Wrestling Over Charlie Kirk’s Legacy and the Divide in America
© Rebecca Noble for The New York Times
© Rebecca Noble for The New York Times
纽约时报文章报道:在日本和韩国,政商领导人越来越公开地表达不满,认为自己的国家被迫就范,并质疑继续顺从特朗普的要求是否明智。
上周四,美国移民官员突袭了位于乔治亚州的一处现代-LG大型工厂的建设工地,这是韩国两家最知名企业的旗舰项目。据联邦官员称,数百名韩国公民因非法居留或非法工作而被逮捕拘留。
韩国总统李在明本周三表示,企业对这次突袭行动“深感困惑”,因为“他们并非长期或永久性的工作人员,而是协助安装设施设备的技术人员”。如果美国不能保障此类人员在美工作安全,韩企将会“犹豫是否要进行直接投资”。
韩国外长赵显本周一在国会表示,鉴于发生在佐治亚州电池厂的突袭事件,韩国在贸易谈判中提出了美国为韩国工人提供更多签证配额的要求。
特朗普在周一的社交媒体发文称,他将“尽快通过合法途径”为在美投资的外企派遣人员赴美生产提供便利,但他补充说,这些企业必须雇佣并培训美国工人。
纽时报道:在首尔方面努力将300多名韩国工作人员接回之际,韩国的保守派媒体、向来支持美韩结盟的《朝鲜日报》发文指出,政府必须“认识到事态的严重性”。在周一的社论中,该报敦促官员向美方传达韩国国内正在质疑是否应继续在美国投资。
“人们不禁要从根本上质疑,美国所说的‘同盟’究竟意味着什么,”《朝鲜日报》写道。
公众的愤怒给韩国敲定7月下旬贸易协议细节的工作增加了难度。根据协议,美国同意将对韩国商品的关税从25%降低至15%,作为交换,韩国企业承诺将在美国投资3500亿美元,其中1500亿美元专门用于增强美国造船业。
特朗普在这项协议中的主要让步是降低了对韩国经济非常重要的汽车行业的关税。但由于降税措施尚未生效,这一承诺正成为悬在谈判之上的变数。本周两国将继续磋商韩国投资的落实方案,但首尔方面已明确表示,它无法接受日本上周所作出的那种让步。
“没有哪个韩国人会签署那样的草案,”李在明办公室的政策室长金容范周二在一次公开论坛上表示。
他补充说,如果无法就其余对美投资安排达成协议,韩国政府将不会推进造船业投资计划——该项目被韩国官员称为“让美国造船业再次伟大”方案。特朗普一再誓言要重振美国的海运产业,这将需要韩国的帮助,后者是仅次于中国的世界第二大造船国。
以前好像都是用路由器 刷 梅林什么的,现在好像不流行了?有什么简单的方案 或者半成品方案吗?
因为买了一个 google tv 的盒子,这个盒子好像不太好像 APPLE TV 一样 装小火箭什么的,所以索性考虑弄个软路由
这种慢牛涨幅最可怕了~
© Mike Blake/Reuters
据法新社莫斯科13日的最新报道:俄罗斯周六表示,已在乌克兰中部第聂伯罗彼得罗夫斯克州再夺下一个村庄。俄军声称7月初便已推进到该州。
俄罗斯国防部指出,部队已经夺下了位于顿内茨克州(Donetsk)州界附近的新米科拉伊夫卡村(Novomykolaivka)。
尽管法新社说无法查证俄罗斯的以上说法,而根据由乌克兰军事分析人士经营的线上战场地图DeepState显示,该村目前仍由基辅掌控。
不过,众所周知,俄军装备优于乌军,兵力数量也远远超过,近几个月来持续对乌克兰发动攻势,且在东部战线有所斩获。
基辅在8月底首度承认:俄军已进入第聂伯罗彼得罗夫斯克州(Dnipropetrovsk);而莫斯科在8月初就宣称在当地推进。
目前俄军大约掌控乌克兰1/5领土。克里姆林宫要求乌克兰从东部顿巴斯(Donbas)地区撤军,作为停火的前提,基辅则明确拒绝。
第聂伯罗彼得罗夫斯克州并非莫斯科公开声称为俄罗斯领土的5个乌克兰地区之一,这5个地区分别为顿内茨克州、赫松州(Kherson)、卢甘斯克州(Lugansk)、札波罗热州(Zaporizhzhia)和克里米亚(Crimea)。
俄无人机侵入波兰后又与白俄启动大规模联合军事演习
本周五(9月12日)开始持续到下周二,俄罗斯与其忠实盟友白俄罗斯启动四年一度大规模联合军事演习“西方-2025”,这令人联想起2021年的两国联合军演,俄军在其后几个月就从白俄发动对乌克兰的侵略进攻,持续三年半后仍然胶着和不断升级。引发西方、尤其欧洲邻近国家的高度戒备。
而在以上演习前的周二至周三夜间,约二十架俄罗斯无人机进入波兰领空。这一罕见的严重事件被波兰与其北约盟友认定为“蓄意挑衅”,引发波兰国内高度紧张。波兰军方紧急动员本国和北约防空战机,击落这些从乌克兰和白俄罗斯方向进入的部分无人机,并关闭相关空域和多座机场。
波兰总理图斯克此后表示,自二战以来,欧洲“从未如此接近公开的冲突”。乌克兰总统泽连斯基则说,俄白联合军演绝非单纯防御性质,其演习针对的不仅仅是乌克兰。
特朗普向欧洲施压也有新招
正当北约盟国面对俄罗斯直接军事挑战之时,美国总统特朗普周六通过社媒平台公布了他写给“所有北约国家和世界”的信函,该信说:“当所有北约国家都同意并开始采取同样行动,并且停止从俄罗斯购买石油时,我准备对俄罗斯实施重大制裁”。
信中说“当所有北约国家都同意并开始采取同样行动,并且停止从俄罗斯购买石油时,我准备对俄罗斯实施重大制裁。如你所知,北约对胜利的承诺远未达到100%,而且某些国家购买俄罗斯石油的行为令人震惊!这极大地削弱了你与俄罗斯的谈判地位和议价能力。总之,我准备好行动,就等你们了。就说说什么时候吧?”
特朗普补充道,“我相信,加上北约,作为一个整体对中国征收50%至100%的关税——这些关税将在与俄罗斯和乌克兰的战争结束后全部撤销,也将极大地有助于结束这场致命却荒谬的战争。中国对俄罗斯有着强大的控制力,甚至掌控力,而这些高额关税将打破这种掌控力”。
特朗普随后重申其对这场由2022年普京下令全面入侵乌克兰而已持续了三年半的战争的说法,即“这不是特朗普的战争,而是拜登和泽连斯基的战争”,“如果北约照我说的做,这场战争很快就会结束,所有生命都将得救!否则,你们只是在浪费我的时间,也浪费美国的时间、精力和金钱”。
此前,特朗普周五表示,他对普京的耐心正在耗尽。同一天也美国向七国集团(G7)成员国施压,要求它们对购买俄罗斯石油的印度和中国大幅提高关税,以迫使俄当局与乌克兰进行和平谈判。
自美俄阿拉斯加峰会以来,外交进程陷入僵局,俄罗斯对乌克兰平民的袭击不断增加,对此,特朗普未施加其先前承诺的任何后果,反而将向普京施压的责任推给欧洲,要求欧盟对购买俄罗斯石油的中国和印度加征关税。
Sir Keir Starmer explicitly asked Lord Mandelson about his links to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein before deciding to appoint him as the UK's ambassador to the US, the BBC understands.
The prime minister is believed to have asked Mandelson three questions relating to his friendship with the disgraced financier while he was being vetted for the influential role.
The revelation is likely to pile further scrutiny on what Sir Keir knew before the Labour peer got the job. Mandelson's friendship with Epstein was known at the time of his appointment but No 10 said new information about it only came to light this week, prompting his sacking.
Downing Street and Mandelson have declined to comment.
Mandelson was asked to leave his post on Thursday after a now notorious cache of emails was reported by Bloomberg on Wednesday evening.
These included supportive messages Mandelson sent after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor in June 2008.
In one message, Mandelson is reported to have told Epstein to "fight for early release" and, the day before he began his prison sentence, another which read: "I think the world of you."
These emails did not show up in two vetting processes carried out in Whitehall around his appointment.
When Mandelson was under consideration for ambassador, the Cabinet Office's Propriety and Ethics Team (PET) prepared a file for the prime minister that contained information about Mandelson and Epstein's links, the BBC has been told.
After reviewing the file, No 10 sources say Sir Keir asked Mandelson to address three specific questions, which were sent to him via email by the prime minister's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney.
These questions were: why has he continued contact with Epstein after he was convicted? Why was he reported to have stayed in one of Epstein's homes while the financier was in prison? And was he associated with a charity founded by Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell that the financier had backed?
It is understood Mandelson believes that he was truthful and frank about his association with Epstein, and told No 10 that he had not stayed in Epstein's Manhattan apartment in 2009, while the paedophile was in prison. Another source confirmed Mandelson told Downing Street he had not stayed there.
Court documents in 2023 showed Epstein telling his private banker that Mandelson was planning to stay, but the peer has never explicitly denied or confirmed if he did.
No 10 sources believe Mandelson was "economical with the truth" in his answers to the three questions.
However, at the time, his answers were considered sufficient for him to be appointed which led to a second vetting process, called "developed vetting" (DV), being carried out under the auspices of the Foreign Office.
The BBC has been told the emails were not available to those in government when Lord Mandelson was appointed, as they came from a defunct email address.
A senior Whitehall figure said it would have been possible to locate those messages had more questions been asked, and forensic background digging been done.
The row has led to growing pressure on Sir Keir over his judgement in making Mandelson ambassador, and questions over the extent of what he knew about ties between Mandelson and Epstein.
Some Labour MPs in public and private are asking whether Sir Keir should resign, and some are suggesting Number 10 senior aides are to blame.
Sources have told the BBC that Mandelson was asked to resign on Wednesday, even though the prime minister had backed him at PMQs.
Mandelson refused, and after a "furious" Sir Keir read the emails on Wednesday night, a final decision to sack him was taken on Thursday morning.
The Cabinet Office has declined to comment. Mandelson has repeatedly expressed regret about his relationship with Epstein who died in jail in 2019.
For many people, a real sign that we have entered autumn came earlier this month when the Northern Lights were spotted across the UK for the first time in the season.
The aurora dazzles when it can be viewed, sometimes - as in the case this September - with stunning displays visible across most of the country, from Scotland and Wales down to Kent.
Plenty of fans of the lights head out in the wilds of the UK to take photos, armed with the latest equipment - but could we just stay at home and see them and snap a photo on our phones?
Well first of all, in the right circumstances, it is possible to see the Northern Lights from your bedroom window, according to expert Dr Maria-Theresia Walach.
She once saw the aurora by eye from Lancaster city centre in red, green and purple but admitted it was "a rare occurrence".
Dr Walach, who is from Lancaster University and is also a member of the AuroraWatch UK team, said it was possible in general to see the aurora in cities and towns - but it depended on cloud and light pollution, which could even include the moon.
It was possible you could see them from your bedroom window, she added.
"If we are in a geomagnetic storm for example, you definitely can," she said.
"Windows won't obscure the light of the aurora but, depending on street lights, it might be trickier."
Asked if aurora hunters needed to find a high place to watch the skies, Dr Walach said: "No, not at all."
Being high up just helps because it is possible to see further, she added.
The further north you are also helps, she says. Scandinavia and northern Scotland remain the best places to see the Northern Lights.
To know when the northern lights are likely to be visible in the night skies this autumn and winter, the advice first of all from the BBC's lead weather presenter, Simon King, is to keep a check on forecasts
Wait for enhanced solar activity and check the weather, because the lights will not be visible in a cloudy sky, he added.
This year is forecast to be a good one to see them because we are at a peak in the Sun's 11-year cycle of activity which is continuing in 2025.
Nicole Carr and Simon Scott, from Astro Dog, a firm which runs stargazing, photography and education events, said people who were able to travel could use weather radar apps to find gaps in the cloud.
"Perseverance can pay on cloudy nights," they said. "You never know if there may be gaps in the clouds at just the right moment."
They said they have sat in the cold and dark for hundreds of nights without seeing anything but "when you do get lucky and catch a display, it makes it all the more special".
If you want to actively go out and find a good spot to view and photograph the lights, we have spoken to some of the country's aurora hunters.
Ian Parkes, from Wombourne, Staffordshire, said he first of all checks social media for graphs on when solar flares will hit - and then looks at one of the three free mobile apps he uses – Aurora Watch UK, Glendale and Aurora UK.
He usually visits Sheep Walks in Staffordshire and takes a DSLR camera with a tripod and remote but added that anyone could take images with a phone.
The key, he said, was always to look north and remember that the aurora could be quite low, adding that it often looks black and white - or like a cloud.
"It's a wow moment, especially the first time you see it, it's just amazing," he said. "It's just being at one with nature."
Mr Parkes said he had seen the lights seven times in two years, adding: "Every time I've gone out, I've seen it."
If you want to know if you are near a good place in the UK to see the aurora or somewhere to head to, BBC Countryfile drew up a list in September of the best sites in the country to see them.
They included the UK's official Dark Sky Reserves - areas where light pollution is particularly low - and among them are:
Hot spots also included the Northumberland coast, Lerwick on Shetland, the Yorkshire Dales, the Lake District and the Antrim coast in Northern Ireland.
They have also been seen in many locations across the Midlands including in Shropshire, Nottinghamshire, Staffordshire and Warwickshire.
Dr Walach suggested in the main that people should seek out a darker area in the countryside, turn off torches and allow time for their eyes to adjust.
"It can take around 10 minutes or more for your eyes to fully adjust to darker spaces," she said.
"The aurora also moves around the sky a lot, so I also recommend a warm coat and a hot chocolate."
Nottingham photographer Chris Denning gets his aurora forecasts from Facebook where the Wil's Aurora Alerts channel gives as much advance warning as possible.
He advised people though to manage their expectations because many aurora events were only visible by camera.
The most important thing was to "enjoy the chase", he said, adding: "Sometimes you'll win and sometimes you won't, but that's half the fun."
James Rowley-Hill, in Norfolk, recommended coastal areas and fields in the middle of nowhere, to escape strong light pollution.
He said "expectation vs reality" is the biggest problem, adding: "Many folks think this is the normal, when it really isn't."
While for Josh Drury, a photographer based in Somerset, catching an aurora often depended on forecasting.
"You need a good storm. You need clear skies," he said.
"When we have an aurora kicking off, you have to drop absolutely everything and go out and try to catch it.
"A lot of it is pot luck."
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
去年,新京报曝光了油罐车运输乱象调查:有些油罐车卸完煤制油直接装运食用大豆油。触目惊心,可是,官方最后的调查结果是新京报的报道属实,但调查没有发现其他类似的现象。
很遗憾,新京报没有继续拿出新的证据来证明还有类似情况。如果全国真的只有一两辆油罐车如此,那这个新闻也就没有我们预期的那么大的现实意义了。可是,这个报道后来据说获了不少奖,足见真实情况可能很复杂。
到底是记者只暗访发现了报道中曝光的情况呢,还是其实还掌握了类似情况迫于压力没有进一步公布呢?没有问过当事记者,但对此类暗访的具体操作,个人有一个亲历的案例可以分享,供大家参考。
时政记者褚朝新
2023年5月17日,陪一个朋友去一家医院挂脊柱外科的专家号。可是,接诊的医生并不是该专家王医生,而是另外一个年轻医生,戴着口罩,别人称呼他为王教授,他也不否认。如果不是有心,一般人不会发现坐在自己面前的医生并不是自己想见的那个王教授。
当场发现这个问题后,取了证,拍照摄像并现场询问坐诊的医生:你是谁?他被迫承认,自己是专家的学生。
然后,我在现场核实搞清楚了冒充专家坐诊的医生的具体身份和姓名以及与专家的具体关系。
那么,专家去哪里了呢?随后医院的多个部门回复我,有的说专家去急诊了,有的说专家太累提前下班回家了。说法各异,总之是不统一。
这个时候,证据确凿,题为《湖南一医院忽悠病人:卖专家号,让年轻医生代诊》的文章已经成形。但是,我并没有着急,决定等一等再看。
两个考虑:第一,专家可能真的有急事,比如急诊有危急病人需要他去救治,临时请人代为坐诊。或者专家年纪太大,确实累了需要回家休息,如果是这样,那轻易曝光可能会误伤一个好医生。第二,如果不掌握更多证据,医院完全可以谎称这只是一个偶发案例。
所以,我没有在当时就急着曝光此事,而是等了一个月之后,再次专门去该医院暗访。
2023年6月14,专门再次去该医院点名挂了该专家的号用于暗访。结果,该专家居然再次不在岗,仍然是第一次代他坐诊的年轻医生在以专家的名义接诊。
再次拍照、摄像取证,这一次,我还采访了几个其他病人,他们均没有发现接诊的并不是自己想找的专家。
2023年6月15日,作文曝光了此事,但是当日的文章里完全没有提6月份的暗访,故意只写了5月份的遭遇。
15日上午,广西一家媒体的记者看到文章后采访我时问到:褚老师,你写的事情发生在5月17日,为什么现在才写出来?
这是一个好问题,记者虽然年轻,但很敏感。是啊,发生于5月17日的事情,为什么6月15日才公布呢?
发稿前,我还研判了第一篇文章发布后两种可能:第一,直接承认管理不善,长期存在此类问题,将彻底整改。如果是这样,那我发布第一篇文章后就可以停下来了,经济下行,各行各业都不容易,坦然承认错误能改就行。第二个可能是,医院可能会承认5月17日确实是有其他医生代专家坐诊,但大概觉得我只有一个暗访经历,不掌握其他证据,因此极可能只承认这件事是偶发案例,并非常态。如果这样,我可以进一步曝光此事,造成更大的舆论影响,触动监管部门大范围清查此类问题,达到以点带面的监督效果。
有了这些研判,自然要打个埋伏,明明暗访了两次,都是其他医生冒充专家坐诊,但故意只说第一次的经历,绝口不提自己暗访了两次,看医院如何应对。
第一篇文章发布后,该医院先是投诉我侵权,说我没有证据证明文中写的"卖专家号但让年轻医生代诊”这个事实。然后,该医院又联系到我,发来了包含道歉内容的书面说明。
书面说明中说:医生当日紧急参加重大疑难手术,未及时告知导诊停号。导诊不知情的情况下门诊办未及时停诊,致使患者未能由王教授接诊,做法确实不妥,反映出门诊管理的不足。
一方面投诉我的文章侵权,否认存在曝光的问题,另一方面又向我道歉,承认医生不在门诊坐诊,这就是现实斗争的复杂性与残酷性。
6月16日,我再次发文公布了6月14日暗访的结果,用确凿的证据证明该院用普通医生冒充专家坐诊并非一次,可能是常态,医院的说明是谎言,并再次提出质疑:如果专家总是在急诊救人,那你们就不应该在门诊让他卖专家号,毕竟专家号比普通的号贵出很多。
我在6月16日的文章里还明确写到:再一次挂了王教授的号,再一次不是王教授坐诊而是其他人代诊,这显然不是偶发的事情,极可能是常态,这才下决心在6月15日披露此事。第二次去暗访的这些内容,其实我昨天就写好了,但一个多年做新闻的经验告诉我,医院极可能会谎称我曝光的5月17日的情况只是一个偶发的特例,不是常态,我的策略是:等他们说了这些谎话,我再把6月14日暗访的情况发出来打他们的脸,所以留了一手。这就是为什么5月17日的事情6月15日才披露的原因。这不是耍滑头,是多年从事新闻工作慢慢摸索出的斗争技巧。
医院终于无话可说了,不久,该专家从该医院消失了。不过,湖南的卫健部门最后是如何处罚医院的,两年过去了也没有公布调查和处罚结果。
做新闻当然要快,但也要多个心眼,多掌握几个典型案例,然后把握好信息发布的节奏,有料别一次性放完,放一点,让他们误以为你只知道这么多,继续表演、撒谎甚至妄想倒打一耙,然后再拿出新的证据来打他们的脸,让读者明白,他们又在说谎了。
采访中,多问几个人,多掌握几个案例,掌握的证据别一次性全部用完,给自己留后路,也给对手留下主动全盘认错和狡辩撒谎的空间。这些,都是传播技巧,也都是斗争经验。
2025年9月10日
默存、新默存、新新默存都不在了。
今天我们再做新新新默存,因为手还在,因为心里还有自由、美与爱。而默存,就是自由、美与爱的孤岛。
我们建造孤岛,不过是因为早已陷入一个被分割成许多条块的社会。我们每天都看到海量资讯,但并不知道在我们的社会里究竟发生了什么事,也不知道其他人究竟在想些什么。我们知道自己小圈子里一些人的想法,通过社交网络也零星地揣摩到另一些人可能的想法,但我们不知道高层的想法,不知道底层的想法,也不知道中间阶层的想法,我们不知道无声无息死去的人的想法,正如不知道无声无息活着的人的想法。我们彼此之间无法自由沟通,而无法沟通的痛苦绝对不会只停留在个人层面。在阻碍沟通的时代中,自由、美与爱都随之凋谢,除非人们还有内心的歌,而且在任何狭小处、有人无人处,依然拍手作歌。
喝酒的时候我常拍手作歌。似乎只有在喝醉的时候,我才能感受到自由。可是,为什么人只有在喝醉时才能感受到自由呢?显然是因为,这种所谓的自由并不存在。
精神的自由不单是一种在他物之外,而且是一种在他物之内争得的对于他物的不依赖性,精神的自由之成为现实不是由于逃避他物,而是由于克服他物。这话太深刻,显然不是我说的。是黑格尔。
自由要克服的东西太多,而于我,当务之急首先就是克服虚无。
虚无的力量太大,人活一生,很难不被它击中。虚无的力量,在于人生的本质即是消逝。如同荒野呼喊,片刻即散,如同水沫,不能久聚。于是一切都再无意义,没有意义也就没有方向。虚无就是意义或方向的消失。人们不断给自己制造激情,不断追逐热点,但在根底上是冷冰冰的,这就是虚无。人一旦虚无,很容易庸俗。所谓庸俗,就是做低级的事,在无意义的东西上花费力气,对优美与崇高漠不关心。一个庸俗的人,多多少少也总是一个虚无的人。
克尔凯郭尔是最早论述虚无的大师。他认为,如果虚无在人身上完成,那么就不再存在什么意义重大的公共的或私人的问题,没有什么再能够让人敬畏,能够从人这里呼唤献身。无法献身是虚无予人最主要也最可怕的结果。如果一个人在深切的爱中,他不会虚无,因为他还有献身的对象,由此能感觉到现实存在的核心,而此核心之外的一切都不重要。如果一个人在坚定的信念中,他不会虚无,因为他同样能感觉到现实存在的核心,被真实具体的关切所召唤。无论因为爱还是信念,只要一个人能出于某种关切来界定自己并献身时,他的世界就获得了严肃性与意义感,从而居于虚无之上。
为了居于虚无之上,有必要为自己建造一个孤岛。默存也许就是这样一个孤岛。自由、美与爱的孤岛。
关于爱,黑格尔早年有段很晦涩也很迷人的论说,爱就是拒绝生离、只能死别。能够活着分离的爱就不是爱。所以我们再做新新新默存,因为有共同爱的人不能活着分离。
阿伦特在《黑暗时代的人们》中说:即使在最黑暗的时代中,我们也有权去期待一种启明,这种启明或许并不来自理论和概念,而更多地来自一种不确定的、闪烁而又经常很微弱的光亮。这光亮源于某些男人和女人,源于他们的生命,它们在几乎所有情况下都点燃着,并把光散射到他们在尘世所拥有的生命所及的全部范围。
她说的,其实就是,自由、美与爱的孤岛,大家一起来建造。
© Kenny Holston/The New York Times
© Federico Rios for The New York Times
© Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
Israeli forces have stepped up their assault on Gaza City with a wave of heavy air strikes, marking a sharp escalation from previous military operations.
Unlike earlier phases of the war, the current offensive has relied heavily on aerial bombardments, with entire apartment blocks and large concrete structures reduced to rubble.
The intensification of strikes in recent days has triggered a surge in civilian displacement.
Israel has warned all residents of Gaza City to leave immediately in anticipation of a huge ground offensive.
On Sunday, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said about 250,000 people had left the city and moved south. It also said it had destroyed a high-rise building that it said had been used "to advance and execute terrorist attacks" against its troops.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the city is Hamas's last major stronghold. But the plan to occupy Gaza City has brought international criticism.
The UN has warned an intensification of the offensive on an area where a famine has already been declared will push civilians into an "even deeper catastrophe". Gaza City is the largest urban centre in the territory and a historic heart of Palestinian political and social life.
Residents say the Israeli military has been targeting schools and makeshift shelters, often issuing warnings only moments before bombardments.
Many families have been forced to flee in darkness toward western Gaza.
"We escaped certain death, my husband, our three children and I," said Saly Tafeesh, a mother sheltering in the city. "My brother died in my arms after being shot by a quadcopter drone. We ran in the dark to the west of Gaza."
The Israeli military has told residents to evacuate to the south of the territory - but many families say they cannot afford the journey, which costs up to $1,100 (£800). Hamas, meanwhile, has intensified its calls for residents to stay put and resist leaving the city.
Rubein Khaled, a father-of-nine preparing to move south, expressed frustration.
"The Hamas preacher at Friday prayers accused anyone leaving Gaza City of being a coward running from the battlefield," he said.
"But why doesn't he tell Hamas leaders to surrender and release the Israeli hostages so this war can stop? We don't want to leave either, but we have no choice."
Israeli forces have not yet reached some eastern neighbourhoods that have remained largely intact since earlier raids in January, but the current campaign suggests they may now be seeking to dismantle entire districts.
Meanwhile, a Qatari foreign ministry spokesman strongly criticised Israel's prime minister in an interview with the BBC following this week's Israeli strike on Hamas officials in the Qatari capital Doha.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari told the BBC that the international community had "to deal with a Netanyahu problem".
"He is not somebody who is listening to anybody right now, who is listening to any reason, and we have to collectively stop him in his tracks," the official said.
He argued the strike in Doha showed the Israeli leader "never intended to sign any peace deal" to end the war in Gaza and instead "believes he can re-shape the Middle East in his own image".
Five of the group's members and a Qatari security officer were killed in Tuesday's strike - though the Palestinian armed group claimed no senior leaders had been killed. Hamas members had been in Doha to discuss the latest US proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza.
Israel has faced widespread condemnation, including at the UN Security Council. Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel targeted the "terrorist masterminds" behind the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel.
Qatar's Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani earlier said that Qatar did not get advance warning of the strike, only receiving a call from a US official 10 minutes after the attack had started.
On Friday, al-Thani had dinner with US President Donald Trump and his envoy Steve Witkoff in New York, having earlier met Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House.
Rubio is travelling to Israel this weekend in a show of solidarity with Israel ahead of a UN meeting later this month at which France and the UK are expected to formally recognise a Palestinian state.
On Sunday, the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza said the bodies of 47 people killed by the Israeli military had arrived at its hospitals over the previous day.
Since UN-backed global food security experts confirmed a famine in Gaza City on 22 August, the ministry has reported that at least 142 people have died from starvation and malnutrition across the territory. Israel has said it is expanding its efforts to facilitate aid deliveries and has disputed the health ministry's figures on malnutrition-related deaths.
The Israeli military launched its campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
At least 64,803 people have been killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry.
Nepal's major political parties have demanded the country's President Ram Chandra Poudel reinstates the parliament he dissolved following deadly anti-corruption protests.
In a statement, eight parties - including the Nepali Congress, CPN-UML and Maoist Centre - said the president acted unconstitutionally.
Poudel dissolved the House of Representatives on Friday upon the recommendation of newly-appointed interim Prime Minister Sushila Karki - it was also a key demand from the protest movement.
More than 50 people were killed in clashes with riot police during this week's mass protests sparked by a ban on social media platforms. Karki was appointed after a deal was reached with protest leaders.
The ban was lifted on Monday - but by then the protests had swelled into a mass movement. Angry crowds set fire to parliament and government buildings in the capital Kathmandu on Tuesday, forcing then-Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli to resign.
Saturday's statement demanding the reinstatement of the parliament was signed by the chief whips of the eight political parties.
They argued the step taken by the president was unconstitutional and against the precedents set by Nepal's judiciary.
The dissolution of the parliament was a major demand by student leaders from the so-called "Gen Z" protest movement.
But the eight parties say the protesters' demands - including new elections announced for 5 March next year - should be addressed through an institution voted by the people.
President Poudel is yet to publicly respond to the political parties' statement.
Karki, a 73-year-old former Supreme Court chief justice and the first woman to lead the impoverished Himalayan nation, was sworn in during a brief ceremony in the capital Kathmandu.
She is expected to appoint ministers to her cabinet within a few days.
She is widely regarded as having a clean image, and her leadership of the interim government is being supported by student leaders from the "Gen Z" movement.
But her cabinet will face multiple challenges, including restoring law and order, reconstructing parliament and the other key buildings that were attacked, reassuring the Gen Z protesters who want change - and others in Nepal who are fearful its young democracy and constitutional order could be derailed.
Another key task will be to bring those responsible for violence to justice.
Nepal is gradually returning back to normalcy after the worst unrest in decades.
Nepal's soldiers - who had been deployed to patrol the streets of Kathmandu - returned to their bases after Karki took the oath of office.
The protests were triggered by the government's decision last week to ban 26 social media platforms, including WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook - but they soon widened to embody much deeper discontent with Nepal's political elite.
In the weeks before the ban, a "nepo kid" campaign - spotlighting the lavish lifestyles of politicians' children and allegations of corruption - had taken off on social media.
And while the social media ban was hastily lifted on Monday night, the protests had by that stage gained unstoppable momentum.
迈过“如期披露”这一最基础门槛之后,还需经历“四不测”标准。这是基于“优中选优”的测评原则。全市场89家财险公司,仅58家入围实测名单。
财险公司偿付能力普遍高于寿险公司,但各显神通;具有外资背景的5家财险公司虽规模不太大,但偿付能力表现良好;两家专注新能源车险的公司,经营在好转。
南方周末研究员 张文景 南方周末实习生 葛炯皓 尤欣瑶
责任编辑:丰雨
在庞大的财险市场,风控更严的外资系、财大气粗的电力系、深耕某一领域的垂类系,抑或大而全的龙头公司,各展其能,各有标杆,但亦不乏落后者。
在全市场所有财险公司中,谁的偿付能力最稳?哪家已告急?谁最有能力为投保人“遮风挡雨”?为此,南方周末新金融研究中心首度推出财险偿付能力榜——2025年“金标杆·财险偿付能力榜”初榜(下称“财险偿付能力榜初榜”)。
如何选取测评对象?与寿险偿付能力榜初榜(详见:《75家寿险公司,为何仅有53家入围偿付能力测评?》)类似,如期披露偿付能力报告是入围基础门槛,再综合考量偿付能力合格与否、公司类型和资产规模等因素。最终58家财险公司进入实测名单。榜单指标体系同样包括三大维度10个指标,但子指标有所变动。测评定量数据则来源于各财险公司2025年二季度偿付能力报告。
历时半年余,南方周末新金融研究中心研制而成财险偿付能力榜初榜。这是2025年“金标杆—新金融竞争力榜”(下称2025年“金标杆”)18个子榜之一,亦是7个保险系子榜之一。客观、科学、公正和透明是“金标杆”系列榜单一直遵循的四大原则。
“财险偿付能力榜初榜”显示,财险公司偿付能力普遍高于寿险公司;电力系“鼎和保险”一技独秀,具有外资背景的5家财险公司虽规模不太大,但偿付能力表现良好,专注新能源车险的两家公司的经营在好转。
但各组得分差异明显,千亿组得分明显领先百亿组和十亿组,“十亿组”仅两家得分超过60分。
9月开始,南方周末新金融研究中心将在被测评公司2025年相关最新披露报告基础上更新数据并测评,并同步对被评测公司展开深度问卷调查、实地走访和线上调研。与此同时,将遴选相关领域资深专家组成独立专家评审团进行“背对背”评分。在上述三类分值各占一定权重的基础上,制作并公布“2025年金标杆·财险偿付能力榜”终榜。
国家金融监督管理总局最新发布的《保险机构法人许可证目录》显示,全市场所有财险公司共89家。
在选择财险公司测评对象时,采用与寿险公司偿付能力榜相同原则,如期披露是入围基础门槛,再叠加综合考量偿付能力合格与否、公司类型和资产规模等因素。
南方周末新金融研究中心研究员调研发现,截至目前,已有86家财险公司如期披露2025年二季度偿付能力报告,仍在名单中的仅有天安财险(已被注销经营许可证,申能财险接管其业务。)、安达财险(因不符合同一主体不能成为两家同类保险公司控制类股东的监管要求,所有业务并入华泰财险)、安心财险(已被东吴财险承接业务)、长安保险(2023年二季度风险综合评级为D类,2023年四季度至今未披露偿付能力报告)尚未披露。
迈过“如期披露”这一最基础门槛之后,还需经历“四不测”标准。这是基于“优中选优”的测评原则。一是偿付能力不达标不测。华安财险、亚太财险、安华保险和前海财险,因风险综合评级为C类,偿付能力不达标。
二是特殊财险公司不测。中石油专属保险、中国铁路自保、中远海运自保、广东能源自保、众惠相互、汇友相互和劳合社(中国)均属于特殊组织形式,其中前4家财险公司属于自保公司。何为自保公司?与普通商业保险公司不同,自保公司也被称作专属自保保险公司,指专为其母公司提供保险服务的机构。
众惠相互和汇友相互属于相互制保险公司。劳合社(中国)则是英国劳合社在中国设立的子公司。根据《保险公司偿付能力监管规则第20号:劳合社保险(中国)有限公司》,监管机构对其单独监管。
三是“Ⅱ类”公司中风险综合评级为B的公司不测。包括长江财险、华农保险和泰山财险等11家财险公司。
四是总资产少于10亿元者不测。太平科技、中国渔保、凯本财险、中国渔保和兴亚财险5家公司总资产不足10亿元。
此外,富邦财险和东吴财险也被剔除。富邦财险官网无法正常进入,其在中国保险业协会网站披露2025年二季度偿付能力报告,由于其未公布公司类型,此次未测评;东吴财险前身是安心财险,2025年4月才获准开业。考虑其开业时间较短,此次也未测评。
经过上述严格筛选之后,最终58家进入实测范围。南方周末新金融研究中心研究员测评发现,财险公司偿付能力普遍高于寿险公司。58家被测评机构核心偿付能力充足率平均值为308.68%,综合偿付能力充足率平均值为348.53%,20家风险综合评级为A类。
与寿险偿付能力榜初榜相同,财险偿付能力榜初榜测评指标体系同样包括“偿付能力充足率”“风险评级”和“流动性风险管理”三大维度,所占权重分别为40%、30%和30%。
不同之处在于,在“流动性风险管理”中,衡量负债端流动性指标由“经营活动净现金流”替换成“百元保费经营活动净现金流”。二者本质相同,但后者是相对值,旨在排除规模因素干扰。
以人保财险为例,若仍以“经营活动净现金流”测评,人保财险2025年二季度经营活动净现金流约269亿元。此次测评的58家财险公司中,总资产大于该数值的除人保财险自身外仅有10家。
哪家机构赔付能力更强?哪家机构成为“黑马”?
按照《关于优化保险公司偿付能力监管标准通知》,实施差异化资本监管。对于财产险公司,总资产100亿元以上、2000亿元以下公司的最低资本按照95%计算偿付能力充足率;总资产100亿元以下公司的最低资本按照90%计算偿付能力充足率。
参照上述标准,将58家被测评财险公司分为三组:总资产超过2000亿元为“千亿组”、总资产在100亿以上,2000亿以下为“百亿组”,总资产不足100亿元为“十亿组”。
实际上,仅有人保财险、平安产险和太保产险总资产规模超过2000亿元。但考虑财险公司普遍规模不大,国寿财险、大地财险、中华财险和阳光财险也被纳入“千亿组”,分数给予一定折算。
“千亿组”中,7家财险公司得分均在60分之上,平均分69.71分。平安产险、太保产险、大地财险进入前三。
大地财险为何进入前三?从细分维度看,大地财险在“偿付能力充足率”和“流动性风险管理”中得分较高,两者均排名第二。但因风险综合评级为BB,“风险评级”维度得分不高,排名仅高于中华财险,巧合的是,中华财险风险综合评级也是BB,与大地财险相同。
财险龙头“老大”为何未能称霸榜单?人保财险因“流动性风险管理”项得分垫底与前三失之交臂。南方周末新金融研究中心研究员发现,其现金及流动性管理工具占比仅有1.96%,远低于该组平均值4.34%。
这或与人保财险融资变现能力强,谋求收益的资金管理策略有关。在2025年二季度偿付能力报告中,人保财险称,“公司融资渠道畅通,资产流动性高、变现能力较强。公司在银行间和交易所通过债券质押式回购融资的能力较强,回购交易分散化程度较高。流动性管理工具和高流动性资产保持合意规模,股票和债券的变现能力较强。另外,公司再保业务可有效缓释重大保险事故可能引发的流动性风险。总体而言,公司发生流动性偿付风险的概率很小。”
百亿组“成分混杂”,有电力系,有专业农险,有互联网保险,还有重组更名者,它们的偿付能力是否充足?
财险偿付能力榜初榜显示,“百亿组”平均分约54.77分,但呈现“一枝独秀”格局。“电力系”鼎和保险以81.72分强势登顶,比第二名紫金保险高近15分。中银保险位居第三,同属“电力系”的英大财险以0.12分之差暂列第四。
中原农险、阳光农险和国元保险三家专业农险公司均进入前十;互联网保险分化,众安保险位居第九,泰康在线则落在第十五。
申能财险(原天安财险)和大家财险(原安邦财险)暂列尾部。二者均是重组改名后新成立的财险公司,大家财险2019年获批开业,申能财险2024年5月获批开业。
鼎和保险何以遥遥领先?总部位于深圳的鼎和财险成立至今已17年有余,其股东以南方电网系企业、长江电力及华电资本等能源巨头为主。所谓“背靠大树好乘凉”,依托股东强大资本实力,鼎和保险核心偿付能力充足率和综合偿付能力充足率高居“百亿组”第一。
2025年9月5日,该公司以资本公积转增资本方式增加注册资本方案已获得深圳金融监管局批准。与传统融资方式不同,此次鼎和保险的方式被戏称为“左手倒右手”式内部权益调整。这是一种另类的融资方式,因只涉及账面调整。其优点是既可稳定偿付能力等指标,又避免增加股东压力。进一步研究发现,鼎和保险曾定下“10020”发展目标,即2025年实现100亿元保费、20亿元净利润。这侧面反映该公司快速发展的决心。
南方周末新金融研究中心研究员认为,增资并非万能。从可持续发展角度而言,鼎和保险应树立正确“业绩观”,注重资产负债匹配,强化风险管理。
同处深圳的国任保险,则无这般幸运,在该组中排在最末。作为深圳市属国资控制的唯一财险公司,该公司不仅综合偿付能力充足率和核心偿付能力充足率位于末位,同时还是该组唯一风险综合评级为B的财险公司。
以中小财险公司为主的“十亿组”表现如何?
财险偿付能力榜初榜显示,该组平均得分45.22分,仅有三井住友保险(中国)和比亚迪保险得分超过60分,前者领先后者1.09分,位居榜首。中意财险以33.93分暂居榜尾。榜首榜尾分差接近29分。
进一步研究发现,在前十名中,具有外资背景的财险公司共有5家。这并不令人意外。较强的风险控制能力原是外资险企进入中国市场的保证,令人意外的是比亚迪保险和现代财险也进入前十。
这是两家经营新能源车险的财险公司,但经营模式大不相同。比亚迪保险,背靠比亚迪汽车工业有限公司,以直销模式打开市场。现代财险则与滴滴出行绑定,深耕网约车场景。
新能源车险本就具有高成本率,网约车车险业务成本更高。网约车使用频率更高、行驶里程长,出险概率相对更高,赔付率也相应上升。(详见:《专揽“高风险中的高风险”,网约车险吃螃蟹者的勇气何来?|新能源车险调研①》)
南方周末新金融研究中心研究员查阅比亚迪保险和现代财险近两个季度偿付能力报告发现,二者综合赔付率均处于下降趋势。
比亚迪保险二季度偿付能力报告显示,其综合赔付率(年度累计数)由一季度96.36%降至二季度95.17%。现代财险二季度综合赔付率为79.84%, 环比下降7.4%。
综合成本率也随之改善。比亚迪保险综合成本率(年度累计数)由103.61%降至101.23%,现代财险综合成本率也由122.43%降至114.07%。
综合成本率是衡量财险公司经营效率和盈利能力的重要指标。通常而言,综合成本率越低越好,低于100%则意味着承保端盈利。反之,则亏损。
校对:星歌
所谓“雷暴哮喘”,一般是指在花粉季节的高峰,突然出现了雷暴天气,电闪雷鸣,大雨倾盆,在局部地区突然出现群体性的哮喘集中发作,症状轻重不一,但发病都较急。
口罩可能可以防住完整的花粉颗粒,但很难防住被雷暴劈碎的花粉碎片;此外,哮喘患者本身就呼吸不畅,戴上花粉防护口罩更不利于呼吸,会加重难受程度。
南方周末记者 黄思卓
责任编辑:崔慧莹
近期多地突现“雷暴哮喘”,大量患者排队就医。视觉中国|图
咳嗽加剧、憋得难受、喘气困难、心跳急促、无法入睡……秋季花粉高峰期遇上雷电交加,总让哮喘患者感到“天要塌了”。
近期,北京、山西太原、河北石家庄等城市遭遇雷暴天气后,大批哮喘急性发作或症状加重的患者前往医院就医,急诊室人满为患。
以山西太原为例,2025年9月8日晚9时许,太原突发雷雨大风等强对流天气,“雷暴哮喘”急性发作患者激增。据山西医科大学第一医院官方报道,该院9月8-10日就接诊了七百余名哮喘急性发作患者。
与此同时,“雷暴哮喘”迅速成为各大社交平台的热搜词,焦虑紧张的情绪在网络与现实中不断蔓延。
“雷暴哮喘”是一种什么疾病?有哪些危害,又该如何应对?9月11日,北京协和医院变态反应科主任医师、中华医学会变态反应学分会前任主任委员王良录接受了南方周末记者采访。
南方周末:“雷暴哮喘”是哮喘的一种吗?
王良录:所谓“雷暴哮喘”,一般是指在花粉高峰
校对:吴依兰
商务部网站
商务部公告2025年第27号 公布对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查
中华人民共和国商务部(以下简称商务部)于2025年7月23日收到江苏省半导体行业协会(以下称申请人)代表国内相关模拟芯片产业正式提交的反倾销调查申请,申请人请求对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片进行反倾销调查。商务部依据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》有关规定,对申请人资格、申请调查产品有关情况、中国同类产品有关情况、申请调查产品对国内产业影响、申请调查国家有关情况等进行了审查。
根据申请人提供的证据和商务部初步审查,申请人相关模拟芯片的合计产量符合《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》关于申请人资格的规定。同时,申请书中包含了《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第十四条、第十五条规定的反倾销调查立案所要求内容及有关证据。
根据上述审查结果,依据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第十六条的规定,商务部决定自2025年9月13日起对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片进行反倾销立案调查。现将有关事项公告如下:
一、立案调查及调查期
自本公告发布之日起,商务部对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片进行反倾销立案调查,本次调查确定的倾销调查期为2024年1月1日至2024年12月31日,产业损害调查期为2022年1月1日至2024年12月31日。
二、被调查产品及调查范围
调查范围:原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片。
被调查产品名称:相关模拟芯片。
英文名称:Certain Analog IC Chip。
产品描述和主要用途:相关模拟芯片中使用40nm及以上工艺制程的通用接口芯片(Commodity Interface IC Chip)和栅极驱动芯片(Gate Driver IC Chip)。
其中:
通用接口芯片是一种旨在提供多样化接口类型的集成电路芯片,用于连接各类设备、系统或组件,以实现高效的数据传输和信号转换。被调查的通用接口芯片包括:
1.符合ISO11898标准的控制器局域网(CAN,Controller Area Network)接口收发器芯片,用于汽车及其他工业产品中各系统之间信号的发送与接收;
2.符合TIA/EIA-485标准的RS485接口收发器芯片,用于工业系统中各类设备之间信号的发送与接收;
3.基于利用串行数据线和串行时钟线的低速串行总线方式制得的双向二线制同步串行总线(I2C)接口芯片,用于设备中的各类板卡或芯片之间的信号缓冲中继通道的切换与扩展;
4.符合国际电工委员会IEC 60747-5-2标准的数字隔离器芯片,用于汽车及其他工业产品中高低压系统之间的绝缘通信,或用于增强通信抗干扰性能;
5.其他同时兼容上述种类的通用接口芯片。
栅极驱动芯片是一种用于增强控制器的栅极控制信号输出、控制功率半导体器件的导通和截止的集成电路芯片。栅极驱动芯片提供必要的电压和电流水平,以有效地打开和关闭这些半导体开关,从而实现电能的转换和控制。被调查的栅极驱动芯片包括:
1.低边栅极驱动芯片(Low-Side Gate Driver IC Chip);
2.半桥/多路栅极驱动芯片(Half-Bridge/Multi-Channel Gate Driver IC Chip);
3.隔离栅极驱动芯片(Isolated Gate Driver IC Chip)。
被调查的栅极驱动芯片具备以下功能:1.将控制器的低压信号转化为更高电压或更大电流的驱动信号,以实现功率器件稳定导通和关断;2.提供瞬态的拉和灌电流,提高功率器件的开关速度,降低开关损耗。
被调查的通用接口芯片和栅极驱动芯片包括成品芯片及可用来生产相同功能芯片的晶圆、晶粒,以及未来发展具有相同功能的产品。
该产品归在《中华人民共和国进出口税则》:85423990。该税则号项下其他产品不在本次调查范围之内。
三、登记参加调查
利害关系方应于本公告发布之日起20天内,向商务部贸易救济调查局登记参加本次反倾销调查。参加调查的利害关系方应根据《登记参加调查的参考格式》提供基本身份信息、向中国出口或进口本案被调查产品的数量及金额、生产和销售同类产品的数量及金额以及关联情况等说明材料。《登记参加调查的参考格式》可在商务部网站贸易救济调查局子网站下载。
利害关系方登记参加本次反倾销调查,应通过“贸易救济调查信息化平台”(https://etrb.mofcom.gov.cn)提交电子版本,并根据商务部的要求,同时提交书面版本。电子版本和书面版本内容应相同,格式应保持一致。
本公告所称的利害关系方是指《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第十九条规定的个人和组织。
四、查阅公开信息
利害关系方可在商务部网站贸易救济调查局子网站下载或到商务部贸易救济公开信息查阅室(电话:0086-10-65197878)查找、阅览、抄录并复印本案申请人提交的申请书的非保密文本。调查过程中,利害关系方可通过商务部网站贸易救济调查局子网站查询案件公开信息,或到商务部贸易救济公开信息查阅室查找、阅览、抄录并复印案件公开信息。
五、对立案的评论
利害关系方对本次调查的产品范围及申请人资格、被调查国家及其他相关问题如需发表评论,可于本公告发布之日起20天内将书面意见提交至商务部贸易救济调查局。
六、调查方式
根据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第二十条的规定,商务部可以采用问卷、抽样、听证会、现场核查等方式向有关利害关系方了解情况,进行调查。
为获得本案调查所需要的信息,商务部通常在本公告规定的登记参加调查截止之日起10个工作日内向利害关系方发布调查问卷。利害关系方可以从商务部网站贸易救济调查局子网站下载调查问卷。
《相关模拟芯片反倾销案国外出口商或生产商调查问卷》询问信息包括公司的结构和运作、被调查产品、对中国的出口销售、国内销售、经营和财务等相关信息、生产成本和相关费用、估算的倾销幅度及核对单等内容。《相关模拟芯片反倾销案国内生产者调查问卷》询问信息包括公司基本情况、国内同类产品情况、经营和相关信息、财务和相关信息、其他需要说明的问题等内容。《相关模拟芯片反倾销案国内进口商调查问卷》询问信息包括公司基本情况、被调查产品贸易和相关信息等内容。
利害关系方应在规定时间内提交完整、准确的答卷。答卷应当包括调查问卷所要求的全部信息。
七、信息的提交和处理
利害关系方在调查过程中提交评论意见、答卷等,应通过“贸易救济调查信息化平台”(https://etrb.mofcom.gov.cn)提交电子版本,并根据商务部的要求,同时提交书面版本。电子版本和书面版本内容应相同,格式应保持一致。
利害关系方向商务部提交的信息如需保密,可向商务部提出对相关信息进行保密处理的请求并说明理由。如商务部同意其请求,申请保密的利害关系方应当同时提供该保密信息的非保密概要。非保密概要应当包含充分的有意义的信息,以使其他利害关系方对保密信息能有合理的理解。如不能提供非保密概要,应说明理由。如利害关系方提交的信息未说明需要保密,商务部将视该信息为公开信息。
八、不合作的后果
根据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第二十一条的规定,商务部进行调查时,利害关系方应当如实反映情况,提供有关资料。利害关系方不如实反映情况、提供有关资料的,或者没有在合理时间内提供必要信息的,或者以其他方式严重妨碍调查的,商务部可以根据已经获得的事实和可获得的最佳信息作出裁定。
九、调查期限
本次调查自2025年9月13日起开始,通常应在2026年9月13日前结束调查,特殊情况下可延长6个月。
十、商务部联系方式
地址:中国北京市东长安街2号
邮编:100731
商务部贸易救济调查局
电话:0086-10-65198182 85093415
传真:0086-10-65198172
相关网站:商务部网站贸易救济调查局子网站(http://trb.mofcom.gov.cn)
商务部
2025年9月13日
网络编辑:明非
她在妈妈的托举下走出家门,看到更广阔的世界,而妈妈依旧困在老家的一方天地里,不知道生活还有另外一种可能。
“男孩会被爸爸认为是血脉相连的人,而女儿跟母亲的处境会更相似,更能理解和同情母亲。”
第三次离婚签字前,母亲想放弃,觉得忍一忍也能凑合过。“我说不行呀,这次一定要赢,不然我们之前的努力算什么?”
南方周末记者 吴小飞 南方周末实习生 黄诗韵 劳施琦
责任编辑:谭畅
没有女儿的帮助,她们很难离婚。农健|插画
“结婚证只需半天办成,离婚证却需要我、妈妈、弟弟三个人各去掉半条命。现在妈妈离婚了,这个过程太辛苦了,从被死亡威胁到报警、找律师申请人身安全保护令再到法院调解,曾经和蔼可亲的亲人一个个变得面目可憎……恭喜我们逃出生天。”2025年3月,帮助母亲逃离父亲后,福建女孩陆萤在社交平台记录了这段经历。
像陆萤这样向外界分享“救赎母亲”经历的女孩,这两年越来越多。受访的几名女孩均于2000年前后出生在南方农村,接受过高等教育。孩童时期感受到难以名状的异样家庭环境,在成年之后逐步清晰:父亲的缺位、母亲的困境、至亲间难以弥合的裂痕。
面对父母的婚姻,女孩很难把自己当旁观者,似乎自小就埋下的救赎母亲的种子,在长大之后茁壮生长。在她们看来,父亲似乎成为了家庭不幸的源头,而远离他成为一切问题的解法。
父母离婚后,有女孩和父亲断绝来往,或成为只在节庆联系的“熟悉的陌生人”,也有女孩夹在父母之间左右为难。南方周末采访的几位女孩,带着帮助更多处于困境中女性的初心分享自己的故事,但拒绝向媒体提供父亲的联系方式。她们觉得,父女之间很难沟通这个话题,也担心自己的行为不被认同,遭到指责或报复。
2025年春节刚过,陆萤母亲又被丈夫骂了。她下定决心要离婚。
剧烈的内心冲击发生在春节前,当时家族中一位已经有孙子的老年女性,因为不堪丈夫长期家暴而成功离婚,母亲内心那“不可逾越的藩篱”终于坍塌。
2024年5月,一天夜里12点多,还在加班的陆萤突然接到母亲的电话。“那个男的(指陆萤父亲)又打她了,她被赶出家门,身上什么都没带,让我帮忙联系人临时住一下。第二天我看到她的手臂、大腿和后背上都是淤青。”陆萤回忆。
当时,母亲首次向陆萤郑重表达要离婚的想法。陆萤和弟弟带母亲验伤、调监控,准备帮母亲打官司。但因为自己忙于工作,且对起诉离婚的流程并不了解,这事最终不了了之。这一次,当母亲再次表明离婚决心时,陆萤立即放下手上的一切,全力配合母亲。
海南女孩胡雯的父母,也在2025年春节为琐事争吵。胡雯妈妈认为,是因为自己没给丈夫生下儿子,婆家才非常不满,而两人迥异的性格和征地的意外财富,都成了家庭矛盾的催化剂。每一次冲突中,胡雯妈妈似乎总是那个挨打的人。
趁着父亲不备,胡雯带着妈妈和两个妹妹匆匆躲去姨妈家。收拾行李时,胡雯问妈妈,“为什么不离婚?你不怕他打死你吗?”她还告诉妈妈,“小时候每次看到你们吵,我都很难受,很想你们分开,但没有能力。我现在大了,我感觉你们分开还幸福一点。”
对离婚一直犹豫的胡雯妈妈,被女儿挂着眼泪的诘问和劝说怔住。她突然意识到,自以为对孩子好而苦苦维持的婚姻,实际上早就伤害了她们。稍微平静之后,她同意离婚。
广西女孩李可的妈妈没有遭遇家暴,但对丈夫也攒够了失望。她指责丈夫懒惰、爱赌博,缺乏对事业和家庭的责任感。李可想起小时候曾经替父亲挽回离开的母亲,心里满是内疚。
2024年夏季,李可爸爸为了一两万元把银行卡卖给不法分子,因涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪被拘。李可妈妈到处求人,差点花光家中积蓄。
“他爱赌博,以前没少给他擦屁股,以后还不知道会怎么样拖累我们,离婚了起码不用替他背债。”考虑到子女前途,李可妈妈终于下定决心,要跟丈夫尽快切割。
没有女儿的帮助,她们很难离婚,这是所有受访妈妈的共识。李可妈妈觉得,女儿的支持不仅指认同她的离婚决定,更是发现一直在隐忍坚持保护孩子的自己,突然有了一个依靠。她可以跟女儿说心里的烦恼和苦闷,遇到事情可以同女儿商量,并且坚信女儿会维护自己。
“女儿长大后懂了很多道理,很多事情她一说
校对:吴依兰
网传深圳西北角的荒地上藏着最大的共享单车坟场,深圳官方辟谣,称深圳市目前未发现有视频相关单车坟场。
7月起一则视频在互联网上传播,称深圳西北角的一片荒地,成为了数十万辆共享单车的坟场。
深圳网信办指导、深圳新闻网运营的官方微信号“深圳网络辟谣”星期六(9月13日)发文称,这一视频内容为谣言,经全市核实,深圳市目前未发现有视频相关单车坟场。
深圳在2018年曾被爆出,龙岗区怡美苗圃场、安托山公园等地,曾存放大量“僵尸”共享单车。
香港下周将公布新一份《施政报告》,多个政党呼吁政府派发消费券,但香港总商会主席陈瑞娟指,消费券属冠病疫情期间的非常措施,现今香港政府财政状况并不适宜再派发消费券。
据网媒香港01报道,香港政府下个星期三(9月17日)将公布新一份政府施政报告,多个政党提出重推消费券吸引市民留港消费。经民联主席卢伟国、自由党主席邵家辉及民建联副主席周浩鼎星期六(9月13日)出席香港电台《星期六问责》节目时,均支持重推消费券,吸引市民留港消费。
他们也认同,考虑到政府面对财政赤字,需要有条件地派发。邵家辉建议参考澳门做法,在店铺消费一定金额才可使用消费券,发挥放大作用。
但港总商会主席陈瑞娟星期六于有线新闻节目《有理有得倾》表示,消费券并非提升消费意欲的长远方法,政府要推动经济须寻找问题根源,提出更长远的措施。例如增加国际活动或帮助商户消费转型,令旅客来港不只是打卡、追景点。她又说,政府于2021至23年间派发三次消费券,涉及金额逾千亿,认为目前政府财政状况不适宜再推行有关措施。
香港政府曾在2021年至2023年推行电子消费券计划,其中2021年与2023年金额均为5000元(港币,下同,约825.7新元),2022年则为1万元。消费券适用范围涵盖本地零售、餐饮及乘搭交通工具。
香港政府强调消费券对刺激零售市道与提振经济有明显效果,也有研究指其催化了本地电子支付应用,但消费税涉及庞大行政费,三年总计逾10亿元,受到质疑。
据政客新闻网欧洲版报导称,欧盟委员会正在提出一项新方案,即如何将冻结的数十亿欧元俄罗斯资产转至乌克兰,即用欧盟支持的欠条(IOU)替换转移到基辅的资金。
欧盟委员会正试图解决自俄乌战争爆发以来最棘手的问题之一——西方国家可以夺取俄罗斯央行被冻结资产产生的利息,但无法使用被冻结的巨额资金,而这将对乌克兰的自卫和重建能力产生重大影响。
一位官员称这项新提案“在法律上颇具创意”,可为乌方的战争努力释放大量额外资金,而无需从技术上没收俄罗斯主权资产本身,因为后者在法律上存在风险。
据四位了解情况的官员透露,欧盟委员会代表周四在布鲁塞尔闭门会议上向各国副财长提出了这一想法。该提议获得了谨慎的热情,但并未达成任何协议或承诺。一位官员表示,正式提案可能很快就会出台。
俄军于2022年2月全面入侵乌克兰后,约2000亿欧元的俄央行资产被欧盟冻结。这些资产大部分由总部位于布鲁塞尔的金融机构——欧洲清算银行(Euroclear)持有。
由于乌克兰明年面临预计80亿欧元的预算缺口,欧盟国家正讨论在国内预算紧缩的情况下继续为这个饱受战争蹂躏的国家提供资金的新方案。
欧盟委员会认为,通过将这笔现金兑换成零息短期欧盟债券,可以避免被指控扣押这笔资金。官员们指出,这一想法尚未获得批准,其他利用俄罗斯资产的方案也在考虑之中。
欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩(Ursula von der Leyen)在周三的“盟情咨文”演讲中表示,只有在莫斯科向乌克兰支付战争赔款后,乌克兰才会偿还这笔贷款。
根据其规定,欧洲清算银行持有的任何到期资产都必须转入欧洲央行的存款账户,该账户将从持有的现金中获得利息。迄今为止,欧盟一直利用产生的利息偿还其在七国集团(G7)向乌克兰提供的450亿欧元贷款中的份额,这笔贷款即将全部还清。
鉴于乌克兰方面的资金即将耗尽,欧盟委员会建议利用其在欧洲央行的现金存款,为“赔款贷款”提供资金,以帮助这个饱受战争蹂躏的国家在未来几年里渡过难关。
冯德莱恩周三在欧洲议会发表的“盟情咨文”讲话中提到,“只有在俄罗斯支付赔款后,乌克兰才会偿还贷款。这笔钱今天就能帮助乌克兰”。但她当时并没有透露太多细节。
为了安抚欧洲清算银行,欧盟委员会建议将与这些资产挂钩的现金存款与欧盟国家共同担保的零息债券进行交易。该计划生效前仍存在诸多障碍,尤其是国家担保需要一致同意。
比利时政府和欧洲清算银行已多次警告称,使用被冻结的俄央行资产发放贷款可能会带来法律麻烦。
Thousands have gathered in central London for a march organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson, with a counter protest by anti-racism campaigners also taking place.
Some 1,000 officers have been assigned to the demonstrations, the Metropolitan Police said, with barriers in place to create a "sterile area" between the two groups.
"Today London stands tall in defence of one of our most vital rights – free speech," Robinson wrote on X.
The streets were a sea of union jacks, St George's crosses, Scottish saltires and Welsh flags as large crowds of protesters amassed near Waterloo Bridge ahead of the 'Unite the Kingdom' march towards Whitehall.
The Met said it had borrowed 500 officers from other forces for the day, with police vans from Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Devon and Cornwall.
There were a mix of slogans on the flags including 'Stop the Boats', 'Send them Home' and 'Unite the Kingdom,' and anti-transgender activists are among the crowds.
One man carried a large wooden cross with 'RIP Charlie Kirk' written on it - the right-wing US activist shot dead on Wednesday while speaking at a university.
The rally is set to include speeches from US President Donald Trump's former strategist Steve Bannon and presenter Katie Hopkins.
Elsewhere, around 500 people gathered near Russell Square for the 'March Against Fascism' counter protest organised by Stand up to Racism (SUTR).
Demonstrators held placards reading 'Women Against the Far Right,' 'Oppose Tommy Robinson,' and 'Refugees Welcome'.
The group will also march toward Parliament Square - only a few hundred metres from the Unite the Kingdom rally. Speeches are expected by MPs Diane Abbott and Zarah Sultana.
Ahead of the march, the Met confirmed it would not be using live facial recognition - which captures people's faces in real-time CCTV cameras - in its policing of the Unite the Kingdom march.
It also said there were "particular concerns" among some in London's Muslim communities ahead of Robinson's protest, citing a "record of anti-Muslim rhetoric and incidents of offensive chanting by a minority at previous marches".
Cdr Clair Haynes urged Muslim Londoners not to change their plans or avoid central London, but to approach a police officer should they feel concerned while out in public.
She said: "Officers will take a firm line on behaviour that is discriminatory or that crosses the line from protest into hate crime."
She added that police would act "without fear or favour" and asked demonstrators to "be considerate of the communities they are passing through".
"What a week. What a mess." A senior Labour MP is not the only one in disbelief at the latest - you couldn't make it up - mishap for this government.
How Downing Street handled revelations about Lord Mandelson's friendship with the wealthy paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was the first test of the new senior team in No 10.
The uncharitable view is they flunked it by not acting quickly enough – putting the prime minister's face on the calamity by sending him into the bearpit of Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) with a staunch defence of his man in Washington.
They knew there were new allegations about his relationship with Epstein. The direction of travel seemed set - and Mandelson would likely have to go.
The even more uncomfortable factor is that last week the prime minister defended another colleague, Angela Rayner, when - you guessed it - the direction of travel in Westminster seemed set, and she would likely have to go.
It's undermined the prime minister's own authority and blown the chance of a quick autumn reset for Labour, when the party was desperately trying to turn the page.
The more generous argument made by Sir Keir's allies - he's been let down by two different people in two different ways, and has had to front up to clean up their different messes.
"Keir is frustrated and a bit angry because he is having to deal with the conduct of others, rather than show what he is trying to do," one source says.
Another says: "He hired someone who didn't tell him the full truth."
No 10 doesn't imagine that the damage of the last fortnight of farce is limited to those who have departed government.
And as they absorb the scale of the embarrassment over Mandelson's friendship with Epstein, new details over who knew what - and when - are emerging all the time.
Westminster sources have suggested the prime minister himself had raised questions about Mandelson's links with Epstein during an initial vetting process carried out by the Cabinet Office before he was given the job.
But then he was checked out again by the Foreign Office once he'd been appointed.
Even before Labour won the election in 2024 there had been a desire in Sir Keir's circle to look beyond the traditional diplomatic appointment for their ambassador to the White House, one of the government's plum jobs.
They had noted how the former Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, was sent to DC and determined that a politician could be the right choice.
With his experience as a trade commissioner, an impressive spider's web of contacts, and respected political nous, Mandelson was soon determined to be an excellent potential fit.
Sir Keir's powerful chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, believed there were only two qualified candidates for the role, and was enthusiastic about Mandelson.
Before the final decision was made last autumn, the Cabinet Office was asked, as it would be for any such candidate, to consider whether he was fit to be offered the job.
Already at that stage it was no secret Mandelson had been friends with Epstein, so it was obvious those links would need to be considered.
I'm told a file on Mandelson from the Cabinet Office's Propriety and Ethics Team (PET), whose job it is to know where the bodies are buried in Whitehall, was presented to the prime minister that included information about his relationship with the disgraced millionaire.
On reading this file, Sir Keir had three questions he wanted to clarify with the peer, a No 10 source tells me: Why had he continued his friendship with Epstein after he was first convicted and not broken contact with him?
Why had he stayed at one of Epstein's houses when the financier was in jail?
And was he a "founding citizen" of an ocean conservation charity that Epstein had backed?
That trio of questions was put to Mandelson in an email from Sir Keir's chief of staff McSweeney on his behalf.
The peer, I'm told, replied to those questions in an email in which Downing Street sources now say he was "economical with the truth".
It's understood Mandelson believes that he was truthful and frank about his association with Epstein, and told No 10 that he had not stayed in Epstein's Manhattan apartment in 2009 while Epstein was in prison. Another source confirmed that he told Downing Street he had not stayed there.
Court documents revealed in 2023 Epstein told his private banker that Mandelson would be staying at the property. Mandelson has never explicitly denied or confirmed he did, although it has been reported that he had no recollection of doing so.
It's worth noting that none of those issues - the possible house stay, the charity, or the continued friendship - were discovered during the vetting process. They had been reported in previous years.
But the guarantees relayed to the prime minister by Mandelson were considered sufficient to be worth the gamble of giving him the job.
Once the appointment was then made, sources suggest the "developed vetting" process then kicked in, under the auspices of the Foreign Office.
The normal process for government appointments is dependent on the job being given and the sensitivity of the material and information to be handled.
But there is scarcely a job with a higher level of trust required than the White House ambassador, given the two countries' links on security, defence, trade and intelligence.
I'm told nothing was flagged to No 10 as a result of the DV process, which would have involved an in-person interview which in this case, "ought to have been completely forensic, but they must have used the wrong lens," according to another senior figure.
Unlike the PET file, Downing Street would not receive the results of such a process as a matter of course, even in an extremely high-profile appointment. The DV process is a standalone routine.
And Downing Street sources insist that they weren't made aware of any problems, so everything went ahead.
The upshot? Even though there were two different processes checking out Mandelson's background, which publicly was known to include dealings with a notorious wealthy sex offender, neither appear to have turned up anything major - nor the now notorious emails which investigative reporters were able to locate recently.
One Whitehall insider told me it was "staggering - either they skipped the process of any basic due diligence, or they did that process and missed the obvious questions".
"No one involved in making the appointment cared enough to check whether all the risk had been identified in appointing a man who had twice previously had to resign over his judgement. Careless doesn't cover it."
The government has repeatedly said this week that part of the problem was the messages between Mandelson and Epstein were from a defunct email address.
Yet a senior Whitehall figure tells me it would have been possible to locate those messages had more questions been asked, and forensic background digging been done.
Neither Downing Street nor the Cabinet Office wanted to comment. The BBC approached the Foreign Office which has not responded.
Until this week, it seemed No 10's calculated risk of appointing Mandelson was paying off.
Not just because US President Donald Trump appeared to enjoy his company, praising his "beautiful accent" on camera recently in the Oval Office, but also because the UK had got its trade deal.
The state visit was all about to unfold in its pomp and glory. Sir Keir appeared, unlike many other global leaders, to have managed to build a warm and functional relationship with the most powerful man in the western world.
All of that, at least partly down to the smooth talking and politicking of the ambassador.
What he and No 10 were enjoying as a successful tenure was to be suddenly disrupted when the peer featured in what's known as the Epstein "birthday book". It features a cosy message - Mandelson branding Epstein his "best pal", and a photograph of the two in which Mandelson is wearing a bathrobe.
And what was to prove more serious, reporters at the news agency Bloomberg managed to get hold of a cache of Epstein's emails, which included his communications with Mandelson over months and years.
In an attempt to get ahead of the story, Mandelson predicted that a whole slew of contact between the two was about to emerge into public view - and he described the revelations to The Sun as "very embarrassing". This sent alarm bells clanging back in Whitehall.
He hadn't shared the contents of the emails with Downing Street and had been "dismissive, claiming there was nothing new" in the stories emerging about his friendship with Epstein earlier in the week, sources suggest.
But, by late on Tuesday, the government was aware that more damaging allegations were coming, and contacted the peer to ask what was going on.
On Wednesday morning, Mandelson's prediction of there being more to come was first reported, just as, in the normal routine, No 10 was planning the day and preparing the prime minister for his weekly PMQs bout in the Commons.
At noon, before government had heard back from Lord Mandelson, the prime minister gave a staunch public defence of him in a move that now looks foolhardy.
But when Mandelson did reply after PMQ's, the government didn't think his answers were good enough.
The prime minister's chief of staff McSweeney was called out of a meeting in a secure room in Whitehall where mobile communications are forbidden.
Sources suggest the decision was made soon after to ask Mandelson to resign.
He refused, trying to "brazen it out" - sources suggest he kept "telling everyone it would be fine".
On Wednesday No 10 was also trying to weigh up the impact of losing the ambassador on the crucial state visit of the US president, just days away, and also what the legal ramifications would be of forcing Mandelson out.
But later on Wednesday night, the full extent of those emails were published by Bloomberg, and the prime minister read the exchanges in all their gory glory.
"Keir was furious," I'm told, and on Thursday morning, he made the formal decision with the foreign secretary that if Labour's veteran fixer wouldn't go on his own accord, he'd be sacked.
On Friday the prime minister was working at his country retreat, Chequers, mulling over his conference speech for which Sir Keir has "picked up the pen", in a more proactive way than in times gone by, aware this is a moment when the pressure to lift the mood and show his worth is intense.
After a first year in office that disappointed many in the Labour Party, and left them in the polling doldrums, his big moment on the podium at conference was already set to be a high-wire act.
After this chaotic fortnight, it's "fortuitous we are heading to conference and we can grab the mic," one insider said.
Another senior figure told me: "I don't see problems that aren't fixable."
But when it comes to Lord Mandelson, the clamour may take some time to fade. "This isn't over – No 10 is in total denial," a party insider said.
A different prominent source told me the Mandelson mess "is just another big misstep".
Alongside Sir Keir, there is also growing disquiet about the prime minister's chief of staff McSweeney.
It's no secret he was keen to appoint Mandelson, even though he and the prime minister did have questions about his relationship with Epstein.
But sources dispute he was trying save the US ambassador from his fate this week.
It's said he agreed on Wednesday lunchtime Mandelson had to go, before travelling to Brussels for meetings, leaving him out of the country when the final call to sack him was made.
When politicians are down, powerful staffers often become a target.
Opposition politicians and critics on the inside can even appear to enjoy the hunt for someone to blame.
However, McSweeney is central to Sir Keir's leadership.
"If there's no Morgan, there's no Starmer," one senior Labour figure said, warning MPs warming up to point the finger to be careful about where it all might lead.
After a dreadful start of what should have been a shiny new political season, one cabinet minister says in sorrow: "We have made the right big strategic calls, but there is just no way that we should be in this position after a year."
But others believe all is not lost. Just as Labour slumped in popularity at breakneck speed after winning the election, senior figures suggest their fortunes could improve dramatically quickly too.
Volatility in politics can be governments' enemy, but also potentially be their friend.
Yet right now, it's hard to see where Labour can find much comfort.
There is little option but to keep going, to focus on what insiders characterise as "good announcements" coming in the next few weeks, presenting a huge opportunity for the prime minister to shift the dial and boost the party's confidence.
But one minister joked after a shocking fortnight for the government: "I keep thinking maybe it's all a very detailed dream and I'll wake up."
"But then no, this is reality, and we just have to get on with it." They certainly do.
Lead photo image: Alberto Pezzali/Pool via REUTERS, Ben Pruchnie/Getty Images
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
Israeli forces have stepped up their assault on Gaza City with a wave of heavy air strikes, marking a sharp escalation from previous military operations.
Unlike earlier phases of the war, the current offensive has relied heavily on aerial bombardments, with entire apartment blocks and large concrete structures reduced to rubble.
The intensification of strikes in recent days has triggered a surge in civilian displacement.
Israel has warned all residents of Gaza City to leave immediately in anticipation of a huge ground offensive.
On Sunday, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said about 250,000 people had left the city and moved south. It also said it had destroyed a high-rise building that it said had been used "to advance and execute terrorist attacks" against its troops.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the city is Hamas's last major stronghold. But the plan to occupy Gaza City has brought international criticism.
The UN has warned an intensification of the offensive on an area where a famine has already been declared will push civilians into an "even deeper catastrophe". Gaza City is the largest urban centre in the territory and a historic heart of Palestinian political and social life.
Residents say the Israeli military has been targeting schools and makeshift shelters, often issuing warnings only moments before bombardments.
Many families have been forced to flee in darkness toward western Gaza.
"We escaped certain death, my husband, our three children and I," said Saly Tafeesh, a mother sheltering in the city. "My brother died in my arms after being shot by a quadcopter drone. We ran in the dark to the west of Gaza."
The Israeli military has told residents to evacuate to the south of the territory - but many families say they cannot afford the journey, which costs up to $1,100 (£800). Hamas, meanwhile, has intensified its calls for residents to stay put and resist leaving the city.
Rubein Khaled, a father-of-nine preparing to move south, expressed frustration.
"The Hamas preacher at Friday prayers accused anyone leaving Gaza City of being a coward running from the battlefield," he said.
"But why doesn't he tell Hamas leaders to surrender and release the Israeli hostages so this war can stop? We don't want to leave either, but we have no choice."
Israeli forces have not yet reached some eastern neighbourhoods that have remained largely intact since earlier raids in January, but the current campaign suggests they may now be seeking to dismantle entire districts.
Meanwhile, a Qatari foreign ministry spokesman strongly criticised Israel's prime minister in an interview with the BBC following this week's Israeli strike on Hamas officials in the Qatari capital Doha.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari told the BBC that the international community had "to deal with a Netanyahu problem".
"He is not somebody who is listening to anybody right now, who is listening to any reason, and we have to collectively stop him in his tracks," the official said.
He argued the strike in Doha showed the Israeli leader "never intended to sign any peace deal" to end the war in Gaza and instead "believes he can re-shape the Middle East in his own image".
Five of the group's members and a Qatari security officer were killed in Tuesday's strike - though the Palestinian armed group claimed no senior leaders had been killed. Hamas members had been in Doha to discuss the latest US proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza.
Israel has faced widespread condemnation, including at the UN Security Council. Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel targeted the "terrorist masterminds" behind the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel.
Qatar's Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani earlier said that Qatar did not get advance warning of the strike, only receiving a call from a US official 10 minutes after the attack had started.
On Friday, al-Thani had dinner with US President Donald Trump and his envoy Steve Witkoff in New York, having earlier met Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House.
Rubio is travelling to Israel this weekend in a show of solidarity with Israel ahead of a UN meeting later this month at which France and the UK are expected to formally recognise a Palestinian state.
On Sunday, the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza said the bodies of 47 people killed by the Israeli military had arrived at its hospitals over the previous day.
Since UN-backed global food security experts confirmed a famine in Gaza City on 22 August, the ministry has reported that at least 142 people have died from starvation and malnutrition across the territory. Israel has said it is expanding its efforts to facilitate aid deliveries and has disputed the health ministry's figures on malnutrition-related deaths.
The Israeli military launched its campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
At least 64,803 people have been killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry.
Scott Sperry jotted his name down on a sign-up sheet.
The 22-year-old student at Utah Valley University had watched Charlie Kirk's videos for years and credits the conservative firebrand with being a catalyst in his own political involvement.
Now, on this Thursday afternoon, moments before his political hero was about to speak on campus, Sperry thought it was time for him to pay it forward by joining his school's chapter of Turning Point USA - the organisation Kirk co-founded in 2012 to advocate for conservatism on college campuses.
Moments after taking his front-row seat to see Kirk speak, Sperry watched in shock as a sniper bullet rang out and blood started pouring from Kirk's neck. The images, he said, he still can't shake, but he thinks the loss will only strengthen the movement Kirk inspired him to join.
"When you try to silence a voice like this, they don't go away - you only amplify it," sophomore Scott Sperry said. "There are now going to be a million Charlie Kirks, and I feel like that's the thing that we need to do."
As the immediate shock of the attack calms, some at Utah Valley University said it has been replaced with a deep sense of resolve to continue what Kirk began.
Students with various political ideologies - including those vehemently opposed to Kirk's beliefs - told the BBC they've felt a personal sense of responsibility to ensure healthy debates on college campuses continue.
With branches at more than 850 colleges, Turning Point USA - which Kirk co-founded when he was just 18 - has been credited with helping galvanise younger voters and helping Donald Trump win the White House.
Kirk, who had millions of followers online, would often tour college campuses across the country to debate issues like gender, race, gun control and immigration. His views - and his confrontational style - often drew criticism from the left and attracted protestors to his on-campus events.
At a speaking event at San Francisco State University last spring, one student called him a "rage baiter" while others accused him of using real-life students as "click-bait" - he often posted his heated arguments with liberals online, where the exchanges would go viral.
The killing has thrown Utah Valley University into the centre of America's political divide. Soon after Kirk was shot, some who disagreed with him took to social media to blame Kirk, who has openly supported gun ownership. On the right, pundits and politicians said that conservatives were under attack by the "radical left".
The spotlight has made some students feel the need to step into the ideological fray.
"This is the first political thing we've ever done. We're not political like this," freshman McKinley Shinkle said, while waving signs with his cousin on campus that called Kirk a hero and said they aren't afraid.
"This happening on our campus and then seeing people who are supporting the shooting - it just kind of radicalised us," he added, nothing they're both planning to continue political involvement. "It's changed everything."
Nestled in a valley surrounded by towering mountains, Utah Valley is the biggest university in the state. It sits on a hill, overlooking a crisp blue lake and a 218-feet-tall granite temple for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The state, which is also a conservative stronghold, has the largest concentration of Mormons in the US and religion plays a leading role in this community.
Many have expressed confusion about why Kirk was targeted here. Ben Forster, a sophomore, noted how Kirk often stopped in much more liberal-leaning areas where he could have been more of a target.
"This is now where his martyrdom was established," he said, reflecting on his school. "I mean, that is what martyrdom is: He was killed at a debate."
Despite not agreeing with Kirk's stances, Forster attended Wednesday's event in Utah to watch the spectacle and hear the varying viewpoints - something he hopes won't halt at his school and others after the attack.
"I don't care about what his opinions were," he said. "He was exercising his right in a public forum to talk and discuss - and that is a good thing."
The signs of what happened here are everywhere you look near campus.
Law enforcement blocking entrances, makeshift memorials with candles and flowers, signs in apartment windows and on roads declaring Kirk a hero after he was gunned down in front of thousands during one of his signature college campus debates.
Some students told the BBC they've been leaning on one another in the aftermath - with some discussing what happens next. It's clear part of that future will include a political awakening for some on campus.
Several students made defiant posters, hanging them in their apartment windows with messages reading, "freedom" and "you can't kill the truth". A campaign-style merch display near campus is selling Trump hats and flags. All day and all night, people drive through the traffic circle entrance to campus, beeping their horns - either supporting or in opposition to Kirk.
Jeb Jacobi, a sophomore, has been involved with the school's Turning Point USA chapter for years and was volunteering at Wednesday's event - the first stop on Kirk's planned 15-site "American Comeback Tour" of college campuses.
He got involved after becoming a fan of Kirk's trademark debates on campuses.
"I just liked that he really made people think," he said. "No matter your politics, he would get so many young people involved and intrigued. He provided a path for people to get involved."
"Something like this - it's only going to really help what Charlie was doing," Jacobi added, saying he believes the number of people involved in the school's Turning Point USA chapter will balloon.
One of those new additions: Sperry.
"We're going to lead the way," he said. "We owe it to Charlie."
The first deportation flights of migrants under the UK's new returns deal with France are expected to begin next week, the BBC understands.
The 'one in, one out' pilot scheme was set up as part of a deal announced by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron during his state visit to the UK in July.
Dozens of migrants were detained in Dover last month under the agreement and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said this week that they are are expected to be returned to France "imminently".
It is understood that formal removal directions have been issued to asylum seekers to say they will be deported to France within five days.
In return, it was agreed that the UK will accept an equal number of asylum seekers who have not tried to cross and can pass security and eligibility checks.
At the announcement in early July, Starmer said the plan was a "product of months of grown-up diplomacy" which would "deliver real results".
Critics, including the Conservatives, argue the policy would prove "unworkable and wide open to abuse".
It is also understood that MPs will get a chance to question new Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood on the deal during Home Office questions in Parliament on Monday.
As of 8 September, 30,164 people had crossed the Channel in small boats in 2025, up from 22,440 for the same period in 2024.
Under the new treaty, published on 4 August, France agreed to take back adults or accompanied children who make a journey to the UK by small boat, once any asylum claim is withdrawn or declared inadmissible.
Both countries have agreed to work towards making transfers with three months after small boat arrivals have entered the UK.
Former home secretary Yvette Cooper stressed the scheme starting up was a trial.
Details of how people will apply to come to the UK from France under the treaty have also been published by the government.
Successful applicants will initially be granted the right to come to the UK for three months, to "consider how to regularise their stay".
Applicants will apply online – but have to submit proof to the Home Office they are applying from within France.
The UK has agreed to pay the transportation costs both of those migrants it sends to France, and those it accepts back in return.
The policy is part of a number of measures unveiled by the Labour government in an attempt to tackle the small boats crossings from France.
In July, it announced that 25 people including gang leaders and small boat suppliers had had their assets frozen and been banned from travelling to the UK.
An extra 300 National Crime Agency officers will target the people-smugglers arranging the crossings, and a new Border Security Command body will work closely with the Home office, police, immigration enforcement and intelligence agencies.
The UK is also paying France almost £500m over three years - as agreed by the previous Conservative government - to fund extra officers on the French coast.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.