A woman has been charged over a theft at the Louvre Museum in Paris last month, French media report.

The 38-year-old, who has not been named, was charged with complicity in organised theft and criminal conspiracy with a view to committing a crime. She appeared before a magistrate, who will decide whether to detain her.

The woman was arrested earlier this week with four others. Two men who had previously been arrested were already charged with theft and criminal conspiracy after officials said they had "partially recognised" their involvement in the heist.

Jewels worth €88m (£76m; $102m) were taken from the world's most-visited museum on 19 October.

Four men carried out the daylight theft.

Two of the alleged thieves - who had been arrested earlier - later admitted their involvement in the theft, while the fourth person has not yet been caught.

Appearing before the magistrate on Saturday, the woman was in tears as she confirmed that she lived in Paris' northern suburb of La Courneuve suburb, a journalist working for the AFP news agency reported.

The hearing then continued behind closed doors at the prosecution's request.

She was one of the five people arrested earlier this week in and around the French capital, including the suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis. One of those held has been released without charge.

However, one of the five is thought to have taken part in the heist.

A flight carrying British aid arrived in Jamaica early on Saturday to help with recovery efforts after Hurricane Melissa, as the UK plans its first chartered flight to bring British nationals home later on Saturday.

The aid flight brought more than 3,000 emergency shelter kits as part of a £7.5 million regional emergency package.

Part of the funding will be used to match donations to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent - with King Charles and Queen Camilla among those who have donated.

Despite aid arriving in Jamaica in recent days, fallen trees and landslides have complicated distribution efforts after Hurricane Melissa devastated parts of the island, killing at least 19 people.

The hurricane made landfall in Jamaica on Tuesday as a category five storm and was one of the most powerful hurricanes ever measured in the Caribbean.

Melissa swept across the region over a number of days and left behind a trail of destruction and dozens of people dead. In Haiti, at least 30 people were killed, while Cuba also saw flooding and landslides.

Jamaica's Information Minister Dana Morris Dixon said on Friday "there are entire communities that seem to be marooned and areas that seem to be flattened".

The UK initially set aside a £2.5 million immediate financial support package, with an additional £5 million announced by Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper on Friday.

Cooper said the announcement came as "more information is now coming through on the scale of devastation caused by Hurricane Melissa, with homes damaged, roads blocks and lives lost".

The British Red Cross said, as of Saturday morning, that 72% people across Jamaica still do not have electricity and around 6,000 are in emergency shelters.

The organisation said the King and Queen's donation would help the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) "continue its lifesaving work" - which includes search and rescue efforts in Jamaica as well as ensuring access to healthcare, safe shelter and clean water.

Although aid is entering the country, landslides, downed power lines and fallen trees have made some roads impassable. The situation has made it difficult to get aid to the worst-hit areas.

Some communities are being affected by water shortages, while the BBC has seen queues for petrol pumps, with people waiting for hours to then be told there is no fuel left when they reach the front of the queue.

Some people are seeking fuel for generators, others for a car to reach an area in which they can contact people, as the power is still down across most of the island.

Around 8,000 British nationals were thought to have been on the island when the hurricane hit.

The UK's first chartered flight to bring British citizens home is set to leave Kingston's Norman Manley International Airport late on Saturday.

The UK foreign office has asked travellers to register their presence on the island.

The department also advises travellers to contact their airline to check whether commercial options are available.

A man who died in a helicopter crash in Doncaster on Thursday has been named by his family as Peter Smith, aged 70.

The pilot, 41, and two other passengers, a 58-year-old woman and a boy, 10, suffered minor injuries.

In a statement released by South Yorkshire Police, the family described Mr Smith as "a beloved husband, father and grandfather" and said they were "all devastated by this sudden loss".

"He had a real passion for aviation, and this was something he shared with his family," they added.

"He particularly liked to spend time with his grandchildren doing crafts and playing. He was a proud family man who spent a lot of his time with his son, both working with and socially. Peter loved to have meals out with his wife and had a particularly sweet tooth."

The aircraft had taken off from Retford Gamston Airport, in Nottinghamshire, shortly before it crashed in the Doncaster suburb of Bentley, off Ings Lane, just after 10:00 GMT.

South Yorkshire Police and the government's Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) have launched a joint investigation into the incident.

In the statement, the family said they were supporting the investigation and asked people "to not speculate on the circumstances surrounding the accident".

"We would like to ask for privacy during this incredibly difficult time to allow us to come to terms with what has occurred and grieve for the loss of Peter," they added.

A spokesperson for the AAIB said a team of experts in aircraft operations, engineering and recorded data had been deployed to the site on Thursday.

The aircraft is understood to have been owned by Kuki Helicopters, based at Retford Gamston Airport. The firm said it would "continue to support" the agencies involved in the investigation into the crash.

The firm, which according to its website offers flying lessons and experiences, said in a post on Facebook: "At this very sad time all our thoughts and prayers are with the family and friends of all those involved in the helicopter incident which happened yesterday."

The statement continued: "Our heartfelt condolences are sent to everyone affected by this tragedy and we will of course continue to support relevent agencies involved in the continuing investigation."

Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

A woman has been charged over a theft at the Louvre Museum in Paris last month, French media report.

The 38-year-old, who has not been named, was charged with complicity in organised theft and criminal conspiracy with a view to committing a crime. She appeared before a magistrate, who will decide whether to detain her.

The woman was arrested earlier this week with four others. Two men who had previously been arrested were already charged with theft and criminal conspiracy after officials said they had "partially recognised" their involvement in the heist.

Jewels worth €88m (£76m; $102m) were taken from the world's most-visited museum on 19 October.

Four men carried out the daylight theft.

Two of the alleged thieves - who had been arrested earlier - later admitted their involvement in the theft, while the fourth person has not yet been caught.

Appearing before the magistrate on Saturday, the woman was in tears as she confirmed that she lived in Paris' northern suburb of La Courneuve suburb, a journalist working for the AFP news agency reported.

The hearing then continued behind closed doors at the prosecution's request.

She was one of the five people arrested earlier this week in and around the French capital, including the suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis. One of those held has been released without charge.

However, one of the five is thought to have taken part in the heist.

Thousands of people from some of Scotland's most deprived areas are to be offered free weight-loss jabs as part of government-funded research.

Up to 5,000 people in Scotland will take the injections as part of the multi-million pound study being led by Glasgow University.

The findings will provide insight into the lives of people living with obesity and health inequalities across the UK.

If successful, it could lead to a wider rollout of the injections throughout the country.

The jabs copy or boost the effects of natural hormones called incretins, which control blood sugar levels.

They act on areas of the brain which impact hunger and appetite and can slow down how fast the stomach empties. This may help people living with obesity regulate their eating habits.

The UK government has provided an initial £650,000 for the Scotland CardioMetabolic Impact Study (SCoMIS).

As a leading cause of long-term illness such as heart disease and cancer, tackling obesity will help millions live longer healthier lives and reduce the pressure on health services, potentially saving the NHS billions annually.

UK Health Innovation Minister Dr Zubir Ahmed said: "As a practicing NHS surgeon and Glasgow MP, I know firsthand the impact of the obesity crisis that plagues Scotland – and the litany of health problems it leads to.

"More than 1 in 3 adults in Scotland's most deprived areas are living with obesity. The UK government is committed to tackling inequality wherever it finds it in our country.

"It's why this landmark UK government investment is targeting help where it's needed most in Scotland and meeting people where they are and backing helping the NHS services they trust to treat them."

Aims of the study:

• To test how weight‑loss medicines can be delivered effectively and fairly in everyday NHS care.
• To measure the level of weight loss and improvements in quality of life, particularly for patients in disadvantaged areas.
• To examine the impact on obesity‑related illness, NHS use, and overall healthcare costs.
• To explore whether better health through weight loss can help people stay in work, reduce sick leave, and take a fuller part in society.

Jason Gill, professor of cardiometabolic health at Glasgow University, who is leading the study, said: "While tackling obesity requires multifactorial public health action, incretin therapies add a powerful new tool to the national obesity strategy.

"The burden of obesity is greatest in the most deprived segments of society and the status quo risks widening health inequalities.

"SCoMIS aims to be a landmark real‑world study evaluating a new model of obesity care, providing incretin treatment via primary and community care to Scottish adults living with obesity, with a focus on those in the most economically deprived communities."

'Cutting-edge research'

Jenni Minto, Scottish minister for public health, said the Scottish government was proud to be leading the way in tackling obesity through innovation and collaboration.

"This study places patients and communities at the heart of cutting-edge research into weight-loss medicines, ensuring we build the evidence needed to deliver the greatest benefit to those who need it most," she said.

UK Science Minister Lord Vallance said: "Scotland has always been at the forefront of medical innovation and public health, and this initiative is further proof of the world-class expertise that can be found here.

"By learning how these weight-loss medicines work, and how we can support them to reach our most deprived areas, we can slash health inequalities in Scotland and the rest of the UK so that our obesity strategy delivers a real, lasting change."

The study, which will be launched next year, also involves industry leaders Novo Nordisk and IQVIA, as well as clinical leaders at the Universities of Dundee and Edinburgh.

They will work out how to make best use of AI driven digital technologies to support patient access, engagement and data collection.

The study will involve 3,000 to 5,000 Scottish patients living with obesity who will benefit from the medicines the most.

Americans are expected to see skyrocketing health care prices as the open enrollment period for insurance through the Affordable Care Act marketplace begins on Saturday.

About 24 million people buy health insurance through the marketplace, the majority of whom used to receive tax credits to lower the monthly price of insurance.

Without credits, the monthly cost could rise by 114% on average, according to health research nonprofit KFF. This could mean an extra $1,000 a year, and in some cases much more.

Democrats have demanded the healthcare subsidies, which expire at the end of the year, be extended in exchange for ending the month-long federal government shutdown.

Republican leaders have argued the health insurance issue should be dealt with separately, and after the government reopens. Though some conservative lawmakers have expressed concerns with the subsidies ending.

For those who have previously made use of the tax credits, the new costs could be a shock.

Stacy Cox and her husband, who are small business owners in Utah, were paying $495 (£376) a month for health insurance.

Ms Cox said that without the tax credits, their monthly premiums are estimated to rise to $2,168, a 338% increase.

"It's horrific to actually see real numbers," she said.

If the subsidies are not extended, Ms Cox said she and her husband will cancel their health plan and buy some type of emergency insurance, which would not cover any of their routine and preventative health care costs.

The back-up plan is worrying for Ms Cox, who has an autoimmune disease, and her husband, who has hereditary cardiovascular disease.

"It's horribly stressful, because what I know is that the emergency plan is not going to cover what I need," she said.

Experts say that about seven million people like Ms Cox are expected to stop buying health insurance through the marketplace if the tax credits end. Of those, around four to five million are expected to lose health care coverage altogether because they won't be able to find other means, some experts suggest.

Lawmakers remain at an impasse over the issue, as they enter the second month of the government shutdown.

Democrats are seeking to renew the subsidies and reverse steep cuts President Donald Trump made to Medicaid, the government-run programme which provides healthcare insurance for low-income adults, children, pregnant women, elderly adults and people with disabilities.

Some Republican lawmakers have criticised the subsidies as a part of Obamacare legislation that they do not support.

But at least a few conservative lawmakers have said they want the tax credits to continue, including Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has said she is "absolutely disgusted" by the subsidies ending.

Americans were also facing the possibility of a suspension of food aid used by more than 40 million people, because of the government shutdown.

But judges on Friday ruled that the Trump administration must pay for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits using emergency funds.

President Donald Trump reacted to the legal decision via Truth Social on Friday, saying: "our government lawyers do not think we have the legal authority to pay SNAP with certain monies we have available, and now two Courts have issued conflicting opinions on what we can and cannot do.

"I have instructed our lawyers to ask the Court to clarify how we can legally fund SNAP as soon as possible," he said.

"You might think this is about Andrew," a senior Whitehall figure wonders out loud.

"But put this in your diary as a pivot point in the relationship between Palace and Parliament."

Will this royal mess usher in a new era? And despite their conventional refusal to comment, could politicians become quicker to point out the monarchy's flaws, and more willing to speak out?

"Nice try!" was the then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson's response when he was asked by reporters about the original, disastrous interview with the man who was until 48 hours ago afforded his title Prince Andrew, back in 2019.

That just about sums up the response - for years. Ministers would rather do almost anything than speak out on the saga.

"It was more than being allergic - you were going into a no-win scenario," a former No 10 official recalls. "You either incur the wrath of the Palace, or you look like you are defending the indefensible."

The avoid-it-if-you-possibly-can tactic was not just associated with the long-running Andrew saga. For many years, the broad convention has been that senior politicians who want to get near government keep their mouths diplomatically shut about the royals, aside from bland praise, or supportive quiet murmuring.

And the convention worked both ways - with the Royal Family never talking about political matters in public. Polite nods in both directions were the order of the day. It has been deliberate - "don't upset the Queen, don't upset the King."

In our political system, it's hard to think of other areas where there is the same kind of unwritten rule. The former No 10 source says the prime minister is rarely told to not do something, but when it comes to the royals, aides and officials are "preprogrammed" to advise: do not get involved.

There have, of course, always been notable exceptions.

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is a republican, and questioned whether the royal family should be scaled back.

Boris Johnson infuriated the Palace when he closed down Parliament for weeks, suspected of seeking to stop MPs trying to thwart his ambition to take the UK out of the EU. For the Palace, that nakedly political action was deeply uncomfortable.

David Cameron was rapped on the knuckles when he claimed the late queen "purred" down the phone line when he told her the result of the Scottish referendum.

The leader of the Greens, Zack Polanski, tells me they are a republican party, and there are plenty of proud republicans peppered through Labour, the SNP, and Lib Dem ranks, although those aren't the parties' official positions.

The truth is, for those in, or close to power, the monarchy is not just a fact of political life, but part of it. The reason? Don't forget, the crown is depicted on the headed paper of government documents, on the front of our laws, and stamped on the side of ministers' red boxes. The government is his or her majesty's administration.

Ministers are appointed by the Crown. And that's not just abstract. Senior politicians who attend the Privy Council will see the monarch on a regular basis. The prime minister famously has an "audience", a one-to-one chat, with the King every week.

So the government and Palace are fundamentally connected through process and personalities. Insiders underline these real relationships are another reason for not taking potshots.

In the last few weeks, however, there is no question there's been a bolder appetite in Parliament. Revelation after revelation about Andrew's behaviour has prompted an unusual level of chatter. We've seen MPs trying to force a change in the law for him to lose his titles.

The Lib Dems pondered using their allotted time in the Commons to debate cranking up the pressure. And the powerful Public Accounts Committee has been demanding answers over Andrew paying only a peppercorn rent at his home in Windsor. Even though his big brother is calling in the removal vans, the PAC is still waiting for responses to its queries. Depending on the responses it gets, they may still launch a bigger investigation into the financial trail.

And while it still seems unlikely, the committee's MPs could even summon Andrew to give evidence to them.

American politicians have threatened to do the same - and UK Trade Minister Chris Bryant said on Friday morning he should attend if asked to do so, as any "decent person" would.

Even a few weeks ago, it's hard to imagine those kinds of comments escaping the mouth of any member of a British government.

The nature of the allegations - and arguably the Palace's hesitation to take bolder action over a long period of time - has changed the mood, reflecting, as politicians often do, the public's attitude.

"The truth is we are very supportive of the Royal Family and the King," one opposition source said. "But lots of people we spoke to knocking on doors were so unhappy, so we felt it needed to get sorted."

Unease about royal behaviour had spread way beyond regular critics of the monarchy – Robert Jenrick and Sir Ed Davey bringing it up "sent shockwaves".

And sources suggest messages were being quietly conveyed from government too. One said: "'people [...] politely saying to the Palace this is not going away and this is difficult - the government saying 'eek, this isn't going away' - will have been part of it."

It is also the case that the royal furore has been incredibly convenient for the government this week - grabbing headlines while Chancellor Rachel Reeves' behaviour was being questioned.

During royal scandals, "you breathe a sigh of relief as you guys - the media - go crackers over something else," a former No 10 official told me.

By her own admission, Reeves broke the rules. She didn't get her story straight at the start. Had the King made his decision a few days earlier or a few days later, the chancellor's embarrassment might have been building into a bigger scandal.

It'd be wrong to suggest it was politicians who sent Andrew packing. The King was very unusually heckled. There have been years of unease over Andrew's behaviour. Allegation after allegation.

Several weeks ago Virginia Giuffre's family went on my show and said Lord Mandelson should never have been the UK ambassador to the US.

But the role of Parliament and politicians did matter, a source says. Another Whitehall insider tells me it started in Parliament - and the Palace "would have been aware that it was becoming a bigger issue" there.

While technically, of course, the monarch is the ultimate boss, Parliament writes the cheques, through what's known as the Sovereign Grant, and has the power to scrutinise the Palace's spending.

So what now? Some MPs perhaps have a taste for exerting pressure on the royals. There is the possibility of a full investigation into Andrew's finances. There are already calls for a debate about removing Andrew from the line of succession. That would require a change of the law. It's not a tempting prospect for a weak government to pursue that kind of deeply controversial business.

But one insider tells me: "There are quite a lot of politicians in both houses who have wanted to get into this over the years and now Andrew has opened the door ajar and they can now push it fully open and go in."

Perhaps royal rows will become a more regular part of our political fare.

What another former Downing Street figure described as the "blanket blah-blah-blah, we can't comment" approach might have had its day.

BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. You can now sign up for notifications that will alert you whenever an InDepth story is published - click here to find out how.

It's fright night in the Strictly Come Dancing ballroom!

Stars are gearing up for the contest's annual Halloween Week on Saturday evening, with songs by Charli XCX, Lady Gaga and Benson Boone in the mix.

It's one of a number of themed weeks that happen every year - the others are Movies, Blackpool, Musicals and Icons.

It comes as speculation continues to mount over who will replace presenters Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman, after their announcement last week that they will be leaving at the end of the current series.

Fans outside Elstree Studios in Hertfordshire suggested names including Alesha Dixon, Zoe Ball and Alison Hammond as possible new hosts.

This year's Strictly grand finale is on 20 December, and the BBC said Winkleman and Daly's final appearance would be the Christmas Day special.

During last week's show, the duo nodded to the news of their departure, as they thanked audiences for their "beautiful messages".

This weekend will also see a special performance from Celebrity Traitors star Cat Burns, who will appear during Sunday night's results show.

Here's who is dancing on Saturday night - and to what:

• Alex and Johannes - Salsa to Horny by Mousse T feat. Hot 'n' Juicy
• Amber and Nikita - Viennese Waltz to I See Red by Everybody Loves an Outlaw
• Balvinder and Julian - Samba to Stay by Shakespears Sister
• Ellie and Vito - Tango to Abracadabra by Lady Gaga
• George and Alexis - Cha Cha Cha to Apple by Charli XCX
• Harry and Karen - American Smooth to Mystical Magical by Benson Boone
• Karen and Carlos - Argentine Tango to Red Right Hand by Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds
• La Voix and Aljaž - Paso Doble to Beethoven's 5th
• Lewis and Katya - Couple's Choice to Creep by Radiohead
• Vicky and Kai - American Smooth to Total Eclipse of The Heart by Bonnie Tyler

Stop reading now if you want to avoid spoilers from last Saturday's Icons Week

Last week, Emmerdale star Lewis Cope and his dance partner Katya Jones led the pack with 34 points, after their Johnny Cash Quickstep impressed the judges.

La Voix brought the laughs - belting out Cher's Believe before diving into a Salsa to Strong Enough. The judges noted there was room for improvement, but La Voix's charisma on the dancefloor was lauded.

Other highlights included a mood-boosting dance by Ellie Goldstein and her partner Vito Coppola, who packed a punch with a dynamic Salsa to a Spice Girls medley. Goldstein even got a heart-warming video message from her favourite Spice Girl, Baby.

Despite some impressively garish trousers, YouTuber George Clarke hit a bum note with his Jive to Harry Styles' As It Was. Craig Revel Horwood, acerbic as ever, called it "flat footed", and Clarke and his partner Alexis Warr crashed out with the lowest score this evening - at 27.

But in the end, it was Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and his partner Lauren Oakley who left the competition follow a dance off against Amber Davies and Nikita Kuzmin.

This Saturday night, the remaining couples will undergo terrifying transformations as they perform routines they hope will win over the judges and audiences at home.

We can expect judges Shirley Ballas, Craig Revel Horwood, Motsi Mabuse and Anton Du Beke to embrace the Halloween spirit too - with all eyes on what costumes they might opt for.

Halloween week is also a milestone, as week six is almost halfway through the competition.

Fans can expect to enjoy plenty of tricks and treats from the vampires, zombies and skeletons.

But as always - the couple whose performance doesn't quite cast a spell will be banished during Sunday night's results show.

Strictly Come Dancing is broadcast live at 18:35 on BBC One and on BBC iPlayer.

Eighty-one-year-old Viv Truran is very particular about how she takes her photos.

"We do it in portrait for social," she says, matter-of-factly.

Viv is embracing life as an online fashion content creator who regularly goes viral and is part of a growing number of women in later life turning to Instagram and TikTok to express themselves.

"I don't mind being called a 'silver surfer' or a 'silver influencer'. I'll take that," she said.

"Can you believe over five million people have seen me? I just can't get over it."

With almost 300,000 followers on Instagram, the content creator, who was born and raised in Cardiff, shares daily videos of her outfits and styling tips.

Her followers are from across the globe and she said they varied in age from people in their 20s to over-65s.

"I love the youngsters because they want me to be their grandma."

Viv said it was only when she got comments on her posts asking where her outfits were from that she became "for the want of a better word, an influencer".

After a career involving stints in the civil service and British Telecom, Viv became "Del Boy on legs" as a "wheeling and dealing" antique dealer in her late 40s.

But what does she think is at the heart of her success in her "third career"?

"I think people want authenticity and I think, I hope, I'm authentic. What you see is what you get."

Sherry Grossi, 81, from North Carolina in the US, tries to "give a lot of encouragement" to her almost 130,000 followers on Instagram and 30,000 on TikTok.

"I find that women, as they age, get booked into a certain category and you're supposed to slow down and you're not supposed to do this or that and, to me, that's totally wrong."

The businesswoman, mother and grandmother is pleased to see social media embracing people in later life and is determined to prove to older people that they shouldn't allow anyone to put them into categories.

"I see a lot more older influencers. People are thinking that 80 is the new 60, and 60 is the new 40.

"If I can do it at 80 years old, anybody can do it."

The Office for National Statistics estimates the number of people aged 65 and over increased across the whole of the UK, in the year to mid-2024.

Prof Eleri Rosier from Cardiff University Business School said it was no surprise to see the changing demographics reflected on social media, adding that there had been a "massively noticeable shift" of the age of the people shaping fashion and beauty content online.

"For a long time, social media has been dominated by younger creators but now, a lot more, we're seeing older influencers," she said.

She added that they were popular because they created content they know their followers enjoy.

Rhian Davies, 58, from Cwmbran, Torfaen, said she was once told of the idea that when many women hit middle age they become "invisible" and admits she "felt that".

But when the mum-of-two started sharing her outfits on TikTok, she racked up more than 170,000 followers.

"It is really important to me to show other women my age that it's still OK to take up space, it's still OK to want to look after yourself and do the best that you can."

Her most successful videos are when she's "showing the reality" of life and recording herself with no make up and natural hair.

"From very early on I realised that most women wanted to see themselves represented, not this perfectly groomed woman with the Aga in the background and the kitchen island.

"They wanted to see somebody that looked like them.

"When you're in your 50s, you don't always want to watch the ones in their 20s doing their makeup, because what works for them doesn't work for my age group."

Sali Hughes, beauty columnist for The Guardian, isn't surprised to see the rise of "silver influencers" as brands have spent years "marketing aggressively at young people who don't have any money" to buy their products.

But now they are waking up to the fact that age diversity is essential for success as older people, generally, have more money than young consumers.

"If you obsess so much on youth that will bite you on the bum, unfortunately."

When Valerie Mackay, 62, joined Instagram, she found it tricky to find fashion content creators who looked like her so she "just started posting my outfits."

Eight years on and with more than one million followers under her belt, the mother-of-two from the Highlands of Scotland is regularly invited to work with high-end brands such as Armani and L'Oréal.

She said: "With social media, it doesn't matter how old you are, where you live, the opportunity's there if you want to go for it."