't realise how long it was.

"I am glad to be back and hopefully I'm here a bit longer than the last time."

India captain Shubman Gill on TMS: "Tough luck, but the way we went out in the position in the morning to make a comeback like this was tremendous from Ravindra Jadeja and the low order.

"When you play these kind of Test matches with both teams giving everything they have, there is always admiration at the end.

Former England skipper Michael Vaughan on TMS: "England always seem to find a way, particularly at home.

"When it gets tight they have a leader who drives them forward with a will to win."

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Reddy is caught by Smith off the bowling of Woakes

More on this story

From drugs bans to Wimbledon champions - how did we get here?

14 July 2025 at 22:05

From drugs bans to Wimbledon champions - how did we get here?

Jannik Sinner with the Wimbledon men's trophyImage source, Getty Images
Image caption,

Sinner is now a four-time Grand Slam winner

  • Published

Jannik Sinner says his and Iga Swiatek's singles title wins at Wimbledon were made "very special" following the doping cases involving them over the past year.

For the first time in Wimbledon history, both the men's and women's champions have served suspensions for banned substances, ensuring that their celebrations have been accompanied by controversy.

With the authorities accepting both players' insistence that the cases were caused by contamination of medication, many are clearly willing to look past the short bans.

But others are concerned about the impact it could have on the image of tennis.

"I don't think it's a good look for the sport," said Australian Nick Kyrgios, when previewing both Wimbledon finals.

Indeed, minutes after Sinner's victory on Sunday, the 2022 finalist posted a cryptic asterisk on social media, widely seen as a reflection of the mixed feelings some have about the men's world number one winning just over two months after completing a doping ban.

When asked by BBC Sport on Monday about those who may feel uneasy about him and Swiatek winning, Sinner said, "Well, me and Iga, we actually talked yesterday about this, and we've been celebrating in a way even more, because it was a very difficult time for her and also for me, and only me and my team and the people who are close to me know exactly how it went.

"There are always going to be some people who believe in you and [who] do not, but this is in everything. So yeah, in a way, it's very special, because it was very, very stressful the time on the last four or five months."

So, what were the details of their cases? How did it all get resolved so they could return to action so soon? How do players and officials feel about it? Does it detract from their achievements? And what does it mean for Wimbledon, and the sport more widely?

What happened with Swiatek?

Iga Swiatek with the Venus Rosewater Trophy after her Wimbledon final victoryImage source, Getty Images
Image caption,

Swiatek's previous best performance at Wimbledon was reaching the quarter-final in 2023

The six-time Grand Slam winner tested positive for heart medication trimetazidine (TMZ) in an out-of-competition sample in August 2024, and served a one-month suspension, which ended in early December.

Commonly used to treat problems such as angina, TMZ increases blood flow to the heart and stimulates the metabolism of glucose, which can improve endurance, which is why it is a banned substance in elite sport.

Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva was given a four-year ban last year after testing positive for TMZ in a sample before she competed at the 2022 Winter Olympics.

Swiatek's level of fault was considered to be at the lowest end of the range, as the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) accepted it was caused by contamination of a regulated non-prescription medicine, manufactured and sold in Poland, which she said she took for jet lag and sleep issues.

What happened with Sinner?

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Brilliant Sinner becomes first Italian Wimbledon champion

Sinner twice tested positive for low levels of the banned anabolic steroid clostebol - which can be used to build muscle mass - in March 2024.

As with Swiatek, authorities accepted it was caused by the use of an over-the-counter medication and he was cleared of any wrongdoing by an independent tribunal, with the ITIA deciding not to suspend him. It accepted he had been inadvertently contaminated by his physiotherapist, who was treating a cut on his hand with an over-the-counter spray, which was later found to contain the banned substance.

Significantly, however, the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) appealed against the panel's ruling that Sinner "bore no fault or negligence", and said it was seeking a ban of between one and two years.

A hearing at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) was set for April - but in February, shortly after retaining his Australian Open title, it was announced that Sinner and Wada had reached a controversial settlement, with the Italian then serving just a three-month ban.

It meant he did not miss any Grand Slam tournaments, and was back in time for the French Open, prompting accusations of favouritism, with some players openly questioning their faith in clean sport.

There have also been questions over why Sinner's former physio and trainer - who were both deemed responsible for the clostebol entering his system - could have made such a mistake, and why they have not faced any action from the authorities.

Why weren't longer bans issued?

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

This video can not be played

Media caption,

Swiatek dominates Anisimova to win first Wimbledon title

Wada had felt the independent tribunal should have punished Sinner for strict liability - that he was ultimately responsible for failing the two drugs tests.

However, it also accepted that Sinner "did not intend to cheat", that the drug "did not provide any performance-enhancing benefit" and this happened "without his knowledge as the result of negligence of members of his entourage". On this basis, it was prepared to reach a settlement with Sinner, rather than go to Cas where the outcome would have either been a ban of at least a year or Sinner being cleared.

"This was a case that was a million miles away from doping," Wada's general counsel Ross Wenzel told BBC Sport.

Similar case resolutions have been allowed since 2021, and Wenzel said Wada had since struck 67 agreements. The code is set to change from 2027, meaning cases where players have failed tests but were deemed not to be at fault - like Sinner - could be punished from just a reprimand to a two-year ban.

In Swiatek's case, Wada did not appeal against her one-month suspension, claiming that its scientific experts "confirmed the specific contaminated melatonin scenario… is plausible and that there would be no scientific grounds to challenge it at Cas".

What was the reaction from other players?

In the wake of Swiatek's punishment, Simona Halep was one of several players who questioned the differences in how doping cases were treated.

In 2023, the Romanian had received a four-year ban for two anti-doping violations, later reduced to nine months after an appeal.

Reflecting on both cases in December, Kyrgios said: "I think people are trying to sweep it under the rug. I just think that it's been handled horrifically in our sport. Two world number ones both getting done for doping is disgusting for our sport. It's a horrible look."

In the wake of Sinner's suspension, former British number one Tim Henman claimed the ban was "too convenient" and left tennis fans with a "pretty sour taste".

"When you're dealing with drugs in sport it very much has to be black and white, it's binary, it's positive or negative, you're banned or you're not banned" he told Sky Sports.

"When you start reading words like settlement or agreement, it feels like there's been a negotiation and I don't think that will sit well with the player cohort and the fans of the sport."

Serena Williams said she would have been banned for 20 years and had some of her Grand Slam titles taken away if she had committed the same anti-doping offence as men's world number one Sinner.

British player Tara Moore, who was provisionally banned for two years while challenging a doping charge of which she was eventually cleared after 19 months, also suggested top players were "treated differently", with their image prioritised.

Accusations of preferential treatment were firmly disputed by the ITIA and Wada, but many believe both players have benefitted from being able to pay top lawyers to act quickly.

"A majority of the players don't feel that it's fair," said 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic. "It appears that you can almost affect the outcome if you are a top player, if you have access to the top lawyers."

The Professional Tennis Players' Association (PTPA) - an organisation co-founded by Djokovic which aims to increase player power - said there is a lack of "transparency", "process" and "consistency" in the system.

Three-time Grand Slam champion Stan Wawrinka, writing on social media, said he did not "believe in a clean sport any more".

What has been the response to Swiatek and Sinner winning?

Former British number one Greg Rusedski seemed to speak for many in the sport when he told BBC Sport: "I think you have to give them the benefit of the doubt, look at the tennis they have played in this last year, and I think this will all go away in time."

Certainly there seemed little concern from those present at Wimbledon - or the millions watching and listening on - about the backstory of the pair of champions, with the focus on the quality of their play and the ruthlessness of their respective performances.

Perhaps this should come as no surprise, given that doping controversies are far from unusual in tennis. Indeed, fellow Wimbledon winners Halep, Maria Sharapova, Martina Hingis and Andre Agassi also all had positive drugs tests, albeit after winning the championship, rather than before.

"It's a little embarrassing for the sport and, by extension, for Wimbledon, it's a unique and unwelcome double" says public relations expert Tim Jotischky, of the PHA Group.

"However, the evidence suggests that fellow professionals are more upset than the viewing public… the Alcaraz-Sinner rivalry has captured the imagination of sports fans and, whilst Alcaraz is the more popular player, Sinner has never been targeted by spectators.

"That might be because many don't follow the sport closely enough to be aware of the details, but the main reason is probably because tennis still looks like a clean sport, where performance-enhancing drugs have a minimum impact, in a way that athletics and cycling often do not.

"Iga Swiatek's Wimbledon triumph followed a slump in form… that may have helped divert attention away from her ban.

"But tennis cannot be complacent or ignore the concerns of leading professionals. The rules around drugs offences need to be transparent and implemented consistently, regardless of a player's box office appeal."

The All England Lawn Tennis Club has been approached for comment.

Related topics

风声OPINION|大连工大,你应该保护受害女生,而不是开除

By: elijah
15 July 2025 at 00:08

img

近日,大连工业大学一位女生和一位外国籍男士发生关系后,亲密照片被该外国人放到了社交媒体,近日,该校选择将女生开除,并把女生的名字公之于众。

CDT 档案卡
标题:大连工大,你应该保护受害女生,而不是开除
作者:张丰
发表日期:2025.7.13
来源:微信公众号“风声OPINION”
主题归类:大连工业大学女生被开除学籍
CDS收藏:公民馆
版权说明:该作品版权归原作者所有。中国数字时代仅对原作进行存档,以对抗中国的网络审查。详细版权说明

多家媒体在转发该通报的过程中,都没有隐去该女生姓名。目力所及,只有澎湃新闻做到了保护当事人的隐私。那些新闻编辑,在无意识中加入了流量狂欢的队伍,失去了基本的操守。这事发生在2025年,真是万分遗憾的事。

试想,如果女生是和一位中国男生发生关系,照片被如此公开,相信现在男生已经被公安部门拘留,也会被万众唾弃——相信这一点法律意识,警察叔叔还是具备的。

然而,因为涉事男子是外国人,结果就大为不同。在互联网上,这件事被很多人解读为“外国人认为中国女孩很容易到手”,很多中国男性网友表示愤慨。不过,他们愤慨的对象,不是这位外国人,而是受害者。

随便打开各家媒体对本条新闻的报道,无论是视频类报道,还是文字类报道,甚至有些自媒体写手,跟帖区出现大量类似言论:他们纷纷表示支持学校的处分,认为该女生“倒贴”外国男性,崇洋媚外,咎由自取,等等,甚至认为不仅有辱国格,还“丢人丢到国外去了”。

如此看来,大连工业大学的通报似乎就可以理解了——他们援引的是《大连工业大学学生违纪处分规定》的第三章第九十九条,“与外国外人不当交往,有损国格、校誉的,视情节给予记过及以上处分。”

看来,校方则认为这位受害的女生是“有损国格、校誉”的。这和一部分网民的意见是一致的,女生和外国人发生了关系,这些男生表示很不满。他们认为自己吃亏了,或者是尊严受到了冒犯。

这里似乎存在一个“等式”:一个外国人和一个中国女人发生关系,并且在网上侮辱了她,就等于“侮辱中国人”。但是,他们并没有责怪外国人,而是对女生进行网暴,这是典型的“受害者有罪论”——都怪你不争气。

在潜意识中,这些男性网民认为女性是“属于自己的”,她们的“不贞”就是对自己的冒犯。而当她们的“不贞”的对象还是外国人时,所谓“国恨家仇”就涌上心头。

过去几年,在中国互联网上有大量类似的内容,虚假编造“中国女性”和黑人男性发生关系,很多视频都是移花接木,或者一张图片配上有煽动性的文字。不过,这些传言都缺乏“真实信息”,比如相关时间、地点等。

还有一部分谣言指向高校,比如所谓的“女大学生陪外国留学生”的传闻。中国的留学生制度还有欠缺,对外国留学生资质也有放宽的嫌疑,有时候还存在一些“照顾”(比如留学生公寓条件通常比中国学生宿舍要好)。

但无论如何,认为中国女学生很轻易地和外国男留学生发生关系,肯定是这个时代典型的“叫魂”,一种混杂着民族意识的网络传说而已。

这是非常值得注意的网络舆论现象,它往往和其他社会热点,比如高彩礼(中国男性结婚困难)、高学费(外国留学生有补贴)等混合在一起。在散布排外情绪的同时,也指向了对女性的“规训”。那些传说,其实都反映出一部分男性在社会中的失落。

在这一次事件中,这些男性感受到的是“双重暴击”:女生和外国人发生关系不仅是“事实”,还被外国人以一种挑衅的方式公开出来。一时间,就连很多有现代法治意识,平常也很重视保护个人隐私的新闻编辑,也被冲昏了头脑。

这就是大连工业大学开除女生的“社会氛围”。这不仅是一种道德审判,也是道德侮辱。他们不但认为女生是“不名誉”的,也认为她损害了学校甚至“国家”的脸面。

我们可以想想,如果大连工业大学发布的声明,不是开除女生,而是一条这样的内容:我们注意到最近网上有关于我校女生的传闻,呼吁网民遵守法律,保护当事人的隐私与权益——这样的大学,会不会更让人尊敬一些?

【CDT周报】第227期:甘肃教育厅请优先关注天水儿童吧!

14 July 2025 at 23:58

上期周报:【CDT周报】第226期:他勇敢破窗的“不服从”成为所有人的退路

过去一周中国数字时代【404文库】新增文章9篇,【每日一语】新增网语5条,【大事记】收录热点事件2条,刊登读者投稿2篇,投稿请点此

编者的话:

img

7月5日—7月13日,这一周。

甘肃省天水市麦积区褐石培心幼儿园出现了大量铅中毒的幼童。7月1日前后,因为有孩子出现呕吐症状,一些学生家长带孩子到天水市本地的医院检查,结果显示孩子血液中含铅量异常。7月2日至7月3日,陆续有家长带孩子到三百多公里外的西安各医院做检查,其中多数孩子血铅水平严重超标。更令人震惊的是,在天水市当地检测称“正常”的孩子,在西安的医院却被确诊为中度甚至重度中毒,检测结果相差几十倍。根据中国的现行医疗规定,儿童的血铅含量超过100µg/L,则意味着需要进行“环境治理、排查铅源”,而超过200µg/L则属于“铅中毒”(分为轻、中、重度)。7月8日,天水市联合调查组发布了一份调查通报,通报称褐石培心幼儿园共有251名儿童接受检测,结果显示233人血铅异常,其原因是厨师在食品中违法添加了不能食用的彩绘颜料。同一天,甘肃省教育厅倒是发了条与儿童有关的微博,不过关注的却是加沙小孩,此举引发众怒。

file

虽然官方短时间内将8人刑拘,也有多位官员被问责。但还是有不少网友认为,此次铅中毒事件的“颜料说”存在多处疑点。例如,关于投毒动机,通报说是为了“扩大生源,提高效益”,但彩绘颜料和食用色素的功用差异巨大,食用色素本身的价格也非常低廉,有必要为了省几块钱赌上自己命运吗?还是说园方根本是个草台班子,连最基本的食品安全常识都缺乏?而关于含铅量问题,通报称发现送检面点的含铅量高达1000多毫克,但彩绘颜料每千克的国标最高含量才90毫克,究竟要用多少颜料,才能“稀释”出一块含铅量如此之高的发糕?这一点也让人难以信服。当然,最让网民怀疑的,是另有污染源存在。事实上,早在2006年天水市就爆出过铅中毒事件,有超过200人血液中铅水平超标,附近一家铅锌冶炼厂被指非法排放废料。

file

由此不少人追问:是否存在这样的可能——幼儿园长期取用被污染的地下水,造成“食物+水源”的双重污染?所谓“颜料投毒”是否只是为了遮蔽更深层的“环境污染”,这或许是当地在幼儿身体检测初期便启动“维稳模式”的真正原因。毕竟,当地的确长期存在环境污染问题,惯性的维稳思路让有关部门近乎本能的指使医院造假数据、掩盖真相,并急于甩锅幼儿园着重强调“园长、老板、后厨人员”的主观恶意,希望尽快平息舆情、撇清自身责任。同往常一样,新闻媒体再度在这样的重大公共事件中集体缺席,以至于有网友感叹“通报之后无报道,无法回应公众疑问”。社会对真相的索取能力被无限制压缩,而这已然是一种通报时代的常态了。

img

7月12日,甘肃成立省委省政府调查组,提级调查天水市麦积区褐石培心幼儿园幼儿血铅异常问题,一个“更加权威”的后续通报或将出台。但个中存在的悖论是,官方通报本身并不能解决新闻匮乏的社会现实,因为通报的目的并非是提供核心信息,而是对事件本身做出定性、消灭舆论。在这种前提下,通报的作用越强,媒体的作用越弱,也难怪有网友指出“每一次通报都将通报本身逼近绝境”。其结果就是——无论如何,人们总是选择绕过通报,宁愿信谣言,也不再信通报。有网友因此怀念起过去——“好多人都骂南方系,但是在南方系兴盛的那些年,像天水这样的事件多半就会有大版面的记者深度报道了,现在我只能在网上看自媒体的盲猜。”讽刺的是,就连这条“恶意怀念”的微博,最终也遭到404了。

file

除此之外,还有一种更惨的情况,那就是媒体报道及官方通报对一些关键词的软屏蔽。近期,有网友曝光,郑州市人民公园附近接连发生多起聚众殴打事件。施暴者通过交友软件伪装成同性恋者,打造虚假人设,骗取信任后将受害者约至公园实施围殴。在围堵追打过程中,他们还以“是1还是0?”等言语对受害者进行羞辱。很显然,这就是针对“同性恋”或“性少数群体”的针对性犯罪,是典型的仇恨暴力事件。在经济下行的背景下,中国的边缘群体也更容易成为被指责、被攻击、被发泄的对象。但由于中国官方长期将“同性恋”、“LGBT”、“男同/女同”等词设为敏感词,这就导致郑州警方在持续通报打人事件时相当尴尬,它们甚至没有发任何“蓝底白字”,也没有媒体在报道中提及了同性恋字样。有网友抗议“恐同媒体这是在配合仇同犯罪…你们把词条抹去,是对受害者的再一次侵犯。”

img

从郑州警方最后的一次通过媒体发布的通报来看,它们显然意识到了这些仇同暴力事件的背后其实代表着治安恶化(共有17人被抓获)和监管缺失。于是,它们再度发明出新的说法——这些人是“多次临时起意,相约作案”。有网友调侃这简直是“美化预谋犯罪”的完美说法,可问题是“临时起意”和“相约作案”这两个词不是本就矛盾吗?还有网友指出这起事件比当年的唐山打人事件更甚,犯罪者们不但亲自拍摄、分享了打人视频,并且他们在潜意识中似乎觉得歧视同性恋合理且安全。这本身也揭示出,当下社会存在一种默认可以攻击和歧视少数群体的恶劣氛围。这些少数群体,可以是同性恋,也可以是一些人口中的1450、西奴、同性恋、耽美作者、捞女……与此同时,人民日报也在呼吁着让“社会风气重归淳朴”,它在一篇评论中建议让“同志”称呼重归主流。有网友讽刺道“可是,在那个’淳朴’的年代,同性恋是要被同志枪毙的吧。”

img

CDT 档案卡
标题:【CDT周报】第227期:甘肃教育厅请优先关注天水儿童吧!
作者:中国数字时代
发表日期:2025.7.14
主题归类:甘肃天水幼儿园铅中毒事件
CDS收藏:话语馆

一周荐读:

2025年7月13日是刘晓波逝世八周年的纪念日。本文是2018年张彦在柏林锡安教堂纪念刘晓波逝世一周年时所发表的演讲,作者近期又进行了补充。时至今日,刘晓波在中国历史上的重要性与象征意义不仅没有减弱,反而愈加凸显。这不仅是因为他留在中国并坚持抗争的勇气,更因为他对自我的深刻反省——一个曾颇为轻狂自负的知识分子,最终成长为一个思想者,并起而行之,示范给生活在专制体制下的人们,该如何诚实而有尊严地度过一生。

一周关注:

2025年7月3日,刘奇方带着小女儿去西安西京医院检查血铅含量,一天后得到的结果显示,她的血铅含量是232µg/L。而据相关标准,儿童血铅含量的正常参考值是100µg/L以下。他的小女儿3岁,就读于甘肃省天水市褐石培心幼儿园,才刚刚上学3个月。7月3日,刘奇方在手机上刷到新闻,才知道褐石培心幼儿园“出事了”——幼儿园的不少儿童被检查出血铅含量异常。7月3日,甘肃天水市麦积区卫生健康局发布《情况通报》称,7月1日,麦积区市场监管局和公安分局接群众反映,查获一起某幼儿园违规使用添加剂导致部分幼儿血铅异常案件。

近期,有多名网友发帖称,郑州市人民公园附近发生多起聚众殴打他人事件。据悉,多名施暴者通过交友软件伪装成同性恋者,打造虚假人设,精心骗取信任后,将受害者约至公园。确认身份后,他们持棍棒、甩棍、喷雾等工具围殴受害者,还拍摄视频上传至网络。该事件引发了全网强烈愤慨,有多个网络大V公开呼吁严惩施暴者。有网友指出这是一起针对性少数群体的赤裸裸的仇恨犯罪……

感谢大家的关注,坚果兄弟和郑宏彬被提前释放。据代理二人的律师的分享可知,关于坚果兄弟和郑宏彬的暂缓执行行政拘留的申请通过,两人被放出,已经离开陕西榆林拘留所。非常感谢朋友们对笔者的肯定,上篇已被删帖的文章《一埋了之的煤矸石乱象|坚果兄弟和郑宏彬被消失的背后》共计收到601元赞赏,笔者已转二人亲友,作为迎归之礼。

一周惊奇:

“我的饭店一年也赚不了多少钱,就因为我在短视频平台上发了一个介绍菜品的视频,就要罚我45万元,这样的处罚是不是太儿戏了?”山东临沂饭店老板黄兰(化名)随手拍摄发布的一段菜品视频,竟被认定为“违法广告”,接到临沂市兰山区市监局电话不到3天,便收到拟罚款45万元的《行政处罚告知书》。通过拨打公益普法热线,黄兰联系到北京市京哲律师事务所龚华、张天增两位律师,并获得律师免费的公益代理。7月10日,兰山区法院对黄兰起诉兰山区市监局的案件立案审核通过。

当代都市人最“亲密”的时刻,绝对有在早晚高峰地铁里,和陌生人交换体温和呼吸。只不过,一线城市曾经逼仄的车厢,如今似乎宽敞了些;而在杭州、武汉、合肥,越来越多人涌入早班地铁,前胸贴后背成了常态。这些体感变化,映照的正是中国人口版图的重新洗牌。2021年,中国总人口达到峰值14.126 亿;次年死亡人数首次超过出生人数,人口自然增长由正转负,宣告持续60年的增长就此终结。与此同时,常住人口流失,正以前所未有的速度,席卷中国三分之二的省份。

很多人也许没记住谭秦东这个名字,但仍会记得他的那张照片。照片摄于2019年4月17日,他从看守所出来那天。那天,谭秦东穿着刚换上的干净衬衫和针织背心,笔直站在背景满是枯树的路边,在看守所呆了三个多月后,他看起来惊魂未定。很难在这张脸上看到他的过去:一个体面的三甲医院医生。谭秦东当时39岁,有中南大学湘雅医学院硕士学位,曾担任南方医科大学第三附属医院的麻醉医师,持有医师资格证和医师执业证。但在这张照片里,他的身份、职业和尊严仿佛都被抹去了。

一周讽刺:

这些天发生关于质疑盘古大模型抄袭千问的事情闹的沸沸扬扬。作为一个盘古团队的成员,我最近夜夜辗转反侧,难以入眠。盘古的品牌受到如此大的影响,一方面,我自私的为我的职业发展担忧,也为自己过去的努力工作感到不值。另一方面,由于有人开始揭露这些事情我内心又感到大快人心。在多少个日日夜夜,我们对内部某些人一次次靠着造假而又获得了无数利益的行为咬牙切齿而又无能为力。这种压抑和羞辱也逐渐消磨了我对华为的感情,让我在这里的时日逐渐浑浑噩噩,迷茫无措,时常怀疑自己的人生和自我价值。

一周声音:

傅国涌多年勤奋写作有了回报,那些著作给他带来了公共声誉,在那“公知”依然是一种赞许性称谓的年代,傅国涌也是其中重要的一员,他也可以在很多公开场合发言,他那滔滔不绝的表达能力给他带来了更多拥趸。但在我眼里,傅国涌后来获得的这些声誉都是辅助性的,他早年的那些选择和担当才是独一无二的。时代浪潮之下,社会多重嬗变,而公共领域则是支离破碎,后来的傅国涌更像是一个隐者,隐身于历史和文化研究,这些当然是他热爱的领域,但其中有多少无奈,或许也不足与人道。

拖欠工资,不给空调,把人困在热屋里不让走,最后活活热死,这不是刑事,这是“现代奴工制度”的现实案例。这场悲剧,不是天灾,是人祸,是几十年一套懒政惯性酿出的苦果。学生很快要开学了,学校说暑假会装空调,到时候媒体就会问一句“装了吗”,校方会点点头:“装了”。可大爷回不来了。他在最热的一天,最安静地死去,没有哀号,没有救命声。

你把底层打工人打造成“风险人群”,再用算法开除他们的人权。外卖小哥不是不守规则,他们是不被允许有规则。你说他闯红灯,可你逼他10分钟内送达三公里五单。你说他逆行,可你不给他合法可行的路线规划。你说他不戴头盔,可你取消他为戴头盔晚30秒的申辩机会。他不是不想慢下来,是这个系统不给他停下来喘口气的权利。

一周故事:

张培生(此为网络上流出的大爷姓名)是青岛大学滢园宿舍区的一名宿管,我们对他所知不多。就像大多数平凡的普通人,除非朝夕相处,否则故事总是无从知晓。留存在学生记忆里的都是些日常小事,一位名为Tokaiesss的网友发帖,她记得大爷和她一起找过遗失的毕设论文,也有人记得大爷在毕业时帮自己搬行李,还有人去看演唱会错过宵禁,不得已敲醒大爷的窗户,张培生关切的问:怎么这么晚才回来啊?

6月16日,湖南省临澧县山洲村一烟花厂发生爆炸,造成9人遇难,26人受伤。事故发生后,有媒体披露,自2023至2025年,该厂多次因“改变工房用途”、“超核定药量储存”等问题被立案调查;又因“余药清理不及时”、“消防设施配备不规范”等隐患被责令整改。执法处理的罚款金额从5000元到5万元不等。政府部门的监管流于形式,与地方产业发展的考量脱不了干系。烟花爆竹产业是临澧县的支柱产业。2024年,临澧县烟花爆竹全产业链产值达60亿元,连续2年翻倍增长,且提出了“2026年产值达到100亿元“的目标。

旧闻评论|我不觉得这位女生社死了

By: elijah
14 July 2025 at 23:56

img

大连工业大学这书不念也罢。在目前的情况下,那位李姓同学与学校之间似无必要再有什么学业上的联系。这所学校将禁止婚前性行为写进校规,将与外国人所谓“不正当交往”,视作最高可开除的“有损国格”行为,这肯定会让更多女生、女性敬而远之。

在所有同情女生、愤恨网暴及迂腐校方的声音中,有一种判断认为,这件事会毁了该名女生,让她社会性死亡。尽管这个判断是支持该名女生的,抗议荡妇羞辱,可这种“社死”论断却奇怪地强化了它们所反对的猎巫氛围,论者或该有所审视。

CDT 档案卡
标题:我不觉得这位女生社死了 | 舆论手札
作者:照相的宋师傅
发表日期:2025.7.14
来源:微信公众号“旧闻评论”
主题归类:大连工业大学女生被开除学籍
CDS收藏:公民馆
版权说明:该作品版权归原作者所有。中国数字时代仅对原作进行存档,以对抗中国的网络审查。详细版权说明

假如在这件事中非要选一个“社死”的对象,最恰当的不应当是大连工业大学的校规吗?或者,是忠实执行这套充满伦理偏见的校规,并利用此事以羞辱学生为乐的校领导班子成员吗?抑或,社死之刀剑当降临在那些欢呼网络游街、赛博浸猪笼的人身上。

如果你认为这件事会让该名女生“社死”,哪怕是以此为起点,来抨击对该名女生的围剿,也会在无形中强化那股污名化女性的聒噪。在大连工业大学想要教训该名女生的事件上,反对的真正起点是抗议对女生的迫害,无论迫害是源于学校当局还是来自癫狂网民。

甚至是那位乌克兰当事人,据说在澄清自己“没有结婚”的传言时,也将女生有男友这个未经核实的信息视作“遗憾”,一边声明女生不是EASYGIRL,一边却将它添加为标签。在本应是文明常识的价值排序中,迫害来自四面八方,根本不缺以“社死”之名抗议的人。

所有从法律、道德、权力及认识层面爆拆大连工业大学处分决定的人,以及他们喊出的经验常识——尤其是那些感同身受的女性——都是该名女生不会被“社死”的民意基础。反过来说,假如认为女生最后仍会被“社死”,那捍卫她保留私人生活方式的意义何在?

有朋友将本次事件中所有立场分化的意见——抹黑女生的、为她鸣不平的——全部定性为对这位受迫害女生的消费。这种意见无疑是深刻的,并怀着巨大的沉郁之情。可不把“女生社死”当成理所当然的结局,或许才有可能走出全员消费者的哥谭式沉沦。

从很多角度看,本次正反争议都是非常典型的性别议题,它让羞辱人的一方暴露了“本国女性为本国男人所有”的深层怯懦,这个共同点让这些人展示了向女生吐口水、扔石块的“勇气”。同时,让捍卫者一方有机会密集使用诸如“荡妇羞辱”等经典修辞,回击以剖析之刃。

蔡澜世后也曾两极分化,可相较于该女生所遭受的,人间世堪比炼狱,有更残忍的诛心之论。这也是有些人从头到脚斥责大工大及其可耻拥趸的逻辑起点,如果你不能把女生所受的视作悲剧,哪怕是从所有的舆论消费陷阱中逃离,那你也可能是另一出悲剧的主角。

在与颟顸校方及野蛮网友较量的过程中,一些重要的社群特征重新活跃起来,性别意识在价值观的竞争中被普遍强调,且获得了更多支持。受害者有罪论受到严厉批判,严格区分受害者与加害者的习惯得到重视。即使人们无法清理陈腐校规,可让其臭名远扬。

纵观整场风波,机构媒体既是第一批向该女生砸石头的,也是迄今为止仍属可耻的缺席者。机构媒体未能在第一时间守住编辑的职业伦理,也未能在后续发挥事实核查的专业职责。此事被谣言包裹而恶声越传越大,机构媒体的“社死”无法装饰。

虽然社会已然退步到“恶猜个人、善待公权”的非理性阶段,可在这件事上,许多人仍展现了捍卫私人生活方式及其边界的勇气。诸多社会组成部分多有堕落,让整个社会千疮百孔,可仍不能轻言该名女生的“社死”不可避免,否则这个社会真的是死绝了。

熊倌儿|国格?注意,他要开始耍流氓了

By: elijah
14 July 2025 at 23:52
CDT 档案卡
标题:国格?注意,他要开始耍流氓了
作者:熊倌儿
发表日期:2025.7.14
来源:微信公众号“熊倌儿”
主题归类:大连工业大学女生被开除学籍
CDS收藏:公民馆
版权说明:该作品版权归原作者所有。中国数字时代仅对原作进行存档,以对抗中国的网络审查。详细版权说明

当一个人大谈特谈爱国时,代表着他要开始耍流氓了。

但凡有点儿道理,他会讲道理,有点儿逻辑,他会讲逻辑。

没道理,没逻辑,就要扯大旗拉虎皮,开始耍流氓了。

流氓很好,流氓很轻松。

你只要不把自己当人,一切问题都解决了。

墨汁儿把心染一染,心黑了,龌龊事儿用“爱国”裱起来,胆气壮了,丢掉脸皮,吼起来更有劲儿了。

毕竟流氓庇护所是收容流氓的,美德是万万进不得的。

你讲科学,讲良知,讲正义,讲道义,讲的过“立场”吗?讲的过“爱国”吗?

19世纪法国诗人夏尔·波德莱尔在诗歌中用“象牙塔”(Tour d’ivoire)描绘艺术家脱离世俗、专注于精神世界的理想居所。

后来,这一意象被延伸到学术领域,或者学校,比喻远离现实社会的喧嚣与复杂。

如今看,这象牙塔里学者有,流氓也不少嘛。

往年,有些学生念书念傻了,举报自己老师立场不坚定,是卖国汉奸,吓得学校连夜发公告与老师切割。

学校与教师是雇佣关系,将之解雇似乎也并无不可。

但是学术或有对错,辩驳即可,却因呱噪或影响大小,在“爱国流氓”面前低了头,这学术还是学术吗?

如今出事了,学校非但不保护受害学生,还要踩上一脚,说她侮辱国格。

也是生不逢时,往前倒腾个一百多年,该校门口可以竖个贞节牌坊,此等 “光荣”事迹书于碑文之上,必定遗臭,啊不,呸,必定“流芳百世”,万人“敬仰”。

唯一缺点是后脑勺长了根尾巴,甚是丑陋。

史铁生曾说过:“流氓”二字万难自立门户,唯冠以动词“耍”,方才顺理成章。也就是说,流氓是耍出来的。”

如果说学生举报老师,还带有一丝无意识犯蠢的流氓行径。

那么,学校的操作就称得上耍流氓了,甚至是“恶毒”。

开除不算,还要“示众”,“侮辱国格”的帽子扣下来,等着大众声讨呢。

若非条件不允许,指不定还想开公审大会,游街哩。

流氓性通常还伴随着奴性,比如遇到甘肃儿童铅毒案,某些“爱国”博主在涉及体制外时,大胆出击,雷霆万钧,狂风骤雨。

可当触及体制内,是非观便被某种奇怪的立场扭曲了,偃旗息鼓,语重心长:“大家谈归谈,不要被带了节奏,小心境……”

一时不由让人怀疑他们是性功能障碍,还是胯下空荡荡?

境外XX节奏带的再快,还能快过下三路的节奏么?

这种“欺软怕硬”的模式,在丛林法则盛行的环境里,会被某些人称为“实用”或者“情商”。

对上奴颜婢膝是为了获取保护、资源或避免惩罚;

对下耍流氓则是为了掠夺资源、发泄情绪。

面对他们认为比自己弱小、无力反抗或缺乏保护的对象时,则变得蛮横无理、恃强凌弱、肆意侵犯他人权益、不讲规则,以此获得控制感和优越感。

其核心是极端的利己主义和机会主义,缺乏稳定的道德准则和对他人的基本尊重。

深涵说|天水之失

By: elijah
14 July 2025 at 23:39

img

【《“天水铅中毒事件”的诡谲与问责期待》——2006年4月 央媒时评】

1

2005年—2006年,甘肃省天水市麦积区,甘泉镇吴家河村。

CDT 档案卡
标题:天水之失
作者:深涵
发表日期:2025.7.14
来源:微信公众号“深涵说”
主题归类:甘肃天水幼儿园铅中毒事件
CDS收藏:公民馆
版权说明:该作品版权归原作者所有。中国数字时代仅对原作进行存档,以对抗中国的网络审查。详细版权说明

村民陆续出现头晕、腹痛、发育迟缓等症状,部分儿童体检发现血铅严重超标。

而在吴家河,就有一家冶炼厂(铅锌冶炼企业),长期违规排放含铅废气、废水,导致周边环境(土壤、水源、空气)严重污染。

因此,村民怀疑,他们是受到冶炼厂的污染排放,从而导致的铅中毒。

2006年4月15日,央视网的节目报道了甘肃省天水市麦积区甘泉镇吴家河村200多名村民铅超标事件。

兰州医学研究所麦积区分所,为53个孩子进行了检测,结果无一例外,全部铅超标。

麦积区有关部门认为,这个检测结果不具有权威性,不予认可。

然后,邀请了天水市疾病预防控制中心重新检测,结果与兰研所的结论截然不同,除1名儿童达到临界值外,其余49名儿童尿铅检测正常。

村民不信疾控中心的这个检测结果,远赴西安市中心医院职业病科检测。

检测了200余人,共有211人铅含量严重超标,其中68人被初步确定为铅中毒。

所以说,天水吃麻辣烫可以,做检测,不行。

img

2

19年后,铅中毒事件,再次席发生在天水。

幼儿园的孩子集体腹痛,牙龈发黑,掉发,精神萎靡,家长质疑,幼儿园“辟谣”:

孩子们没事。

天水本地医院帮着打掩护,“现口头通知,经检测,血铅值多为20-60μg/L(正常范围)。”

家长不信,连夜飞往西安,再次检测。

经西安医院检测,同一患儿血铅值普遍200-500μg/L(中重度铅中毒),最高达528μg/L(超正常值5倍),与天水数据相差10-45倍。

家长炸锅了,媒体介入报道,网友舆情热议,事件捅上了热搜。

举国关注之下,事情越闹越大,天水开始忙着“灭火”。

某些部门的相关单位人员,开始赶赴西安,动员家长劝阻他们回天水治疗。

我觉得吧,平等对话和基本共情,已经成了这个时代两个群体之间,最稀缺的品质之一了。

你在关心孩子的死活,它却只关心帽子和面子。

img

3

这些年官僚主义、形式主义、教条主义,集体作恶的显著特征之一,就是“吃苦是你的福气,痛苦你不许喊,问题不好解决就先解决提出问题的人。”

故而,上位者的纠错是万难执行的,当局者的认错反省,是万万不可的。

举一反三、诚恳道歉、深刻反思,不是基于“认清事实错误”,而是被滔天舆论逼着没法子,必须得站出来走两步了。

用大白话翻译过来就是,“它们不是真的知道错了,而是知道自己要死了,怕了。”

铅中毒事件没发生之前,整齐划一的正能量IP账号统一宣传天水麻辣烫。

幼儿园铅中毒事件发生之后,“本地检测正常”、“相关人员赶赴西安劝返”,莫名其妙的新的热点事件不断刷屏冲击着此等事关民生要害的真正“热点”。

img

回到本文开头的那句话,“天水铅中毒事件”的诡谲与问责期待。

19年前,后续问责,没有期待到处理结果。

19年后,同类事件的二次重映,我没有看到刮骨疗毒的雷霆手段,最后呈现出来的戏剧化表演方式,是依旧老掉牙的招数:

劝返,平息事态。

面子上的过失,是让幼儿园的孩子“铅中毒”了,里子里的过失,是地方形象的二次损伤,“不许喊疼”。

两次事件同一地区、同类操作,民众质疑系统性造假成为信任崩塌根源。

悲剧,不是死了一万个人,而是一个人,重复死了一万次,比这更悲剧的是,一万次的翻拍剧本里,他们都用了同一个运镜手法:

把死者埋了,别让人看见,没人看见,也就没人死。

img

4

长久以来,我一直觉得我们这里的管理者有两个通病:

死都要争第一;死都不认错。

淄博烧烤火了,天水麻辣烫必须跟上,天水麻辣烫火了,重庆卤鹅必须上桌,重庆卤鹅火了,苏超也要搞起来。

出圈上位流量爆表,拉升GDP提升地方管理者的耀眼履历,集体狂欢连带着宣传机构恨不得24小时加班加点卖力宣传。

“再努力一点,赶超北上广,我们争第一”。

这是正能量的正面宣传。

反之,舆情反噬了,丑事揭盖了,负面新闻上热搜了,全国网友追着骂街了。

“检测数据正常”、“处置流程合法合规”、“相关单位人员赶赴外地劝返【举报者】”。

“再多浇几盆水,集体消音,死都不能认错。”

2020年,河南鲁山县刚刚脱贫。

2023年8月,脱贫的鲁山县,上了全国热搜。

鲁山县花费715万元建造“牛郎织女”雕塑,因造价高昂、设计被指抄袭长沙“湘江女神”雕塑引发舆情。

招标公告6月14日发布,7月6日公布中标单位,但6月23日已有基座施工视频流出,涉嫌未批先建。

平顶山市2023年8月31日成立联合调查组,承诺“及时公布结果”。

这个及时公布,公众等了整整两年。

这几日,鲁山县又上了热搜。

市民多次追问,官方回复“仍在调查”“涉及保密”,多部门回避回应。

鲁山的市民,我知道你们很急,但你们先别急。

《“天水铅中毒事件”的诡谲与问责期待》,诸君难道没看见,天水的市民,期待的诡谲事件与问责,期待了19年,不也还在期待吗?

流量聚利的时候,喜大普奔,通稿满天飞;问责追责的时候,查无此人,查无此事,“等待公布”。

“这个世界会好吗?”——“等通知”。

img

观人说话|九问“女大学生拟被开除”事件

By: elijah
14 July 2025 at 23:31
CDT 档案卡
标题:九问“女大学生拟被开除”事件
作者:顾意
发表日期:2025.7.13
来源:微信公众号“观人说话”
主题归类:大连工业大学女生被开除学籍
CDS收藏:公民馆
版权说明:该作品版权归原作者所有。中国数字时代仅对原作进行存档,以对抗中国的网络审查。详细版权说明

这又是一场典型的“观点太多,事实很少”的舆论事件。

关于大连工业大学一女生拟被开除一事,持续发酵多天,不少社交和资讯平台的热搜榜单,同时有好几条热搜与此事相关。这一现象,本身就值得深思。鉴于目前确凿的事实很少,我有以下九问:

1.目前,确凿的信息是,日前大连工业大学学生工作部(处)网站发布《关于拟给予李某某同学开除学籍处分的公告》,但通报并未说明事因,只是说根据根据《普通高等学校学生管理规定》第三十条第六款及《大连工业大学学生违纪处分规定》第十九条第六款,拟给予开除学籍处分。

《普通高等学校学生管理规定》第三十条第六款是“学校规定的不能完成学业、应予退学的其他情形”,那么李某某是没有完成学业,还是属于“其他情形”?或者说,二者兼有?这也是不少网民争议的一个焦点。

2.《大连工业大学学生违纪处分规定》第十九条第六款是:与外国人不正当交往,有损国格、校誉的,视情节给予记过及以上处分。很多网友是凭借这一条,联系到涉事女生和乌克兰前CS2选手Zeus交往一事。但哪怕是“劈腿”,是否足以达到有损国格、校誉的地步?拟开除学籍的处分是否过重?

3.上世纪八十年代,教育部试行的《高等学校学生守则》提出“维护国格”,有着当时的时代背景,一些高校随即将其细化到校规。但是放到现在的社会背景中,这样的校规是否过时了?

4.鉴于相关事由涉及个人隐私,学校可以在这样的公告中直接点名涉事学生吗?是否考虑到这可能引发人肉搜索和网暴?如果不该点名,是不是应该尽快撤回公告并道歉?甚至追究责任?

5.7月13日晚,Zeus在其社交平台回应此事,向当事女生道歉并否认出轨,声明自己并没有结婚,也没有处在恋爱关系中;同时还表示,自己在社交媒体上发过几段视频,“视频里能看清我们的脸,但内容没什么露骨,也没有任何不尊重人的地方”。那么,如果Zeus没有撒谎,相关不雅视频的说法,是否是网络谣言?又是谁在造谣?

6.有网友说涉事女生从大连飞上海见Zeus的机票是男朋友买的,也有人说涉事女生没男朋友,此前则有消息称“两人当时均非单身状态”,现在Zeus已经明确否认。真相到底是怎样的?这样的细节直接关乎此事的定性,不能不清不楚。

7.在有的社交平台上,涉事女生直接被“开盒”,个人隐私被深度“挖掘”,这难道不违法吗?相关违法者是否要被追究责任?有些信息甚至长期挂着,相关平台有无监测和管理? 

8.目前大连工业大学的公告只是“拟决定”,李某某仍有陈述和申辩的机会。接下来,校方是否应进一步查清事实,回应相关质疑?是否应听取社会意见,做出更妥善的处分和处理?

9.一个人哪怕在道德上有亏欠,并不是可以网暴她的理由,也并不意味着她的个人信息和名誉权就不受保护。这种常识,何以一再被践踏?

The Economy Has Been Resilient. The New Round of Tariffs May Hit Harder.

The economy’s resilience so far to President Trump’s global trade war risks emboldening him and unleashing the sort of economic devastation that economists have long feared.

© Alyssa Schukar for The New York Times

Economists warn it is just a matter of time before tariffs, if they take effect at the levels President Trump has threatened, start to bite.

Mark Gordon is a psychopath, says woman he raped when he was 14

14 July 2025 at 22:04
BBC An image of Mark Gordon as a teenager against a background of a US flag and barbed wireBBC

Mark Gordon is a dangerous "psychopath" who should have been locked up for life as a child, an American woman he raped 36 years ago has told the BBC.

Gordon was jailed for attacking his neighbour at knifepoint in Miami when he was aged 14 and BBC News has now obtained US court papers revealing the shocking nature of the crimes.

Gordon, 51, and his partner, Constance Marten, 38, have been found guilty of gross negligence manslaughter, after their baby, Victoria, died while they were on the run from UK authorities.

The pair became the focus of a nationwide search after Gordon - who was put on the sex offender's register when he returned to the UK - and Marten disappeared while she was pregnant.

Social services had already taken four of their other children into care.

Gordon has always maintained his rape conviction was unlawful.

'I know he is evil'

For legal reasons, the jury at their first Old Bailey trial was not told Gordon had been convicted of rape in 1989 but details emerged during the retrial.

He was sentenced to 40 years in prison and, after serving 20 years, was deported back to the UK.

BBC News can reveal the full details of the brutal assault, having obtained court documents from his sentencing hearing at Broward County Courthouse, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in 1990.

The victim of his crime, Jane - not her real name - told the BBC she had followed the recent legal proceedings from thousands of miles away in the US.

She says she was "floored" when she found out the man who attacked her more than three decades ago was on the run from police in the UK in 2023.

Jane says Gordon should have been imprisoned in the US for life. "The four-and-a-half hours I spent with him was enough to know he is evil," she says.

Warning: This story contains descriptions of a violent sexual attack.

Broward State Attorney’s Office A police image of Mark Gordon taken at the time of his arrest in 1989. He is standing bare-chested against a yellow background and is looking directly ahead. Broward State Attorney’s Office
A police image of Mark Gordon taken in 1989 at the time of his arrest

Gordon, who was born in the UK, moved to the US as a child with his mother. They initially lived in New York, before settling in Miami.

US court papers reveal how, in late April 1989, he broke into his neighbour's bungalow one night, wearing a mask and armed with a knife and a pair of garden shears.

The court heard how Gordon raped Jane, a mother-of-two, multiple times in an attack that lasted more than four hours. He threatened to kill her children, who were aged nine and seven at the time, if she screamed.

Jane, who was then aged 30, told Judge Stanton Kaplan she had been woken by the sound of her dog barking.

"I went to my bedroom door and hesitated," she said. "I opened the door and was met with the sight of a masked figure dressed in black." Jane said she screamed and he told her: "Don't scream or I'll kill your children."

"I knew there was no way out," she said.

Jane then described being repeatedly raped by the teenager at knife point.

"I was told to say goodbye to my children because this was the day I was going to die. I was told I was worthless, not as good as the others, which led me to believe I was not the first one he had raped.

"As he was telling me these things, he was running the knife up and down my body. He was jabbing at my skin deep enough to hurt but not cut.

"He was holding it over my heart, saying: 'All I have to do is push and you are dead'. I was terrified my children would find my body covered in blood. He enjoyed the nightmare he was causing."

Broward State Attorney’s Office Police photo of the shovel that Mark Gordon hit Patrick Nash withBroward State Attorney’s Office
A police photo of a shovel used by Gordon to attack another neighbour whose home he also broke into

The same court heard, three weeks after attacking Jane, Gordon broke into the home of a couple called Patrick and Annette Nash, who lived a few doors down.

Prosecutors said masked and dressed in black, he made his way to their bedroom. When Annette woke and screamed, Gordon hit her husband with a shovel before fleeing.

At a hearing on 29 February 1990, Gordon pleaded guilty to four counts of armed sexual battery (rape), one of armed kidnapping, one of aggravated battery and two of burglary with a weapon. He later withdrew his guilty plea and stood trial in a chaotic court case in 1994 where he was convicted.

The defence's main witness in mitigation during the sentencing hearing was Gordon's mother, Sylvia Satchell. She revealed to the judge that her son had been the victim of sexual abuse at the age of four while at a nursery in Birmingham.

"I'm asking for a little leniency for him," she told the judge. "This is a first offender and I wouldn't want him to be a hardened criminal at this young age. He's only 15 now."

In a foretaste of his behaviour during his Old Bailey trials, Gordon tried to sack his lawyer and said he was too sick to attend court. He was eventually sentenced to 40 years in prison.

After the attack, Jane's life fell apart. She said her home no longer felt safe and she could not spend another night there.

"Now I'm plagued by nightmares, living with friends or relatives, afraid to be alone," she told the court in 1990.

"My children lost me for months while I dealt with what happened to me."

Jane says she still remembers packing what she could into her car and moving away. Eventually her home was sold for a fraction of what it was worth.

She now lives in a different part of the US, but still misses the Florida climate - particularly during the winter. "The cold is so painful," she says. "Once a Florida girl, always a Florida girl - yet another loss caused by Mr Gordon."

Florida Department of Law Enforcement Mugshot of Mark Gordon dated 15 January 2010. He is looking directly into the camera and is wearing a light blue top against a blue background. Florida Department of Law Enforcement
Gordon was deported to the UK after serving 20 years in a US prison

During Gordon's 1990 sentencing hearing, held before he retracted his pleas, Jane implored the US judge: "Please protect the innocent by keeping the guilty in prison for his life. Show him no mercy. Show him the guilty are punished and not merely chastised."

"I wanted them to sentence him as an adult and not just let him out when he was 18," Jane says now. "He showed me no mercy. So show him no mercy and save the other women out there.

"I think he's just evil."

If you have been affected by the issues raised in this story, help and support is available via the BBC Action Line

BBC Gaza documentary narrated by Hamas official's son breached accuracy guideline, review finds

14 July 2025 at 21:45
BBC/Amjad Al Fayoumi/Hoyo Films Abdullah Al-Yazouri walking in front of a demolished building in the BBC documentary Gaza: How To Survive A WarzoneBBC/Amjad Al Fayoumi/Hoyo Films

A BBC documentary about Gaza breached editorial guidelines on accuracy by failing to disclose the narrator was the son of a Hamas official, the corporation's review has found.

BBC director general Tim Davie commissioned the review into Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone, after it was pulled from iPlayer in February when the boy's family connections emerged.

The review found that the independent production company, Hoyo Films, bears most of the responsibility for the failure. However, it said the BBC also bears some responsibility.

The BBC said the programme should not have been signed off, and it was taking appropriate action on accountability.

The BBC said it was taking a number of steps to prevent a similar breach being repeated:

  • The corporation will create a new leadership role in news documentaries and current affairs. The new director role on the BBC News board, which will be advertised in the next week, will have strategic leadership of its long form output across the news division.
  • New editorial guidance will be issued that careful consideration must be given to the use of narrators in the area of contested current affairs programmes, and that the narrator will be subject to a higher level of scrutiny
  • A new "first gate" process will be introduced, meaning "no high-risk long form programmes can be formally commissioned until all potential compliance considerations are considered and listed"

The corporation did not name any individuals facing disciplinary action.

Hoyo Films said it took the reviews findings "extremely seriously" and said it "apologises for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the editorial guidelines".

The company said it was pleased the report had found there was "no evidence of inappropriate influence on the content of the documentary from any third party".

It said it welcomed the report's recommendations and "hope they will improve processes and prevent similar problems in the future".

Hoyo Films said it would work closely with the BBC to explore the possibility of using some material for re-edited and re-versioned shorter films for archive on iPlayer.

The BBC's director general Tim Davie apologised, saying the report "identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy".

"We will now take action on two fronts," he continued. "Fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated."

'Not appropriate'

The review found three members of the independent production company knew of the father's position as deputy minister of agriculture in the Hamas-run government in Gaza, but no-one within the BBC knew this at the time.

However, the report criticised the BBC team for not being "sufficiently proactive" with initial editorial checks, and for a "lack of critical oversight" of unanswered or partially answered questions.

The review said it had seen no evidence "to support the suggestion that the narrator's father or family influenced the content of the programme in any way".

It added the narrator's scripted contribution to the programme did not constitute a breach of due impartiality.

However, the report concluded that the use of the child narrator for this programme was "not appropriate".

A financial examination found that a fee of £795 was was paid for the narrator, paid to his adult sister, an amount which was not "outside the range of what might be reasonable in the context".

The review was conducted by Peter Johnston, the BBC's director of editorial complaints and reviews.

The BBC Board said: "Nothing is more important than trust and transparency in our journalism. We welcome the actions the Executive are taking to avoid this failing being repeated in the future."

Gregg Wallace 'deeply sorry' after 45 claims against him upheld

14 July 2025 at 21:57
BBC/ShineTV Gregg Wallace on MasterChefBBC/ShineTV

A report into BBC show MasterChef has found 45 allegations against Gregg Wallace were upheld including one of unwelcome physical contact and another three of being in a state of undress.

In total, the report says 83 allegations were made against the TV presenter, with the majority of the substantiated claims relating to inappropriate sexual language and humour, but also culturally insensitive and racist comments.

The inquiry, conducted by an independent law firm, was ordered by MasterChef's production company Banijay in the wake of a BBC News investigation which first revealed claims of inappropriate sexual comments against Wallace.

Ahead of the report's release, Wallace insisted it had cleared him of "the most serious and sensational allegations".

Last week, it emerged that he had been sacked as presenter of the cooking show, as dozens more people came forward to BBC News with fresh claims against him.

The 50 people who came forward to BBC News said they encountered Wallace across a range of shows and settings.

Around 20 were on Banijay productions, but others related to areas like night clubs, awards ceremonies and other TV shows. Some of the individuals we heard from also contributed to the Banijay inquiry.

A decision has not yet been made about unseen series of MasterChef which was filmed last year.

The report also says that ten standalone allegations were made against other people, two of which were substantiated.

Both of those substantiated allegations , which did not involve Wallace, relate to inappropriate language, one of swearing and one of racist language.

The investigation team also found evidence that between 2005 and 2024, six complaints were raised with the production company and six with the BBC.

Patrick Holland, chief executive of Banijay UK, said in earlier years, "it is clear that escalation procedures were not as robust as they should have been".

"We are extremely sorry to anyone who has been impacted by this behaviour and felt unable to speak up at the time or that their complaint was not adequately addressed," he added.

A BBC statement said: "Although the full extent of these issues were not known at the relevant time, opportunities were missed to address this behaviour – both by the production companies running MasterChef and the BBC.

"We accept more could and should have been done sooner."

The BBC said it apologised to "everyone who has been impacted by Mr Wallace's behaviour", and confirmed it has no plans to work with the presenter in future.

Gregg Wallace has been contacted for comment.

Four foreign nationals died in airport plane crash

14 July 2025 at 23:03
UKNIP A huge billowing cloud of black, grey and white smoke coming from the edge of the airfield. It is so thick that it is hiding some of the trees - that are on the edge of the airfield. A fire engine can be seen spraying water towards the mass of smoke. UKNIP
East of England Ambulance Service said four ambulances and Essex and Herts Air Ambulance were sent to the incident

Four people who died when a small plane crashed at London Southend Airport are believed to be foreign nationals, police have confirmed.

The airport has been closed since emergency services were called to the incident involving a Beech B200 Super King shortly before 16:00 BST on Sunday.

Witnesses described a "fireball" type explosion soon after the Netherlands-bound light aircraft had taken off.

All four people were killed in the crash - two pilots and two passengers - and Essex Police said in a press conference on Monday it believed they were foreign nationals.

The names of the four who died have not been released but officers are now working to confirm their identities.

Ch Supt Morgan Cronin said the victims would be "treated with the utmost respect and dignity".

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has put in place a significant air exclusion zone surrounding the crash site.

All flights to and from the airport on Monday have been rerouted, with passengers advised to check with their airline for advice.

The Beech B200 Super King Air plane was operated by Zeusch Aviation, based at Lelystad Airport in the Netherlands, which has confirmed it is "actively supporting the authorities with the investigation".

The plane had flown from the Greek capital Athens to Pula in Croatia on Sunday before heading to Southend. It was due to return to Lelystad on Sunday evening.

Aerial video showed the plane crash site and wreckage

Detectives and forensic teams are working in parallel with the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), the Royal Air Force, Essex County Fire and Rescue Service and London Southend Airport to work out what happened.

Speaking at the press conference, Lisa Fitzsimons, a senior inspector at the AAIB, said it was "too early to speculate on what caused this tragic accident".

"If there are safety lessons that can be learned, we will make recommendations that will aim to prevent a similar accident occurring," she said.

Eight of its inspectors are now at the crash site.

A London Southend Airport spokesperson said: "Our thoughts are with those affected by [Sunday's] events and all passengers impacted by this disruption.

"We will restart flight operations as soon as possible and will continue to update the public on developments."

A graphic illustrates how a plane crash unfolded in real time on a photo of the airport runway in question.
A timeline of how the light aircraft crash unfolded at London Southend Airport
Smoke rises at Southend Airport after the plane crash

Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Court papers reveal how Marten and Gordon failed their four other children

14 July 2025 at 22:06
BBC Graphic showing Constance Marten holding a child, against a background of redacted court papersBBC

Constance Marten and Mark Gordon's failures as parents are revealed by damning court papers, which have been released to BBC News.

A years-long family court case ended in January 2022 when their four children were permanently placed into care.

The documents show how over the years the couple fled to Ireland to avoid contact with social services when Marten was pregnant, refused antenatal and newborn healthcare and repeatedly missed contact sessions with their children once they were in care.

A turning point in the proceedings came when a family court judge ruled, "on the balance of probabilities", Gordon had caused Marten to fall from a first-floor window while she was pregnant.

Their fifth child, Victoria, died in January 2023 after they had gone on the run from authorities. Marten, 38, and Gordon, 51, were found guilty of gross negligence manslaughter on 14 July following a retrial.

They were convicted of child cruelty, concealing baby Victoria's birth and perverting the course of justice during their first trial in June 2024.

Until recently, family court hearings have taken place in private and journalists have not been permitted to report on them.

BBC News led a legal challenge which resulted in the publication of the documents.

The family court judgments, made across five years, provide an important insight into the couple's chaotic life together and the danger judges decided that posed to their four children.

Family court proceedings began in south Wales, where the couple's first baby was born, and continued in London, when Marten and Gordon moved there.

The papers reveal:

  • Gordon did not call 999 after Marten fell from the window and he refused to let paramedics into their home to treat her
  • Afterwards, Marten, pregnant with their third child, fled to Ireland to avoid contact with social services
  • The couple put their children's health at risk by refusing standard antenatal and newborn healthcare
  • Once their older children were in care, they repeatedly missed contact sessions with them
  • Faced with permanently losing her children, Marten told a court she would separate from Gordon in a desperate bid to keep them - but the judge did not believe her

Marten and Gordon - a convicted rapist - returned from travelling around South America in June 2017. She was four months pregnant with their first child.

The pair had travelled through a country during an outbreak of the Zika virus - which can affect a baby's development - and the London hospital where Marten attended antenatal appointments became concerned. But Marten missed at least two more check-ups and then disappeared.

The hospital was worried enough to put out a "national alert". Marten's family also hired a private detective to find her.

Months later, she resurfaced in south Wales after going into labour.

Using the name Isabella O'Brien, and putting on an Irish accent, she told staff at Glangwili Hospital, in Carmarthen, that she was from the travelling community. But they weren't convinced and, remembering the national alert issued in London, called the police.

When officers arrived, there was a physical struggle in front of the other mothers and their babies - and Gordon was arrested. He was later sentenced to 20 weeks in prison for assaulting two female police officers.

This marked the start of a long and often chaotic journey through the family court system, in which Gordon and Marten repeatedly switched lawyers, represented themselves, or failed to turn up for hearings.

Metropolitan Police Constance Marten and Mark GordonMetropolitan Police

In the first court judgment, made by District Judge Taylor at Swansea Family Court in July 2018, a psychiatrist warned that Gordon had "the capacity to act in a violent manner", and could be violent when under stress.

He spent the initial weeks of their first baby's life in Cardiff prison, while Marten stayed with families in a series of mother and baby placements.

When Gordon was released, Marten travelled to visit him in London, leaving the newborn behind for 17 hours.

"There are some concerns that on occasions these parents prioritise their own relationship over [their baby's] needs," Judge Taylor recorded. Similar phrases crop up time and again throughout the 84 pages of court documents released to the BBC.

The judge found the couple had "poor decision-making skills" and a "potential to act impulsively".

At least twice, professionals warned Marten about the dangers of falling asleep with a newborn on her chest - Marten reportedly said she had taken the advice on board.

This first brush with the family courts ended with a six-month supervision order, allowing a social worker to "advise, assist and befriend" the couple's baby. But almost immediately they left Wales for London.

They lived in a series of houses in the east and south-east of the city, leaving without paying rent on more than one occasion - despite Marten having a regular income from a family trust fund.

In one of these houses, their second baby was born. They called a private midwife but Marten had given birth to the baby by the time she arrived. Gordon refused to tell the midwife his own name, and became angry when she called an ambulance, the court documents say.

By late 2019, Marten was pregnant with her third child, and this is when judgments from Her Honour Judge Reardon, at the East London Family Court, pick up the story. A local authority in London alleged domestic abuse between Marten and Gordon, that they had failed to provide adequately for their children's medical needs, and that they had attempted to evade an investigation into their welfare.

The judge wrote that the legal proceedings in front of her were "protracted and delayed", mainly because of the way the parents had conducted the litigation. Their attendance at hearings was intermittent and they gave excuses such as "toothache" and a "car accident" for not turning up.

'Help me, help me'

The night of 21 November 2019 would be a key turning point.

A neighbour was woken by screaming in the early hours of the morning. When he looked outside, he saw Marten falling from a first-floor window and landing on a car.

According to the judgments, Gordon did not call 999, but someone else did. When paramedics arrived, Marten was inside the house screaming: "Help me, help me."

Marten spent eight days in hospital being treated for a shattered spleen and lacerations to a kidney. She was 14 weeks pregnant, but the baby survived.

Gordon told police officers he and Marten had both fallen out of the window while trying to fix the TV aerial, but they remained suspicious.

  • If you have been affected by the issues raised in this story, help and support is available via the BBC Action line

In her judgment Judge Reardon said: "I find on the balance of probabilities that the father caused the mother to fall out of the window. I am not able to find whether he pushed her or whether she fell during a struggle. The former may be more likely."

When Marten left hospital, social workers wanted to talk to her, but she fled with her two children to a hotel in Ireland. She was eventually persuaded to return, a month later. The two children were removed from her on arrival, and she has never got them back.

By the time Judge Reardon made her fact-finding judgment in January 2021, the couple's third baby had been born. This child was also removed when the couple refused to go to a residential assessment unit.

Judge Reardon said it wasn't easy to evaluate the dynamics of their relationship. She found Gordon was likely to have perpetrated a serious act of violence on Marten, so it would be natural for her to fear him, she said. But despite this, she formed the view that it was Marten who was the "dominant personality".

"The strong impression given by the parents is that of two people who are fiercely united in an unrelenting struggle against a non-existent opponent," she said.

"I conclude that the parents have repeatedly prioritised their own need for privacy and secrecy above their children's health.

"Essentially, these parents have rolled the dice three times in refusing the vast majority of standard maternity and newborn healthcare and checks. They have been lucky each time, but plenty of pregnancies do involve complications which, if unchecked or untreated, can become life-threatening for the mother or the baby or both."

It was a tragic prophecy of what was to befall the couple's fifth child, Victoria.

The couple began repeatedly missing contact sessions with their children, and then stopped visiting altogether. Their eldest child became distressed and developed a stammer. "My mummy and daddy cancelled again," the child told nursery staff.

In January 2022, Judge Reardon made her final decision: the couple's four children, one only a baby, would be permanently removed.

The judge said observations from the contact sessions left her with "vivid snapshots of what could, if this were the complete picture, be a loving and integrated family".

But she had to balance that against the risk of harm to the children, caused by the likelihood of exposure to violence between the parents and their attempts to avoid local authority intervention.

"Perhaps most hurtful, from the children's point of view, is their parents' baffling lack of commitment to them over the course of these lengthy proceedings and their inability, or unwillingness, to do what needed to be done in order to reclaim them," Judge Reardon said.

"It is a picture that I, as a reasonably experienced family court judge, find very difficult to comprehend."

At the last minute, in a desperate attempt to hold on to her children, Marten had offered to separate from Gordon, but the judge simply did not believe she would go through with it.

She couldn't see either parent providing a safe home any time soon.

Eight months later, Gordon and Marten - who was by now pregnant again - left their house in south-east London, and went on the run from authorities - beginning the fatal journey that ended in baby Victoria's death.

The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel is now carrying out a national review into Victoria's death, to examine how "agencies can better safeguard children in similar circumstances".

Meta Built a Data Center Next Door. The Neighbors’ Water Taps Went Dry.

In the race to develop artificial intelligence, tech giants are building data centers that guzzle up water. That has led to problems for people who live nearby.

Meta’s data center in Newton County, Ga., is 1,000 feet from the home of Jeff and Beverly Morris.

红伞伞白杆杆

By: Steven
14 July 2025 at 23:56

“红伞伞白杆杆,吃完一起躺板板”

别人都在用 AI 做各式各样的美少女…
我却用 AI 养蘑菇 🤣 而且是毒蘑菇!

上面照片里的模型,是我用 Tirpo AI 文生 3D 后,下载到本地再在 Rhino 里针对打印调整过部分结构所得到的。打印的耗材就是拓竹官方的 PLA 红色,然后再用儿子的儿童马克笔上色。因为是水性颜料,所以来来回回上了好几道,但幸好效果还可以。

我开始还觉得画得挺潦草,但私下给几波互相不认识的朋友看过后,都觉得不错,尤其是其中一位还是常年在一线亲自做手板的老设计师,我才觉得这值得记录一下。不过我还是觉得,因为这个形体细节足够多,所以稍微涂涂色就看着还行,真要是简练一些的造型,拿笔涂我大概是涂不好的 😭😄

但社区里别人分享的 AI 美少女,做出来呢,也还行… 只要别细看结构 🤫 什么四根手指啊、三根绥带啊、两端对不齐的签子啊… 其实咋一看的效果也确实足够好了,毕竟是虚构的漫画角色,你说头身比例奇怪,好像也是合理范围内。

有个朋友说可以做个奇幻精怪故事集,嗯,我觉得这是个有意思的主题!我先摸索一下工作流,说不定可以跟 3DFiti 结合一起玩。

Yesterday — 14 July 2025Main stream

如何找到某个连接的进程啊

14 July 2025 at 22:05
Blabber9125:

最近机场上传流量不正常,一看出国工具 Nikki 日志,有一个的 ip 一直在疯狂连接,不太确定是不是这个导致的,目前已经把代理关了,如何定位找出这个连接是什么进程啊,问了 AI 给的命令没有找到watch -n 1 'ss -tulpn | grep -v "ESTABLISHED 0 0"'watch -n 1 'netstat -tulpn',很奇怪,也就最近几天出现的流量异常,就是上传,排查不是 PT 导致的,把 transmission 和 qb 关了还是一直有这个连接,马赛克的是我内网飞牛 IP

❌
❌