The rise in judicial threats is being fueled by the political rhetoric of the Trump administration, a judge argues.

The rise in judicial threats is being fueled by the political rhetoric of the Trump administration, a judge argues.

The rise in judicial threats is being fueled by the political rhetoric of the Trump administration, argues the judge Esther Salas.

In some ways, Trump’s broader flexing of power has achieved what he set out to do. But his attempts to push prosecutions of rivals have been far less successful.

© Allison Robbert for The New York Times

Judge Jia M. Cobb wrote that two policies announced in June appeared to unlawfully bar members of Congress from making unannounced visits at immigration detention facilities.

© Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

The Milwaukee County judge faces federal charges, but she has maintained her innocence.

© Jovanny Hernandez/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, via USA TODAY NETWORK, via Imagn Images

It isn’t easy.

A case over a firing at the F.T.C. has far-reaching implications for the federal government.

Until the court imposes limits, the administration will keep acting as if there are none.

We are seeing an intentional effort from justices to rebalance the separation of powers in the federal government.

In Gaza and the West Bank, human rights work is starting to mean something new.