Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Top Biden Aide Holds Rare Talks With Chinese Military General

29 August 2024 at 20:38
Jake Sullivan also met with China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, who said the United States should “find a correct way for the two major countries to get along.”

The Real Country: Paintings of life in the countryside

By: hoakley
16 August 2024 at 19:30

If you have any interest in rural history, you may have noticed how few of its accounts are illustrated. There are extensive quotations from written accounts of life in the country, farming practice, and figures gleaned from the analysis of surveys and wills, but no pictures. Yet in the centuries before photography came into widespread use, artists recorded landscapes and life in the countryside in paint. This article introduces a new series in which I’m going to look at the reality of life and work in the country using some of its finest depictions.

In 1500, the countries in Europe were overwhelmingly rural, with about 80% of their people living in the countryside and engaged almost entirely in agricultural work. By the end of the nineteenth century that had reversed, with 80% living and working in cities and towns. Working the land was physically arduous with only the aid of manual tools, oxen and horses. Injuries were common and seldom received any medical attention, and for most life was brief.

bruegelharvesters
Pieter Bruegel the Elder (c 1525–1569), The Harvesters (1565), oil on panel, 119 x 162 cm, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. Wikimedia Commons.

The first agricultural revolution brought the transition from hunting for and gathering food to cultivating crops and raising livestock. This brought annual events such as the grain harvest, shown above in Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s The Harvesters (1565), which forms a complete visual reference to all the work involved in creating flour from a ripe cereal crop.

bretonsongoflark
Jules Breton (1827–1906), Song of the Lark (1884), oil on canvas, 110.6 × 85.8 cm, The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Wikimedia Commons.

While men wielded large scythes to mow some crops, others were cut with the sickle shown in Jules Breton’s Song of the Lark (1884). This young woman is walking barefoot through the fields on her way to start another day harvesting the grain she and her village relied on to keep them from starvation.

lhermittegleaners1887
Léon Augustin Lhermitte (1844–1925), Gleaners (1887), oil on canvas, dimensions not known, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA. Wikimedia Commons.

Old Testament accounts of the underprivileged surviving by gleaning what’s left after the landowner had brought in their harvest continued well into the twentieth century. This is Léon Augustin Lhermitte’s account from 1887. In many areas, though, gleaning was a common essential for everyone.

milletangelus
Jean-François Millet (1814–1875), L’Angélus (The Angelus) (1857-59), oil on canvas, 55 x 66 cm, Musée d’Orsay, Paris. Wikimedia Commons.

Crop yields in the past were far lower than they are today. There was no understanding of soil fertility, crop rotations led to poor soil quality, and most land was too wet for the primitive ploughs in use. It was often necessary to plough the same land five or more times in a year to eradicate weeds and achieve worthwhile crop yields. In Jean-François Millet’s Angelus, completed around 1857-59, a destitute couple are seen praying over their small basket of potatoes, as they try to eke a living from that pitifully poor soil.

Some problems remain the same, although their solutions are now quite different.

morlandratcatchers
George Morland (1763–1804), The Ratcatchers (1793), oil on canvas, 32.5 × 35.5 cm, Private collection. Wikimedia Commons.

George Morland’s Ratcatchers from 1793 shows a couple of itinerant workers with the dogs they used to catch vermin such as rats, the man on the left holding up one of their successful catches.

Our ancestors determined the landscapes we see today. In much of England, this has been attributed to the appropriation of what had been common land, for large farms operated by the land-owning classes, in what’s known as enclosure.

John Crome (1768–1821), Mousehold Heath, Norwich (c 1818-20), oil on canvas, 109.9 x 181 cm, The Tate Gallery (Purchased 1863), London. © The Tate Gallery and Photographic Rights © Tate (2021), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/crome-mousehold-heath-norwich-n00689

The whole countryside changed, as previously open land used for communal grazing was enclosed and turned into farmland. John Crome captures this in this painting of Mousehold Heath, Norwich (c 1818-20), showing the low rolling land to the north-east of the city, which had been open heath and common land until the late eighteenth century. By 1810, much of it had been enclosed, and ploughed up for agriculture.

Crome opposed the enclosure of common land, and here shows the rich flora, free grazing, and, for the plains of East Anglia, rolling countryside. In the right distance some of the newly created farmland is visible as a contrast. Fortunately, almost two hundred acres (74 hectares) of this heath have been preserved, but it had been considerably more extensive until 1790.

Agricultural practices have left other marks in our landscapes. In parts of England and Wales, there are two types of countryside, those drawn with straight lines and others featuring curves. These are even seen in roads, which follow old field boundaries. In some areas the roads are generally straight, but in others they wiggle all over the place, like a drunken man.

The Hill above Harlech c.1917 by Sir William Nicholson 1872-1949
Sir William Nicholson (1872–1949), The Hill above Harlech (c 1917), oil on canvas, 53.7 x 59.4 cm, The Tate Gallery (Purchased with assistance from the Knapping Fund 1968), London. © The Tate Gallery and Photographic Rights © Tate (2016), CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Unported), https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/nicholson-the-hill-above-harlech-t01047

Sir William Nicholson’s view from The Hill above Harlech, painted in about 1917, looks across the broad sweep of sand in Tremadoc Bay towards the distant Lleyn Peninsula, in North Wales. Much of the land seen here is divided up into small fields by well-maintained hedges, and there’s hardly a straight line to be seen until you get down to the coastal plane.

One of the major reasons for all these curves is ploughing.

bevanturnriceplough
Robert Bevan (1865–1925), The Turn Rice-Plough, Sussex (c 1909), oil on canvas, 66.4 x 90.2 cm, Yale Center for British Art, New Haven, CT. Wikimedia Commons.

Robert Bevan’s The Turn Rice-Plough, Sussex from about 1909 shows two ploughmen turning a plough in a field in the south-east of England. Its title is probably a simple error for turnwrest, a dialect name used in Kent and Sussex to describe any type of one-way plough which needed to be turned at the end of a furrow as shown here. Because of this need to turn, the ploughman’s course was far from straight, but usually traced a gentle reversed S. To enable this team of horses to turn at the top of the furrow, they steered to the left before swinging to the right in the arc that would bring them on course for the furrow heading back down the slope.

When those ploughed strips were enclosed by hedges, their edges were curved with their furrows. In time, tracks ran along those hedges, and in the nineteenth century they were turned into roads, which now twist and turn as they run past those old furrows.

In the nineteenth century, the first signs of mechanisation arrived, using either horses or steam for power.

rigolotthreshingmachine
Albert Rigolot (1862–1932), The Threshing Machine, Loiret (1893), oil on canvas, 160 x 226 cm, Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rouen, Rouen, France. Wikimedia Commons.

Albert Rigolot’s painting of The Threshing Machine, Loiret from 1893, shows a fine example of horses being used to thresh the grain from freshly cut cereal. One of the early uses for steam engines was to power similar machines, and the next step was to make those engines mobile under their own power, as traction engines and eventually tractors.

vogelerfarmerploughing
Heinrich Vogeler (1872–1942), Farmer Ploughing (c 1930-42), oil on canvas, 40 x 50 cm, location not known. Wikimedia Commons.

When heavy steam traction engines were replaced by tractors with internal combustion engines, teams of oxen and horses were replaced by these new-fangled vehicles. Heinrich Vogeler’s Farmer Ploughing from the period 1930-42 shows a tractor with its own tracks towing a heavy plough. I doubt whether even the most visionary farmworker of the sixteenth century imagined what was to come.

I hope that you will join me in this series over the coming weeks.

Nomadland – 6,燃气系统

By: fivestone
4 November 2023 at 15:39

关于车里用的燃气炉灶方案。因为只是简单的 van,而不是正式的房车,不存在内嵌的燃气系统,只是每天把各种气罐炉头搬来搬去。简要地说,每天使用最多的方案是:

从大号液化石油气罐(POL),先转成美式一磅罐卡口(UNEF 1″),再转接到户外圆罐炉头(Lindal B188)上。

这样的组合,可以随时把其中的一些环节,替换成其它款式的气罐和燃气用品。


户外常见的气罐接口,大概有这五种:

① POL,也就是最常见的大号「煤气罐」,准确地说,叫「液化石油气罐」。我这边日常可以买到的,有 3.7kg 和 8.5kg 两种容积。大的更划算,但我的床板下面只能放进小号的,换一瓶气大约 $20,Bunnings 和很多加油站都有换。

还有一种 LCC 27 接口,是 POL 的升级版。近年来政府渐渐把 POL 气罐,升级成更安全的 LCC 27 接口。这个是向下兼容的:原先用在 POL 上的管线,仍然可以拧进 LCC 27 的气罐;反之则不行,LCC 27 专用的管线,不能用在 POL 气罐上。所以,使用 POL 的管线,就不必在乎每次换到的气罐,是旧接口还是新接口。

② 3/8″ BSP-LH,另一种大号石油气罐的接口,通常只有专门的户外型房车才会使用。加油站很少见,更换气瓶也远不如 POL 方便。可以很方便地改成 POL,户外店有转接头卖($15)。

③ UNEF 1″ / BOM,北美常见的一磅重的绿气罐,北美的加油站和便利店到处都是,但澳洲和中国很少,只有专门户外店才有。

④ Lindal B188,又名 7/16 UNEF,户外背包露营时,最常见的扁圆气罐。虽然北美有很多炉头,都是 ③ 的 UNEF 接口,但毕竟 UNEF 接口过于笨重,自己背而不是车载露营的话,国际通用的炉头,更多的还是 ④ 的接口。

⑤ 常见的火锅店长气罐。虽然工艺远不如 ③ ④,但是更便宜也更好买,所以很多用 Lindal 圆罐炉头 ④ 的人,都会常备一个 ⑤→④ 的转换头($5)。(长罐到美式一磅罐 ⑤→③ 的转接头我从来没见过,大概因为美式罐太笨重了)

还有一些不常用的接口,譬如和 ④ 很像但是不带螺纹的气罐、以及一些笨重烧烤台用的 1/4” BSP……与本文无关,就不面面俱到地提及了。


一张图显示我日常的炉灶系统:

  • ① POL 大号液化气罐,3.7kg,连瓶 $60,换气 $20
  • ③ UNEF 美式一磅罐,$10
  • ⑤ 火锅长罐,通常是聚餐时剩下的,在车里慢慢用掉,$1.5
  • ⑥ POL 转接 UNEF 的管线,①→③,价格和管线长度有关,感觉 1.5m 的比较舒服,$30
  • ⑦ UNEF 转接 Lindal 圆罐炉具的转换头,$5
  • ⑧ 户外炉头,和 ④ 匹配的 Lindal B188 接口,$30-50。这款 Kovea Camp 4 已经陪我二十多年,早就停产了。如今有很多国内牌子(火枫、兄弟…)也很好用。这种自带支架的款式,架七寸锅也没问题。于是,本来准备了更大的、火力更强的炉头,但日常也很少拿出来用。
  • ⑨ 火锅长罐转接 Lindal B188 户外炉头的转换头,⑤→④ ,$5
  • ⑩ 从 POL 大罐往美式一磅罐里灌注燃料 ①→③ 的装置,把一磅罐反复使用,$5。关于灌装的事情,后面会说。

于是,日常使用最多的组合方案,包括:

  • ①→⑥→⑦→⑧,从大气罐直接连到户外炉头
  • ③→⑦→⑧ 或 ⑤→⑨→⑧,有时做饭的地方离车远,不想拎着大气罐,就把小气罐接在炉头上
  • ①→⑩→③,从大气罐往美式一磅罐里灌装

日常煮食时,炉头和锅放在旁边的桌板,或者直接放在地上也可以。并不需要专门把气罐搬出来用。

其它车内需要用到燃气的装置,还有:

  • ⑪ Mr Heater 暖气炉,UNEF 接口,冬天直连大气罐 ①→⑥→⑪,或者用一磅罐 ③→⑪
  • ⑫ 更大的、火力更猛的炉头,可以架更大的锅,甚至炒菜,Lindal 圆罐接口,①→⑥→⑦→⑫
  • ⑬ 喷枪,做炙肉料理!,Lindal 圆罐接口,通常接小罐用,③→⑦→⑬ 或 ⑤→⑨→⑬
  • ⑭ 本生灯,做一些手工时加热用,Lindal 圆罐接口,接一磅罐用(因为需要很稳的底座),③→⑦→⑭
  • ⑮ 热水淋浴装置,Lindal 圆罐接口。这个很少用,因为日常都在蹭健身房淋浴间

以及,必须的,一氧化碳监测仪,$25


ps,关于灌装。所有的一磅罐、户外圆罐、火锅长罐……厂家都是禁止用户自行灌注燃料反复使用的。但所有这些罐子,都存在着自行灌装的黑科技,以及相应的很便宜的转接头卖。其中美式一磅罐因为自带减压阀,比其它罐子更安全一些。个人感觉重复灌几次,还是没问题的。网上也不乏号称一个罐子反复用了一辈子的。但我还是不推荐读者贸然使用,请自行斟酌。如果只是偶尔用一下小罐子,多买几个一次性火锅气罐也就是了。

卖转接头的网店图。——但是连卖家的演示图,也是错误的。灌装时应该把大罐子倒置,让沉在下面的液态的石油气流进小罐子,而不仅仅是挥发的气态。

❌
❌