Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Yesterday — 9 December 2025Main stream

Medium and Message: Oil on paper

By: hoakley
9 December 2025 at 20:30

Centuries of experience with painting using oil paints have proved the importance of a robust support and a ground that isolates the paint layer from its support. Older use of wood panels with a gesso ground consisting largely of gypsum or chalk ensured the paint layer wouldn’t be subjected to mechanical stress, and would remain isolated from the underlying wood. Canvases became popular because of their relative lightness particularly in larger sizes, but still require an isolating ground layer both to protect the canvas from damage by the paint, and to prevent discolouration of the paint.

When sketching in oils in front of the motif became increasingly popular in the late eighteenth century, those paintings weren’t intended for public view, but as an aid for the artist when composing finished paintings in the studio. Rather than gather hundreds of small oil sketched on canvas or panels, the first plein air painters usually used paper or cardboard as support and ground. Subsequently, when their studios were sold off following their death, surviving oil sketches were usually laid on canvas for preservation and display.

Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes, (Title not known) (c 1783), oil on paper laid on canvas, c 18 x 28 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris. © 2015 EHN & DIJ Oakley.
Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes (1750-1819), (Title not known) (c 1783), oil on paper laid on canvas, c 18 x 28 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris. © 2015 EHN & DIJ Oakley.

Although he probably wasn’t the first to compile a library of oil sketches, those gathered by Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes when he was painting in the Roman Campagna in the 1780s are among the most brilliant. This untitled view of the countryside near Rome is thought to have been painted in about 1783.

Thomas Jones, A Wall in Naples (c 1782), oil on paper laid on canvas, 11.4 x 16 cm, National Gallery, London. Wikimedia Commons.
Thomas Jones (1742-1803), A Wall in Naples (c 1782), oil on paper laid on canvas, 11.4 x 16 cm, National Gallery, London. Wikimedia Commons.

At about the same time, the Welsh painter Thomas Jones was doing the same thing in and around Naples as well. This tiny view of A Wall in Naples was painted in about 1782, and is now one of the gems in London’s National Gallery. Below is a detail.

Thomas Jones, A Wall in Naples (detail) (c 1782), oil on paper laid on canvas, 11.4 x 16 cm, National Gallery, London. Wikimedia Commons.
Thomas Jones (1742-1803), A Wall in Naples (detail) (c 1782), oil on paper laid on canvas, 11.4 x 16 cm, National Gallery, London. Wikimedia Commons.
Thomas Jones, The Capella Nuova outside the Porta di Chiaja, Naples (1782), oil on paper, 20 x 23.2 cm, Tate Britain, London. Wikimedia Commons.
Thomas Jones (1742-1803), The Capella Nuova outside the Porta di Chiaja, Naples (1782), oil on paper, 20 x 23.2 cm, Tate Britain, London. Wikimedia Commons.

Jones was taught by the Welsh artist Richard Wilson, but none of his oil sketches have survived. Jones’ Capella Nuova outside the Porta di Chiaja, Naples is another example that’s significantly larger, and now in the Tate Gallery.

Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes, (Title not known) (c 1783), oil on paper laid on canvas, c 18 x 25 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris. © 2015 EHN & DIJ Oakley.
Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes (1750-1819), (Title not known) (c 1783), oil on paper laid on canvas, c 18 x 25 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris. © 2015 EHN & DIJ Oakley.

Valenciennes went on to assemble a large library of his oil sketches that he used for his studio paintings following his return to Paris. He was admitted to the Academy in 1787, published an influential manual of perspective and painting in 1799, and became Professor of Perspective at l’École des Beaux-Arts in Paris in 1812.

Among the aspiring young landscape painters who followed in the footsteps of Valenciennes was Camille Corot, who was taught by Achille Etna Michallon, who in turn had been taught by Valenciennes. Corot painted in the Roman Campagna between 1825-28, using the same techniques of applying his oil paint direct to sheets of paper.

Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot, View of Rome: The Bridge and Castel Sant'Angelo with the Cupola of St. Peter's (1826-7), oil on paper on canvas, 26.7 x 43.2 cm, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. WikiArt.
Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot (1796-1875), View of Rome: The Bridge and Castel Sant’Angelo with the Cupola of St. Peter’s (1826-7), oil on paper on canvas, 26.7 x 43.2 cm, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. WikiArt.

Corot painted this View of Rome: The Bridge and Castel Sant’Angelo with the Cupola of St. Peter’s in 1826-27. This is one of the best-known bridges over the River Tiber, and not far from the centre of the city. The view is taken from the north-east of the bridge, on the ‘left’ bank, probably close to the Piazza di Ponte Umberto I, looking towards the south-west (‘right’ bank). The painting is sketchy rather than finely finished, and appears to have been painted en plein air onto a sheet of paper that has subsequently been laid on canvas.

Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot, View of the Convent of S. Onofrio on the Janiculum, Rome (1826), oil on paper mounted on canvas, 22 x 33 cm, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, England. WikiArt.
Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot (1796-1875), View of the Convent of S. Onofrio on the Janiculum, Rome (1826), oil on paper mounted on canvas, 22 x 33 cm, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, England. WikiArt.

This View of the Convent of S. Onofrio on the Janiculum, Rome is another from Corot’s first campaign in Rome.

Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot, The Bridge at Narni (1826), oil on paper, 34 x 48 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris. WikiArt.
Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot (1796-1875), The Bridge at Narni (1826), oil on paper, 34 x 48 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris. WikiArt.

Corot’s years in Italy were formative in his own development, and one of the key elements he put in place to hand on to Camille Pissarro and other Impressionists. The Bridge at Narni is one of his finest oil sketches.

Carl Eduard Ferdinand Blechen, Tiberiusfelsen auf Capri (Tiberius Rocks, Capri) (1828-9), oil on paper mounted on canvas, 20.5 x 30 cm, Lower Saxony State Museum, Hanover. Wikimedia Commons.
Carl Eduard Ferdinand Blechen (1798-1840), Tiberiusfelsen auf Capri (Tiberius Rocks, Capri) (1828-9), oil on paper mounted on canvas, 20.5 x 30 cm, Lower Saxony State Museum, Hanover. Wikimedia Commons.

Others followed Valenciennes’ instructions, among them Carl Blechen, a brilliant German landscape painter who sketched the Tiberius Rocks, Capri during a visit in 1828-29, again on paper.

Carl Eduard Ferdinand Blechen, Galgenberg bei Gewitterstimmung (A Scaffold in a Storm) (c 1835), oil on paper mounted on board, 29.5 x 46 cm, New Masters Gallery, Dresden. Wikimedia Commons.
Carl Eduard Ferdinand Blechen, (1798-1840) Galgenberg bei Gewitterstimmung (A Scaffold in a Storm) (c 1835), oil on paper mounted on board, 29.5 x 46 cm, New Masters Gallery, Dresden. Wikimedia Commons.

Blechen’s late oil sketch of A Scaffold in a Storm was painted in about 1835, shortly before he succumbed to severe depression. This anticipates many elements of Impressionism: it appears to have been executed rapidly in front of the motif (although a view from his studio over Berlin and Brandenburg), with many brush-strokes plainly visible; details are composed of stylised marks; it is an everyday if not banal subject, with an informal composition.

However, the French Impressionists seldom if ever sketched in oils on paper, as their paintings made in front of the motif were intended to be sold to and viewed by the public, for which paper wasn’t considered suitable. Times had changed.

Before yesterdayMain stream

偏见和缺陷是创作的灵药:人类和 Ai 有什么区别_3.ylog

By: Steven
16 May 2024 at 21:00

无论你对 Ai 秉持怎样的态度和观点,都希望这期节目能给你带去一些思维激荡的时刻。作为工业设计师,我认为,如果不时常忏悔,不为自己做的东西(无论是否在自己的意志下,通常都不在)对这个世界造成的影响抱有歉意,这样的人很容易成为误以为自己是夜神月的弥海砂。

这是一期需要配图食用的播客,从近期一组以「戏剧感」为创作目标的十二生肖聊起,关于 Ai 创作的评价和人类作品之间的区别,谈到如何在这个 AIGC 爆发的时代下找到自己的位置。

创作者的骄傲和创作者的骄傲,是南辕北辙的两件事。

在这一期,你会听到:

—— 什么样的作品是有「人味儿」的?

——「偏见」和「缺陷」是艺术创作的灵药?

—— 为什么 Ai 会在创作领域疯狂爆发?

—— 现当代艺术常被人诟病的原因之一:抽象

—— 细节!什么是令人信服的细节?

—— 这些 Ai 正在拓宽我的眼界;

—— 人不能创造出自己从未见过的东西,吗?

—— 设计不是天马行空地想象,它是一种「劳作」;

—— 超人的诞生;

—— 超人的洞察和创新,与人类无关;

—— 能耗、模型与错觉;

—— 涌现、艺术与创新;

—— 马车夫的工作经验如何平移到汽车司机?

—— 选择 AIGC 工具的基本思路;

—— 向藻类致敬!

|相关图片|

—- 十二生肖系列中的兔、马、猴,完整图集和介绍 见链接

—-《城堡下的人群》(参考马列维奇的风格)

—- 毫无表达意图的随手测试图

—- 似是而非的剃须刀设计图

—- 汽车设计草图的测试

|相关阅读|

—- 十二生肖·Midjourney·戏剧角色设计

—- 描觀念 繪感受|超微型 AI 觀念畫展

—- 艺术可以糊弄,体力劳作也是高级智能

—- 表达的精度就是人类外延的尺度

—- 镜头的变幻就是故事

|登场人物|

苏志斌:工业设计师,智能硬件产品经理,《设以观复》作者

|相关链接|

若你所使用的播客客户端未能完整显示插图,或遇网络问题未能正常播放,请访问:

荒野楼阁 WildloG 的地址:https://suithink.me/zlink/podcast/

阅读设计相关的各类文章:https://suithink.me/zlink/idea/

|其他社交网络媒体|

苏志斌 @ 知乎|SUiTHiNK @ 即刻 / 微博

苏志斌SUiTHiNK @ Bilibili / YouTube / 小红书

|联络邮箱|

suithink.su@gmail.com

欢迎在 小宇宙、Spotify、YouTube、Apple Podcast 收听本节目,期待你的留言。

💾

❌
❌