Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

How Thunderbolt 5 can be faster or not

Early reports of Thunderbolt 5 performance have been mixed. This article starts from Thunderbolt 3 and dives deeper into the TB5 specification to explain why it might not deliver the performance you expect.

Origins

Thunderbolt 3 claims to deliver up to 40 Gb/s transfer speeds, but can’t actually deliver that to a peripheral device. That’s because TB3 includes both 4 lanes of PCIe data at 32.4 Gb/s and 4 lanes of DisplayPort 1.4 at up to 32.4 Gb/s, coming to a total of nearly 65 Gb/s. But that’s constrained within its maximum of 40 Gb/s.

The end result is that the best you can expect from a Thunderbolt 3 SSD is a read/write speed of around 3 GB/s. Although that would be sufficient for many, Macs don’t come with arrays of half a dozen Thunderbolt 3 ports. If you need to connect external displays, the only practical solution might be to feed them through a Thunderbolt 4 dock or hub. As that’s fed by a single port on the Mac, its total capacity is still limited to 40 Gb/s, and that connection becomes the bottleneck.

Thunderbolt 5 isn’t a direct descendant of Thunderbolt 3 or 4, but is aligned with the second version of USB4. This might appear strange, but USB4 in its original version includes support for Thunderbolt 3. What most obviously changes with USB4 2.0 is its maximum transfer rate has doubled to 80 Gb/s. But even that’s not straightforward.

Architecture

thunderbolt5a

The basic architecture of a Thunderbolt 5 or USB4 2.0 connection is shown above. It consists of two lanes, each of which has two transmitter-receiver pairs operating in one direction at a time and each transferring data at up to 40 Gb/s. This provides a simultaneous total transfer rate of 80 Gb/s in each direction.

These lanes and transmitter-receiver pairs can be operated in several modes, including three for Thunderbolt 5 and USB4 2.0.

thunderbolt5b

Single-lane USB4 is the same as the original USB4 already supported by all Apple silicon Macs, and in OWC’s superb Express 1M2 USB4 enclosure, and in practice its full 40 Gb/s comfortably outperforms Thunderbolt 3 for data transfers.

thunderbolt5c

The first of the new high-speed Thunderbolt 5 and USB4 2.0 modes is known as Symmetric USB4, with both lanes bonded together to provide a total of 80 Gb/s in each direction. This is the mode that an external TB5 SSD operates in, to achieve claimed transfer rates of ‘up to’ 6 GB/s.

thunderbolt5d

The other new mode is Asymmetric USB4. To achieve this, one of the Lanes has one of its transmitter-receiver pairs reversed. This provides a total of 120 Gb/s in one direction, and 40 Gb/s in the other, and is referred to in Thunderbolt 5 as Bandwidth Boost. This can be used upstream, from the peripheral to the Mac host, or more commonly downstream, where it could provide sufficient bandwidth to support high-res displays, for example.

Direct host connections

In practice, these modes should work transparently and to your advantage when connecting a peripheral direct to your Mac. If it’s a display, then the connection can switch to Asymmetric USB4 with its three transmitters in the host Mac, to deliver 120 Gb/s to that display. If it’s for storage or another device moving data in both directions, then Symmetric USB4 is good for 80 Gb/s in each direction, and should deliver those promised 6 GB/s read/write speeds.

Docks and hubs

When it comes to docks and hubs, though, there’s the potential for disappointment. Connect three high-res displays to your dock, and you want them to benefit from Asymmetric USB4 coming downstream from the host Mac. If the dock correctly switches to that mode for its connections to the displays, then it won’t work properly (if at all) if the connection between the dock and host is Symmetric USB4, as that will act as an 80 Gb/s bottleneck for the dock’s downstream 120 Gb/s.

Using a Thunderbolt 5 dock or hub is thus a great enabler, as it takes just one port on your Mac to feed up to three demanding peripherals, but it requires careful coordination of modes, and even then could fall short of your expectations.

Consider a TB5 Mac with a dock connected to one large high-res display, and a TB5 SSD. If modes are coordinated correctly, the Mac and dock will connect using Asymmetric mode to deliver 120 Gb/s downstream to the dock, then Asymmetric again from the dock to the display. But that leaves the SSD with what’s left over from that downstream bandwidth, although it still has 40 Gb/s on the return from the SSD through the dock to the Mac. That TB5 drive is then likely to perform as if it was an old USB4 drive, with perhaps half its normal read/write speeds. Of course, that’s still better than you’d get from a TB4 dock, but not what you paid for.

There’s also the potential for bugs and errors. I wonder if reported problems in getting three 6K displays working through a TB5 hub might come down to a failure to connect from Mac to dock in Asymmetric mode. What if the Mac and dock agree to operate in Asymmetric mode when the sole connected display doesn’t require that bandwidth, thus preventing an SSD from achieving an acceptable read speed?

Who needs TB5?

There will always be those who work with huge amounts of data and need as much speed as they can get. But for many, the most important use for Thunderbolt 5 is in the connection between Mac and dock or hub, as that’s the bottleneck that limits everyday performance. MacBook Pro and Mac mini models that now support TB5 come with three Thunderbolt 5 ports and one HDMI display port. You don’t have to indulge in excess to fill those up: add just one Studio Display and external storage for backups, and that Mac is down to its last Thunderbolt port.

As a result, Thunderbolt docks and hubs have proved popular, despite their bottleneck connection to the Mac. For many, that will be where Thunderbolt 5 proves its worth, provided it can get its modes straight and deliver the better performance we’re paying for.

How is Thunderbolt 5 doing so far?

When Apple launched its first M4 Macs just over a month ago, I was surprised that models with M4 Pro or Max chips offered Thunderbolt 5. Although there are still relatively few computers in use with support for TB5, and a dearth of peripherals, this article summarises early experience with this exotic new bus.

What TB5 peripherals are available?

As far as I’m aware, as of today there’s only one Thunderbolt 5 peripheral shipping in quantity, the Kensington SD5000T5 Thunderbolt 5 Triple Docking Station, with a total of three downstream TB5 ports. I’m just completing a full review of this, due to appear in MacFormat and MacLife magazines early next year.

SSDs have been announced by OWC in its Envoy Ultra, and Sabrent. The first of OWC’s have apparently started to ship, although they aren’t expected to become readily available until the New Year, when Sabrent’s are also expected.

OWC has also announced a TB5 hub, but that’s unlikely to appear until next year.

Several PCs are now available with TB5 support, although that seems to be fiddly to configure in Windows. Among those is the Razer Blade 18, which is even more expensive than a MacBook Pro with an M4 Max.

Other than those, there are lots of expensive TB5 cables, just precious little to connect to the other end.

Multiple displays

Many of those rushing to buy into TB5 are doing so because of its promised support for multiple displays. For example, the Kensington dock claims to support up to three 6K displays at 60 Hz with the M4 Max, and two with the M4 Pro. Although I have been unable to test those combinations, there are already reports that the M4 Max works well with three displays connected direct, but only two of those work when using the Kensington dock.

This has apparently taken Kensington and Apple by surprise, but until this has been addressed, I wouldn’t assume that you’ll be able to use all three displays attached to the dock.

Multiple SSDs

In early 2023, when TB4 hubs were becoming available, I wrote a whole series of articles here analysing their performance with a range of different SSDs. Links to those are given at the end. Those predated OWC’s superb Express 1M2 USB4 enclosure that now offers consistent and reliable performance for Apple silicon Macs, but not Intel models, which unfortunately lack support for USB4.

I have recently been revisiting SSD performance, both directly connected to my Mac mini M4 Pro, and working through the Kensington dock. Although some results are impressive, there are others that shock.

sysinfotb5

As shown in System Information, this dock connects to the host at 80 Gb/s, and to each USB4 drive at the expected 40 Gb/s.

On the bright side, 1M2 enclosures that return direct read/write speeds of 3.7/3.7 GB/s read almost as fast when attached through the dock, but their write speed drops to 2.3 GB/s, similar to many TB3 SSDs attached directly. You can even connect a USB4 drive to each of the dock’s three TB5 ports to benchmark them simultaneously, and get read/write results of 2.1/2.1 GB/s on each of them. That performance represents the maximum total data transfer capacity, matching claims of 6 GB/s made of TB5 SSDs, and equating to 80 Gb/s in TB5/USB4v2 symmetric mode.

tb5tests

Results from TB3 SSDs are more worrying. An award-winning certified Thunderbolt 3 SSD that achieves 2.9/2.2 GB/s read/write attached direct maintained a good read speed through the dock at 2.8 GB/s, but it almost ground to a halt during the write test, at 422 MB/s, that’s roughly the speed you’d expect from a basic SATA SSD.

You can read similar experiences during early testing of this dock for PC World.

For the time being, TB5 performs well with USB4 and directly connected TB3 SSDs, and the dock is a good solution for those wanting high-speed access to two or three USB4 SSDs in OWC Express 1M2 enclosures. The dock does have serious problems when writing to TB3 SSDs, though, where it may fall far short of expectations. Hopefully these problems will be resolved early next year.

Recommendations

  • Although TB5 promises much, initial tests show that it currently has problems meeting that.
  • Reports indicate that it may not yet support M4 Max chips driving three 6K displays at 60 Hz from a TB5 dock.
  • Performance claimed for TB5 SSDs has not yet been confirmed in independent tests.
  • Performance of TB3 SSDs attached to a TB5 dock demonstrates some very poor write speeds.
  • Performance of USB4 SSDs attached to a TB5 dock demonstrates better and more consistent results, although their write speed also falls.
  • TB5 cables and peripherals are expensive.
  • Thunderbolt 5 is still at an experimental stage, and may take some time before it realises its potential.

Thunderbolt performance and TB4 hubs

General hub performance
Write speed throttling
How faster SSDs can impair performance of slower ones
Three SSDs on one hub
Getting best performance from Thunderbolt on Apple silicon Macs: a practical guide

Testing with Stibium

When using the ‘gold standard’ method of testing storage using my free Stibium, you don’t normally need to restart the Mac between write and read speed measurements. This has changed with the Mac mini M4 Pro, at least. If you go straight on to measure read speeds, results will be bogus because of what appears to be extensive caching of the files written during the previous write test. That results in absurdly high read speeds of more than 6 GB/s in most cases. This is surprising, as a total of just over 53 GB of files are written during the full write test, which seems far more than macOS should ever cache successfully!

For these tests on external SSDs, I therefore quit Stibium after measuring write speed, unmount the volume tested, remount it in Disk Utility, and open Stibium again to perform the read tests. This apparently clears caches reliably, and read speeds are consistent and in accord with those expected.

Interests

I bought my own Mac mini M4 Pro, Kensington SD5000T5 Thunderbolt 5 Triple Docking Station, and all the OWC Express 1M2 enclosures and their SSDs, at their regular retail prices. The only product tested here that has been provided by a manufacturer is, rather sadly, the TB3 SSD.

❌