© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times
A group of President Donald Trump’s MAGA allies released a playbook Wednesday to fulfill the largest deportation push in U.S. history. It could very well split Trump’s coalition.
The plan from the Mass Deportation Coalition — an organization led by some prominent Trumpworld veterans, immigration restrictionist groups and hawkish policy experts — rests on one crucial pillar: A major immigration enforcement crackdown on workplaces, modeling the strategy that former President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s administration used to deliver the nation’s largest deportation initiative in history.
“There is no chance for a mass deportation program if worksite enforcement is not the centerpiece,” the playbook, shared first with POLITICO, reads. “Enforcement at scale means focusing on physical areas where illegal aliens are concentrated: worksites.”
That strategy almost certainly promises to alienate some of the Trump administration’s allies in the agriculture, construction and hospitality industries, which all rely heavily on undocumented labor. Farm groups in particular hold significant sway in Trump’s Washington and have already shown prowess in steering the administration away from worksite enforcement when those efforts disrupted the industry.
Worksite raids could also prove deeply unpopular with voters, whose views have turned increasingly negative toward Trump on immigration and seemingly forced the administration to ramp down its deportation push.
The release of the group’s playbook — which also offers recommendations from digitizing the employment verification process to barring unauthorized immigrants from accessing credit — comes as the Trump administration enters a new stage of internal immigration enforcement.
In the months since an immigration surge in Minneapolis left two U.S. citizens dead, the administration pivoted its message on mass deportations while overhauling its leadership at the Department of Homeland Security. Border czar Tom Homan replaced Customs and Border Protection chief Greg Bovino in Minneapolis and drew down the immigration enforcement presence in the city; the president ousted DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and tapped then-Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) to replace her; and a POLITICO review of official administration social media accounts found that references to “mass deportations” sharply decreased in March.
In a statement, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson denied that the White House has shifted its deportation approach.
“Nobody is changing the Administration’s immigration enforcement agenda,” she said in a statement. “President Trump’s highest priority has always been the deportation of illegal alien criminals who endanger American communities. As the Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly said, approximately 70 percent of deportations to date have been illegal aliens with criminal records.”
Still, the Mass Deportation Coalition is trying to push the White House back toward a more aggressive immigration approach. Its members include Mark Morgan, the former acting commissioner of CBP under Trump; Erik Prince, a Trump ally and former Blackwater CEO who has pitched the White House on privatizing immigration detention operations; and a number of conservative organizations like the Heritage Foundation.
The group commissioned a poll last month by McLaughlin & Associates, one of Trump’s pollsters, that found a majority of likely U.S. voters support deporting all migrants who entered the country illegally. The poll also found that 70 percent of likely voters support “strengthening workplace immigration enforcement to help raise wages for American workers.”
However, those results differ drastically from other recent polling on immigration, like a January POLITICO poll amid the Minneapolis surge which found that nearly half of U.S. adults say Trump’s mass deportation campaign was too aggressive, including 1 in 5 of his 2024 voters.
“Special interests and industry have been able to operate in the shadows, and to lean on lawmakers and administration officials,” said Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project and a member of the Mass Deportation Coalition. “We're taking that fight public, and we don't think that they're well situated to win that fight, because their arguments don't sell with the American people.”
The group’s stated goal of 1 million deportations in 2026 mirrors a private goal among White House officials, the Washington Post reported last year. It would mark a significant uptick in apprehensions: The Department of Homeland Security said it deported just over 600,000 individuals in 2025, though independent analyses put the number lower.
Industry groups are warning worksite enforcement would disrupt supply chains. Last June, after immigration raids on farms and meatpacking plants sent a shiver through the agriculture industry and drew negative headlines, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and others successfully lobbied the president to pivot to focus on blue cities instead — a move that eventually culminated with the tumultuous operation in Minneapolis.
“The president made clear where he stands on the issue, and made clear how he wants to see the policy enforced,” said John Hollay, president of the National Council of Agricultural Employers. “If [immigration raids] were to occur again on farm operations, that’s going to disrupt the food supply chain, and we’ve made that very clear. We know the president is committed to ensuring our food supply chain is not disrupted and that prices at the grocery store are not raised unnecessarily.”
© Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images
最近，有网友反映，自己买安眠药后，收到厦门湖里区交管部门注销驾驶证短信。此事迅速在网络引发热议，有些人支持交管，认为这种大数据执法有利于公共安全，有人则认为此举侵犯了公民隐私。
我仔仔细细把此事前因后果梳理了一遍，发现此事槽点实在太多了。
就先挑几种为这事变化辩护的声音说说吧，比方说，我看该新闻下面一条高赞评论说，“这是精神类药物，跟隐私有啥关系啊？本来就是要实名购买的”（见下图）。
这个毫无逻辑的网友评论，居然获得如此多的点赞，真让人无语。拜托，实名买药不代表可以公开，不代表我的就诊信息可以让除医院之外的第三方可以看到，医疗就诊信息是个人最为核心的隐私，除非经过严格的法律授权，谁都应该无法调取。
湖里区交管部门后来回应此事说，“该短信只是提醒，驾驶员接到信息后，建议前往辖区交警部门进一步核实，或需要签署承诺书或开具医院证明。”（据极目新闻）又有一些人站出来为湖里交管辩护，说“只是提醒，又不是真注销”，言下之意大家有些大惊小怪。
不知这些网友生活在天上还是人间，居然对一件折腾民众的事情，说得如此轻飘。我倒想问问，民众往交管所来回跑，不需要花费时间和精力吗？签承诺书或开具医院证明，难道不是件麻烦的事吗？问题是，我好好一个人，对他人安全没造成威胁，却受到如此歧视性对待，冤不冤？
再说，湖里交管给那位网友发的短信，明确说要注销驾照，现在又改口说“要进一步核实”，拜托，执法部门给民众发送执法信息，应该准确而完整，不要上来这么一惊一乍好吗，不然收信人即便没有神经衰弱，恐怕都要给吓出来了！
此事引发最多的，就是关于公民隐私泄漏的讨论，对于这个话题，我感觉没必要再多说，毕竟道理再简单不过。我倒想分析一下，这种大数据执法对公共安全是好事还是坏事？
正常服用安眠药等精神类治疗药物的人群，是否会影响驾驶安全，这个我们并未看到详实的科学研究。不过，常识是明摆着的，如果一个人有失眠或精神焦虑、抑郁等疾病，及时服药治疗，对于他的身体，进而对于驾驶安全难道不是一件好事吗？
反过来，如果一个需要服药治疗精神疾患的人，在得知自己一旦开药，就诊信息就会传给交管，可能导致驾照被注销，或者说可能要为保驾照被折腾一番，你觉得他还是轻易去开药和治疗吗？
换成我，我肯定不会的。我看到这个“买安眠药收到注销驾驶证短信”的新闻，就有些后怕，因为我之前就因为失眠开过安眠药，如果我们当地交管也像厦门那样搞大数据执法，我也要倒霉了。
有统计显示，中国有3亿人被睡眠障碍困扰。另一公开数据显示，中国精神障碍人群规模已高达2.8亿。这两个统计肯定有重叠，毛估估，目前国内有睡眠障碍和精神障碍，需要服药治疗的人，应该有上亿左右吧。
如果所谓大数据执法普及，服药治疗和驾照注销联系在一起，必然会导致一大批人，因为害怕惹上麻烦而回避治疗，如此一来，这些人的症状只会加重，这对他们的身体显然不是好事，对驾驶安全会是好事吗？
所以，只要用常识思考，许多事是很容易看明白的。
上期内容：【404文库】中国数字时代2026年2月404文章统计
【404文库】是由中国数字时代运营的一个"因审查而被屏蔽或删除（404 not found）文章"的存档项目。在相当长的一段时间内，中国数字时代通过在标题前加注【404文库】的方式，对大量需要抢救性保存的文章进行了归档、发布。自2021年起，为便于列表化呈现与系统化检索，中国数字时代设立了【404文库】专页。（在专页上，您还可以查看文章的原始链接、发布平台、话题分类、删除时间等信息。）
点此跳转到中国数字时代404文库专页。
2026年3月1日—3月31日，我们测试发现有36篇墙内文章遭到404。涉及的主要话题有：张雪峰去世、伊朗战争、微信审查、315晚会，已加入中国数字时代【404文库】。目前项目总收录文章2492篇。（注：上期总数统计有误，已修正）
点此跳转到中国数字时代404文库专页。
© Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
© Minh Connors for The New York Times
© David Guttenfelder/The New York Times
© Eric Lee for The New York Times
© Joe Skipper/Reuters
© Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times; Brad J. Vest for The New York Times
© Pool photo by Jim Watson
© Ian C. Bates for The New York Times
© Tristan Spinski for The New York Times
© Ahmed Gaber for The New York Times
© Adrianna Newell for The New York Times
© Miguel J. Rodriguez Carrillo/AFP via Getty Images
Democrats are opening a new front in their midterm offensive over Iran.
VoteVets Action Fund is rolling out a $250,000 ad campaign Wednesday targeting Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) over his support of the war with Iran, according to details shared first with POLITICO.
It’s one of the first examples of Democrats putting real money behind the issue in the midterms since President Donald Trump’s attack on the country more than a month ago. And it comes as Republicans grow increasingly worried that the war’s impact on prices could hurt the party at the ballot box this fall.
The ad attacks Van Orden, an at-risk Republican and combat veteran, for backing a Pentagon push for $200 billion more for the Iran operation as prices at the pump continue to rise, and after he called last year for cuts to the Department of Veterans Affairs. The ad accuses Van Orden of backing cuts to veterans’ care — though in the hearing referenced, the Republican advocates for slashing bureaucrats to add more doctors.
The spot sheds light on how Democrats are working to weaponize the war: by arguing that Trump is spending big abroad while further pinching voters’ pocketbooks and, in VoteVets’ case, stiffing veterans.
“Look at that gas pump. We’re paying the cost every damn day of this war in Iran. But for Congressman Van Orden, we’re not paying enough. He’s going for another $200 billion dollars to spend in Iran,” a male Marine Corps veteran narrates in the clip.
“This is the same guy who backed big cuts to VA care for vets,” the veteran says, referring to significant staffing reductions at the agency since Trump returned to office, including thousands of medical personnel. “Vets like me, we understand the cost of war. But if we don’t have the money to take care of our veterans, we damn sure can’t afford another war. Call Van Orden on it.”
VoteVets, whose PAC works to elect Democratic veterans, intends to expand its Iran ad campaign into other battleground districts, with a particular focus on GOP veterans who the group argues are blindly following Trump in abandoning his campaign-trail pledge to end endless wars.
“There’s absolutely no doubt that voters throughout the country, and particularly in Rep. Van Orden’s district, are very aware of the fact that every single day we spend billions of dollars [on] this war in Iran is yet another day that not only is the affordability crisis ignored, but it's getting even worse,” said former Rep. Max Rose, a New York Democrat who serves as a senior adviser to VoteVets. “What this first video represents is our commitment to holding every single Republican veteran in the House of Representatives accountable for their lies, hypocrisy and absence of courage.”
Van Orden, a retired Navy SEAL who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, slammed VoteVets as a “running joke in the veteran community” in a statement to POLITICO. He expressed support for Trump’s military operation and the supplemental funding plan that the White House has been reviewing. But Van Orden stressed that he continues to oppose putting uniformed troops on the ground in Iran.
“Iran has been at war with the United States for 47 years. When we start putting a price tag on American citizens’ lives, we’ve already lost sight of our responsibility,” Van Orden said. “Every single American murdered by these radical Muslim mullahs is priceless, and every American life we can save is beyond value.”
The 30-second spot will run during NCAA games and other live sporting events, as well as on broadcast, radio, streaming services and social media platforms. It represents an escalation in Democrats’ rhetoric and aggression as the party seizes on growing voter backlash to the now monthlong conflict that Trump is threatening to intensify.
Democrats have already been hammering Republicans over affordability as the average price of a gallon of gas soars over $4. Now they’re eyeing ways to connect other cost concerns to the ballooning spending on the war amid reporting that Republicans are considering further reductions to federal health spending to bankroll the military effort — returning to some of their signature issues of the cycle to argue that the GOP is prioritizing fealty to the president over voters’ pocketbooks.
Other Democrat-aligned groups are joining in. Battleground Alliance PAC flew a plane over a minor league baseball game in Pennsylvania over the weekend with a banner targeting Republican Rep. Ryan Mackenzie that read “Mackenzie: Your Iran Vote = Sky High $$$Gas.” The group is planning similar stunts in more than half a dozen other swing districts across Michigan, Iowa, Nebraska and Ohio.
“We're in a war of choice, which is spending an enormous amount of money, and we're going to get more health care cuts and oil price increases,” said Andrew Grossman, a senior adviser to the labor-backed Battleground Alliance PAC. “And so the cost of living — like the chaos and the Republican Congress just saying yes always to President Trump — is hitting Americans in our pocketbooks, and that is the single most important issue of our moment.”
Mackenzie’s campaign manager, Andres Weller, dismissed the move in a statement as “the same political stunts that people are tired of. An outside group did the same thing at the same place in 2024, and all it accomplished was annoying people who were trying to enjoy a baseball game with their family and friends.”
Democrats’ ramp-up comes as Republicans are increasingly fearful a prolonged war will hurt their chances of holding onto power in the midterms. The conflict is already fracturing the MAGA coalition. And polls show a majority of Americans are against the operation in Iran, including an Ipsos survey released Tuesday that found two-thirds of Americans want the U.S. to end its involvement even if the president does not achieve all his goals, and that 56 percent expect the conflict will have a negative impact on their personal financial situation.
Voters are “going to look to their members of Congress to see if they double down or be an independent voice [on Iran],” Samuel Chen, a Pennsylvania-based GOP strategist, said. “If they’re doubling down on it in these tight seats in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and other places, that could be the difference.”
© Matt Rourke/AP
法新社周三（4月1日）消息称，美国国务卿鲁比奥在接受福克斯新闻采访时说：“我认为很遗憾，几乎毫无疑问，一旦这场冲突结束，我们必须重新审视这一关系。我们需要重新评估北约这一联盟对美国的意义。”他还补充说，最终决定权在总统特朗普手中。
据称，美国对部分北约成员国（包括法国、西班牙和意大利）感到不满，因为这些国家没有允许美方飞越该国领空，或使用境内的美军基地向以色列运送军事装备。这一行动与2月28日爆发的伊朗战争有关。
特朗普此前也曾在迈阿密的一次商业论坛上表示，美国未来可能不会在必要时帮助北约盟友，并再次批评该联盟。他称：“我们每年为北约花费数千亿美元来保护他们，我们一直都会支持他们，但考虑到他们现在的做法，我想我们也许不必再这样做了，对吧？”
近几周来，特朗普多次发表强硬言论，在他的社交平台上将北约称为“纸老虎”和“懦夫”，并警告说美国“会记住这一点”。
鲁比奥进一步表示：“如果我们已经到了这样一个地步——北约联盟反而阻碍我们使用这些基地，使我们无法用来维护美国利益，那么北约就成了一条单向通道。”他还说：“如果北约仅仅意味着我们在欧洲驻军来保护欧洲……而当我们需要使用他们的军事基地时，他们却回答‘不’，那我们为什么还要留在北约？这是必须要提出的问题。”
此外，鲁比奥还强调，应由美国的盟友负责保障霍尔木兹海峡的安全。目前该海峡因伊朗的行动实际上已被封锁，而欧洲国家在能源上依赖该通道。他还表示，在对伊朗的战争中，“我们已经接近终点”，但未给出具体时间表。
自特朗普第二任期以来，美国与北约之间的关系正经历严重动荡。美国指责欧洲国家过度依赖美国安全保障，而欧洲方面则对美国可能减少承诺深感担忧。
日本首相高市早苗日本时间4月1日下午与法国总统马克龙举行会谈，就伊朗局势交换意见并协商应对措施。马克龙总统已于昨日下午抵达羽田机场。将与日本方面重点探讨七国集团（G7）能否在伊朗问题上保持协调一致，对于日本担心作为七国集团轮值主席国的法国可能会邀请中国国家主席习近平出席七国集团峰会，法方明确表示不会邀请中方与会。
据日本外务省相关人士透露，两国领导人虽曾在去年11月的G20峰会上有过简短交流，但此次会谈是马克龙与高市之间“首次正式的首脑会谈”。
4月1日，马克龙总统在东京都内举行的日法经济论坛上发表演讲指出，在能源与资源领域减少对特定国家依赖、推进“去风险化”（风险降低），是日法两国面临的共同课题。他还表示，两国都是“储蓄大国”，但在技术创新方面投资仍显不足，应加大投入，以增强经济的韧性。
此外，4月1日，日本经济产业大臣赤泽亮正与法国经济、财政、工业和数字主权部部长莱斯屈尔在日本经济产业省举行了会谈，就加强重要矿产资源采购多元化合作达成一致。双方计划通过政府与民间合作项目，构建稀土供应链，以减少对中国的高度依赖。
法国总统府4月1日之前明确表示，计划于6月15日至17日在法国东部埃维昂举行的G7峰会，将邀请印度、韩国、巴西和肯尼亚四国参加，但不会邀请中国。作为本届G7轮值主席国，法国已决定不向中国发出邀请。
围绕是否邀请中国的问题，去年11月曾有报道称马克龙考虑邀请中国国家主席习近平出席峰会，对此，日本政府基于中国在海洋活动和经济施压方面的行为，向法方表达了担忧，认为若邀请中国，相关问题可能难以充分讨论。12月2号，也就是马克龙访华前一天，日本国家安全保障局局长市川惠一给法方打了电话，表达“关切”，等马克龙从北京回来正式放风要邀请中国，日本外务省明确表示反对。12月5号，日本外相茂木敏充在记者会上强调：“日本重视由共享民主主义和法治等基本价值观的G7所形成的团结。”政府相关人士指出：“G7的意义在于由在诸多方面具有共识的成员进一步深化讨论”，并透露这一立场也已传达给法方，而法国认为：抱有巨大对外贸易黑字的中国，在纠讨论正全球贸易不平衡问题上不可或缺，但综合日本方面的顾虑以及中方参与意愿有限等因素，最终决定此次不发出邀请，并寻求以其他形式展开对话。
在首脑会谈中，鉴于伊朗局势恶化、欧洲部分国家与美国立场出现距离，日本与法国将就推动G7协调应对展开磋商。双方还将确认在谴责霍尔木兹海峡“事实上封锁”的声明中扩大参与国家范围，以保持步调一致。
在因中东局势而趋于不稳定的资源与能源领域，两国将就制定确保重要矿产稳定供应的路线图达成一致，包括推进双方共同投资的稀土冶炼项目等。
同时，考虑到中国军事活动的日益活跃，双方还将加强在安全保障领域的合作，特别是法国作为在太平洋拥有领土的国家，将与日本深化相关协作。
此外，日法两国政府还将配合此次首脑会谈，发表关于核能与核聚变能源合作的联合声明。在核聚变方面，双方将通过包括在法国正在建设的国际热核聚变实验堆（ITER）在内的项目推进合作，国际热核聚变实验堆是目前正在法国卡达拉舍建设的国际大型核聚变科学实验项目，其目标是验证磁约束核聚变作为能源在工业规模上的可行性，是迈向未来核聚变发电站的“和平利用核聚变能源之路”。日法双方将继续推进与日美欧等多方的合作开发，面对中东局势紧张，双方将致力于减少对化石燃料的依赖，推进核电站长期运行以及下一代核反应堆“快堆”的研发合作，并确认到本世纪中叶推进示范性快堆开发的共同目标。同时，还将加强核燃料循环领域的合作，包括推动日本青森县六所村核燃料再处理工厂的安全运行。
节目简介
欢迎收听这期节目！前段时间，一款改装的「透明版 iPhone Air」在网上引起了热议 。但是，直接剥离背板油漆露出内部精密零件，真的是一种很酷的极客审美，还是对工业设计的一种糟糕误解 ？本期节目，我们将穿过这场透明风波，去扒一扒 iPhone Air 玻璃背板下真正隐藏的极端工程追求 。同时，我们也将借此一窥，在 AI 开始接管物理世界的今天，科技巨头们到底在暗中筹划着一个怎样的未来 ？
Show Notes
把精密零件裸露出来就是很酷的设计感吗 ？我们将重新审视历史上经典透明设计的真正语境，聊聊为什么「透明版 iPhone Air」本质上可能是一场审美误会 。
iPhone Air 让人惊叹的纤薄，并不仅仅是视觉和比例上的魔法，更源于对核心元器件集成度边界的疯狂压榨 。苹果全新的“高原”设计语言和 Apple Watch 有什么关联 ？
标准版 iPhone 面向当下，而 Air 却是一个指向未来的坐标 。当计算核心不再被强制绑定在一块大屏幕之下，我们身边的电子设备生态将迎来怎样的一场无声大洗牌 ？
AI 的颠覆绝不止于聊天、写代码或生成图片，它正在悄悄渗透进物理世界的技术栈里 。结合苹果近期低调收购的 AI 初创公司，以及 Air 机身上隐藏的全球最大消费级 3D 打印零件，AI 驱动的逆向工程将如何改变我们习以为常的几何美学 ？
作为极具前瞻性的工程探索，iPhone Air 遭遇了商业上的滑铁卢 。既然时机并未成熟，消费者也倾向于“既要又要”，为什么 Apple 仍然愿意掏出这笔极其昂贵的「学费」 ？
本期互动问题：
如果未来的计算设备真的变成了一张看不见、摸不着的分布式网络，手机这个实体彻底消失，你觉得人类最难克服的「物理习惯」会是什么呢？欢迎在评论区留言，跟我们一起大开脑洞！
本期关联视频
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Qw9jBeESW/
｜相关链接｜
若你所使用的播客客户端未能完整显示插图，或遇网络问题未能正常播放，请访问：
荒野楼阁 WildloG 的地址：https://suithink.me/zlink/podcast/
阅读设计相关的各类文章：https://suithink.me/zlink/idea/
｜其他社交网络媒体｜
苏志斌SUiTHiNK @ Bilibili / YouTube / 小红书
｜联络邮箱｜
suithink.su@gmail.com
欢迎在 小宇宙、Spotify、YouTube、Apple Podcast 收听本节目，期待你的留言。
Login
