In two-dimensional visual art, particularly painting, the term frieze is used to describe an arrangement of figures that are flattened into a plane parallel to the plane of the picture, thus resembling those seen in architectural friezes. These returned to fashion in the late nineteenth century for their unusual visual effect.
John Roddam Spencer Stanhope (1829–1908), Why seek ye the living among the dead? (St Luke, Chapter XIV, verse 5) (1896), oil on paper, 15.3 × 22.8 cm, location not known. Wikimedia Commons.
John Roddam Spencer Stanhope’s Why seek ye the living among the dead? (St Luke, Chapter 14, verse 5) (1896) refers to the account of the Resurrection in which Mary Magdalene and companion(s) return to Christ’s tomb, only to find its door open and the tomb empty. They are then greeted by two men who inform them that Christ has risen from the dead. Stanhope depicts this in the style of a frieze, the four figures arranged across the painting in a single parallel plane. Although part of a complex narrative, he depicts only a limited window from the story, and in doing so makes his painting simpler and more direct.
Gustav Klimt (1862–1918), Beethoven Frieze (‘The Hostile Powers’) (1902), casein, stucco, gold leaf, on mortar, 217 x 639 cm, Österreichische Galerie Belvedere, Vienna, Austria. Wikimedia Commons.
In 1902 Gustav Klimt painted a frieze of 24 metres in length for the fourteenth exhibition of the Vienna Secession, his Beethoven Frieze, of which the above is a section known as The Hostile Powers, and that below is Nagging Grief. This is not only a frieze in the sense of a flat wall painting, but its composition is flattened as well.
Gustav Klimt (1862–1918), Beethoven Frieze (‘Nagging Grief’) (1902), casein, stucco, gold leaf, on mortar, 220 x 640 cm, Österreichische Galerie Belvedere, Vienna, Austria. Wikimedia Commons.Ferdinand Hodler (1853–1918), Einmütigkeit (Unanimity) (1913), mural, dimensions not known, Neue Rathaus, Hanover, Germany. Image by Bernd Schwabe, via Wikimedia Commons.
Another frieze or mural painted at this time is Hodler’s Unanimity from 1913, in the Neue Rathaus in Hanover, Germany. This has survived adverse criticism, the Nazi regime, and the bombing of the city during the Second World War. At its centre is the figure of Dietrich Arnsborg (1475-1558), who on 26 June 1533 brought together an assembly of the (male) citizens of Hanover in its market square, by the old town hall. Together they swore to adhere to the new Reformation doctrine of Martin Luther, as shown here in their unanimous raising of right hands.
Evelyn De Morgan (1855–1919), The Cadence of Autumn (1905), oil on canvas, dimensions not known, The De Morgan Centre, Guildford, Surrey, England. Wikimedia Commons.
Evelyn De Morgan’s Cadence of Autumn from 1905 shows five women in a frieze against a rustic background. From the left, one holds a basket of grapes and other fruit, two are putting marrows, apples, pears and other fruit into a large net bag, held between them. The fourth crouches down from a seated position, her hands grasping leaves, and the last is stood, letting the wind blow leaves out from each hand.
There are also a few paintings in which a frieze forms the background rather than figures in the foreground.
Frederick Sandys (1829–1904), Medea (1866-68), oil on wood panel with gilded background, 61.2 x 45.6 cm, Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, Birmingham England. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederick Sandys shows Medea (1866-68) at work, preparing a magic potion for one of Jason’s missions. In front of her is a toad, and other ingredients. Behind her, in a gilt frieze, is Jason’s ship the Argo.
Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1828–1882), How Sir Galahad, Sir Bors and Sir Percival Were Fed with the Sanct Grael; but Sir Percival’s Sister Died by the Way (1864), watercolour and gouache on paper, 29.2 x 41.9 cm, The Tate Gallery, London. Wikimedia Commons.
Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s painting of Arthurian legend, How Sir Galahad, Sir Bors and Sir Percival Were Fed with the Sanct Grael; but Sir Percival’s Sister Died by the Way from 1864, awards haloes to what at first appear to be secular women. In fact he has stretched this legend to include the Virgin Mary, in the left foreground with her white lilies, also given haloes, and a host of angels with wings forming a background frieze.
Finally, paintings may incorporate a frieze above or below a more conventional three-dimensional image.
Félicien Rops (1833–1898), Pornocrates (1878), watercolour, pastel and gouache on paper, 75 x 45 cm, Musée Provincial Félicien Rops, Namur, Belgium. Wikimedia Commons.
Félicien Rops’ notorious Pornocrates (1878) shows a blindfolded and nearly-naked woman being led by a pig tethered on a lead like a dog. Below is a frieze containing allegories of sculpture, music, poetry and painting. Make of them what you wish.
Growing plants indoors is an ancient tradition, but it wasn’t until the nineteenth century that it became popular among the middle classes. While some were grown for their flowers, foliage plants became common, and in the later part of the century Aspidistra elatior became so widespread in Britain that it was a symbol of dull middle-class respectability and the bourgeoisie.
The potted houseplants straggling up for light from the window in John Roddam Spencer Stanhope’s Thoughts of the Past (1859) are anything but respectable, though. Here they form part of the stereotype of one of London’s many prostitutes.
Carl Larsson (1853–1919), The Toy Corner (1887), further details not known. Wikimedia Commons.
In 1887, the young Swedish artist Carl Larsson painted The Toy Corner inside his family home. His wife Karin was a talented artist who concentrated on interior design, and was responsible for most of the interiors shown in her husband’s paintings. At the left is a collection of plants in red earthenware pots.
Paul Signac (1863-1935), La salle à manger (Breakfast, The Dining Room) (Op 152) (1886-87), oil on canvas, 89 x 116 cm, Kröller-Müller Museum, Otterlo, The Netherlands. Image by anagoria, via Wikimedia Commons.
At about the same time, Paul Signac pictured the bourgeoisie at table in La salle à manger, variously known as Breakfast or The Dining Room from 1886-87, perhaps his first major Neo-Impressionist painting. The man seen in profile with his cigar is Signac’s grandfather Jules, and the woman drinking coffee may be Signac’s mother. This is thoroughly middle class, with its uniformed maid, a spotless tablecloth, plush curtains and a potted plant in the window.
Paul Signac (1863-1935), Un Dimanche (Sunday) (Op 201) (1888 Oct – 90 Mar), oil on canvas, 150 x 150 cm, Private collection. WikiArt, Wikimedia Commons.
Sunday, which Signac started in October 1888 and completed in March 1890, is perhaps the best-known of his interiors, and continues their theme of the humdrum life of the bourgeoisie. Its static, stultified composition and atmosphere are intentional, and pervade its every detail down to the potted palms at the left.
Harriet Backer (1845–1932), Woman Sewing (1890), oil on canvas, 33 x 41 cm, Private collection. Wikimedia Commons.
Harriet Backer’s Woman Sewing (1890) shows a woman (a wife in the Norwegian title) sat at her sewing. This appears to have been a quick oil sketch, with its gestural depictions of potted plants, table, and chair.
Anna Ancher (1859-1935), Fisherman’s Wife Sewing (1890), oil on canvas, 59 x 48 cm, Randers Art Museum, Denmark. Wikimedia Commons.
The potted plants in Anna Ancher’s Fisherman’s Wife Sewing (1890) are in flower, and shown in their shadows cast on the wall by the sunlight pouring through a window to the left.
Christian Krohg (1852–1925), Eyewitnesses (1895), oil on canvas, 192 x 310 cm, Nasjonalgalleriet (purchased 1895), Oslo, Norway. Courtesy of Nasjonalmuseet, Oslo.
In 1895, Christian Krohg painted one of his more enigmatic works, a throwback to his social narratives, and something of a ‘problem painting’: Eyewitnesses. It is nighttime in a living room. Two fishermen stand in front of a door. Still wearing their soaked and soiled oilskins, they appear to have entered the room straight after coming ashore from the sea. One stares in shock towards the viewer, the other looks down and away. Both appear full of unease, silent and immobile.
At the right, a young woman is standing, leaning forward towards the men, as if listening to them. She looks anxious, with her hands clasped in front of her chest. Behind her an oil lamp burns brightly, there are the leaves of a large potted plant, and a couple of paintings on the wall behind a large blue settee.
Laurits Andersen Ring (1854–1933), At Breakfast (1898), oil on canvas, 52 x 40.5 cm, Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, Sweden. Wikimedia Commons.
In another world three years later, the Danish painter Laurits Andersen Ring’s wife Sigrid sits reading the ‘leftist’ daily newspaper Politiken At Breakfast in 1898. The furniture is modern, designed rather than thrown together, and colour-coordinated. By the window on the right is a small stack of potted plants enjoying the light.
Harriet Backer (1845–1932), Thorvald Boecks bibliotek (Thorvald Boeck’s Library) (1902), oil on canvas, 94.5 x 89 cm, Nasjonalgalleriet, Oslo. The Athenaeum.
Thorvald Boecks bibliotek (Thorvald Boeck’s Library) (1902) is one of Harriet Backer’s few interiors that is devoid of people, here replaced by books from floor to ceiling. Alongside the intricate detail of their many spines, furniture, and other decorations is a high potted plant at the left.
Nikolai Astrup (1880–1928), Interior Still Life: Living Room at Sandalstrand (c 1921), oil on board, 81.9 x 100.4 cm, Private collection. The Athenaeum.
The windowsills in Nikolai Astrup’s Interior Still Life: Living Room at Sandalstrand are full of plants enjoying the sheltered climate indoors.
Þórarinn B. Þorláksson (1867-1924), The Artist’s Home (1924), media not known, 35 x 25 cm, location not known. Wikimedia Commons.
Further north still, homes in Iceland’s capital Reykjavik had room for ample foliage, as shown in Þórarinn Þorláksson’s view of The Artist’s Home in 1924.
The aspidistra is still flying in domestic interiors today.
This third and final article devoted to paintings of Easter covers the events after the entombment, from Christ’s body in the sepulchre and the harrowing of Hell, to the Resurrection. Although less frequently painted than the Crucifixion, the Resurrection is the whole purpose of Easter.
William Blake’s The Angels hovering over the body of Christ in the Sepulchre; Christ in the sepulchre, guarded by angels from about 1805 elaborates the gospel accounts of Christ’s body in the sepulchre with reference to the description of the tabernacle in Exodus, chapter 25 verse 20: And the cherubims shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering the mercy seat with their wings, and their faces shall look one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubims be.
This may have been in the light of Hebrews, chapter 9 verse 5: And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercyseat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.
Jan Brueghel the Elder (1568–1625) and Hans Rottenhammer (1564–1625), Christ’s Descent into Limbo (1597), oil on copper, 26.5 x 35.5 cm, Koninklijk Kabinet van Schilderijen Mauritshuis, The Hague, The Netherlands. Wikimedia Commons.
Just before the end of the sixteenth century, Jan Brueghel the Elder collaborated with Hans Rottenhammer in Christ’s Descent into Limbo (1597). This is set in a grand vision of a dungeon at the edge of a fiery underworld that could have been painted by Hieronymus Bosch.
William Blake (1757–1827), Christ Appearing to His Disciples After the Resurrection (c 1795), color print (monotype), hand-colored with watercolor and tempera, 43.2 x 57.5 cm, The National Gallery of Art (Rosenwald Collection), Washington, DC. Courtesy of The National Gallery of Art.
William Blake’s Christ Appearing to His Disciples/Apostles After the Resurrection is one of his large colour print series from 1795, referring to the gospel of Luke, chapter 24 verses 36-40: And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, “Peace be unto you.” But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit. And he said unto them, “Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.” And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
William Holman Hunt (1827–1910), Christ and the Two Marys (1847), oil on canvas, 117.5 x 94 cm, Art Gallery of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. Wikimedia Commons.
William Holman Hunt’s Christ and the Two Marys is an early Pre-Raphaelite painting from 1847, the year before the formation of the Brethren, and a time when religious themes were popular among them. The two Marys are Mary Magdalene and “the other” Mary, while Christ, his stigmata plainly visible, has cast off the bandages his body was wrapped in for burial.
Nikolai Ge (1831–1894), Heralds of the Resurrection (1867), media and dimensions not known, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow, Russia. Wikimedia Commons.
Nikolai Ge’s Heralds of the Resurrection, from 1867, probably shows Mary Magdalene rushing to tell the disciples of the news that Christ’s body was missing, and that he was resurrected. At the right are the guards who were placed at the tomb, perhaps.
Albert Edelfelt (1854–1905), Christ and Mary Magdalene, a Finnish Legend (1890), oil on canvas, 216 x 152 cm, Ateneumin taidemuseo, Finnish National Gallery, Helsinki, Finland. Wikimedia Commons.
Several impossible legends grew about Mary Magdalene; here Albert Edelfelt’s Christ and Mary Magdalene, a Finnish Legend (1890) dresses her in contemporary clothing, and transports the two to the lakes and forests of Finland, where the first pale leaves of Spring are on the trees.
Fritz von Uhde (1848–1911), Touch me not. John 20:17 (1894), oil on canvas, 144.7 x 168.3 cm, Neue Pinakothek, Munich, Germany. Wikimedia Commons.
Fritz von Uhde has a similarly modern approach in Touch me not. John 20:17 from 1894, this time outside a small town in Germany.
John Roddam Spencer Stanhope (1829–1908), Why seek ye the living among the dead? (St Luke, Chapter XIV, verse 5) (1896), oil on paper, 15.3 × 22.8 cm, location not known. Wikimedia Commons.
John Roddam Spencer Stanhope’s Why seek ye the living among the dead? (St Luke, Chapter 14, verse 5) (1896) refers to the version in which Mary Magdalene and companion(s) return to Christ’s tomb, only to find its door open and the tomb empty. They are then greeted by two men who inform them that Christ has risen from the dead. Stanhope depicts this in the style of a frieze, the four figures arranged across the painting in a single parallel plane. Although part of a complex narrative, he depicts only a limited window from the story, and in doing so makes his painting simpler and more direct.
Eugène Burnand (1850–1921), The Disciples Peter and John Running to the Tomb on the Morning of the Resurrection (1898), oil, dimensions and location not known. Wikimedia Commons.
Late in the nineteenth century, Eugène Burnand’s most successful painting was The Disciples Peter and John Running to the Tomb on the Morning of the Resurrection from 1898, now in the Musée d’Orsay in Paris. Their faces and hands tell so much, surprisingly for an artist who had concentrated for his whole career on landscapes.
Albin Egger-Lienz (1868–1926), Resurrection (1923), oil on cardboard, 71.5 x 101 cm, location not known. Wikimedia Commons.
Albin Egger-Lienz painted a thoroughly modern account in 1923-24. He developed the study above, known simply as Resurrection, into the finished painting of Resurrection of Christ below.
Albin Egger-Lienz (1868–1926), Resurrection of Christ (1923-24), oil on canvas, 197 x 247 cm, Tirol Art Museum, Austria. Wikimedia Commons.
I close with a wonderful painting of a more recent Easter Sunday, by the Ukrainian artist Mykola Pymonenko.
Mykola Pymonenko (1862–1912), Waiting for the Blessing (1891), oil on canvas, 133 x 193 cm, Rybinsk Museum-Preserve Рыбинский историко-архитектурный и художественный музей-заповедник, Rybinsk, Russia. Wikimedia Commons.
Waiting for the Blessing (1891) shows the scene at a country church at dawn on Easter Sunday. The local population is crowding inside, while the women gather with their Paska, traditional ornamental bread that must be blessed before it can be eaten as a brunch. Note how defocussed the crowd in the background appears relative to the women and children in the foreground.
Prostitution isn’t the only occupation that has been claimed to be the earliest, and that claim wasn’t even made until the late nineteenth century. However, it certainly was one of the most common ways for women to earn a living in the growing cities of Europe during the nineteenth century. Like bars and places of entertainment, prostitution only thrived where there were plenty of potential customers with money. London and Paris were renowned for the number of women who worked as prostitutes, catering for all classes and pockets.
Thoughts of the Past (1859) was the first of John Roddam Spencer Stanhope’s paintings to be exhibited at the Royal Academy, and remains one of his best-known works. It shows a woman standing by a window looking out onto the River Thames in London, and is a faithful depiction of the studio below that used by Dante Gabriel Rossetti at the time, in Chatham Place.
The woman and her surroundings contain rich clues as to her status: behind her, a gaudy cloak with some white lace hangs. The small dressing table is tatty and covered with cheap, garish jewellery. Potted houseplants straggle up for light from the window, and at their foot is a man’s glove and walking stick. She’s dressed for the bedroom, with her long red hair let down, and looks gaunt, her eyes tired and sunken. The view looks towards Waterloo Bridge, with the Strand embankment to the right, at the time a popular haunt for prostitutes.
Ford Madox Brown (1821–1893), Work (1863), oil on canvas, 68.4 x 99 cm, Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, Birmingham, England. Wikimedia Commons.
In Ford Madox Brown’s Work (1863), the profligate woman in the foreground wears a torn and tattered red dress (detail below), although it’s faded rather than full scarlet. With her gaggle of unruly children and a babe in arms, she’s portrayed as a prostitute.
Ford Madox Brown (1821–1893), Work (detail) (1863), oil on canvas, 68.4 x 99 cm, Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, Birmingham, England. Wikimedia Commons.Henri Gervex (1852–1929), Rolla (1878), oil on canvas, 175 x 220 cm, Musée des Beaux-Arts, Bordeaux, France. Wikimedia Commons.
Like Manet’s notorious Olympia (1863) before, the contemporary surroundings and heap of clothes beside Henri Gervex’s Rolla (1878) ensured it was deemed immoral by the Salon jury. This was inspired by a poem by Alfred de Musset about a prostitute, and Gervex depicted her asleep in bed as her client gets dressed the following morning. In the end, the artist got a commercial gallery to exhibit this painting, where it attracted far more attention than it would have in the Salon.
Jean-Louis Forain (1852–1931), The Client (1878), watercolour, gouache and pencil, 24.8 x 32.4 cm, Dixon Gallery and Gardens, Memphis, TN. The Athenaeum.
Jean-Louis Forain’s candid view of endemic prostitution shown in his watercolour The Client (1878) surpassed those of Edgar Degas, and were later to inspire the paintings of Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901).
Félicien Rops (1833–1898), Down and Out (1882), pastel and crayon on paper, 45.5 x 30 cm, Musée Provincial Félicien Rops, Namur, Belgium. Wikimedia Commons.
One response to the popularity of Naturalism was Félicien Rops’ tender portrait of a low-end prostitute Down and Out in 1882. While she stands next to a sheet on the wall headed TARIF making clear her trade, a single small red flower adorns her flaunted cleavage.
Antonino Gandolfo (1841–1910), Compensation (1880-85), oil on canvas, 84 x 51 cm, location not known. Image by Luigi Gandolfo, via Wikimedia Commons.
In Antonino Gandolfo’s Compensation from 1880-85, the man settling his bill is only seen by the hand holding out money, and a foot. The young woman holding out her hand to receive, looks away in shame, and wears scarlet to advertise her trade. This is one of a series by Gandolfo depicting the poor in the city of Catania on Sicily.
The theme of prostitution dominates many of the paintings of the Norwegian artist Christian Krohg, who was also an author.
Christian Krohg (1852–1925), Albertine in the Police Doctor’s Waiting Room (1885-87), oil on canvas, 211 x 326 cm, Nasjonalgalleriet, Oslo, Norway. Wikimedia Commons.
Just before Christmas 1886, Christian Krohg’s first novel Albertine was published by a left-wing publisher. Its central theme is prostitution in Norway at the time, and the police quickly seized all the copies they could find, banning it on the grounds of violating the good morals of the people. Krohg was found guilty of the offence the following March and fined, although the police were only able to seize 439 of the first 1600 copies to go into circulation.
At the same time as he was writing that novel, Krohg had been working on his largest and most complex painting: Albertine in the Police Doctor’s Waiting Room (1885-87). He also painted other scenes from the book.
In the novel, Albertine starts as a poor seamstress, who is mistaken for a prostitute by the police officer in charge of the section controlling prostitutes. He plies her with alcohol then rapes her. She is summoned to be inspected by the police doctor, whose examination further violates her, making her think that she is destined to be a prostitute, and that is, of course, exactly what happens.
Albertine isn’t the prominent woman in the centre looking directly at the viewer: Krohg’s heroine is the simple and humble country girl at the front of the queue to go into the police doctor for inspection. Behind her is a motley line of women from a wide range of situations. At the right, in the corner of the room, is another country girl with flushed cheeks. Others are apparently more advanced in their careers, and stare at Albertine, whose profiled face is barely visible from behind her headscarf. Barring the way to the surgery door, and in control of the proceedings, is a policeman.
Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida (1863–1923), White Slave Trade (1895), oil on canvas, 166.5 x 194 cm, Museo Sorolla, Madrid, Spain. Wikimedia Commons.
During Joaquín Sorolla’s period of Naturalist painting, he depicted the contemporary trade in prostitutes in Spain. His White Slave Trade (1895) is set in a bleak railway compartment, where four young women are asleep while being transported in the care of an older woman. In contrast to their guardian who wears black, the young women are dressed in bright-coloured Valencian regional costumes, and wear fashionable shoes. Their few possessions are stacked on the bench at the right, and include a guitar. The ‘slave trade’ to which the title refers is the movement of prostitutes between brothels, in this case from the city of Valencia to the port of Cartagena, then over to Orán and Algeria.
Aksel Waldemar Johannessen was another Norwegian who took up the cause with Krohg. He had been born in Hammersborg, a poor suburb of Oslo, but his paintings weren’t exhibited until after his death in 1922.
Aksel Waldemar Johannessen (1880–1922), Forced into Prostitution (1915), oil on canvas, 41 × 31 cm, Private collection. Wikimedia Commons.
Forced into Prostitution, also known as Night Wanderer, from 1915, shows the artist’s wife Anna in the role of a prostitute in the city of Oslo. Here an odious-looking client with bushy eyebrows and a thick-set face is pressing against her from behind, wanting to pick her up.