If there’s one thing sure to put the fear of God into someone it’s a nearby bolt of lightning. One of the most understandable associations of lightning is thus with deities, particularly those who are as swift to anger and avenge as a sudden thunderstorm. In the myths of classical Greece and Rome, that could only mean Zeus or Jupiter, whose bundle of thunderbolts has even survived into computer technology.

Jan Cossiers’ impressive Jupiter and Lycaon from about 1640 shows Jupiter’s eagle vomiting thunderbolts at Lycaon, who is hurrying away as he is being transformed into a wolf, becoming the prototype for the werewolf of the future. These thunderbolts resemble arrows with shafts that zigzag like lightning in the sky, and are preserved today in the symbol used for Thunderbolt.

Tintoretto’s Jupiter and Semele (1545) shows an early moment in the myth of the mortal woman who was raped by the god, then destroyed by his thunderbolts when in late pregnancy. She reclines naked under a red tent. Jupiter has evidently just revealed himself, and rolls of cloud are rushing out from him. There are thunderbolt flames licking at Semele’s tent, and around the clouds surrounding Jupiter, but no sign of them touching Semele yet.

The myth of Philemon and Baucis also revolves around Jupiter visiting mortals, this time in innocuous human form and in company with Mercury. After the elderly couple have entertained the two gods, they go outside and ascend a mountain while the land below becomes flooded.

Peter Paul Rubens’ Stormy Landscape with Philemon and Baucis (c 1625?) is a dramatic landscape with storm-clouds building over the hills, bolts of lightning, a raging torrent pouring down the mountainside, and the four figures on a track at the right. Philemon and Baucis are struggling up the track with their sticks, as they’re being taken to safety from the rising flood by Jupiter and Mercury.

Richard Wilson’s Destruction of Niobe’s Children from 1760 is a classical history-in-landscape, with a bolt of lightning in the centre far distance, a chiaroscuro sky, and rough sea below. Wilson shows this myth when Apollo is still killing Niobe’s sons. The god is at the top of a steep bank on the left, with Niobe among her children down below.

Nicolas Poussin’s setting of a Landscape during a Thunderstorm with Pyramus and Thisbe (1651) shows the city of Babylon in the distance, along a picturesque and pastoral valley. But the peacefulness of this landscape has been transformed by the sudden arrival of a thunderstorm: the gusty wind is already bending the trees, and near the centre of the view a large branch has broken with its force. Two bolts of lightning make their way to the hills below.

There’s frantic activity in response not only to the storm, but to a lioness attacking a horse, whose rider has fallen. An adjacent horseman is about to thrust his spear into the back of the lioness, while another, further ahead, is driving cattle away from the scene. Others on foot, and a fourth horseman, are scurrying away, driven by the combination of the lioness and the imminent storm.

In the foreground, Pyramus lies dying, his sword at his side, and his blood flowing freely on the ground, down to a small pond. Thisbe has just emerged from sheltering in the cave, has run past the bloodied shawl at the right, and is about to reach the body of her lover. She is clearly distraught.

The apocalyptic British painter John Martin told the semi-historical story of The Destruction of Tyre in this relatively small painting of 1840. Tyre was the great Phoenician port on the Mediterranean coast, claimed to have been the origin of navigation and sea trade. The prophet Ezekiel (chapter 26) foretold that one day, many nations would come against Tyre, would put the city under siege, break her walls down, that the fabric of the city would be cast into the sea, and it would never be rebuilt. Martin brings the forces of nature in to help destroy the port, with a storm great enough to sink many vessels, leaving their prows floating like sea monsters. In the distance is his standard lightning bolt.

Poussin used the great flood in Genesis as the underlying narrative in his late painting of Winter (c 1660-64), from his series of the four seasons. Lightning crackles through the sky as a few survivors try to escape the rising waters.

In Norse mythology it’s the god Thor who wields the thunderbolts. Mårten Eskil Winge’s painting of Thor’s Fight with the Giants (1872) shows this lesser-known battle in rich detail, including the two goats drawing the god’s chariot, and lightning bolts playing around his mighty hammer, the cause of thunder.

In Dante’s Inferno, when the author visits Hell with Virgil as his guide, there’s a lightning strike where souls are being ferried across to eternal torment. As the pair are trying to convince the ferryman Charon to take them both across, there is a violent gust of wind, a red bolt of lightning, and Dante becomes unconscious. This is shown in Alexander Litovchenko’s painting of Charon Carrying Souls Across the River Styx from 1861.

In John Martin’s 1820 painting of the witches scene from William Shakespeare’s tragedy Macbeth, three witches materialise from a swirl of mist and lightning bolts on the left, and Macbeth and Banquo appear surprised at their sudden arrival. Winding around the shores of the distant lake is the huge army, and Martin has turned the Scottish Highlands into rugged Alpine scenery as an indication of the much greater outcome of this meeting.

Tomorrow I’ll show a range of landscape paintings featuring lightning.

Lord Byron’s poem Mazeppa was briefly popular in paintings during the first half of the nineteenth century, but was by no means his only work to have been painted. When Byron was on his Grand Tour of Europe in 1810-11, he wrote what he described as “a Turkish Tale” of The Giaour, published in 1813.

That inspired Eugène Delacroix to paint The Combat of the Giaour and Hassan in 1826. The name Giaour is based on an offensive Turkish word for infidel, and Byron’s poem describes the revenge killing of Hassan by the Giaour for killing the latter’s lover. After their deadly combat, the Giaour is filled with remorse and retreats into a monastery. This painting was rejected by the Salon of 1827, but Delacroix went on to paint later versions.

Nearly a decade later, in 1835, Delacroix returned to Byron’s poem, and painted this version of the Combat of the Giaour and Hassan. This time he had the benefit of watching Moroccan cavalry manoeuvres, and a commission from the Comte de Mornay. The resulting composition is radically different from his earlier version, and although Mornay seems to have been pleased with the result, the critics remained unimpressed.

In May 1810, Lord Byron, then only twenty-two, swam across the Hellespont (now the Dardanelles) between Abydos and Sestos, in a recreation of the myth of Hero and Leander. Three years later, the poet used the same Abydos as the setting of his heroic poem of The Bride of Abydos (1813). This was the literary basis for four of Eugène Delacroix’s paintings.

The young and beautiful Zuleika had been promised by her old father Giaffir to an old man, but fell in love with her supposed half-brother Selim. The couple elope to a cavern by the sea, where he reveals that he’s the leader of a group of pirates who are waiting to hear his pistol shot as a signal to them. When Giaffir and his men approach, Selim fires his pistol, but is killed by Giaffir, and Zuleika dies of sorrow.

Delacroix’s Bride of Abydos from 1843-49 shows the moment of climax as Selim is preparing himself to defend against Giaffir’s attack.

Although Delacroix was probably the painter most frequently influenced by Byron’s poetic stories, he was by no means the only one. In 1816-17, Byron wrote what many consider to be an autobiographical poem, Manfred, that inspired Robert Schumann and Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky in musical compositions.

This followed Byron’s ostracisation over alleged incest with his half-sister. Its hero Manfred is tortured by guilt in relation to the death of his beloved Astarte. Living in the Bernese Alps, where Byron was staying at the time, Manfred casts spells to summon seven spirits to help him forget and sublimate his guilt. As the spirits cannot control past events, he doesn’t achieve his aim, and cannot even escape by suicide. In the end, he dies.

John Martin’s watercolour of Manfred and the Alpine Witch (1837) shows Manfred conjuring a witch from a flooded cave in the mountains. Unusually light and sublime but not apocalyptic, it is perhaps one of Martin’s most beautiful works, and reminiscent of Turner’s alpine paintings.

In 1821, when Byron was living in Ravenna, Italy, with his lover Teresa, Countess Guiccioli, he composed a historical tragedy as a play in blank verse, Sardanapalus. This relies on an account in the historical library of Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historian, and Mitford’s History of Greece, telling of the last of the great Assyrian monarchs, who ruled a large empire from his palaces in Nineveh. However, a rebellion grew against him, and the story reaches its climax in the fifth and final act of Byron’s play.

At the time, the river Euphrates was in high flood, which had torn down part of the protective walls of the city of Nineveh. Once the river started to fall again, this left no defences against the rebels. Their leader offered to spare Sardanapalus his life if he would surrender, but he refused, asking for a cease-fire of just an hour. During that period he had a funeral pyre built under his throne. He released his last faithful officer to flee for his life, and climbed the pyre. As he did so, his favourite wife Myrrha threw a lighted torch into the pyre, and climbed up after him, where they both burned to death.

Delacroix painted two versions of this famous work: the huge original in 1827, now hanging in the Louvre, and a smaller more painterly replica in 1844, in the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Delacroix departs considerably from Byron’s narrative to invite us to see Sardanapalus in a different light. In this, the original version, his brushwork is tight and the huge canvas intricately detailed.

When he painted this smaller replica seventeen years later, it wasn’t intended to please the Salon, and he was far more painterly in its facture; Instead of showing Sardanapalus and Myrrha mounting the funeral pyre, Delacroix places the king on a huge divan, surrounded by the utter chaos and panic as his guards massacre wives and courtesans.

The last and greatest of Lord Byron’s works to be painted by the masters is Don Juan, an epic poem that he started writing in 1819 and left incomplete on his death in 1824. Based on traditional Spanish folk stories of the life of an incorrigible womaniser, Byron portrays his hero as a victim easily seduced by women. Despite its seventeen cantos, the attention of painters has concentrated on events in the second canto, after Don Juan’s first love affair with a married woman. As a consequence of that, Don Juan’s mother sends her errant son to travel in Europe, and that results in shipwreck, from which he is the sole survivor.

For Eugène Delacroix, the shipwreck became an obsession, linking back to the masterwork of his mentor Théodore Géricault, The Wreck of the Medusa (1818–19).

In Delacroix’s Shipwreck of Don Juan from 1840, Don Juan and his companions have run out of food, so draw lots to determine who will be sacrificed to feed the other survivors.

At some time prior to the Salon of 1847, Delacroix revisited the shipwreck in his Castaways in a Ship’s Boat (c 1840-47). The boat has shrunk in size and the number of survivors is falling steadily.

Ford Madox Brown’s watercolour of The Finding of Don Juan by Haidée from 1869-70 shows Haidée, a Greek pirate’s daughter, and her maid Zoe discovering the apparently lifeless body of the hero on a beach. Inevitably, Don Juan falls in love with Haidée, despite them having no common language. Her father takes a dislike to Don Juan, and has him put into slavery.