Foreign troops in Ukraine "considered a danger to Russia", Kremlin tells BBC
Sometimes it's not what's said that makes the biggest impression.
It's the reaction.
In the Russian Far East, Vladimir Putin delivered a warning to the West: don't even think about sending soldiers - and that includes peacekeepers - to Ukraine.
"If some troops appear there," the Russian president said, "especially now while the fighting's going on, we proceed from the premise that these will be legitimate targets for destruction."
Then the reaction.
The audience at the economic forum in Vladivostok burst into applause, with Russian officials and business leaders apparently welcoming the threat to "destroy" Western troops.
Observing the scene in the hall, I found the applause quite chilling.
And this came just a day after Kyiv's allies, the so-called Coalition of the Willing, had pledged a post-war "reassurance force" for Ukraine.
Putin said he would only meet Zelensky in Moscow - a proposal dismissed outside Russia as a non-starter
The audience applauded again when the Kremlin leader suggested that he would be prepared to meet Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky - but only on home soil.
"The best place for this is the Russian capital, in Hero City Moscow," said Putin.
Outside Russia, Putin's proposal has been dismissed as unserious, a complete non-starter. A case of political trolling.
But in many ways it encapsulates the Kremlin's current position on the war in Ukraine: "Yes, we want peace, but only on our terms. You reject our terms? No peace then."
This uncompromising stance is being fuelled by a combination of factors.
First, by the Kremlin's belief that, in Ukraine, Russian forces have the initiative on the battlefield.
Second, by diplomatic success. In China this week, Putin shook hands and shared smiles with a string of world leaders. The optics were all about demonstrating that Russia has powerful friends, such as China, India and North Korea.
And then there's America. Last month US President Donald Trump invited Putin to Alaska for a summit meeting. Back home pro-Kremlin commentators hailed the event as evidence that Western efforts to isolate Russia over the war in Ukraine had failed.
To convince the Kremlin to end the fighting Trump has previously set ultimatums and deadlines; he's threatened further sanctions if Russia won't make peace.
But Trump hasn't followed through on his threats - and that's another reason for Russia's confidence.
Putin publicly praises Trump's peace efforts. And yet he has rejected Trump's ceasefire proposals and shown no desire to make concessions over the war in Ukraine.
So where does that leave prospects for peace?
Putin said recently that he could see "light at the end of the tunnel".
It seems to me that right now Russia on the one hand, and Ukraine and Europe (and to some extent America) on the other are in different tunnels, on different roads, with different destinations.
Ukraine and Europe are focused on ending the fighting, shaping security guarantees for Kyiv and making sure that the Ukrainian army is strong enough post-war to prevent another invasion.
When Putin talks about "light at the end of the tunnel", I believe he imagines a path that leads to a Russian victory in Ukraine, and more widely, to the construction of a new global order that benefits Russia.
In terms of peace, it's hard to see where and when these two very different highways will converge.
Every Saturday paper leads on Angela Rayner's resignation - after she failed to pay enough stamp duty on her flat in Hove - and the ministerial shake-up it triggered. The Times headline reads "The great Rayner reshuffle", reporting on Sir Keir Starmer's new cabinet appointments as he tries to "overhaul his top team".
The Daily Mail calls it "nightmare on Downing Street". The paper says Yvette Cooper is appointed foreign secretary after "failing to tackle the small boats crisis" from her position in the Home Office. Former Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood will take up Cooper's previous position.
The i Weekend says Shabana Mahmood, the new home secretary, is a "rising star" in the Labour Party, and has been "installed" in the Home Office to take a "harder line" on migrants and "slow Nigel Farage's momentum".
"Exit Rayner, now Starmer takes the fight to Reform" reads the headline of the Daily Telegraph, picturing MPs Pat McFadden and Ed Miliband alongside an image of Rayner. According to the paper, Miliband will retain his post as net zero secretary, while McFadden has been given a new "super-charged" department that will focus on "growth, containing benefits, pensions and skills briefs".
"Starmer upends his cabinet after Rayner resigns over tax scandal" says the Financial Times. The paper calls the reshuffle a "big gamble", and says that the moving of 11 ministers into new roles raises questions about whether they will perform better after the change.
"PM battles to contain crisis" says the Guardian, writing that fallout from the controversy is "likely to further damage Labour's reputation". The front page features a quote from Rayner's resignation letter, which reads "for a teenage mum from a council estate to served at the highest level of government has been the greatest honour of my life".
The Mirror brands Reform UK leader Nigel Farage a "stamp duty 'hypocrite'", alleging that he would have had to pay additional stamp duty for a home in Clacton were it not purchased by his partner.
Farage says Labour is "not fit to govern", is a quote carried by the front page of the Daily Express. The paper writes that the Reform UK leader has urged voters to "kick Sir Keir Starmer's government out of No10", vowing to "save Britain".
"Rayn's over" says the Saturday edition of the Star, labelling the subsequent changes to cabinet a "government meltdown" and "frontbench mayhem".
"Sunk" declares the Sun, with a photo of Rayner in an inflatable boat emblazoned on the front page.
The Times calls it "The Great Rayner Reshuffle" and thinks its scale, just over a year after winning a landslide election, reflects deep concern about the government's collapse in the polls and the rise of Reform UK. The Financial Times calls the reshuffle a "big gamble" - because many ministers have simply been moved to new jobs rather than been sacked, raising questions about whether their performance will actually improve.
The paper says: "Angela Rayner is someone who could reach places that the PM can't, which is part of why their opposites-attract partnership made sense." The Sun says she was "cut adrift" but thinks the trouble she has caused the prime minister could get a lot worse. "To her legions of militant supporters," it says, "she is far from a busted flush - she is a martyr, and soon quite possibly their Red Queen over the water".
Farage is the focus for the Daily Express. It leads with his warning that Labour are "not fit to govern" - saying he "twisted the knife" in a stricken government with his claim that his party could win a general election in two years' time.
下面就是我假想的一个联合所有失业者的类似公社的组织：
你被面包店解雇了，没有收入，但是你会做面包？请加入公社做面包。但是不拿钱，拿的是公社的代金券，相当于公社这个小社会的虚拟货币（用 V 币也行），可以用来买公社其他失业面包师做的面包，至少饿不死。外面哪个面包店老板解雇员工？那就彻底的抵制他，彻底不消费他的东西，我们只用公社的币，买公社其他失业者生产的东西。
你被服装厂解雇了，但是你会做服装？同理如上，加入公社赚币。
Login
