Some TSA Workers to Get $10,000 Bonus Checks for Shutdown Work

© Jason Henry for The New York Times

© Jason Henry for The New York Times

© Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times

© Angelina Katsanis for The New York Times

© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

EPAGermany's coalition government has agreed a new military service plan to boost troop numbers following months of wrangling between political forces.
The new military service plan will mandate all 18-year-old men to fill out a questionnaire on their suitability to serve and, from 2027, to undergo medical screening.
The decision comes as Berlin aims to create Europe's strongest conventional army.
The boss of Germany's biggest defence firm, Rheinmetall, has told the BBC he believes that target could be met in five years.
Armin Papperger said Chancellor Friedrich Merz's aim to boost the Bundeswehr was "realistic" and he told the BBC that "clear decisions" were coming from government.
Earlier this year German defence chief Gen Carsten Breuer warned that the Western Nato alliance had to prepare for a possible Russian attack within four years.
Mr Papperger said he had "no glass ball" about the future but agreed Germany had to be "ready in '29".
When they formed a coalition earlier this year, Merz's conservative CDU/CSU and the centre-left Social Democrat SPD agreed to re-introduce military service which would be voluntary "to start with".
The Bundeswehr currently has around 182,000 troops. The new military service model aims to increase that number by 20,000 over the next year, rising to between 255,000 and 260,000 over the next 10 years, supplemented by approximately 200,000 reservists.
From next year, all 18-year-old men and women will be sent a questionnaire to assess their interest and willingness to join the armed forces. It will be mandatory for men and voluntary for women.
From July 2027 all men aged 18 will also have to take a medical exam to assess their fitness for duty.
If the government's targets are not met, a form of compulsory enlistment could be considered by parliament. If war were to break out, the military would be able to draw on the questionnaires and medical exams for potential recruits.
Some within Germany's political left remain deeply opposed to mandatory service.
Many young Germans are wary and a significant majority oppose it. A recent Forsa survey for Stern magazine suggested while just over half of respondents favoured compulsory service, opposition rose to 63% among 18- to 29-year-olds.
"I don't want to go to war because I don't want to die or I don't want to be shot at," said Jimi, a 17-year-old student from Berlin, who attended an anti-conscription protest outside the Bundestag earlier this week. "I also don't want to shoot people."
An attack against Germany was an "unlikely and abstract scenario" that the government was using to legitimise "stealing millions of young people's right to decide what they should be doing", he said.
Meanwhile, 21-year-old Jason signed up as new Bundeswehr recruit earlier this year because of the current "security situation".
"I wanted to contribute to defend peace, to defend democracy if the worst happens," he said. By joining up he felt he was "giving back to society" but also believed in the deterrent potential of the army, "so potential enemies don't even think about attacking you".


Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has sought to reassure Germans, saying that despite the new military service plan there was "no cause for concern... no reason for fear".
"The more capable of deterrence and defence our armed forces are, through armament through training and through personnel, the less likely it is that we will become a party to a conflict at all," Pistorius said.
Defence spending in Germany tumbled after the end of the Cold War, while conscription was suspended in 2011.
Given its past, Germany has long been shy of showing military might, but earlier this year Friedrich Merz announced that the rule for German defence "now has to be whatever it takes", following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Nato countries across Europe have come under pressure from President Donald Trump's White House to hike spending.
European moves to re-arm have meant significant revenue for Rheinmetall.
Its CEO, Armin Papperger, whose firm also supplies Ukraine, said: "We make a lot of money because there is a huge demand."
"We have to grow strong on vehicles, on ammunition, we have to have our own satellite competencies. We do much more on the electronics and artificial intelligence... than ever before," he said.
A US report last year suggested the Rheinmetall boss had been the target of a Russian assassination plot. There was no confirmation at the time and Mr Papperger would not be drawn on the report, saying: "I feel good, I feel safe."
Asked about whether he felt Europe was in a state of a cold or hybrid war, he said: "Whatever you call it, it's not a peaceful time."

© Go Nakamura for The New York Times

© Pete Marovich for The New York Times

© Eugene Gologursky/Getty Images

© Patrick Semansky/Associated Press

© Nick Oxford/Reuters

© The New York Times

法国司法当局正在考虑安排2015年发生的巴黎1113恐袭击事件的受害者与罪犯萨拉赫·阿卜杜勒萨拉姆 (Salah Abdeslam) 会面。那么,所涉及的这项修复性司法程序是如何运作的呢?在接受法兰西新闻电台 (franceinfo), 采访时,对巴黎1113恐怖袭击事件负有责任的最后一名幸存恐怖分子的律师表示,她的当事人希望与他被判犯有罪行的恐怖袭击事件的受害者家属见面。
萨拉赫·阿卜杜勒萨拉姆 (Salah Abdeslam)会见巴黎1113恐袭事件遇难者家属吗?据他的律师奥利维亚·罗南Olivia Ronen 称,这位袭击突击队最后一位幸存成员“希望能够解释情况,进行讨论,并为相关各方敞开大门,如果他们愿意谈论拘留和审判事宜的话。”
因此,萨拉赫·阿卜杜勒萨拉姆愿意采取那项修复性司法的途径,而这种司法途径目前从未在恐怖主义案件中使用过。所谓恢复性司法措施是指允许犯罪的受害者和犯罪者积极参与解决犯罪造成的困难,特别是修复犯罪造成的任何损害的任何措施
在巴黎1113恐袭事件的庭审中,巴塔克兰剧院 (Bataclan )遇难者之一的父亲乔治·萨利内斯向特别重审法庭提出了这一想法。受害者协会“巴黎生命”(LifeforParis)主席亚瑟·德努沃 (Arthur Dénouveaux )在脸书X上发帖证实,“多名受害者对修复性司法感兴趣”。
什么是修复性司法?修复性司法的概念在电影《我将永远看到你们的脸庞 (Je verrai toujours vos visages ) 》中得到重点阐述,并于2015年在法国开始实施。它被视为对刑事司法系统的补充手段,其原则是允许受害者或民事当事人与犯罪者会面。
据司法部称,由经过专门培训的中立调解员主持的保密谈话会议旨在“帮助受害者重建生活,追究犯罪者的责任,并帮助他们重新融入社会”。
严格的实施条件: 修复性司法只能在特定条件下实施,尤其要避免加剧受害者的创伤。例如,只有在加害者承认事实,且任何一位参与者都可以随时制止的情况下,才能进行这项修复性司法。
司法部表示:“它可以在刑事诉讼的各个阶段实施:审判前、审判中或审判后,甚至在没有起诉的情况下也可以实施。”
司法部还澄清说:“它的进展、成功或失败与司法判决无关。”
个人主动性的过程
要实现修复性司法,必须源于“个人自愿主动性”。民事当事人或受害者应联系相关法院的受害者援助办公室 (BAV)。他们也可以联系支持受害者的组织或拨打 116 006,该热线会将他们转接给专业人士。
如有需要,修复性司法可以采取以下四种形式:
- 修复性调解:
在这种修复性司法模式下,加害者和受害者在事先进行过访谈的调解员的协助下进行对话,旨在讨论所犯罪行、其后果以及在各个方面的影响。司法部澄清道:“实体会面并非强制性的。”
- 修复性会议:
这种版本类似于修复性调解,但涉及加害者和受害者的亲属参与讨论。
- 囚犯与受害者会面(RDV):
在这个版本中,类似案件的受害者和加害者会面地点在监狱内。这项修复性司法项目为期三个月。每次会议都围绕一个不同的主题展开讨论
- 罪犯与受害者会面(RCV):
这个版本与 RDV 相同,只是会面地点不在监狱。
超过300个修复性司法程序被启动
虽然这些方法在法国尚未像在英国或加拿大那样普及,但它们正开始兴起。法国修复性司法研究所(IFJR)报告称,已有超过300人启动了修复性司法程序,而2023年这一数字约为150人。

巴黎恐怖攻击事件届满十周年,法国于本周举行全国悼念活动。尽管法国驻美大使馆在社交平台上发文追思,美国官方未对相关纪念活动或法国反恐情势发表公开评论。然而,在美国网络社群上,仍有民众回忆当年那一夜的震撼。
法国驻美大使馆13日于社交平台贴文指出:“#13November。10年前法国恐怖攻击,超过130人失去生命,超过500人受伤。”贴文配图写着:“10年之后,法国向巴黎攻击的受难者致敬。”记者分别致信白宫、国务院及法国驻美大使馆请求评论,但至截稿前均未获回复。
2015年11月13日,9名伊斯兰国(ISIS)成员在巴黎多处地点发动攻击,目标包括法兰西体育场、街头咖啡馆与Bataclan音乐厅,造成130人丧生、逾400人受伤。这场事件被视为法国近代史上最严重的恐怖攻击,也对欧美安全政策产生长远影响。
对许多美国人而言,巴黎恐攻并非遥远的欧洲事件,而是一段共同的记忆。当年通过即时新闻与社群平台传遍全球的影像,使人意识到恐怖主义已不再受地理界线限制。
在Reddit论坛上,一名网民回忆:“我当时在多伦多念大学,看着体育场外发生的第一起事件报道,接着又看到巴黎各地传来更多消息……那种残酷与冷血令人恶心。我相信那一夜改变了整个西方世界,我们至今仍在承受那晚带来的政治与文化分裂。”
另一位住在明尼苏达州的网民则写道:“真难相信已经十年了。那时我刚上大学,原本要出门参加派对,结果和朋友坐在宿舍里,看着新闻,一言不发。那是我永远不会忘记的一刻。”
2015年后,西方各国安全机构普遍加强对“本土化极端主义”(homegrown extremism)的关注,并推动在社群平台上的宣传监测与去极端化措施。美法两国此后在网络舆情分析、社群激进化防范与暴力极端主义应对方面持续合作。
根据美国国务院《2023年恐怖主义报告》,法国是美国在全球反恐合作中的“关键伙伴”。报告指出,法国的恐怖主义威胁在2023年维持“非常高”水准,并于10月提升至最高警戒层级“紧急攻击状态”,原因是北部城市阿拉斯(Arras)发生教师遇袭案。法国安全部门警告,单独行动者与小型激进细胞已成为欧洲最显著的恐怖主义威胁。
报告同时指出,自2013年以来,法国安全部门已阻止至少73起恐怖攻击企图,其中43起发生于2017年之后。法国亦与美国保持密切情报交流,并在金融制裁领域合作打击恐怖组织资金流向。2023年10月以色列—哈马斯冲突爆发后,法国金融情报单位Tracfin加入“反恐融资特别工作小组—以色列”,以加强全球恐怖资金监控。2023年度报告是国务院最近期的资料。
在太平洋彼端,巴黎当地则举行多场悼念仪式。法国总统马克龙(Emmanuel Macron)与巴黎市长伊达戈在新落成的纪念花园内献花,园内刻有所有罹难者姓名。巴黎铁塔于夜间点亮蓝、白、红三色灯光,全城多处举行默哀活动。

包括法国巨头威立雅(Veolia)在内的欧洲多家塑料回收企业周四(11月13日)联合发出警告:欧洲塑料回收产业正面临严重危机。他们呼吁欧盟立即出台紧急措施,避免回收产业在廉价中国产新塑料的冲击下继续萎缩。
法新社报道,威立雅代表表示,欧洲在全球气候峰会( COP30 )上不断做出高目标承诺,但回收产业却在“被放任衰退”。过去三年,全欧已有约30家回收厂关闭,回收产能减少近百万吨。
业界指出,危机的关键来自“需求不足”。原因是中国近年来大量新增原生塑料生产线,使新塑料价格大幅下跌。目前市场价格差距明显:新塑料每吨约 800 到 900 欧元;而回收塑料却要 1,800 欧元,几乎贵上一倍。
在这样的竞争下,欧洲回收厂难以维持运作。业者指出,过去五年,不论新塑料还是回收料,欧洲从亚洲进口的塑料材料已增加一倍,竞争尤以来自中国最为强烈。
为让市场恢复平衡,威立雅与欧洲塑料回收商协会要求欧盟扩大“强制回收含量”的法规,不只限于以 PET(聚酯)为材质的饮料瓶,也延伸到更多塑料种类,包括汽车工业使用的塑料。
欧盟预计在 2026 年底提出新的资源循环立法方案。不过由于情况紧急,欧盟最快可能在今年12月就讨论首批应对措施。
现行法规规定,PET瓶至少要含有25%的回收塑料,四年后提高到30%。业者则希望欧盟把目标提高到 2027年35%,并促成更多行业必须强制使用回收塑料。
如果没有更强的政策支持,欧洲回收业者担心,将有更多工厂被迫关闭,而欧盟的环保与再生塑料目标也可能因此落空。

美国政府周四(11月13日)宣布,将活跃于德国、意大利和希腊、以“反法西斯”(Antifa)为名的若干运动列为“恐怖组织”,此举属于美国总统特朗普对“安提法”势力全面施压行动的一部分。
法新社报道,美国总统特朗普今年9月签署行政令,正式将“安提法”定性为“恐怖组织”,行政令签署时间恰逢美国极右网红查理.柯克(Charlie Kirk)遇刺身亡、官方举行悼念仪式的翌日。
据美国国务卿鲁比奥周四发表的声明,美国此次指定的对象包括总部位于德国的"安提法东部组织"(Antifa Ost),以及意大利与希腊的三个组织。自11月20日起,这些团体将被列为“外国恐怖组织”。
声明指出,“安提法东部组织"(Antifa Ost )自2018年至2023年在德国发动多起袭击,目标为其认定的‘法西斯分子’,该组织被指控于2023年在匈牙利实施攻击行动。”
匈牙利在今年9月已跟随美国,将“安提法”列为恐怖组织。
其他被点名的组织包括: 意大利的无政府主义联盟 FAI/FRI,希腊的两个无政府主义团体。
美国国务院称,这些被列名的组织“奉行无政府主义或革命马克思主义理念,秉持反美、反资本主义和反基督教立场,并以此煽动或为其在美国及海外的暴力行为辩护。”
根据美国法律,团体一旦被指定为“外国恐怖组织”,其成员将被禁止入境美国,他们在美国境内的所有资产将被冻结,同时任何个人或机构向其提供物质支持都属违法行为。

德国联邦议会周四(11月13日)任命一个专家委员会,全面重审德国对中国的贸易政策。在北京收紧稀土出口、暴露德国工业供应链可被迅速“卡脖子”之后,柏林正加速推动“降低对华风险”(de-risking)战略。
路透社报道,这个委员会由工业协会、劳工团体及智库组成,与2023年上一届政府推出、但仅提出原则性建议的《中国策略》不同,新的委员会将向德国政府提出具有可操作性的政策建议,并为未来立法提供依据。
据德国政府称,委员会将重点审查能源与原材料进口、关键基础设施中的中国投资等敏感议题。在该委员会设立之际,德国财政部长克林贝尔(Lars Klingbeil)即将访华,希望向中方阐明欧盟在多项议题上的立场。
德国今年在对最大贸易伙伴中国的关系上尤其感受到压力。一方面,美国总统特朗普推出新一轮高额关税冲击全球贸易;另一方面,中国则以出口管制展现反制能力。
德国经济研究所(IW)国际经济政策主管马特斯(Jürgen Matthes)直言:“在关键领域,中国既有能力、也可能随时切断供应,而德国对此仍显得过于脆弱。如今推动改革的压力比以往任何时候都要大。”
外交访问受阻 德方“风险管理”意识升高
克林贝尔将成为德国新政府中首位访华的部长。新任外长瓦德富尔(Johann Wadephul)原订10月底访华,但因北京仅确认他所提会面请求中的一项而选择延期。
一名知情人士向路透社透露,一个由德国银行与保险业代表组成的团体将随同克林贝尔下周赴华。
执政阵营的外交政策发言人哈特(Jürgen Hardt)强调:“未来对华政策中,风险管理将占更重要的位置。关键是识别中国可能用来施压的杠杆,并找出规避方式。”
稀土震荡敲响警钟 德中经贸关系进入调整期
作为欧洲制造业出口大国,德国长期受益于中国庞大的市场。然而,前任政府2023年发布的《中国策略》已首次明确提出要“降低对华经济依赖”,并将中国定义为“伙伴、竞争者与系统性对手”。这份长达61页的文件虽呼吁德国企业减少对中国的依赖,但缺乏具约束性的目标。
根据德国经济研究所最新研究,2024年德国对中国的关键性进口依赖程度,与2023年相比几乎没有改善。马特斯指出:“自《中国策略》发布以来,我在实证研究中看不到真正的去风险化进展。原本应敲响警钟的事件,却没有引发足够反应。”分析结果显示:德国约200类产品有至少50%依赖从中国进口,一旦受阻,依然可能对经济造成重大影响。
在中国对稀土出口实施限制后,德国对华依赖的风险立即浮现 —— 德国稀土供应约80%来自中国。此外,近期荷兰与中国因安世半导体企业Nexperia发生争执,引发全球供应链震荡,德国企业再度受到波及。

在路透社11月13日(周四)报道中国证监会主席吴清因健康原因“已提出辞职”、但官方未回应后,中国证监会官网当晚随即发布新闻稿,公布吴清11月10日至13日访问法国与巴西的消息,并公布多张出访会谈照片,引发外界解读为"间接否认请辞传闻"。
路透社援引中国证督会13日晚间发布的新闻稿,中国证监会主席吴清将于11月10日至13日先后访问法国巴黎及巴西里约热内卢。
消息称,访问期间,吴清将分别与法国金融市场监管局(AMF)主席巴贝特-拉亚尼(Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani),以及巴西证监会(CVM)代理主席罗柏(Otto Lobo)、委员科波拉(Marina Copola)举行双边会谈,就法国、欧盟与巴西证券市场监管趋势,以及深化资本市场务实合作等议题交换意见。
证监会并指出,吴清在法国与巴西期间,还与法国兴业银行、法国巴黎银行、英国巴克莱银行、瑞银集团、瑞士百达等国际机构投资者,以及当地中资企业和金融机构代表座谈。他将向与会者宣介中共二十届四中全会精神、说明中国资本市场开放机遇,也听取外资与中资机构对中国资本市场改革与高水平开放的意见建议。
路透社同日披露消息称:吴清已因健康为由提出呈辞
与中国证监会公布出访消息几乎同步,路透社13日刊出独家报道,引述多名知情人士称:吴清已因健康原因向有关方面提出辞呈,但尚不清楚是否获批及何时离任。
报道指出,中国证监会、中国国务院新闻办公室均未回应路透社的置评请求。知情人士因议题敏感而匿名。
中央社报道,路透社这篇报道发布后迅速在中国社交媒体引发热议,“吴清”一度登上热搜榜,许多网友表达惋惜,并转发文章称赞其“市场改革贡献”。
背景:上任一年市场回稳 改革形象鲜明
吴清今年60岁,2024年2月7日接替遭免职的易会满出任证监会主席。当时A股市场低迷,上证指数徘徊2600点关卡。官方与市场普遍将吴清视为推动市场稳定、整顿乱象的重要人物。他曾在前一轮监管任期中因严打券商违规被称为“券商屠夫”。
自吴清接任后,中国官方陆续推出市场干预及流动性支持措施,投资者情绪逐渐改善。上证指数周四收涨0.73%,报4029.5点,再度刷新十年来新高。
吴清近月公开露面频繁,未见缺席重大行程。他还担任“学习贯彻党的二十届四中全会精神中央宣讲团”成员。央视新闻联播本月6日播出他3日在甘肃进行宣讲、并赴企业与员工交流的画面。
在外界关注其动向之际,官方公布吴清法国访问行程,被部分分析视为“间接否认”路透社有关辞职的报道。

© Nathaniel Wilder for The New York Times

© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

© Darron Cummings/Associated Press


© Photo courtesy of Wikipedia

联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)已于上周经投票表决,同意由国际知名的埃及学家、埃及前旅游和文物部长哈立德·阿纳尼·阿里·伊兹教授(Pr. Khaled El-Enany Ali Ezz)为新一届总干事。这位现年54岁的北非国家学者将于本周六(2025年11月15日)起开始接替奥德蕾·阿祖莱夫人(Mme Audrey Azoulay)成为这一联合国机构的第12位总干事。
于一周前高票当选新一届联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)总干事的埃及学者哈立德·阿纳尼教授(Pr. Khaled El-Enany),不仅将成为首位出自阿拉伯国家的总干事,也将是继塞内加尔的姆博(Amadou-Mahtar M'Bow)于1974年至1987年之后,第2位出任这一职务的非洲人。就此,法国历史学家莫雷尔夫人(Mme Chloé Maurel)日前在与本台法广非洲组(RFI Afrique)记者克里斯蒂娜(Christina)的访谈中分析认为,这是全球南方(Sud global)发出的一个强烈信号,反映了在联合国体系内全球南方(Sud global)影响力的上升。

哪在一名埃及学者的领导下,联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)未来将如何发展?就此,接受访谈的这位法国女历史学家表示,可能会因为是属于埃及这个非洲和阿拉伯国家,他(新任总干事)将更加包容,对发展援助更加敏感。自1960年以来,联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)十分牵挂全球南方国家的发展。他有可能会加强这一方向,尤其是在教育层面,支持最贫困的国家,尤其是在非洲。但作为一名埃及人,他也可能促使他的国家埃及和阿拉伯世界采取更多行动支持巴勒斯坦。。。
另外,联合国教科文组织本次选举恰逢地缘政治紧张和多边主义危机的大背景下,新任总干事将如何应对?就此,法国女历史学家分析说,他(阿纳尼教授)以绝对多数票当选,这是一个优势。他可以依靠这种合法性。。。

接受本台法广(RFI Afrique)非洲组记者访谈的这位法国女学者的分析还提到,当前的大背景对多边主义、对联合国、对联合国教科文组织以及联合国所有十六个专门机构都是昏暗的。美国刚刚退出联合国教科文组织,这是一个重大挑战。联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)正面临财政资源短缺的问题。毫无疑问,它将不得不寻求其它资金来源。正如它已经开始向私营部门和企业寻求资金那样。中国如今已成为联合国教科文组织最大的资金捐助国,这带来一些问题,因为它使得中国有能力强加或影响某些项目。
Desk Nicolas 13.11.2025_nuit Egypte _Papier Desk 02 Nicolas 13/11/2025 Soir_Egypte : l'entretien avec Chloé Maurel, historienne sur le nouveau DG UNESCO
尼古拉有关联合国教科文组织换届的更多内容,请收听本台法广(RFI)2025年11月14日星期五北京和台北时间19点至20点的第二次中文广播[法语世界]专栏第137集。

乌克兰总统泽连斯基周四对一名被视为其亲信的商人实施制裁,该商人被指控策划了一起大规模腐败案。此举旨在遏制自俄罗斯入侵以来该国面临的最严重政治危机之一。
根据总统令,对46岁的蒂穆尔·明迪奇以及另一名涉案商人的制裁措施包括冻结其资产。
明迪奇被指控在能源领域策划了一场贿赂包括部长在内的多名高级官员的大规模腐败活动,涉及金额高达1亿美元。
明迪奇在丑闻爆发前不久离开了乌克兰,他是泽连斯基当年创立的视听制作公司的共同所有人。泽连斯基在投身政坛之前曾是一名明星喜剧演员。
这是自2022年2月俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以来,泽连斯基总统面临的最严重政治危机之一。
一些乌克兰人对欧洲盟国对此丑闻的反应表示担忧,因为基辅的战争努力在很大程度上依赖于西方的援助。
欧盟目前尚未作出正式回应。一位不愿透露姓名的欧洲消息人士在基辅对法新社表示,希望“政府和行政机构清除腐败分子”,但也认为该丑闻被揭露表明乌克兰反腐败机构的工作很有成效。
作为乌克兰在欧洲的主要捐助国,德国总理默茨周四在与泽连斯基总统的电话交谈中要求后者“积极”打击腐败。
基辅希望近期能获得国际货币基金组织的新贷款,而该组织则认为,对于捐助国而言,打击腐败是乌克兰改革的核心要素。国际货币基金组织代表团周四宣布即将访问乌克兰,讨论该国的融资需求及可能的新贷款计划。
一位与乌克兰总统密切合作的高级官员接受法新社采访时表示,泽连斯基对调查结果感到措手不及。
“当他发现真相时非常愤怒”,这位官员表示。“他全力支持调查工作。政府全体成员都将协助调查。”
该消息人士强调,总统已“在其职权范围内采取了最严厉的措施”,包括实施制裁并要求两名部长辞职。
明迪奇还涉嫌影响政府高级官员的决策,其中包括前国防部长乌梅罗夫(现任国家安全委员会秘书)以及副总理·切尔尼绍夫。
能源部长格林丘克和司法部长加卢什琴科在丑闻曝光后,周三已应泽连斯基的要求辞职。

PA MediaThe BBC has apologised to US President Donald Trump for a Panorama episode which spliced parts of a speech together, but rejected his demands for compensation.
The corporation also said it would not show the programme again.
Lawyers for Trump have threatened to sue the BBC for $1bn (£759m) in damages unless the corporation issues a retraction, apologises and compensates him.
The apology comes after a second similarly edited clip, broadcast on Newsnight in 2022, was revealed by the Daily Telegraph.
A BBC spokesperson said: "Lawyers for the BBC have written to President Trump's legal team in response to a letter received on Sunday.
"BBC chair Samir Shah has separately sent a personal letter to the White House making clear to President Trump that he and the corporation are sorry for the edit of the president's speech on 6 January 2021, which featured in the programme.
"The BBC has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary Trump: A Second Chance? on any BBC platforms.
"While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim."

HandoutAn independent review of the Sara Sharif case has identified multiple failings from agencies before her murder in Surrey in 2023, following two years of abuse.
The child safeguarding practice review, published on Thursday, said there were "clearly several points in Sara's life, in particular during the last few months, where different actions could and should have been taken" by the authorities.
"The system failed to keep her safe," it added.
Responding to the report, the Children's Commissioner said the case was a "catalogue of missed opportunities, poor communication and ill-informed assumptions." The education secretary said there had been "the glaring failures" across all agencies.
From before she was even born Surrey Children's Services, Surrey Police and the Family Court knew of the domestic violence in her home.
The review authors said her father and stepmother were "a lethal combination", and that "with hindsight it is clear that they should never have been trusted" with her care.
Here are five of the key failings identified by the review.
Warning: This story contains distressing details
When Sara Sharif's case was first in the family court in the early months of her life, social workers from Surrey County Council wanted her to be removed from her parents for her safety.
But after the initial court hearings the plan changed.
The review found that the "social workers felt very frustrated" by this, saying voices were not heard.
They felt that in court "the views of the children's guardian took precedence". The children's guardian is an expert appointed by the court to "represent the best interests of a child".
The review authors said that where the children's guardian and local authority social workers have differing views, the difference of opinion should be summarised clearly for the judge.
When Sara Sharif's father remarried and applied for custody, an inexperienced social worker was asked to produce what is called a Section 7 report.
But the review found the report was missing "vital information and analysis" because the files that Surrey Children's Services held were not "thoroughly reviewed".
By chance the judge who heard the case, Alison Raeside, had sat on the earlier hearings, but she was not reminded of some key facts.
For example, Sara's father Urfan Sharif had a history of "domestic abuse and past violence to the children". He had been told to complete a domestic abuse perpetrators programme before having unsupervised contact, but he had not.

Surrey PoliceWhen in March 2023, Sara's school reported to Children's Services that she had a golf ball-sized bruise on her cheek the request for support was graded "Amber".
This meant it should be dealt with within 24 hours. The social worker did not check what information Surrey Police held on the family, and they did not speak to the school to inquire more about Sara's change in demeanour.
She had gone from a bubbly child who loved singing to someone who was "quiet and coy".
Urfan Sharif told the social worker that Sara had "lots of marks because of the machinery she was hooked up to when born prematurely", which was a lie. The outcome was "no social work action".
Five months later Sara was murdered by her father.
The next month Urfan Sharif took his daughter out of school. The review found that she "effectively disappeared from view".
Surrey County Council had a policy of making home visits to children being home-schooled. The Sharif family had recently moved from a small flat in West Byfleet to a house in Woking. The school knew this and had informed the Council who owned both the homes anyway.
The review found that "address on the referral form sent by the school was the new address but the old address remained on the electronic system used by the inclusion team."
It meant that when the home education team went round to check on Sara on 7 August 2023 they went to the old address.
The next day Sara - already tortured, battered and burned - was murdered by Urfan Sharif and her stepmother Beinash Batool.
Neighbours of the Sharif family did at times hear things that worried them, but the review found that "they were worried about reporting concerns about what they heard within the family's home. They feared being branded as being racist, especially on social media".
Sara started wearing the hijab in 2021 when she was only eight years old, even though her stepmother did not.
The review found that the "school showed appropriate curiosity by talking to Sara and stepmother and accepted the explanation that this was linked to Sara's interest with Pakistani culture following a visit to her paternal grandparents in Pakistan".
In the last months of Sara's life the the hijab hid the bruising and injuries to her face and head.