Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

The bicentenary of Frederic Edwin Church: 1857-77

Two centuries ago today, on 4 May 1826, Frederic Edwin Church was born in Hartford, CT. As one of the founding American masters, he has a pivotal place in the history of painting in North America, and is one of the great nineteenth century landscape painters. Inspired by Alexander von Humboldt’s account of central America, Church travelled to Columbia and Ecuador in 1853, and returned to depict their ‘physiognomy’ in grand landscape paintings. He went back to central America in 1857 to build on his earlier success.

churchcathedralchilloecuador
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Cathedral, Chillo, Ecuador (24 June 1857), brush and oil paint on cardboard, 16.7 x 29.2 cm, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

Church painted this oil sketch of the cathedral in Chillo, Ecuador, on 24 June 1857. As with most of his oil sketches, it’s small and made on cardboard, which was cheap and portable but not intended to last the years.

1917-4-1296-a 001
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Drawing, Mount Chimborazo, Ecuador (1857), brush and oil paint, traces of graphite on thin paperboard, 23 x 44.4 cm, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

His larger oil sketch of Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador is rich in painstaking detail for a study never intended to be viewed by others. In comparison to his studio works, though, it’s full of fine gestural marks with some quite painterly passages.

churchmountainsmoonlight
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Drawing, Colombia or Ecuador, mountains, moonlight (1853/1857), brush and oil, pencil on cardboard with gray-brown background, 22.7 x 28.4 cm, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

He may have painted this atmospheric view of mountains in the moonlight during either of his visits to Colombia and Ecuador.

On 29 April 1859, the first of more than twelve thousand people walked into the Studio Building on West 10th Street in New York City, to stand in awe and amazement in front of Church’s huge Heart of the Andes (1859). For many, its dramatic view of a densely-vegetated plain with its backdrop of snow-capped mountains wasn’t its most impressive feature: it was the painting’s meticulous, almost overwhelming detail.

Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Heart of the Andes (1859), oil on canvas, 168 x 302.9 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Heart of the Andes (1859), oil on canvas, 168 x 302.9 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

Tucked away among the brightly-coloured birds and rich plant life, at the very heart of The Heart of the Andes, is a cross, with two figures by it. Dressed as locals, one sits, facing the cross, while the other stands just behind the seated figure and looking in the same direction. The cross is made simply of wood, and appears to have been decorated with a floral garland. It’s partly obscured by the luxuriant wayside plants.

Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Heart of the Andes (detail) (1859), oil on canvas, 168 x 302.9 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Heart of the Andes (detail) (1859), oil on canvas, 168 x 302.9 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

Over its five square metres of canvas, these are the only visible humans.

churchheartofandesd2
Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Heart of the Andes (detail) (1859), oil on canvas, 168 x 302.9 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

They’re part of a complex passage. The cross stands just off a path winding its way past a dead tree-trunk, seen at the left here, on which the artist has ‘carved’ the year and his name. The path then curves to the left, along the bottom of a small gully, where it disappears into the trees and undergrowth.

On the other side of the river, to the right, is a small mission-like settlement. Facing the viewer is the tower and broad frontage of a church, with its large double wooden doors. Beyond and around is the enormity of nature: open plain with scattered trees, then rising ground to the first hills, and many miles distant the soaring white peaks of the Andes proper.

Viewers were recommended to bring opera glasses in order to see these details through the crowd. Jennifer Raab argues this is a different way of seeing, as demanded by the painting, and it evoked literary responses from the likes of Mark Twain and critics.

Church was friends with Isaac Israel Hayes, a noted Arctic explorer, and once the artist had enjoyed the success of The Heart of the Andes he travelled with another friend, Louis Legrand Noble, to Newfoundland and Labrador to build himself a library of drawings and sketches for his next spectacular painting.

Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Icebergs (1861), oil on canvas, 163.8 x 285.8 cm, Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), The Icebergs (1861), oil on canvas, 163.8 x 285.8 cm, Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX. Wikimedia Commons.

Church’s The Icebergs (1861) was ill-fated, though. Its solo exhibition opened just twelve days after the start of the Civil War. Then titled The North, it lacks the human glimpses and intricate details of nature that made The Heart of the Andes such a success. The broken mast now seen in the foreground was a later addition made by Church in an attempt to improve its popular appeal.

Frederic Edwin Church, Our Banner in the Sky (1861), oil on paper, 19.1 x 28.6 cm, Smithsonian Institute, Washington DC. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church, Our Banner in the Sky (1861), oil on paper, 19.1 x 28.6 cm, Smithsonian Institute, Washington DC. Wikimedia Commons.

With the Civil War in progress, Church’s more successful response was Our Banner in the Sky (1861), which was turned into a lithograph, with prints being sold to benefit the families of Union soldiers.

churchrainyseasontropics
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Rainy Season in the Tropics (1866), oil on canvas, 142.9 x 214 cm, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Wikimedia Commons.

Church continued to paint finished works based on his earlier studies in front of the motif. Rainy Season in the Tropics from 1866 features a faithful depiction of a double rainbow, and again added human interest. Splashing through a rocky stream is a small train of pack animals with two drivers, who have paused for a moment to adjust a load, as shown in the detail below.

churchrainyseasontropicsd1
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Rainy Season in the Tropics (detail) (1866), oil on canvas, 142.9 x 214 cm, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Wikimedia Commons.
churchpichincha
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Pichincha (1867), oil on canvas, 78.8 x 122.5 cm,, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA. Wikimedia Commons.

Spanning much of the foreground of Church’s Pichincha (1867) is a suspended bridge, one end glowing in the early morning light. Just over half way across, a woman wearing a brilliant red blouse is riding side-saddle on a mule, which is picking its way slowly across the thin logs forming the walkway. At the left end is another mounted figure, who has just completed that terrifying crossing.

churchpichinchad1
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Pichincha (detail) (1867), oil on canvas, 78.8 x 122.5 cm,, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA. Wikimedia Commons.

Late that year, Church and his family set off on his longest journey, although much of it was undertaken in less arduous conditions than he had experienced in Ecuador. They travelled to Europe, then on to Egypt, Jaffa and to stay in Beirut. In February 1868, Church visited Jerusalem and from there travelled to the city of Petra by camel. In the Spring they returned across the Aegean Sea, and spent the remainder of the year in Rome. They finally returned across the Atlantic in June 1869.

Frederic Edwin Church, Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives (1870), oil on canvas, 138 x 214.3 cm, Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, MO. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church, Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives (1870), oil on canvas, 138 x 214.3 cm, Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, MO. Wikimedia Commons.

In Church’s studio painting of Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives (1870), the Holy City is reminiscent of John Brett’s Florence from Bellosguardo (1863) in its projection and detail. But Church’s lower vantage point allowed him ample foreground, where there are four people and two camels making their way along the dry, stony track skirting the ancient olive trees and crossing the valley to the city. Although not as brightly lit by the late afternoon sun as the Dome of the Rock in the distance, Church draws attention to the figures in the foreground by silhouetting them against the light on the track.

Church provided a detailed key to the salient features, which was engraved and printed for the edification of the viewer. It was hailed a triumph when first displayed to the public in Goupil’s New York gallery in 1871, and at the end of the century Peter Bergheim made a photo-montage showing the same view.

Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), El Khasné, Petra (1874), oil on canvas, 153.7 x 127.6 cm, Olana State Historic Site, Hudson, NY. Courtesy of Olana State Historic Site, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation, via Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), El Khasné, Petra (1874), oil on canvas, 153.7 x 127.6 cm, Olana State Historic Site, Hudson, NY. Courtesy of Olana State Historic Site, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation, via Wikimedia Commons.

Church’s most famous studio painting of Petra, El Khasné, Petra from 1874, is an oddity in showing an unusual view lacking sky, and frames its strongly vertical format. It’s also short on detail, and what can be discerned from the murky depths of its framing appears mysterious and unresolved.

This painting was featured as the centrepiece of the Church family sitting room in his self-designed estate at Olana. He had started work on the design of his mansion there in 1870, engaging Calvert Vaux, co-designer of New York’s Central Park, to assist. They assembled a pastiche of forms and styles into what Church termed a “Feudal Castle”.

churchaegeansea
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), The Aegean Sea (c 1877), oil on canvas, 137.2 x 160.7 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

By 1876, Church was finding painting increasingly difficult due to his advancing rheumatoid arthritis. This late studio work showing The Aegean Sea was completed in about 1877, following which he became almost unable to paint. He wintered in Mexico to alleviate his problems, and died in 1900, at the age of 73. By that time, Church’s finely detailed realist paintings had become reviled, and it wasn’t until the 1960s before his art was taken seriously again.

You can see more about exhibitions and publications to celebrate Church’s bicentenary on Olana’s site.

Reference

Raab, Jennifer (2015) Frederic Church, The Art and Science of Detail, Yale UP. ISBN 978 0 300 20837 5.

The bicentenary of Frederic Edwin Church: 1849-57

Frederic Edwin Church, who was born two centuries ago on 4 May 1826, is one of the founding American masters, and one of the world’s great nineteenth century landscape painters. As the only pupil of Thomas Cole, who founded the Hudson River School, Church has a pivotal place in the history of American painting.

His career started at the time of the Barbizon School, and continued into the height of Impressionism in France, and its arrival in North America. Unlike those, and subsequent US landscape painters, Church was a devout realist who produced huge canvases with meticulous, almost obsessive, detail. He was thus a rival to his contemporary, Albert Bierstadt (1830-1902), who worked largely within his unchallenged territory to the west of the Mississippi.

Church was a precocious artist, and by the time he started his training with Cole in 1844 he seems to have been a fine draftsman and a competent landscape painter. During his two years with Cole, the pair travelled around New England and New York State. Church sold his first painting to his neighbour Daniel Wadsworth, who founded the Wadsworth Athenaeum in Hartford, CT.

From these early days Church’s working methods were traditional, and similar to those of John Constable. He drew in pencil and sketched in oils in front of his motif, then assembled those into highly detailed and finished oil paintings in his studio. Church was an obsessive sketcher in oils, and thousands of his drawings and oil sketches survive in collections such as those of the Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum in New York.

churchwestrocknewhaven
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), West Rock, New Haven (1849), oil on canvas, 68.9 × 101.9 cm, New Britain Museum of American Art, New Britain, CT. Wikimedia Commons.

Church’s early landscape painting of West Rock, New Haven (1849) is a good example of his attention to detail in finished paintings. As shown in the detail below, its foreground features three figures making hay, which they’re stacking onto carts drawn by oxen. Down at the river bank, a dog is enjoying a paddle. Just peeking proud of the distant treetops is the white tip of a church spire.

churchwestrocknewhavend1
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), West Rock, New Haven (detail) (1849), oil on canvas, 68.9 × 101.9 cm, New Britain Museum of American Art, New Britain, CT. Wikimedia Commons.
churchmtdesertisland
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Mt. Desert Island, Maine Coast (1850), oil on cream wove paper, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

He had settled in New York by 1850, and from then went on trips most summers to the wilds of Maine to paint en plein air in oils. He made this rather sparse view of Mt. Desert Island, Maine Coast in oils on paper in 1850.

churchbeaconmtdesertisland
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Beacon, off Mount Desert Island (1851), oil on canvas, 116.8 × 78.7 cm, Private collection. Wikimedia Commons.

The following year Church painted this rich twilight seascape of a Beacon, off Mount Desert Island (1851). Judging from its size and canvas support, this was intended as a finished work rather than a study.

churchschoodicpeninsula
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Schoodic Peninsula from Mount Desert at Sunrise (1850–55), oil on paperboard, 22.9 x 34.9 cm, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

Schoodic Peninsula from Mount Desert at Sunrise (1850–55) is one of many oil sketches which he made during a summer visit to Maine during this period.

churcheaglelake
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Eagle Lake Viewed from Cadillac Mountain, Mount Desert Island, Maine (1850–60), oil and graphite on paperboard, 29.4 x 44.5 cm, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

Eagle Lake Viewed from Cadillac Mountain, Mount Desert Island, Maine (1850–60) is another oil sketch featuring a considerably more complex motif. Cadillac Mountain is relatively low at 466 metres (1,530 feet), but the highest point of Mount Desert Island, so affords such spectacular views.

In 1852, Church read Alexander von Humboldt’s account of his travels in central America, and decided to rise to Humboldt’s challenge to depict the ‘physiognomy’ of the Andes mountains. The following year he travelled to Columbia and Ecuador with the businessman Cyrus West Field, who bankrolled their trip in the hope that he could use Church’s paintings to promote his own local business ventures. They based themselves in Quito, travelling from there to awe-inspiring views of mountains and volcanoes.

churchcayambeotavaloecuador
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Drawing, Andean Mountain Peak (Cayambe ?), Otavalo, Ecuador (August/September 1853), graphite, burch and ozicized white gouache on gray paper, 12.4 x 19.7 cm, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

Church painted this view of what’s thought to be Cayambe in Ecuador in August or September 1853. This isn’t an oil sketch, though, but was made in pencil and gouache.

Frederic Edwin Church, Cotopaxi (1855), oil on canvas, 71 x 106.7 cm, Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, DC. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church, Cotopaxi (1855), oil on canvas, 71 x 106.7 cm, Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, DC. Wikimedia Commons.

On his return to his studio in New York, Church turned those hundreds of sketches and drawings into larger finished paintings, in this case one of his many views of Cotopaxi (1855) in Ecuador. As was conventional at the time, these are highly finished, with no evidence of brushwork and a smooth paint surface.

His other versions of this motif weren’t as peaceful: that of 1862, commissioned by James Lenox, shows rugged waterfalls in the foreground, a barren rocky plain, and the volcano itself ejecting a high plume of smoke and ash. All this is lit by a blood-red sun, sitting low in the sky. This was to enable Church’s painting to serve as a pendant to one of Lenox’s other paintings, Turner’s dramatic Staffa, Fingal’s Cave (1832).

Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), Niagara (1857), oil on canvas, 101.6 x 229.9 cm, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. Wikimedia Commons.
Frederic Edwin Church (1826-1900), Niagara (1857), oil on canvas, 101.6 x 229.9 cm, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. Wikimedia Commons.

Church was among the many landscape painters who visited Niagara (1857). Jennifer Raab has set this painting in its historical context, at a time when secession of Southern states seemed imminent. The Niagara Falls became associated with union and the unity of its details.

He returned to central America in 1857 with the artist Louis Rémy Mignot and added hundreds more drawings and sketches to his collection.

churchcrossinwilderness
Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900), Cross in the Wilderness (1857), oil on canvas, 41.3 × 61.5 cm, Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid. Wikimedia Commons.

Cross in the Wilderness, painted later that year, is one of the earlier works to result from his second visit. This wilderness is unpopulated, devoid of figures or other signs of human presence. It was another two years before Church painted his masterpiece that drew the crowds and established his popularity.

Reference

Raab, Jennifer (2015) Frederic Church, The Art and Science of Detail, Yale UP. ISBN 978 0 300 20837 5.

❌